Preview

Essay On Overbreadth Amendment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
610 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Overbreadth Amendment
Overbreadth Doctrine and the First Amendment
There are many individuals and groups alike that choose to express their disdain for certain actions, laws, and behaviors through the use of Freedom of Speech. The First Amendment has been cited by many protesters when demonstrating that it is their right to Freedom of expression. Freedom of Expression is powerful enough that sometimes words do not have to be spoken for a message to be conveyed. However, not all acts are protected by the First Amendment. For example, burning the flag is protected under the First Amendment but promoting the benefits of marijuana at a school event would be protected (U.S. Courts, n.d). If by chance there is a question of constitutionality regarding the First Amendment, it is usually linked to the overbreadth doctrine. Simply meaning, an individual may feel that their rights and/or others rights to Freedom of Speech may be prohibited by laws when applied under the context in which they were written. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) is the most quoted case that addresses issues of the overbreadth doctrine as it pertains to the First Amendment.
State v. Lilburn
In March of 1990, three (3) hunters assembled with permission from the
…show more content…
Taxpayers for Vincent (Brody & Acker, 2010, p. 40). Lilburn challenged that the legislature use of the word dissuades made the statue more or less content based regulation. However, the Court made it very clear that the harassment laws and other legislative history were not created to silence the views of the demonstrators that disagree with bison hunting. Therefore, it was found that there was no overbreadth that existed and if any were to be found, and then it is to be resolved on a case-by-case

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The court said that the First Amendment Rule applies as a defense against the state tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress. This precedent was set in the Hustler Magazine Inc. v. Falwell. The court needed to decide whether or not the speech was of public concern. Speech of public concern is entitled to special protection under the First Amendment and is on the highest rung of protection. This is to ensure that public debate and self expression are preserved and remain "uninhibited, robust, and wide-open." When an issue is of private matters then it is given much less protection. It is true that it is difficult to define exactly what public concern is. It has been covered in a broad term that can be narrowed down in individual circumstances. For speech to be defined as public concern it must "be fairly considered as relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community." It also can be defined as when the speech "is a subject of legitimate news interest; that is, a subject of general interest and of value and concern to the public." All factors of the speech must be determined and reviewed before a decision is made. The court must consider the content, form, and context of the speech. This includes examining what was said and how it was said. This is to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis because of the varying nature and severity of speech. Once all aspects are covered, the court can determine if the speech meets the criteria for public or private…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Almost all of the rights protected by the First Amendment are governed by the same legal standard, developed in a case called Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987). In Turner, prisoners in Missouri brought a class action lawsuit challenging a regulation that limited the ability of prisoners to write letters to each other. The Supreme Court used the case to establish a four-part test for First Amendment claims. There are four questions that are asked using this test: 1. Is the regulation reasonably related to a legitimate, neutral government interest? 2. Does the regulation leave open another way for you to exercise your constitutional rights? 3. How does the issue impact other…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hudgens V Labar Case Study

    • 2468 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Our constitution gives us the right under the First Amendment to the Freedom of Speech. This seems like a fairly straight forward right, but what many don’t know is that the Constitution only guarantees our right to freedom of speech against abridgement by government, federal or state. (Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board, 424 U.S. 507 Lexis).…

    • 2468 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, what many people do not necessarily know is that there are limits to our free speech and the supreme court has spoken on this topic for cases stating what would have to happen for these rights to be voided, “The constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action [emphasis added]” (WTP 123). Most of our rights have limits to them as it is for our protection and and the supreme court has a set of ways to be able to decide when our speech is no longer…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The sixteenth amendment in article I, section 8 gives congress the power to impose and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. In article I, section 9 states that no direct could be imposed unless made proportion to the population based on census result, which means congress has to levy taxes based on the state population rather than individual. During the civil war the federal government imposed an income tax for individual to pay tax for war expenses; the supreme court found this to be unconstitutional based on the case of Pollock v. farmer’s Loan & trust co. (1895). After this case congress sent to the states the sixteenth amendment which gives congress the power to impose direct tax, that is, congress fixes the amount of income it wants to raise and levies each state with their proportionate share of the amount, a direct tax can be collected by federal officials or the states; state can collect their taxes in any way they want. In nutshell, a direct tax is collected only on persons or property. Indirect taxes are not being used in the constitution. It is simply a label for all duties, imposts and excises taken as a group, and is usually referred to any tax which is not direct. Though it has often been disputed that a uniform tax is one, which shows fundamental equality, the Supreme Court has constantly rejected this disagreement. The main purpose of allowing indirect taxes to be uniform is to secure the law of no taxation without representation.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On 21st Amendment

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This research paper is on the topic of 21st amendment of the U.S. constitution it explains what the 21st amendment is, how the 18th amendment also known as the prohibition era came to be and how the 21st amendment came to directly appeal the 18th amendment ending the prohibition. Also how the state’s power to directly control all aspects of alcohol within their borders, and this may impede on other amendments or clauses in the constitution, and how The Supreme Court changed their ruling on the 21st amendment over the years by letting states have all the power and then taking back some of the state’s powers. The federal government…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amendment 15 Essay

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A lot of people of other races would not be able to vote without the 15th Amendment. “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.” It allows anyone to have a political say in the government. They can’t hush you because of your skin color or what native language you speak (The Library of Congress >> Researchers, August 24, 2012), 78.1 percent of America is white and 21.9 percent are people of other ethnics so that much people would not be able to vote (census2011). We wouldn’t have a mix president. Are president Barack Hussein Obama would not even have a chance to run or vote or probable even have no interest in politics. My history teacher from 7/8 grade would not have told us his experiences of voting. He would not have been able to talk to us about his experiences of voting because he was black.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The incorporation of the Bill of Rights is the procedure by which the United States courts have implemented pieces of the United States Bill of Rights to the states, by the due process clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. During the case of Barron v. Baltimore, the U.S. Supreme Court expressed that the Bill of Rights implemented to the government, but not to the states. Some claimed that the creator of the 14th Amendment intention had been to reverse this particular precedent. This Amendment is one of the reconstruction Amendment, and was adopted in 1868. The fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause forbids local and state governments from denying persons of liberty, life, or property without particular steps that guaranteed fairness.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On 7th Amendment

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Martin Luther King Jr. once said “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Imagine being put into a situation where someone is in complete and utter control of your future and the severity of it. Now pretend they also are going to make it as severe as possible either because you are from a poor family, you have different religious or political views, or someone bribed them to make it as harsh as possible for you. This obviously is not fair and would cause any rational person to rebel against the system put in place for them; that is exactly what the colonists did when King George III took away the colonists’ right to trial by jury. Colonists knew the importance of the 7th Amendment because it prevented judicial bias and allowed…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay On 8th Amendment

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The government has laid out an array of civil rights to protect the liberties of the people with the induction of the United States Bill of Rights in 1791. The large majority of these amendments are appropriate and remain prominent in the modernized American governmental system but these basic human rights carry substantial controversy, the most arguable being the eighth. This amendment states that there shall be no cruel or unjust punishments inflicted upon any individual remaining in the borders of the nation, whether long term resident or briefly visited foreigner. This amendment receives most of its discussion through conversation regarding the death penalty to the detained. In many opinions, lethal injection is supported as fully…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eight Amendment Essay

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When our founding fathers wrote the Bill of Rights, they included a surfeit of amendments that would protect the people’s rights. One of the most prominent amendments in the bill of rights is the eighth amendment. The Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution is the section of the Bill of Rights that states that punishments must be fair, cannot be cruel, and that fines that are extraordinary large cannot be set. The eighth amendment states that punishment must be fair, however a plethora of modern issues violate this specific part of the amendment. In fact, one of the most pivotal modern issue regarding the eight amendment in the bill of rights is death penalty.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In America, we are founded upon the rules and guidelines provided by our Constitution, but those rules and guidelines are constantly open to your own interpretation. When certain conflicts arise, we turn to our Constitution for admonition. But where do the provisions of our Constitution end? In the articles “Texas v. Johnson: Majority Opinion” and “American Flag Stands for Tolerance”, the issue of whether or not the First Amendment allows for people to use the burning of the American flag as a form of protest—but one does it better than the other.…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    As the years go by the amount of children being tried as adults is increasing and what many don’t see is we have to make a change to that. The juvenile justice system was created in the late 1800s to improve the U.S. policies regarding youth offenders. It is believed youth could be rehabilitated and needs to be protected and kept separate from the adult criminals. But when California passed Prop 21 the policy changed and young offenders were punished rather than rehabilitated. According to The League Of Women Voters information packet:…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Issues

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun control is any law, policy, practice, or proposal designed to restrict or limit the possession, production importation, shipment, sale, and/or use of guns or other firearms by private citizens. There should be stricter gun control laws in the United States. A CBS poll, conducted on Dec. 14, 2012, found that 51% of adults nationwide were in favor to make gun laws stricter. Currently we have a divided government with the majority of the House of Representatives going to Republicans, the majority of the Senate going to the Democrats, and adding to that a Democratic President. Democrats favor strict gun control laws e.g. oppose the right to carry concealed weapons in public places. Republicans oppose strict gun control laws and are strong supporters of the Second Amendment as well as the right to carry concealed weapons.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FUR 2601

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As in the case of Ferreira v Levin NO, where Chaskalson P held that the allegation need merely be that, objectively speaking, a right in the Bill of Rights has been infringed or threatened, this case, the right of freedom of expression in being violated. The right which is infringed upon is not emotional, but objective.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays