Preview

Training Day Violations

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
693 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Training Day Violations
In the movie “Training Day” there were several events that occurred that were violating individual’s Fourth and Fifth Amendment. An even though depending upon the situation of the events there can be certain things a police officer can do if they have a reasonable/probable explanation behind their actions. Some of the events that’s occurred in the movie were the pulling over a vehicle of college students, violence against homeless men, Violation on Snoop Dogg, and the home search of Macy Gray. All instances had some type of violation against one’s self or property.
Alonzo and Jake pulled over a vehicle after viewing them buy drugs for recreational use. They used violent confrontation and intimidation towards the suspects and citizens, along while they seized they drugs. It triggered the citizens constitutional right but because the drugs were not in plain sight, nor did …show more content…
The homeless men did commit several crimes one trying to rape a minor, two fighting a police officer. Those cases would result in rape, evading arrest, and resisting arrest. However instead of being arrest for their crime they were physically/mentally abused, their drugs were taken from them and they were set free.
The Hunt for Snoop Dogg violated one’s constitutional rights, because he was not placed under arrest, being in a wheel chair he was tackled down to the floor. Although they did find a gun they used the bullets to count for how much time he would get if he was arrested. To find the drugs Alonzo stuck a pen down his throat for him to throw it. Used this technique to find out who he worked for using his previous record for information. They did not collect the evidence nor did they arrest him. His fifth Amendment was violated because, he was witness against himself by force and not by
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fourth Amendment
    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fourth Amendment

    Arizona (1978), the police collected evidence for four days after the suspect’s apprehension and the death of a police officer at the time of the arrest. He was convicted for murder, assault and narcotics offences. However, because they collected the evidence without a warrant, the suspect’s conviction on the murder of the police officer and assault charges was reversed by the Arizona Supreme Court, but upheld the narcotics conviction. This is a prime example of where the Fourth Amendment protects against unlawful searches. Even though the evidence was overwhelming proof that the suspect murdered the police officer, it was the responsibility of the police to do their due diligence to conduct the search legally. Had they obtained the proper warrants, the conviction would have still been upheld and the suspect would have been punished for the crime he…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study: Chimel V. California
    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page

    Case Study: Chimel V. California

    Facts: This case raises questions concerning the Fourth Amendment and searches incident to a lawful arrest. On September 13th, 1965, three police officers arrived at Chimel’s residence in Santa Ana, California. They possessed a search warrant, which authorized Chimel’s…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roy Olmstead's 4th Amendment Rights
    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page

    Roy Olmstead's 4th Amendment Rights

    Roy Olmstead was accused of importing and possessing illegal liquors back in 1927. He was later proved guilty by wiretaps installed in his basement. Olmstead tried saying that his 4th and 5th amendment were violated, but in conclusion his 4th amendment rights were not infringed because mere wiretapping does not qualify under a search or seizure. To be searched means that they would physically have to be there searching for something without a warrant that is. They are allowed to do so with a warrant. The vote behind his rights were 5-4 not in his favor. So he was later detained and arrested by the police. In this court case the officials learned a lot about how they should think, they decided that they should not back down in that sort of situation…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Supreme Court Issues: The Mapp V. Ohio Case
    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Supreme Court Issues: The Mapp V. Ohio Case

    “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,” Mapp V. Ohio (1961) dealt with that very sentence of the constitution. Were the officers at fault or Mapp? This complex question has a complex answer one that puzzled the Supreme Court and led to a change in criminal procedure. The verdict was a strict interpretation of the constitution. The fourth amendment was relevant because the fourteenth amendment grunted due process. It was a very good decision, it protected the black minority who at the time were being routinely harassed and convicted for no reasons. This decision certainly did not stop that but it made it harder…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    miranda v. arizona
    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    miranda v. arizona

    Case Background: A Mexican immigrant residing in Phoenix, Arizona, Ernesto Miranda, was identified to be a suspect in the line-up of a woman who accused him of rape and kidnapping. Police then arrested and interrogated Miranda. It took up to at least two hours of interrogation by police until Miranda the confessed to the crimes. The confession was written. During the two hours of interrogation, police did not once mention Miranda’s neither Fifth Amendment Protection against self-incrimination nor his Sixth amendment right to have the right to an attorney. After Miranda’s confession the case was then taken to trial hosted by Arizona state court an prosecutors used the oral and written confession as evidence against Miranda. Miranda was then found guilty and he was convicted and sentenced to 20-30 years in prison on each count. The conviction was then upheld due to the fact the Miranda’s attorney appealed to Arizona’s Supreme Court which then led to the case being appealed to the United States Supreme Court which also connected the case with four other similar ones. The court later came to an agreement that it is mandatory that the police have the role of protecting the rights of the accused suspect guaranteed by the…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Deadly Force Case Study
    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Deadly Force Case Study

    This ruling was appealed and eventually overturned by the Court of Appeals finding that this case violated the 4th amendment protections, finding that the use of deadly force is an absolute seizure of one's person and is subject to the same necessary reasonableness requirements. This finding is extremely important as it changes a legal standard for all police in the United States after the Supreme Court hears the case and delivers its affirmation of the Appeals Court response in 1985. Since 1985 police have followed the guidelines in law that resulted from the Supreme Court findings. The fleeing felon laws would now require the felon to be “violent” felon which posed a direct threat to the public or other police. The officer would be required to be able to articulate why he or she believed this suspect to be a threat and why they were believed to be a violent felon. The high court also found that no factual evidence existed at that time to support the argument that the threat of deadly force against fleeing felons would result in less fleeing felons and more successful arrests. The court found this policy is only more likely to end in deceased suspects without the benefits of criminal justice…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Zimring And Unwarranted: Policing Without Permission By Barry Friedman
    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Zimring And Unwarranted: Policing Without Permission By Barry Friedman

    One of the main conflicts occurring in the United States today deals with police brutality and the relationship between police officers and their communities. Two Books Argue the Case for Police Reform From Within, an article in the New York Times, stated that approximately one-thousand people in America are killed annually at the expense of police officers. This number is shocking to many due to the fact that the amount of violent crime and deaths of on-duty police officers has decreased greatly and continues to do so. This article talks about how police enforcement abuses their powers and how they are thought to have too much power which leads to this abuse. It discusses cases that deal with the Fourth Amendment right of American Citizens and where police have used deadly force in instances that it was not necessary, leading to a movement known as Black Lives Matter.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona Case Analysis
    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona Case Analysis

    If a police officer violates a defendant’s Fifth Amendment rights, the case goes on but the evidence that is obtained will be thrown out, “no evidence obtained as a result of interrogation can be used against him” (Wright, 2013).…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona
    • 2098 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    Mіrаndа vs. Arizona was а case that consіdеrеd the rights of the dеfеndаnts in criminal cases in regards to the power of the government. Indіvіduаl rights did not change with the Mіrаndа decision; however it created new constitutional guidelines for law enforcement, attorneys, and the courts. The guidelines ensure that the individual rights of the fifth, sixth and the fourteenth amendment are protected. This decision requires that unless а suspect in custody has been informed of his constitutional rights before questioning anything he says may not be introduced in а court of law (Mіrаndа v. Arizona, 1966). The decision requires law enforcement officers to follow а code of conduct when arresting suspects. After an arrest is made, before they may begin questioning they must first advise the suspect of their rights, and make sure that the suspect understands them.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Eyewitness Identification: Supreme Court Case
    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Eyewitness Identification: Supreme Court Case

    California, two men argued that their Fourth Amendment had been violated by the officers conducting the traffic stop. When the case was brought to the Supreme Court, the court determined that since their was an eyewitness account of reckless driving along with the smell of marijuana, the officers had enough reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop and a vehicle search. Without the 911 callers description of the vehicle, someone else could have been pulled over or, if she had provided inaccurate information of the vehicle, the petitioners could have appealed to the court by stating that they were not the vehicle described, therefore were searched with no reasonable suspicion and should have the evidence thrown out of court. Since it appeared that the caller experienced no sort of impairment when describing the vehicle to the dispatcher, they were able to make an entirely legal traffic stop and vehicle search with no breach of the petitioner’s constitutional…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    4th Amendment Cartoon Analysis
    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    4th Amendment Cartoon Analysis

    Although the 4th amendment has been ratified with the Bill of Rights, it still seems to be constantly evolving with current opinions of the Supreme Court. Even in recent years, it appears that there are more loopholes developing through court case precedents which allows law enforcement to seemingly disregard the 4th amendment almost completely. In this cartoon it can be seen that law enforcement is able to disregard a citizens privacy rights with the permission of the Supreme Court.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Violations
    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page

    Exclusionary Rule Violations

    When law enforcement or an government agency take it upon themselves to enter someone home or search a vehicle without a valid search warrant they are violating that persons Fourth Amendment rights against unlawful search and seizure. Evidence that could be admissible in a case may be excluded from trial if it is gather as a resulted from an illegal search or some other constitutional violation. The exclusionary rule prevents the use of most evidence gathered illegally. The rule can also be triggered by law enforcement violations of a person’s Fifth or Sixth Amendments right as well. I feel that is the case as it contains to John Smith and the search of his…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The concept of stop and frisk
    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The concept of stop and frisk

    In an effort to maximize an individuals rights during search and seizures along with stop-and-frisks, the United States government has developed numerous laws and amendments. The Fourth Amendment states, The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized (U.S. Constitution). This amendment was first used in the court system in the case of Terry vs. Ohio (1968). This case was the case that shaped the stop-and-frisk laws that are found in our country today. In 1942 legislators started to authorize stops-and-frisks on less than probable cause under the Uniform Arrest Act. This act gave an officer the right stop a person in public based upon reasonable ground to suspect that the person is committing has committed, or is about to commit a crime, and then search him for a dangerous weapon if the officer has reasonable ground to believe that he is in danger (Whitebread, 2000). In 1968 the Supreme Court addressed the issue in terry v. ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889. In Terry an experienced plainclothes officer observed three men acting suspiciously; they were walking back and forth on a street and peering into a particular store window. The officer concluded that the men were preparing to rob a nearby store and approached them. He identified himself as a police officer and asked for their names. Unsatisfied with their responses, he then subjected one of the men to a frisk, which produced a gun for which the suspect…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Police Brutality
    • 737 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Police Brutality

    Police work is dangerous. Sometimes police put in situations that excessive force is needed. But, because some officers use these extreme measures in situations when it is not, police brutality should be addressed. The use of excessive force may or may not be large problem, but it should be looked into by both the police and the public.…

    • 737 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fifth amendment
    • 632 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fifth amendment

    The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. The Fifth Amendment also refers to the practice of invoking the right to remain silent rather than incriminating oneself. It protects guilty as well as innocent persons who find themselves in incriminating circumstances. This right has important implications for police interrogations, a method that police use to obtain evidence in the form of confessions from suspects. The clauses incorporated within the Fifth Amendment outline basic constitutional limits on police procedure. The Fifth Amendment is important mainly because it protects us from having our rights abused by the government. It protects us from having the government take our freedom or our property without convicting us of a crime. It also makes it harder for the government to actually convict us of crimes. By doing these things, it helps to protect us from a tyrannical government. The framers of the Fifth Amendment intended that its provisions would apply only to the actions of the federal government. However, after the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, most of the Fifth Amendment’s protections were made applicable to the states. Under the incorporation doctrine, most of the liberties set forth in the Bill of Rights were made applicable to the state governments through The U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Due Process and equal protection clauses of the fourteenth Amendment. As a result, all states must provide protection…

    • 632 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics