Preview

How Supreme Court Decisoins have affected American Society.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1883 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Supreme Court Decisoins have affected American Society.
The Supreme Court has been given credit and blame for having a wide range of effects on society. The decisions that they have made on current and past issues have initiated change in American society. These changes have had both positive and negative results. The effects of their decisions have ranged from improving the status of certain ethnic groups to limiting the procedures of law enforcers and clearly defining the rights of lawbreakers. In essence, Supreme Court decisions have had a profound influence on the behaviors of citizens as well as the political structure of this nation.

The decisions of justices have "altered behavior of political and governmental officials as well as a man walking down the street"(Miller 4). To understand the role of the Supreme Court in the American system then one must pay attention to the social impact of court decisions. "The supreme court has assumed the task (of)...enforcing a law known to all, of deciding what law ought to be and making any changes called for" (Knight 1). Decisions are made by the Justices from conflicting principles not because of the law, but because of an evaluation of what impact the decision will have on American society.

The Supreme Court has had a greater important impact then any other government institution on society as a whole. The decisions have affected people's behavior as individuals and social institutions such as the family and economy (Baum 318). The decisions of the Supreme Court justices have "affected the social behavior of people by influencing...(their) thinking and the structures in which they operate"(Baum 319).

"Change is the primary characteristic of American Society" (Miller 4). Change must also exist in American law. As society progresses and changes, the Court must address injustices as a result of change and determine criteria for a particular decision (Miller 5). As stated earlier, the Supreme Court decisions have initiated both political and social change (Baum 319). The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Since its creation in the late 18th century, the Supreme Court has made numerous decisions that impacted the course of history. The Supreme Court has a very important job, to interpret the constitution principles and make decisions based on these important standards. Had it not been for the rulings made by this court, many laws and precedents may not have been adapted. One case that had an exceptionally important impact on history was the case of Muller vs. Oregon. This case is one of the most influential decisions in Supreme Court history and its impacts are still seen even today.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alfonso Lopez Case Summary

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Perhaps one of the most seminal Supreme Court decisions was the case of United States v. Alfonso Lopez (1995). After nearly a half-century of decisions by the Court in favor of expanded federal power via the Constitution’s Interstate Commerce Clause, the Justices issued a ruling limiting the reach of Congress, signaling a seismic shift on the Court’s interpretation of the Clause. The Court’s decision also sent a strong statement to Congress regarding the legislative body’s jurisdiction over a bevy of activities with a nexus to interstate commerce — from gun control to environmental protection to education.…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court is supposed to interpret the Constitution as it pertains to each case before the court. These decisions then affect public policy and application of the laws. Sometimes laws can be rendered nullified or unenforceable. In some newer cases that deal with internet or other technologies not present at the time of creation, extend beyond the reach of the Constitution, the Supreme Court must interpret how the Constitutional laws should affect the case. This affects the way U. S. society sees the Constitution as it pertains to them.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At no time in this century was the devotion to that principle more vigorously evoked than in 1937, when Franklin Roosevelt introduced a plan to increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court. The conflict set off by the President's plan is more understandable when viewed in the historical context of expanding judicial power as well as in the contemporary context of pro- and anti-New Deal politics.…

    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the years 1952 to 1969 Earl Warren was selected as President of the Supreme court. The Warren Court issued multiple rulings that were challenged in the context of criminal investigations. Warren along with seventeen members in court played an important role in some decisions that were approved. These decisions affected the change of a more conservative court. The Warren Court showed a more liberal outlook. Among these judges were some who were firm and responsible in the decisions for their opinions. To conclude, to this day the Supreme Court has a very important role in the American legal system and this is due to the term that their decisions become law, affecting the following cases throughout the…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the case getting major attention and making it very historical, it bought the Judicial Branch of the legislature on an all the more even power premise with the Legislative and Executive Branches. The Founding fathers expected the braches of government to go about as balanced governance on one another. In spite of the fact that the quick impact of the choice was to deny energy to the court, its long-run impact has been to expand the Court’s energy by building up the tenet that it is insistently the area and obligation of the legal division to say what the law is. Since this case, the Supreme Court has been the last authority of the legality…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The lower courts tell the high court what they have and that helps the Supreme Court decision more easier. Also all justices have oral arguments to hear one another's saying to making the decision. 5. Briefly discuss the cases of Plessy V. Ferguson (1896) and Brown V. Board of Education (1954). Explain why each is an example of “activism” or “restraint”…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 2098 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Supreme Court of the United States of America often makes decisions, which change this great nation in а great way. Often there is а disagreement over their decision: the court itself is often split. The impact of the Courts decision creates discussions and on occasion, violence. This is what happened in the case of Mіrаndа v. Arizona in 1966, this case proven to be one of the most controversial cases in the history of this great nation and its people (Mіrаndа v. Arizona, 1966). This case changed history of this country and left а tremendous impact, which many tried to revisit and change in some way or another.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout the years there has been many cases in the United States that have been controversial. Although, there are only a select few of those cases that have been able to reach the top court, the Supreme Court. Even then not all of the cases that reached Supreme Court gained the status of being a landmark Supreme Court case. Each of these cases that gained the status of a landmark Supreme Court case was by embedding some type of societal impact that lasts to the United States such as, Miranda v. Arizona.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Hollow Hope, Gerald Rosenberg outlines the conditions under which the Supreme Court can accomplish significant social reform. It is through a Conditional Court model that the Supreme Court can overcome powerful constraints of limited rights, a lack of independence, and a shortage in implementation tools and move towards achieving change. In Brown v. Plata, the Supreme Court accomplishes significant social reform consistent with Rosenberg’s Conditional Court model based on an analysis of California’s prison population over time, a measure of the Court’s goal in this case.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scalia vs Breyer

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia rejects the notion of a “living Constitution,” arguing that the judges must try to understand what the framers meant at the time the text was written. (pg 92) Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer contends that in finding the meaning of the Constitution, judges cannot neglect to consider the probable consequences of different interpretations. In a YouTube video I watched a debate with Breyer and Scalia, the first question asked was regarding purpose and consequence. Breyer Stated that he agrees with text, history, tradition ,precedence, purpose , and consequence , however he feels people emphasize more on text, history, tradition, and precedence and try to avoid , purpose and consequence. However Scalia felt that purpose and consequence invite subjective judgment. He gave an example stating “ If the purpose of the statue is to protect civil rights and if you do not interpret it this limitation on it you will protect civil rights all the more, and therefore you should adopt that interpretation. The problem is the limitation in its statue adopted by the legislature is as much apart of its purpose as protecting is the general purpose of protecting civil rights.”( stated in video) He also argued that he doesn’t agree with peoples interpretation because they pick out the consequences they do and do not like and interpret it according to how they feel about it.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gideon V. Wainwright

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Since the Supreme Court was established in 1789, it has ruled on some of the biggest issues in the United States. Most of the rulings by the Supreme Court effect Americans everyday. Earl Warren was the 14th chief justice of the Supreme Court and saw some of the most important cases in the history of the United States and many are still in effect today. The Warren court heavily believed in improving the civil liberties of the people. His ruling on Gideon v. Wainwright is no different.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Landmark Court Case

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    morality of the justices and the mind set of the generation it occurred during. For…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The appointment of a Supreme Court Justice is an rare event of major significance in American politics. Each appointment is significant because of the large amount of judicial power the Supreme Court exercises. Appointments are scarce, and some presidents may not even have to deal with a vacancy on the Court. The Constitution allow helps protect the Court’s independence from the President and Congress. When there is a vacancy in the Supreme Court, there are decisions that have to be made to fill that seat.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Llb Exam Paper

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. ‘The emphasis on diversity in the judiciary is unnecessary. The culture of any judiciary is by nature conservative and there is no evidence that an unrepresentative judiciary would or does come to different decisions than a representative one.’…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays