Preview

Flag Burning & Freedom of Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
679 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Flag Burning & Freedom of Speech
Flag Burning & Freedom of Speech

Jonathan Cunningham

International Academy of Design & Technology Online

Since the Supreme Court has decided that freedom of speech may at times be restricted, the question arises, should such freedom be restricted when it comes to flag burning? An example of such an action would be an angry mob of people who wish to protest a recent decision by the government by burning the flag. Some people state that the government should ban this form of protest. Others staunchly insist this form of expression should not be outlawed. This freedom should not be restricted.

Matt Nagin (2012), a writer for the online news platform policymic, states that “opponents of flag burning speak about it as if the protesters were destroying the national character and/or desecrating the one and only Mona Lisa”. Many citizens quite understandably take offense at the thought or mention of burning the flag. This may at times be especially true with individuals who have served in the military, or their family members; since they can personally attest to the cost of defending freedom or the safety of a nation, flag burning can be especially hurtful or offensive.

In spite of this, the freedom to protest via burning of the flag is protected by law. The most recent occurrence of when the Supreme Court had to re-establish this was in 1989, in the case of Texas vs. Johnson. According to an article posted online by a website known as the Law Library, Gregory Lee Johnson had been convicted of “desecrating a venerated object in violation of Texas Penal Code section 42.09(a) (3)”. He had been given a fine of two thousand dollars and a sentence of a year in prison. Fortunately, his conviction was reversed by the Supreme Court. That same article went on to say, “The Free Speech Clause, the court ruled, forbids the government from establishing an orthodox symbol of national unity that is insulated from public criticism, symbolic or otherwise”.

So



References: Nagin, Matt. (2012, October). Flag Burning is a Freedom That We Must Respect. policymic. Retrieved from http://www.policymic.com/articles/15574/flag-burning-is-a-freedom-that-we-must-respect Law Library - American Law and Legal Information. (2012). Texas v. Johnson. Retrieved from the online Law Library <ahref="http://law.jrank.org/pages/10758/Texas-v-Johnson.html">Texas v. Johnson</a> Upshaw, Ed Earl. (October, 2012). Discussion of “Flag Burning is a Freedom That We Must Respect” article. [Flag burning in a public protest is a deliberate attempt to provoke a reaction…When it is successful, why hold the provoked person responsible...The 1st Amendment guarantees freedom of speech, but it doesn 't guarantee freedom from foreseeable consequences]. Retrieved from: http://www.policymic.com/articles/15574/flag-burning-is-a-freedom-that-we-must-respect

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    So it's common that they surmise that desecrating the flag by setting it ablaze isn't right. Basically, they imagine that they are wearing the flag on their garments and slapping it on guard stickers all over the place is correct. Be that as it may, the legislature acts as though they have better things to do than to toss us behind bars for wearing Old Navy T-shirts or tossing out our patriotic paper plates and mugs after a fourth of July party or utilizing our flag stamped bathroom tissue. Should the legislature care more about what has been done to our national symbol? I think so. Screenwriter Aaron Sorkin of The American President movie and each one of those individuals who trust that setting the flag on fire is secured by the right to speak freely are correct. Our U.S. Flag Code ought to stick to how and when the flag is shown, not to promote a desecration. Others are stating that the image of our opportunity is more imperative than the flexibility it symbolizes—and that is not the American way. As Lee Greenwood sings in his song “God Bless the U.S.A.,” “I thank my lucky stars to be living here today, ‘cause the flag still stands for freedom and they can’t take that away”…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Assignment

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A. Statute 42.09(a) (3) of the Texas Penal Code prohibits the “desecration of a venerable object.” This in lemans terms prohibits the burning of flags.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gregory Lee Johnson’s act of burning the American flag was not verbal communication.The United States Supreme Court ruled it as expressive conduct allowing it as the 1st amendment. In the case of Texas vs. Johnson, the United States Supreme Court leaned on Gregory Lee Johnson’s side, stating that this was an act of the first amendment under the United States Constitution. Gregory Lee Johnson’s charges and fines were dropped. The court case, Texas vs. Johnson closed on June 21, 1989. Shortly after the case of Texas vs. Johnson the United States Congress passed the, Flag Protection Act of 1989. The Flag Protection Act of 1989 rules that the government's interest in preserving the flag as a United States symbol is not more significant than the individual's First Amendment right to disrespect the American flag through expressive…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Passage 1, "American Flag Stands for Tolerance," asserts direct ways that rights, freedom, and choices can be snatched. In the article it is stated that "each individual is to have the freedom to develop by his or her own lights, and not by the command of officialdom." Individuals should be able to live how they intent to instead of having the government decide how they should live. Furthermore why can people not stand up for their rights when "the flag stands for free expression of ideas, no matter how distastful?" People do not want other people interfering with how they want to live their lives. Having freedom snatched away can cause many individuals to do wrong things, such as burning the flag.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One reason is that banning the burning of the flag would be a violation of our freedom of speech. Gregory Lee Johnson set fire to the US flag and was arrested. He was convicted under a Texas law that classified the flag as a "venerated object that permits criminal prosecution…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article talks about how the Supreme Court based a law by a 5-to-4 that a person can show their disagreement with the governmental policies by burning the American flag. It gives a vivid example of the other side of the law in china where people who peacefully express disagreement with the government policies may be slaughtered. Allen goes on to talk about how American flag is a cherished symbol of our nation. Allen also talks about how this is technically abiding by the First Amendment, It is the freedom of the people to express there freedom of expression of speech. He thinks that it is just an ironic situation because of the fundamental commitment to freedom.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wanting to keep the flag around for heritage reasons in museums and places that preserve past flags is completely okay. Whenever it comes to wearing the flag or flying it on important buildings under the American flag is where it becomes inappropriate. Coski (2005) states that in the 1980s the NAACP tried to rally or annul the use of the Confederate Beauregard Battle Flag in states and emblems. Coski shares my current opinion that Southern states should not banish the Beauregard Battle Flag but yet try to understand that its role and meaning are different for different groups of people. The flag should just be retired to museums.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, the first amendment is taken advantage of in many ways. Many people express that they can say whatever they please because they have the Freedom of Speech. They might burn the USA flag, make a racist remark, or some other kind of action, but what they do not realize is that this may hurt people. The First Amendment should be limited so that individuals can speak their mind so long as it does not hurt other people, or violates their rights.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One argument that could be made is that this was not right, because the flag symbolizes something important to many people. This is a valid point, because it a lot of controversy and made multiple people angry throughout the whole case hearing. “The way to preserve the flag’s special role is not to punish those who feel differently about {nationhood and national unity}. It is to persuade them that they are wrong.” This basically says that we shouldn’t be angered and punishing those that disrespect the flag, but be more focused on persuading them they’re…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why do people burn the flag? The issue of freedom of speech is people are abusing the freedom of speech. This issue is important because some people are burning the american flag. Also after school officials banned civil rights groups from recruiting on campus. Students at the University of California organized sit ins, rallies, and strikes. People who were involved were students from Berkeley named, Mario Savio, and Bettina Apthecker. The common good of people should respect it because they US gave us that privilege of speech. We owe our government the respect because they are the ones who gave us the right.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Texas V. Johnson

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1984, following a protest march through the streets of Dallas, Texas against the policies of the Reagan Administration, Gregory Lee Johnson was handed an American flag. Outside the Dallas City Hall, Johnson through the flag onto the ground, poured kerosene on it, and set fire to it. Many protesters around Johnson began a chant of, "America, the red, white, and blue, we spit on you!" While many protesters agreed with what Johnson had done, there were several others who felt extremely offended. In fact, one such person felt the need to gather the remains of the flag which he then buried in his yard. The protest was a nonviolent one and no one standing nearby was hurt or threatened.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment clearly states that congress shall not make any law abridging the freedom of speech. If our government isn’t going to avid by the amendments, then why have them? If they are going to ban the confederate flag then they should be banned for not corresponding with our god given rights. The constitutional amendments are what our government is supposed to stick to.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Flag Speeches

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Being an American, I am a true believer that our flag should not be desecrated in anyway, especially by our own citizens. When thinking of the American flag it is more than just a flag to many Americans, it is a symbol of those who have fought for us to have the rights and freedoms we have today, represents those who have died in battle, and the pride we have in our country. When and if someone desecrates our flag I believe they should be punished.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many individuals and groups alike that choose to express their disdain for certain actions, laws, and behaviors through the use of Freedom of Speech. The First Amendment has been cited by many protesters when demonstrating that it is their right to Freedom of expression. Freedom of Expression is powerful enough that sometimes words do not have to be spoken for a message to be conveyed. However, not all acts are protected by the First Amendment. For example, burning the flag is protected under the First Amendment but promoting the benefits of marijuana at a school event would be protected (U.S. Courts, n.d). If by chance there is a question of constitutionality regarding the First Amendment, it is usually linked to the overbreadth doctrine. Simply meaning, an individual may feel that their rights and/or others rights to Freedom of Speech may be prohibited by laws when applied under the context in which they were written. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) is the most quoted case that addresses issues of the overbreadth doctrine as it pertains to the First Amendment.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With all the political conflicts going on today, one issue that has arisen again recently is the controversy of flag burning. The people that burn the flag claim they are making a statement; however, what is that statement? Is it appropriate to burn the flag as a statement of political discord or is it a disrespectful action that should be illegal? Below I will draw out the thoughts and reasoning behind both stances that have become a major issue in the U.S. again in the past several years.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays