Preview

Texas V. Johnson

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1126 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Texas V. Johnson
Texas v. Johnson (1989) In 1984, following a protest march through the streets of Dallas, Texas against the policies of the Reagan Administration, Gregory Lee Johnson was handed an American flag. Outside the Dallas City Hall, Johnson through the flag onto the ground, poured kerosene on it, and set fire to it. Many protesters around Johnson began a chant of, "America, the red, white, and blue, we spit on you!" While many protesters agreed with what Johnson had done, there were several others who felt extremely offended. In fact, one such person felt the need to gather the remains of the flag which he then buried in his yard. The protest was a nonviolent one and no one standing nearby was hurt or threatened. At this time, 48 of our 50 states had in place laws that prohibited the public burning of the American flag. Texas, of course, was one of these. This caused Johnson to be charged with "the desecration of a venerated object." He was found guilty and faced a sentence of a $2,000 fine and one year in prison. Johnson, appalled by this decision, appealed his case to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas. This court agreed with the prior one and ruled to have his conviction stand. In response, the still angry Johnson appealed his case to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. This court, unlike the previous two, found Johnson to be innocent because it found that the First Amendment protected Johnson's behavior. To arrive at this decision, the court first quickly decided that Johnson's actions feel under the First Amendment protection of free speech because it was expressive conduct. Because of this, the state would need to prove that circumstances existed which would make the state interest outweigh the First Amendment. The court found that there was not a strong enough state interest to overrule the protection of the First Amendment and overturned the previous ruling. Upset with this, The State of Texas appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court and the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The constitution, weather the state or national, is a blueprint or outline in regards to the distribution of power. There are two main purposes to a constitution, the first reason is to establish a government and second reason is to delegate certain powers. Every state have a state constitution that is designed for that state, however the US Constitution override all state constitution. Although Texas is the oldest constitution in the US, the constitution have many revised many time. Since the establishment of Texas Constitution in 1876, the document have been revised or amended approximately 666. There have been so many revisions to the constitution over the years, the question stand what are the strengths and weakness of the current…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On Monday August 21st, A body of a 5-year-old boy was found dead in A drive way of a home in West Mobile. The next day a daycare worker had been arrested and charged with abuse of a corpse.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1980, patient (plaintiff) James Johnson filed suit against Misericordia Community Hospital alleging medical malpractice. The suit specifically alleged corporate negligence in the appointment of Dr. Lester V. Salinksy (independent member) to the medical staff at Misericordia Community Hospital. During the surgery, Dr. Salinsky severed the femoral artery, resulting in partial paralysis for Johnson (casebriefs.com). Ultimately, Johnson suffered a permanent paralytic condition to his right thigh muscles with resultant atrophy and weakness as well as a loss of function after undergoing hip surgery performed by Dr. Salinsky (Showalter,…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Branzburg v. Hayes was the only ever supreme court case to deal with reporter’s privilege. The ruling of this case was that reporter’s had no right to hide their sources in a court case. The chief justice at the time,Warren Burger, made a point that reporters, “like other citizens, [must] respond to relevant questions put to them in the course of a valid grand jury investigation or criminal trial (Fargo,2010).” With a decision that was five for and four against, this case was not an open and shut many thought it to be. Calling into play a look at the first amendment and what it really means when it says the freedom of speech. Interpreting a document that is more than two hundred years old is not an easy task to accomplish, having to combine…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case of Thompson versus Oklahoma raises a number of issues regarding the trials and punishment of juveniles for heinous crimes. This case was argued on November 9, 1987 and involves the trial of fifteen-year-old William Wayne Thompson. Along with his older brother and two friends, William Thomspon brutally murdered Charles Keene, his sister’s husband. His motive was revenge for abusing his sister. William Thompson was a “child” according to Oklahoma law, but he was tried as an adult, convicted with murder, and sentenced to death. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma upheld this ruling. Because he was only fifteen years old at the time of the murder, this ruling violated the Eighth Amendment, causing this case to be brought to the Supreme…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri v McNeely

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Missouri police officer stopped Tyler McNeely after observing it exceeding the posted speed limit and repeatedly crossing the center line. The officer noticed McNeely’s bloodshot eyes, his slurred speech, and a smell of alcohol on his breath. McNeely performed poorly on a battery of field sobriety tests, and he declined to take a Breathalyzer test. When McNeely indicated he refuse a breath sample for testing, the officer took him to a nearby hospital for blood alcohol test. The officer explained to McNeely that under Missouri’s implied consent law, refusal to submit voluntarily to the blood test would lead to an immediate one-year suspension of his driver’s license and could be used against him in any future prosecution. The testing of the blood indicated that the blood alcohol level was significantly above the legal limit. McNeely had challenged the blood test evidence claiming that there should have been a search warrant before ordering a blood sample.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question here is whether or not the petitioner, Jose Padilla, will be deported on account that he had plead guilty to a crime but allegedly had his sixth amendment right violated. There are multiply issues here. The first issue here is Padilla plead guilty to a drug offense that took place in the United States. The second issue is he claims his counsel did not inform him about the consequences of his plea bargain and he was misinformed about the possibility of deportation. The third is he states his decision would have been different if his counsel would have been verbally clear about the risk of his plea bargain. The short answer to the question is yes. Yes, Padilla will be deported back to his home country of Honduras.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooper V. Austin

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philip J. Cooper v. Charles Austin 837 S. W. 2d 606 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992)…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The respondent was convicted in Dallas County Criminal Court of desecration of a venerated object in violation of a Texas statute. He was sentenced to one year in prison and fined $2000. The respondent appealed his conviction through the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas. They affirmed the decision of the lower court. The respondent then petitioned for discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. This court then reversed the decision finding Johnson’s flag burning to be “symbolic speech” protected by the First Amendment. Certiorari was granted. The case went to the Supreme Court.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shane Lawler is a former United States Marine. When he saw people destroying the American flag, he was disgusted. He decided that enough was enough. He posted a video ranting. He stated that people should learn the history of the American flag before they try to destroy it. He also stated that when people destroy the flag, they destroy everything that our ancestors worked for. Additionally, he talked about…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gregory Lee Johnson’s act of burning the American flag was not verbal communication.The United States Supreme Court ruled it as expressive conduct allowing it as the 1st amendment. In the case of Texas vs. Johnson, the United States Supreme Court leaned on Gregory Lee Johnson’s side, stating that this was an act of the first amendment under the United States Constitution. Gregory Lee Johnson’s charges and fines were dropped. The court case, Texas vs. Johnson closed on June 21, 1989. Shortly after the case of Texas vs. Johnson the United States Congress passed the, Flag Protection Act of 1989. The Flag Protection Act of 1989 rules that the government's interest in preserving the flag as a United States symbol is not more significant than the individual's First Amendment right to disrespect the American flag through expressive…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of Powell V. US

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Citation: Powell V U.S. No. 405, Supreme Court of the United States, 1968, 392 U.S. 514, 88 S. Ct. 2145 L. Ed 2d 1254, 1968 U.S. 1140. Facts: Leroy Powell was arrested December, 1966 for public intoxication, which is in violation of Texas state law. Powell was found guilty and fined.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us humans should accept Johnson in “ Texas v Johnson” even though his expressions differ from one another. On pages 1 and 2 of page 1, stated “ We decline therefore, to create for the flag an exception to the joust of principles protected by the 1st amendment.” On the next page, line 39 stated, “ The way to preserve the flags special role is not to punish those who feel differently about these matters.” This evidence helped decide the rational decision to not punish Johnson. It relates to the quote because it’s saying he has a right in the 1st amendment to express by burning the flag. Also we should punish those who have different opinions and views than ourselves.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution in the state of Texas is a document that outlines the function and structure of the government of the United States of Texas. The Texas constitution provides separation of powers which incorporates the bill of rights directly into the constitution. The Texas constitution took effect on February 15 1876. The Texas constitution is the eight to include Mexican constitution in Texas history. Since 1876 the United States legislature has proposed 666 amendments, 662 have gone before Texas voters; only 483 have been approved. (W.W. Norton and Company)The current Texas constitution is among the longest of the states constitutions that have been set into place. The Texas constitution has been described by many has weird and misconstrued as well. To live in Texas is to have your own unique set Constitution that has been adopted to have quality of life amongst Texans. (Texas Politics)…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    se abla espanol

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. In light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Texas v. Johnson, (referred to on page 150 of the text) discuss whether you believe Illinois, or any other state, could enforce a law prohibiting flag burning in protest (similar to the act committed by Johnson).…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays