Preview

Llb Exam Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
360 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Llb Exam Paper
As published on the Laws VLE Nov 2010
Common Law Reasoning and Institutions
The research essay topics for the 2010–11 academic year are:
1. Analyse the adequacy and relevance of the crime control and due process models for understanding criminal justice, with reference to the jurisdiction you are in and/or England and Wales.

(crime control + due process models ( criminal justice)

2. ‘It is healthy that the civil justice system is adversarial. This would ensure that only claims or defences that are worthy would stay the course.’
Analyse this statement in light of research on the actual operation of civil justice systems. You can refer to any jurisdiction.

(Civil justice system is adversarial ( healthy)

3. ‘A core function of any Supreme Court is to challenge, or even strike down, legislation that the judiciary regards as incorrect. By denying the Supreme Court for the United Kingdom this function, a Supreme Court has been created in name but not in function. It would be better if no change had been made at all.’
Discuss.

(Supreme court’s core function ( deny supreme court)

4. ‘The emphasis on diversity in the judiciary is unnecessary. The culture of any judiciary is by nature conservative and there is no evidence that an unrepresentative judiciary would or does come to different decisions than a representative one.’
Discuss.

(Diversity is unnecessary (unrepresentative come to different decisions )

5. ‘The HRA 1998 has had little impact upon protecting the basic liberties of British subjects and could be repealed without any consequence.’
Discuss.

(HRA 1998 has little impact ( protect basic liberties and repealed without consequence)

6. ‘Judicial precedent is best understood as a practice of the courts and not as a set of binding rules. As a practice it could be refined or changed by the courts as they wish.’
Discuss.

(案例 ( can be a practice not rules ( refined and changed by courts)

University of London
Common

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Horshoe Crab

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    B.) Judges should have the power to look beyond the written “letter of the law” in making their decisions. Judges should rule on precedents, however, sometimes a court will depart from the rule of precedent if it decides that the precedent should no longer be followed. For example, if a court decides that a ruling precedent is simply incorrect or that technological or social changes have rendered the precedent inapplicable, the court might rule contrary to the precedent.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The independence of the judiciary from the executive and legislative is said to kept by things like their fixed salaries and sub judice rule. Their salaries ‘are paid from the Consolidated Fund’ and aren’t fixed or changeable by Parliament or the government which keeps the judiciary free from political pressure in terms of finance. The sub judice rule is where the MPs in the House of Commons are unable to comment on current or pending cases. This keeps the judiciary free from political interference and prevents prejudice against judicial decisions. This rule is followed by ministers and civil servants too. Judges are said to be kept neutral because they lack politically ‘partisan activity’ as they don’t comment on ‘matters of public policy’ and avoid siding with different party governments. Another way the judiciary has been made increasingly independent and neutral is the changed position of the Lord Chancellor following the ‘2005 Constitutional Reform Act as he was previously the ‘head of the judiciary, the presiding officers of the House of Lords and a member of the Cabinet’. This Act removed his judicial role and transferred it to the Lord Chief Justice while also separating the ‘law lords’ from the House of Lords via the ‘establishment of a new Supreme Court’ in 2009. This again, separates the judiciary from the legislature and executive which enhances independence and neutrality.…

    • 2833 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The decisions of justices have "altered behavior of political and governmental officials as well as a man walking down the street"(Miller 4). To understand the role of the Supreme Court in the American system then one must pay attention to the social impact of court decisions. "The supreme court has assumed the task (of)...enforcing a law known to all, of deciding what law ought to be and making any changes called for" (Knight 1). Decisions are made by the Justices from conflicting principles not because of the law, but because of an evaluation of what impact the decision will have on American society.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    two schools of criminology: the school of classics and the school of positivist. Simply put, the school of classics focused more on the crime and punishment of the criminal whereas the school of positivist focused on the criminal and how to typically “rehabilitate the criminal” in order to prevent the crime. Note that while there may be two distinct schools with differing ideas, there cannot be such a case that is so one sided that fits under that school exclusively, rather it must be a “combination of classical and positivist principles” (Kubrin 9). However,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essentially the judiciary thrives as a noteworthy system that has been rooted in British history for numerous years. It substantiates to be an efficient system that functions smoothly. So much so that other countries have been influenced to directly copy the system in Britain, many countries are still changing and evolving their current systems to meet the needs of their societies. The British judiciary is widely regarded as one of the best and most independent systems in the world. However the question pondered recently is how independent and neutral is the British judiciary?…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    That the Supreme Court exercises a policy making role has been an established fact ever since Maybury vs. Madison defined the Court’s role in judicial review of existing law. By choosing which cases to review and by establishing precedents by way interpretation of a law’s meaning and applicability the Court influences the course of action adopted not only by government but by individuals and businesses who consider the implications of the Court’s actions. In adjudicating disagreements of alternative interpretations of a law the Supreme Court establishes policies which have implications extending beyond the specific case in question and into social policy at large. In choosing which cases to review the Court calls attention to certain issues…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Systems

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This paper is about a court case, different types of federal and state courts, and new technology used in court cases.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The Human Rights Act 1998 came in to force in October 2000 and had a big impact on current legislation in UK.” (Tassoni. P, 2007, pg. 115)…

    • 3518 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The adversarial model of litigation is the system of justice that we use in the United States. The adversary model relies on each advocate to represent their cause or party and ultimately a jury to come to a finding. Justice has been served when one advocate is able to convince the judge or jury that they are in the right. Our legal system was created in order to find the truth in injustices and restore justice. Over the years many people have found faults in our adversarial model of litigation as they believe the main goal of the legal system has gone astray. The system has gained criticism in which we will further discuss in this paper.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The contest of strength between the Crime Control Model and the Due Process Model is similar to attempting to satisfy every person, each and every second and no one some of the time. Debates are good for both models, but for all growth on one side, there must be one on the opposing side as well. The Crime Control Model, prosecutor or the police, is not in favor for the Due Process Model, a person, to have more rights than they do. Each and every individual who is a United States citizen should know what his or her rights are.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Secondly, “in a criminal court case, the prosecutor must establish the guilt of the defendant, but in a civil court case, the plaintiff must only establish the liability of the defendant. In the former, the defendant is either guilty or not guilty of a crime, while in the latter, the defendant is either responsible or not for monetary damages suffered by the plaintiff. In civil court cases, the plaintiff should only win by a preponderance of evidence,…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ”The uncertainties surrounding the scope and exercise of the royal prerogative give rise to serious constitutional questions concerning the rule of law in a democratic society.”…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The doctrine of precedent, or stare decisis, lies at the heart of the English legal system. The doctrine refers to the fact that within the hierarchical structure of the English courts, a decision of a higher court will be binding on a court lower that is in that hierarchy. In general terms this means that when judges try cases they will check to see if a similar situation has come before a court previously. If the precedent was set by a court of equal or higher status to the court deciding the new case, then the judge in the present case should follow the rule of law established in the earlier case. Where the precedent is from a lower court in the hierarchy, the judge in the new case may not follow but will certainly consider it. It is noted that the doctrine of precedent depends for its operation upon the principle that the courts form a hierarchy with each court standing in a definite position in relation to every other court. The structure of this hierarchy must now be considered for the purposes if the doctrine of precedent. Decisions of the highest courts are binding on lower courts. The House of Lords decisions are binding on all other courts in the legal system, except the House of Lords itself.…

    • 2223 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal System

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the light of these judicial statements, discuss how (if at all) the doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty may be said to have altered because of changes to the doctrine of implied repeal. Consider also the effect of increased secondary legislation, devolution, membership of the EU and adoption of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the doctrine of Parliamentary…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics