Preview

What Are The Limits On An Individual Autonomy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
673 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Limits On An Individual Autonomy
Alisha Kifer
Machine Man In general, an adult has the right to make choices about their life in order to preserve his or her autonomy. In the novel Machine Man by Max Barry, the protagonist Charlie Nuemann would agree with respecting an individual’s autonomy because “. . . this is my body. I can make my own decisions” (Barry 199). While an adult may think that he or she is being treated as an autonomous individual, there are legitimate limits on an individual’s autonomy. Some alterations are permitted by our society and should be, but people should not be able to alter themselves as drastically as Dr. Neumann altered himself. There are possible limits on an individual’s autonomy. Many limits on an individual’s autonomy take precedence in the medical field because in most cases the patient is incapable of making a completely rational decision while injured, traumatized, or ill. For example, if someone has a confirmed
…show more content…
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution grants citizens the right to freedom of speech, yet they have certain limitations to follow to ensure the safety of others. For example, you can’t legally scream “FIRE!” in a public place without the presence of a fire because it could potentially be dangerous to others. Also, one could be sued if slander takes place against another person because it could potentially damage the corresponding individual’s reputation.
In order to respect an individual’s autonomy, an adult should be able to alter his or her body while in the right state of mind, but there should be limits. Individuals should not be allowed to alter themselves like Dr. Neumann did for many reasons. Charlie was not thinking rationally, possibly because of the cognitive effects of the painkillers, when he decided to make drastic body alterations such as amputating his remaining biological leg in order to replace it with a more efficient

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I agree with your statement that we can cause harm as a result of not acknowledging autonomy. I think that assisting patients to a position of maximum autonomy involves providing them with unbiased information about their health status and pros/cons of their treatment regimen. According to Canther (2001), providing value-free information includes staff being ready to engage in debates that include awareness of the interpretation which their own values and beliefs unavoidably impose on the evidence (Canter, 2001). Furthermore, Brinchmann (2002), explains that nurses must be ready to work collaboratively with patients and within the multidisciplinary team to enable patients to express their own point of view, commensurate with their desired…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Schwartz, Robert. “Autonomy, Futility, and Limits of Medicine.” Bioethics: principles, issues, and cases-2nd ed. Lewis, Vaughn. New York: Oxford 2013, 2010. 105-108. Print…

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States prides itself on the freedoms that are afforded to each of its citizens. Among those freedoms is the first amendment freedom of speech. However, that freedom is often called into question. For instance, the Snyder v. Phelps case. In the Snyder v. Phelps case, Albert Snyder who is the father of Matthew A. Snyder, argues how the Westboro Baptist Church (WBC) picketed his son’s funeral asserting offensive statements due to his Albert Snyder’s homosexuality. Moreover, Snyder filed a lawsuit against the WBC “for defamation, intrusion, upon seclusion, infliction of emotional distress and civil conspiracy” (“Snyder v. Phelps” Wikipedia). The speech discussed in the Snyder v. Phelps case deserves the protection of the first amendment.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smith stated that the procedure was one of his most satisfying cases and overall he was confident that he had done right by the patients. Smith admitted that initially he was hesitant and thought it was “absolutely, utterly weird” (Smith 626).Eventually, Smith agreed to perform the procedures because he knew that if he refused the patients could potentially “harm or kill themselves trying to amputate their own limbs” (Elliot 626). Apotemnophilia is defined as “the desire for amputation” (Everaerd 285). People with this inclination often feel trapped or “incomplete with their normal complement four limbs” (Elliot 626). Many have possessed the…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the medical field there emerges a conflict that all physicians will eventually come to deal with, or are already dealing with regularly; that is the conflict of Autonomy and informed consent versus Paternalism and the doctor's intervention. In one hand, Autonomy is the principle of non-interference and the right to self-governance; informed consent is the concept that "Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body…(102)" it is the exercise of a choice after being informed of the process and risks of a medical treatment. While in the other hand lies Paternalism; "the interference with, limitation of, or usurpation of individual autonomy justified by reasons referring exclusively…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Charlie

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The doctors’ of Charlie, a 37-year-old with an IQ of 68, did not act ethically when they performed the surgery to triple his IQ. Ethically is described as the standard of right and wrong in society, usually related to rights and virtues, and development of reasoning and ethical standards. He would have had a much better life without the surgery. He could have at least stayed coordinated, had friends, and a job. Despite this, some people still insist the doctors’ decisions were in fact ethical. However, the negatives outweigh the positives…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “four principles of biomedical ethics of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice” (Cooper, 2012), however, this case shows autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence clashing. The patient and her family have the right to determine the patient’s care; yet, following the patient’s mother’s decision has the potential of causing harm to the…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Autonomy is integral to health care; however, promoting and sustaining patient autonomy may be more difficult to enact than is often suggested. According to Hewitt-Taylor (2004), the concept of autonomy becomes more complex when the patient is a child, or an adult who has learning disabilities or a mental health problem that might be considered to impinge on their ability to make informed decisions. An adult with a mental health problem, who is unable to function autonomously has to rely on their caregivers and POAs for their care. In situations like this, health care staff need to be aware of the legal as well as moral and ethical issues involved when facilitating autonomous choices for their patients (Edgar, et al., 2001). The distinction…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument holds more weight than bioethical, legal, and theological debates against augmenting mankind, but still loses ground due to the fact that not all human augmentations are severe in nature. Recreational bodily modifications have been gaining popularity in the 2010s, partially due to the video game franchise Deus Ex. The transhumanist futurist society of the mid-21st century that it depicts is not too far off from our own. British tabloid newspaper The Sun accidentally ran an about the game due to the fact that its realistic issues are extremely similar those that society faces today. In it, biotechnology and human augmentations have become the norm (Factor Tech). Political and ethical controversy surrounding “augs” has sparked riots and caused a severe schism between those for and those against human augmentations. Our society is not nearly at this point, but the severity of bioethics getting in the way of scientific progress is nothing short of ludicrous. Recent price gouging in the biomedical field has also caused great debate as to whether medical and science firms not only have the right to develop new technologies and forms of treatment, but if they should have the capability to grant or deny necessary treatments based off of…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlie Gordon's doctors did not act ethically when they performed the surgery to make him smarter. The definition of ethics are the standards of right and wrong that tell what humans should do (Dobrin). The doctors did not meet these standards. The doctors tested on Charlie too early, and were trying to help themselves more than they were trying to help their patient. Charlie also ended up dying because of the testing. While some people may say that the doctors were ethical because they made Charlie smarter, which he wanted, there is more evidence for the doctors being ethically wrong than right.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kantian Ethics Case Study

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The action which concurs with the Kantian ethics is to obey the wishes of the healthy patient. The patient has used his autonomous rational nature to decide that donating his organs would not be worthwhile for him. If the surgeon were to ignore the healthy patient's request, he would be violating the patient's ARN through overriding the patient's own willpower to decide what to do with his organs. However, by heeding the healthy patients request he would be respecting the person’s autonomy and thus valuing the patient's autonomous rational…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The First Amendment guarantees every American’s right to the free exchange of ideas, beliefs, and political debate. The First Amendment of the Constitution states that "Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances" (National Archives and Records Administration 2001). We have the right of freedom of speech and by definition, this means that we have “the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint” (Dictionary). This law is stated in the Bill of Rights and has been around since 1971. It is one of the oldest and most important amendments we adopted because as American people we have a…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nature is the essential qualities or characteristics by which something is recognized. Natural is produced by nature with no artificial changes. In the world today it is natural to “Play God”, by using technology to save one’s life. The line should be drawn if technology harms or makes one’s life worse. People are so reliant on the advanced medical technology this world possesses because they believe that it could save their lives, make their lives easier, and make their appearance change based on the self image they want. Scientific and medical technology will constantly continue to grow because there will always be a medical problem that need to be solved by specialized equipment that will help save one’s life. Some critics believe that there should be limits on medical technology based on certain procedures that they think qualify as “playing God”. On the other hand, other critics believe it is pointless to put limits on the medical technology because people are already “playing God”. They are allowed by the government to do what they want as long as they have the money to do so. In “Dr Daedalus”, Lauren Slater explains how Dr. Rosen, a plastic surgeon, believes that when people change the appearance of their selves they are also changing who they are. Slater disagrees with this dilemma that changing the body will change the soul, which in a better term means, if people change their appearance they will ultimately change their core beliefs. In “The Made-to-Order Savior”, Lisa Belkin describes controversial medical technology that persuades a couple to have another child as donor of bone marrow to save the life of their older child. In the article certain critics disagree with this right to manipulate nature. People should not let nature take its course when one’s life is in stake because it is natural for humans to find ways to survive using medical technology.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Direct brain connections to computers By way of BMI technology are already here helping amputees and the paralyzed regain use of their bodies (Deep implants are already used to reverse deafness and blindness) but with refinement the diffusion of this convergence of technologies will almost certainly be used for non-therapeutic purposes — and with that comes profound ethical questions and moral considerations.…

    • 10025 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Transhumanism

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sandberg, has attended and presented various discussions on the benefits of developing technologies for human health in terms of various enhancements and modifications of the human body (Sandberg, 2001). In this article a summary of one of his presentations, he provides information related with morphological freedom that is essential to society if technology will become the common treatment in future health care for physical disabilities. The purpose of his writing is to explain the natural rights that people in society have when it comes to personal physical change. Sandberg, attempts to reach out to those in society who…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays