Preview

Texas V Johnson

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
760 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Texas V Johnson
Texas v Johson The first amendment grants the citizens of the United States the right to speak freely, without legal persecution. Over the past 200 years since this amendment was enacted there have been hundreds of judicial cases devoted to interpreting and refining this law. One such case, reviewed by the United States ' supreme court in 1988, was Texas v Johnson. The case involved Johnson 's conviction of desecrating a venerated object (a Texas Statute) by burning a U.S. flag (Texas V Johnson(1989)). The importance of this case rests not only in the legality of flag burning, but also in the definition of speech. This was the primary concern of the supreme court when reviewing Texas v Johnson. Does the first amendment only pertain to spoken and written words, or can it be construed to protect other forms of expression? During the 1984 Republican National Convention, held in Dallas, Texas, Gregory Johnson was one of approximately 100 protestors, with the stated purpose of protesting the Reagan administration as well as some of the local Dallas based corporations. The group of protesters worked their way to the City Hall, where Gregory Johnson doused an American flag in kerosene and ignited it, while protesters chanted "America, the red, white and blue, we spit on you." There was no violence, and no bystanders suffered any injury, but many were "seriously offended." Johnson was then arrested, and convicted of desecrating a venerated object, a section of the Texas Penal Code. He was sentenced to one year in prison, and fined $2,000 (Herbeck, Tedford). Upon appeal, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed Johnson 's conviction. The court 's decision was founded on the grounds that Johnson 's act was expressive conduct, and therefore protected by the First Amendment. The court also concluded that the State could not criminally sanction flag desecration in order to preserve national unity, nor could the statute be justified as a means of preserving peace,


Cited: Herbeck, Tedford. Freedom of Speech in the United States. Strata Publishing, Inc. Pennsylvania. 2005. "Texas V Johnson(1989)." Boston College. 10 May, 2007.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Some people believe that burning the flag as protest is okay, but it should be banned. In 1989, Gregory Lee Johnson burned the American Flag to protest the policies of President Ronald Reagan at the Republican National Convention center in Dallas, Texas. (Flag Burning should be banned) Johnson was arrested and charged with violating a Texas statute that prevented the desecration of a venerated object, the American Flag. (Johnson Flag Burning) A court in Texas tried and convicted Johnson. He appealed, arguing that his actions were “free speech” protected by the First Amendment. (Patrick Brady) The Supreme Court agreed to hear his case. March…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooper V. Austin

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philip J. Cooper v. Charles Austin 837 S. W. 2d 606 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992)…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Texas v. Johnson (1989) supreme court case is very important. It was a landmark supreme court case, and decided for all future court cases how the first amendment would be interpreted. They had to look at and determine the extent of the phrase, "freedom of speech". Johnson's action of burning an American flag was to be reviewed and they would have to decide whether his action counted as "freedom of speech," and if it was protected by the first amendment. It turned out to be that his action was protected by the first amendment. Protection of the American flag does not come before the freedom to express political ideas.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Training Day Violations

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alonzo and Jake pulled over a vehicle after viewing them buy drugs for recreational use. They used violent confrontation and intimidation towards the suspects and citizens, along while they seized they drugs. It triggered the citizens constitutional right but because the drugs were not in plain sight, nor did…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, the first amendment is taken advantage of in many ways. Many people express that they can say whatever they please because they have the Freedom of Speech. They might burn the USA flag, make a racist remark, or some other kind of action, but what they do not realize is that this may hurt people. The First Amendment should be limited so that individuals can speak their mind so long as it does not hurt other people, or violates their rights.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    GOVERNEMNT

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In my opinion, The freedom of speech is protected by the first amendment. I agree with the prosecutioner in the case of Texas v. Johnson by stating that Johnson’s right to freedom of speech in the first amendment was violated. Even though the state law was violated, the law was unconstitutional by violating the first amendment.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court views the issue of flag burning as a right given to Americans under the First Amendment. A bill was proposed to the legislature and while it made it through Congress, it did not pass with the required 2/3 vote in the Senate. However, many Americans believe that the flag does not just symbolize the government, but the nation as a whole. Amendments to ban flag burning would in fact give people the freedom to protect the flag and its meaning but would be invasive to our first amendment right. Hence, taking away the actual meaning of the flag as a symbol of freedom.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many individuals and groups alike that choose to express their disdain for certain actions, laws, and behaviors through the use of Freedom of Speech. The First Amendment has been cited by many protesters when demonstrating that it is their right to Freedom of expression. Freedom of Expression is powerful enough that sometimes words do not have to be spoken for a message to be conveyed. However, not all acts are protected by the First Amendment. For example, burning the flag is protected under the First Amendment but promoting the benefits of marijuana at a school event would be protected (U.S. Courts, n.d). If by chance there is a question of constitutionality regarding the First Amendment, it is usually linked to the overbreadth doctrine. Simply meaning, an individual may feel that their rights and/or others rights to Freedom of Speech may be prohibited by laws when applied under the context in which they were written. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) is the most quoted case that addresses issues of the overbreadth doctrine as it pertains to the First Amendment.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In a hate crime, the targeted group could be categorized by not just race or sexuality, but religion and political beliefs or group as well. By burning a nation's flag, we could easily categorize it as targeting a political group. When a person burns a nation's flag, he/she could be targeting the general people of that nation, the government of that nation, or to be even more specific, the leaders of that government. . In this case, we will say that the political group referred to is the government(to be more specific, the American government). Therefore, by burning a nation's flag, someone disagrees and takes a stand against a political activity or decision.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Upshaw, Ed Earl. (October, 2012). Discussion of “Flag Burning is a Freedom That We Must Respect” article. [Flag burning in a public protest is a deliberate attempt to provoke a reaction…When it is successful, why hold the provoked person responsible...The 1st Amendment guarantees freedom of speech, but it doesn 't guarantee freedom from foreseeable consequences]. Retrieved from: http://www.policymic.com/articles/15574/flag-burning-is-a-freedom-that-we-must-respect…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Simply stated, the First Amendment guarantees us the freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition. By examining the history of the United States, there have been times when incidents of crime, terrorism, terrorism threats, war, and national crisis have affected the rights of the people of the United States. There have been actions and reactions to those threats by the government. Restrictions were placed on citizens by limiting their rights; specifically the First, Fourth, and…

    • 3643 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The use of the first amendment to protect some individuals’ rights, but deny the same right of expression to others calls into question the validity of such laws/statutes. As the First Amendment assures the people the freedom of speech, press, religion,…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment to the United States Constitution grants citizens the right to freedom of speech, yet they have certain limitations to follow to ensure the safety of others. For example, you can’t legally scream “FIRE!” in a public place without the presence of a fire because it could potentially be dangerous to others. Also, one could be sued if slander takes place against another person because it could potentially damage the corresponding individual’s reputation.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The First Amendment protection for freedom of expression “consists of the rights to freedom of speech, press, assembly, petition the government for a redress of grievances, and the implied rights of association and belief” (www.law.cornell.edu). Though there are several components of freedom of expression “the most basic component of freedom of expression is the right of freedom of speech” (www.law.cornell.edu). The First Amendment states that the “right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without interference or constraint by the government”…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment gives Americans the right to freedom of speech, but this freedom is not unlimited! For example, one does not have the right to lie. We still have laws which prohibit lying under oath and misrepresenting products and services. It is a great abuse of the First Amendment to say it gives the vile and vulgar-mouthed person the right to spew forth his profanity anywhere he chooses and we must remove ourselves and our children from the sound of his words! A person has the right to express an opposing view, but let him do it with intelligent words which reveal his good, logical arguments. Filthy language is never uplifting, but always downgrading. Freedoms, which are abused and misused, will be taken…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays