Preview

Discusion Questions His301

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
563 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discusion Questions His301
Week 2 Discussion Questions
Charlotte McGuffey
HIS/301
July 29, 2013
Christina Winn

Week 2 Discussion Questions
How does the Supreme Court affect U. S. society today?
The Supreme Court is supposed to interpret the Constitution as it pertains to each case before the court. These decisions then affect public policy and application of the laws. Sometimes laws can be rendered nullified or unenforceable. In some newer cases that deal with internet or other technologies not present at the time of creation, extend beyond the reach of the Constitution, the Supreme Court must interpret how the Constitutional laws should affect the case. This affects the way U. S. society sees the Constitution as it pertains to them.
Why does Constitutional interpretation change from court to court?
Constitutional interpretation changes from court to court because each case is unique and each presiding judge has a different opinion on the Constitution. The Framers made the Constitution so that it only changes throw new Amendments but each person can interpret the Amendments as they pertain to each court case. Each state also has their perspective on the Constitution and this also affects the interpretation from court to court.
How do Presidential elections affect the Supreme Court?
Presidential elections affect the Supreme Court depending on what political party the president is. This affects who the President nominates for any vacancies in the Supreme Court at the time of election. In some cases, such as when Clinton won over Bush, there were several vacancies that Bush did not fill so the Democrat-controlled Congress withheld action on Bush’s nominees. Because Congress did this, when Clinton come into office he filled those vacancies with Democratic nominees.

What side would you take in the debates between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists? Why did the Federalists win in 1788?
I am a person who sees both sides of an argument, but I would like to think I would choose

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Before the election, if President Obama was not able to get the Senate to approve his United States Supreme Court applicant, the next president would potentially be responsible for filling the vacant spots on the court over the term due to possible retirements and deaths. If a Republican is elected president, the court could continue to issue decisions that are favorable to conservatives in the many cases it hears. If a Democrat is elected president, the court could shift towards a more liberal direction. How the new president forms the court will differ depending on which party controls the Senate after the…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since its creation in the late 18th century, the Supreme Court has made numerous decisions that impacted the course of history. The Supreme Court has a very important job, to interpret the constitution principles and make decisions based on these important standards. Had it not been for the rulings made by this court, many laws and precedents may not have been adapted. One case that had an exceptionally important impact on history was the case of Muller vs. Oregon. This case is one of the most influential decisions in Supreme Court history and its impacts are still seen even today.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    USpreme Court Case Study

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    United States Supreme Court cases are argued and decided on Constitutional grounds. All arguments and decisions are based on interpretations of the original Constitution and, more often, on Constitutional amendments.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It refers to applying the current interpretation and apply it to current situations. As time progresses the Supreme Court adapts the Constitution for current situation because over time some older laws/rules have needed to be re-clarified and updated. This applies to Judicial Review(Supreme Court, and others) to "declare unconstitutional federal or state laws and other acts of government"(Schmidt P.52). This the same for Presidential Acts and Congressional Legislation as for of informal ways, Presidential Acts are most effective because of the power and president is someone we all follow and look up to so it will have a bigger impact on our lives per say if the supreme court ratified…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conflict that took place in the 1790’s between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists made a huge impact on American History. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists and focused mainly on the city businesses as well as manufacturing interests of the seaports. On the other side, the Anti-Federalists whom were led by Thomas Jefferson represented the rural farmers and southern interests. With the Federalists favoring more federal involvement and the anti-federalists advocating states rights, this debate between the two concerned the central government versus that of the states.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What sorts of men drafted the Constitution in 1787, and how representative were they of all Americans? What explains the differences between the Federalists and the Anti-federalist? Do you think they shared the same vision of what they wanted America to become? How widespread was the popular backing for the Constitution, and what accounts for its ratification?…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role of the Supreme Court is to interpret the constitution and to apply these interpretations to legislation that has been made by Congress as to avoid them from making unconstitutional law. In doing so this is called judicial review in which the Supreme Court takes an active role in intervening in politics. If a law is suggested as being unconstitutional the Supreme Court will either accept or decline and if they accept, this will result in the judiciary then looking at the case and determining whether or not the accusation is true or if the question is entitled to make a claim. In some instances this can be taken too far by the court and they can intervene and end up making a substantial decision on some very controversial issues which would be deemed as unfair by one of the parties, other times their intervention is adequate and justified. I will argue that they are not politically neutral due to the appointment process; however I think they are less like politicians in disguise and more just actively doing their job and interpreting the constitution as how it is supposed to be.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States is a document representing the supreme law do the land. Supreme Court Justices are vested with the power of evaluating this document with corresponding laws and coming up with judgment on their relevancy and constitutionality. However, justices often find themselves at odds on how to decipher the documents original meaning; much like in Obergefell vs Hodges, where Justices Kennedy and Roberts disagree on how the Constitution should be interpreted. In a "Concise Guide to the Federalist Papers," written by Gregory Maggs, the “original meaning” of the constitution is broken down into three different definitions that can be used as foundations for assessing the logic that stems from court opinions. Based off…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aaron Harker

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Through judicial review, the Supreme Court plays a key role in interpreting the meaning of words and phrases in the Constitution.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    New Deal Or Not New Deal

    • 1060 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I believe that the Court has a major role in government. The Courts are obliged to interpret the Constitution and to clarify laws and acts that seem to be in conflict with the Constitution. This is the primary objective of the Court system. To say that the Court has overstepped its authority in defining commerce would be to take the purpose of the Court from the Court. Also, to say that the Court has met its obligation and should now stay out is to say that the framers ideal of checks and balances has worked and is no longer needed in this matter. But my question is how can it be done if the Constitution is a living document that is always changing and never static. In my opinion, the mere fact that these debates over the interpretation of what commerce means and how it is defined is the very reason the Court system was incorporated into our government. This is why the debate seems a bit lopsided in my opinion.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I will concede that you are correct in part, at least on some level. It is obvious that the Court, as conceived by the Framers, is designed to be separate from the vagaries of regular political office. For example, in Article I of the Constitution, the Senate and the House of Representatives are subject to proscribed terms and limitations. In Article II, the President is subject to even more stringent restrictions and a limited term as well. Article III, however, states that judges are to “hold their Offices during good Behavior,” and therefore are not elected by popular vote.…

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Judicial Review

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court’s powers include many different things. They are the highest court within the judicial branch of the United States government. They are oftentimes the deciding factor when it comes to cases that derive from lower courts. Supreme Court justices are guaranteed a life long term and are appointed by the President (U.S. History). However, the Supreme Court has much more power than just listening to cases day by day. They are highly experienced individuals within their realm of expertise and they oftentimes find themselves checking to see if the executive and legislative branches of the United States government are abiding by the Constitution.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Restraints

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The grave problem, however, which courts are often faced with is this: on the one hand, there is no doubt that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and prevails over statutes and executive decisions, and it is for the Courts to interpret the Constitution. On the other hand, in the garb of interpretation, the Court must not seek an unnecessary confrontation with the legislature, particularly since the legislature consists of representatives democratically elected by the people.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do Judges Make Law

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Supreme Court justices must interpret the broadly worded provisions of the Constitution and decide the meaning of vague terms that protect "liberty" or prevent government from the "establishment of religion" or from imposing "cruel and unusual punishment."…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Supreme Court and the High Court were established by the Constitution. The Supreme Court is defined as the Court of Final Appeal, but usually hears appeals only on points of law. Its decisions as to the interpretation of the Constitution and the law are final. The High Court also has authority to interpret the Constitution. It tries the most serious criminal and civil cases, and hears certain appeals from lower courts. When sitting as a criminal court it is called the Central Criminal Court and there is a jury.…

    • 3897 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays