Preview

UNIT 5 COMPLETE Q4

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
309 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
UNIT 5 COMPLETE Q4
Cross-functional teams provide an organization with some significant advantages. Creativity is greatly increased with the composition of this type of team. There is also more effective problem-solving with the diversity, experience and expertise of a cross-functional team (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013). Group cohesiveness can be thought of as the glue that holds the group together. There are two types of cohesiveness that bind groups of individuals together; Socio-emotional and instrumental. Socio-emotional cohesiveness is a sense of togetherness that develops when individuals derive emotional satisfaction from group participation. This type of cohesiveness is effective and rewarding in many circumstances.
Google’s HR cross-functional team would benefit more from instrumental cohesiveness. This sense of togetherness is derived from mutual dependence when the group members believe that the group’s goals would not be possible by acting separately. The purpose of Google’s three workgroups is to diversify the collective experiences and expertise each member brings to the group to have a stronger HR department. Each workgroup should understand that without one of the other groups, their operations would be limited. In other words, it’s important that the team sees each workgroup as being instrumental to the whole. In the cross functional group at Google instrumental cohesiveness needs to be focused on at first, before the team can move to socio-emotional cohesiveness. The importance of instrumental cohesiveness works best for these large cross functional teams because they each have a specific skill set that when combined will make an effective and successful team. Hence the team will be cohesive because they know they are dependent on each other to accomplish the group’s goals.
Strong teams are united by a cohesive thread. This element pulls each separate entity together to function as a single force.

References
Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2013).



References: Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2013). Organizational Behavior, 10th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    References: Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Organizational behavior (13th ed.). : Prentice Hall.…

    • 925 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to teamwork, most people will consider teamwork in terms of being part of a baseball, basketball, or football team. In contrast, a team is “really just a group of people who use their skills, experience, and knowledge to work toward a common goal” (Beverly K. Bachel, 2007). Teams working together in the workplace are extremely productive and profitable. Teams working together increase problem-solving skills and innovation, quality, and decrease turnover and absenteeism. (Scarnati, J 2006) Teams have an overall high success rate when well structured and the communication between the team members stays open throughout the project. A team is a collection of individuals who have gathered to achieve the same…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Team cohesion is the extent to which members of a group unite or find staying together to be of mutual interest (Johnston & Rosin, 2011)…

    • 5957 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Team cohesiveness is defined as the extent to which team members are attracted to the team and motivated. It means every team member has commitment to team activities, support other team members and enjoy team’s success.…

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ratzburg, Wilf H.. (n.d.). Group Cohesiveness. In Organizational Behavior. Retrieved September 13, 2009, from http://www.geocities.com/athens/forum/1650/htmlgroups18.html.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Effective teams know how to deal with conflict; they understand that all members may have different views. However they have rules, and procedures to help address any issues with people; to be an effective team, members need to motivate each other, understanding the needs and personalities within the group. A successful team is committed to success, building confidence in the group and focus on the goal. Integration is important part of group building, and a key element for new members to develop.…

    • 519 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Group cohesion is influenced by several factors. Having strong and confident leadership can guide the team to finding their common goal, and to work together. Also to aid and handle any conflicts that arise among the team. The way that the team develops is crucial to formation of strong cohesion, the linear model of cohesion shows how a team comes together to achieve their goal and create a positive team atmosphere. Personal factors can further or disrupt with group cohesion. Having attributes which could create divides among the team can lead to obstacles, limiting the togetherness of the team. Sharing personal attributes with teammates can make the team come together, feeling the support of your teammates will guide you to perform for them and…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The team from Nut Island had the potential to accomplish great things. They were a very cohesive team. Cohesiveness relates to the degree to which memebers are attracted to and motived to remain part of that team. A cohesive group member values his or her membership and strives to maintain a positive relationship within the group. Every person working at Nut Island wanted to be there and would not let anything get in the way of their team. When looking at only the cohesiveness of a team, Nut Island would be a good example. They worked together and enjoyed what they did at the sewage plant. Employees worked overtime without being paid for it and without complaining. They used everyone’s skills to take care of the plant and the plant equipment.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2013). Organizational Behavior (B. Gordon, Ed., 10th). New York,…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Team Cohesion Paper

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Group cohesion can be broken down into two subtypes which are social and task cohesion. Social cohesion refers to attraction to the group due to positive relationships (Crocker, 2016). Task cohesion refers to attraction to the group due to shared commitment to achieve team objectives (Crocker, 2016). Cohesion is highly important in sport atmospheres as it can enhance performance, work output, friendly team environments, and the accomplishment of goals. As a dynamic process, there are numerous factors correlated with cohesion. Individual factors of each teammate are related to cohesion such as the amount of effort exerted by players and the negative process of self-handicapping. Leadership factors are influential components in the development in cohesion through training, providing social…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mgmt 591

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: 1. Schermerhorn, J.R. Jr.,Osborn, R.N., Uhl-Bien, M., & Hunt, J.E., Organizational Behavior 12th Edition (2012), John Wiley & Sons, Danvers, MA.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organizational Theories

    • 6014 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Geisen, E. Riddelberger, E. Christerner, R. & Bell, R. (2010). When to innovate your business.…

    • 6014 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Asdfgh

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Team Cohesion-“a dynamic process that is reflected in the tendency of a team to stick together and remain together in pursuit of its goals and objectives regardless of the difficulties and set-backs (Kent, 2006)”…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Miller Brewing Co

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 2003, the Miller Brewing Company was in trouble. At the root of the company’s issues was a stagnant organizational culture. Organizational Culture is defined as “the set of shared, taken-for-granted implicit assumptions that a group holds and that determines how it perceives, thinks about, and reacts to its various environments (Kreitner 62)”. Miller was not a priority to its former owner Philip Morris, and a number of marketing failures made matters worse. In 1994, the company accounted for 23% of the industry share and by the time Mr. Adami arrived, the share was down to 17% (Carter). The company was in decline and the focus was to manage the decline. Norman Adami was hired and immediately changed the culture of the company, bringing about a new sense of urgency as well as a more aggressive campaign mentality. Along with his style of leadership, Mr. Adami was persistent in recruiting experienced executives to surround him with an elite team. In result, the company has a higher level of morale and sales growth since 2004.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    globally dispersed R&D subsidiaries were studied from 1995 to 2002. Data were collected from a postal survey, field and telephone interviews, and secondary sources.…

    • 8842 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics