Preview

American Flag Vs. The First Amendment

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
142 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
American Flag Vs. The First Amendment
In America, we are founded upon the rules and guidelines provided by our Constitution, but those rules and guidelines are constantly open to your own interpretation. When certain conflicts arise, we turn to our Constitution for admonition. But where do the provisions of our Constitution end? In the articles “Texas v. Johnson: Majority Opinion” and “American Flag Stands for Tolerance”, the issue of whether or not the First Amendment allows for people to use the burning of the American flag as a form of protest—but one does it better than the other. In my opinion, Texas v. Johnson does a better job at arguing their point. Though both articles agree that the First Amendment does cover the burning of the American flag by means of protest, American

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Passage 1, "American Flag Stands for Tolerance," asserts direct ways that rights, freedom, and choices can be snatched. In the article it is stated that "each individual is to have the freedom to develop by his or her own lights, and not by the command of officialdom." Individuals should be able to live how they intent to instead of having the government decide how they should live. Furthermore why can people not stand up for their rights when "the flag stands for free expression of ideas, no matter how distastful?" People do not want other people interfering with how they want to live their lives. Having freedom snatched away can cause many individuals to do wrong things, such as burning the flag.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The American flag is a piece of cloth that represents the United States of America. The burning of our flag has caused many controversies. Some citizens believe that burning the US flag should be banned no matter what the reason is. Others believe we have the right to burn the flag if we want to. The burning of the flag should not be banned for many reasons.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas vs Johnson

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The First amendment of the Constitution of America calls for the protection of the United states citizens from the United States congress. It states that congress shall not pass any laws favoring a specific religious belief or stop any particular group from worshiping them. The first amendment also protects the United States citizen by allowing them freedom of speech/press and peaceful assembly or petition of the governments policies.(billofrightsInstitute) In 1984 Ronald Reagan was trying to run for his second term as president, however thousands of people gathered in front of the Dallas city hall to protest Reagan’s policies and in that crowd a protester named Gregory Lee Johnson. Johnson pulled a stunt that ended him up in the Dallas city court house convicting him to desecrating the U.S. flag. The Dallas city court’s decision was tried and took to the supreme court for Johnsons first amendment right being violated. The supreme court actually came to the decision that Johnson was protected by the first amendment. “After this decision by the supreme court, there has been six times the house of representatives have tried to vote a constitutional amendment known as Flag desecration amendment which stated “ congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag”. This amendment has not received the 67 votes it needs to pass but hasn’t been less than 63 voted for all six occasions” (billofrightsInstitute)…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans view the Constitution as the Holy Grail to guide our country and provide meaning of the law. It also gives a designation of powers to each branch and the states. Our essential freedoms are specified to us by the Constitution and have been stripped away from some individuals based on their sexual preference. In the Lawrence v. Texas case, it proves that the Supreme Court is continually re-interpreting the Constitution.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The other reason he was justified in his actions was that it was only a state law. There were a couple of states that allowed burning the flag, but Texas did not. The state shouldn’t be allowed to make a law that overrules the country’s amendments. Justice Brennan said, “…no official, high or petty can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinions or force citizens to confess by word…” This quote shows that state shouldn’t be allowed to make a decision based on opinions that force people to abide.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the discussions of if burning the flag should be illegal, one controversial issue has been that it shouldn’t be. On the one hand, many american argue that it should be illegal to burn the flag. On the other hand, some americans contend that burning the flag is a way to get there point across. My own view is that it should be illegal.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us humans should accept Johnson in “ Texas v Johnson” even though his expressions differ from one another. On pages 1 and 2 of page 1, stated “ We decline therefore, to create for the flag an exception to the joust of principles protected by the 1st amendment.” On the next page, line 39 stated, “ The way to preserve the flags special role is not to punish those who feel differently about these matters.” This evidence helped decide the rational decision to not punish Johnson. It relates to the quote because it’s saying he has a right in the 1st amendment to express by burning the flag. Also we should punish those who have different opinions and views than ourselves.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The document I have read, States’ Rights, Depending on the Issue by Albert R. hunt has many different topics and many different views. I have decided to pick the topic of the Southern Confederacy flag being flown in many southern states. The two points that this article offers about the Southern Confederacy flag is that, the flag may be flown because it is to the closest government's decision to decide, which is yes, and or that flag should not be flown because of what it “really” stands for according to many African American citizens, a racist sign of hatred towards their people. This topic has recently been extremely popular because some people call it “patriotism of their local region” and some consider it “a racist reminder that brought African Americans a time of unjust pain and neglection.” Overall, this topic remains such a problem because there are not only two views, but those views are not just different because of saying who's right or wrong, but it is a stand point of saying yay or nay of violence towards African American citizens during America’s pastime.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burning the flag of the United States is burning the peoples freedoms because that what the flag represents.It is the symbol of this country and the whole world recognizes the flag and people that live in the country decide to burn the flag. In the article "Burn the Flag or Burn the Constitution" by Fulton Sandra, she states, "Those who would burn the flag destroy the symbol of freedom, but amending the constitution would destroy part of freedom its self." Also, in "Flag Burning Should be Banned" by Brady Patrick and it stated, "They say the flag symbolizes the freedom to burn it: That our flag is the symbol of un-patriotic conduct. That burning the symbol of patriotism is patriotic." What this two articles are saying that is that burning the flag changes the look of the flag of this country, more times the flag is burned it shows the peoples freedoms burning at the same time. Plus, those who burn the flag try to separate freedom from patriotism but the flag already represents both of the statements. The flag of the United States is there to show our freedoms, patriotism, and people and we decide to burn…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment clearly states that congress shall not make any law abridging the freedom of speech. If our government isn’t going to avid by the amendments, then why have them? If they are going to ban the confederate flag then they should be banned for not corresponding with our god given rights. The constitutional amendments are what our government is supposed to stick to.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first commandment of the Bible, "thou shalt have no other gods before me;" the first Amendment of the United States Constitution, "congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" (The Bible, Exodus 20:1–1, Constitution). In America, many argue the country's Amendments were originally based on the Ten Commandments but immediately both the first commandment and first Amendment are not in line with each other. Roy S. Moore of the Alabama Supreme Court installed a giant 5,200 pound granite block in the lobby of Alabama's court that displayed the Ten Commandments. This act was in violation of the first Amendment as the stone is favoring the Christian doctrine in a government courthouse.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burning the flag in protest is our right as stated by the Constitution. If we allow our government to ban flag burning, it is no longer a matter of protecting our flag's meaning because the more restrictive our government becomes, the more we lose the meaning of the flag. Our flag symbolizes the freedom of our nation and its immense diversity. With this much diversity, we must keep everyone's opinion in mind. If we take away the power of the individual, we become weaker as a whole…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many individuals and groups alike that choose to express their disdain for certain actions, laws, and behaviors through the use of Freedom of Speech. The First Amendment has been cited by many protesters when demonstrating that it is their right to Freedom of expression. Freedom of Expression is powerful enough that sometimes words do not have to be spoken for a message to be conveyed. However, not all acts are protected by the First Amendment. For example, burning the flag is protected under the First Amendment but promoting the benefits of marijuana at a school event would be protected (U.S. Courts, n.d). If by chance there is a question of constitutionality regarding the First Amendment, it is usually linked to the overbreadth doctrine. Simply meaning, an individual may feel that their rights and/or others rights to Freedom of Speech may be prohibited by laws when applied under the context in which they were written. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) is the most quoted case that addresses issues of the overbreadth doctrine as it pertains to the First Amendment.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Flag Burning

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Luke Saginaw, student author of “Why Flag-Burning Should Not Be Permitted,” favors a constitutional amendment that would outlaw flag-burning. Saginaw argues that flag burning is not speech at all but conduct of the sort that is often illegal. Because the flag symbolizes what so many have died to protect, Americans have deep emotional attachments to it. Thus, flag burning is not political speech but instead an attack upon Americans feelings about the flag. An assault that Saginaw deems as non-permissible.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The recent decision resulting from Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition, 2002 reenergizes many issues related to the First Amendment and free speech. The focus of the aforementioned case is the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA). There is a contention as to the courts and legislature's handling of virtual child pornography and whether it garners the same treatment– banned – as traditional child pornography. All sides of the issue consequently address the scope of the First Amendment, and Justice Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court where he correctly limited the scope of intervention. Before delving into the hostile arena of virtual child pornography, a broader understanding of the context surrounding the First Amendment and…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays