Preview

Essay On Judicial Review

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
573 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Judicial Review
The Supreme Court’s powers include many different things. They are the highest court within the judicial branch of the United States government. They are oftentimes the deciding factor when it comes to cases that derive from lower courts. Supreme Court justices are guaranteed a life long term and are appointed by the President (U.S. History). However, the Supreme Court has much more power than just listening to cases day by day. They are highly experienced individuals within their realm of expertise and they oftentimes find themselves checking to see if the executive and legislative branches of the United States government are abiding by the Constitution. Judicial Review is simply the act of the Supreme Court ensuring that the fundamentals of the United States Constitution are being upheld. This can be dated back to the case of Marbury versus Madison in 1803. William Marbury had been selected to serve as justice of the peace. Since the selection was made during the final hours of John Adams’ presidency, James Madison (Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state) …show more content…
Separation of Church and State in the United States has been a touchy topic in recent history. With the phrase “Under God” being removed from the Pledge of Allegiance, it’s making some people wonder if the interference of lawmakers in the topic of religion is really necessary. According to Brendan Kelly of Opposing News, one lawyer from California is stating that the phrase, “In God We Trust” should be removed from all currency because it violates First Amendment rights (Kelly, 1). Judicial review has been an effective way of the judicial branch to make sure that the fundamentals of the Constitution are being upheld. No matter what the case is, there always needs to be some sort of checks and balances within the government to make sure that everybody is on the same
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs. Madison Case
    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marbury Vs. Madison Case

    . Judicial review is usually associated with the U.S Supreme Court and is processed by most state and federal courts of law in the United States. Judicial review also determines whether or not state statues and state executive acts are valid. Judicial review came to part in 1803 where the Marbury VS Madison case was going on it was the first time they ruled the congress unconstitutional. The exercise of judicial review is about the important rules of judicial self-restraint which also allows the burden of proof to be…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs. Madison Case: Judicial Review
    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marbury Vs. Madison Case: Judicial Review

    There were significance of the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison. The Marbury v. Madison case created the judicial review. In the judicial review, Chief Justice John Marshall extended the power of the Supreme Court. He set out three principles. The first principle was that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. The second principle was when a conflict emerges between the Constitution and any other law the Constitution must be followed. The final principle was that the Judicial branch has a duty to approve the Constitution. The powers of judicial review served as an important check on the legislative (law making) branch. The courts must be able to cancel any unconstitutional laws. The Marbury v. Madison case started when John Adams…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Craig Constitutional Interpretation: Chief Justice John Marshall
    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Craig Constitutional Interpretation: Chief Justice John Marshall

    Marbury v Madison was the influential case that the Supreme Court cites as a precedent when employing judicial review. It left the power to be rested on the judicial branch when determining to uphold either the law or the Constitution. By establishing the right to judicial review, Marshall, with the support of the legislative and executive branches, made all cases before the courts subservient to the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Franklin D. Roosevelt's Plan to Expand Judicial Power in 1937
    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page

    Franklin D. Roosevelt's Plan to Expand Judicial Power in 1937

    In the early national period, the judiciary was the weakest of the three branches of government. When Chief Justice John Marshall established the principle of judicial review in MarburyMadison by declaring an act of Congress unconstitutional, he greatly strengthened the judiciary. Even though the high court exercised this prerogative only one other time prior to the Civil War (Dred Scott v. Sanford), the establishment of judicial review made the judiciary more of an equal player with the executive and legislative branches.…

    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    ap gov courts
    • 718 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ap gov courts

    3. Marbury v Madison introduced the concept of judicial review. Judicial review allows the judiciary to check the actions of the executive and legislative branches if it is believe that these bodies did not act in accordance to the constitution. By bringing about judicial review, Marbury v Madison strengthened the system of checks and balances.…

    • 718 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs. Madision
    • 549 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marbury Vs. Madision

    The Judicial Branch consists of the Supreme Court and the judges, and the Supreme Court interprets the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court deals with cases involving the Constitution , the federal laws, treaties and disputes between the states. It does the job its set up to do and the job only, on what powers are allowed by the Constitution. The Constitution is very clear about the position of the Supreme Court as stated in Article III. “The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in One Supreme Court and in such inferior courts that the congress may from time to time ordain and establish.: “The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under the Constitution, the laws of the United States and Treaties.”…

    • 549 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Essay On How Was The Constitution Used To Establish Our Government
    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Essay On How Was The Constitution Used To Establish Our Government

    Why or why not? Our group believes that the U.S. Supreme Court should have the power to declare an act of congress unconstitutional. The reasoning is judicial review is one of the most important checks on the leg of the Executive Branch within the system of checks and balances. If the Supreme Court could not use judicial review over acts of congress the judicial branch would have little power to stop congress from performing a unconstitutional act such as overruling the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment which gave all citizens the right to protection under the law, or ignoring the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which gave all people the rights equal to those of all…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Are civil liberties protected sufficiently in the UK?
    • 1086 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Are civil liberties protected sufficiently in the UK?

    Judicial review is a process that is conducted in the Supreme Court that hears an appeal over lawfulness of a case. It is not focused on the rights and wrongs of…

    • 1086 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Marshall Essay
    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Marshall Essay

    Under Article III of the Constitution, the Marbury vs. Madison case was a landmark petition that gave new authorization to the Judicial Review. The Marbury vs. Madison case was unique because it helped define a previously grey argument on the boundaries between the Executive and Judicial branches of the United States Government. William Marbury was the person directly responsible for the petition on this issue. Marbury issued the court to demand Madison to commission his documents. Madison refused to do so claiming that Marbury’s petition was unconstitutional. The decision on the issue was that Marbury did in fact have the right to his commission, however the court did not have to power to force Madison to give it up. This extremely unique scenario on a very important issue raised the authority for the Judicial Review because the Federal court has the obligation to not only satisfy itself but the lower courts. The decision on this case…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs. Madison: The Supreme Court
    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marbury Vs. Madison: The Supreme Court

    The Judicial Act of 1789 gave Congress the act of granting the Supreme Court the right to issue writs of mandamus. Article III of the Constitution grants the Supreme Court the authority to review acts of Congress to validate whether they are unconstitutional or not and therefore void. Article III of the Constitution also states "the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be a party. In all other cases, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction." The Supreme Court held that they had the authority to review acts of Congress and determine whether or not they were constitutional and void those that were not, but that Congress did not have the right to expand the scope of the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction beyond what was specified in the Constitution. The Supreme Court also held that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional and therefore void.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    United State Supreme Court Research Paper
    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    United State Supreme Court Research Paper

    to the acts of the lower federal courts. In general, the United State Supreme Court plays a special role in our constitutional system of government. Because it has power to judicial review and protects civil rights, so people call it the last resort looking for justice. The other function is the United State Supreme Court has power to examine or determine whether federal and state statutes conform to the constitution.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Branch Essay
    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Judicial Branch Essay

    The Current Power of the Branches of Our Federal Government An Opinion Brandon Parrish Fairmont State University…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Importance Of Under God In The Pledge Of Allegiance
    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Importance Of Under God In The Pledge Of Allegiance

    The pledge of allegiance has remained an important part of the American legacy and culture. It takes part in the American school system, in American sports, and in many other areas. Many say that the pledge holds a place in their hearts, where it allows them to show their pride for their country. But in this pledge there are two words that have a tendency ring in the ears of many Americans, “under god.” In a country that is proud of the separation of church and state, we leave these words in a pledge that is said everyday by millions of Americans who believe and trust the right of separation of church of state yet we fail to do this for a major component in American culture. The words “under god” hold little meaning and should not be placed in the pledge of allegiance, they should be removed permanently.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Activism In Canada
    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Judicial Activism In Canada

    By making decisions regarding the interest of the society the courts assume responsibilities that belong exclusively to the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court justices may rule based on what is in their best interest while saying that they are deciding for the good of the society. Moreover, when the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected, they may not be the representatives of the public’s view. As a result, judges begin making policy decisions about social or political changes society should make and become “unelected legislators.” By freely interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, the communities’ confidence in the Supreme Court will be undermined. When judicial activism in the Supreme Court wields too much power, it can eventually destruct the essence of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Judicial Branch
    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Judicial Branch

    Hamilton argues in the federalist No. 78, which branches of government, specifically the judicial branch and how it’s the weakest branch of government. Hamilton believes that the Judicial branch only has the power to judge on laws, but does not alter the actual final decisions on what the laws people need to uphold. Hamilton recognizes that you need all three branches to make a successful government function and that the judicial branch is the least powerful of the three. The legislative branch makes the laws, executive branch enforces these laws and lastly the Judicial branch needs to understand the laws that are being put forth. Being the least dangerous branch of government it still has its checks and balances being able to hold one another to be accountable for each other, but also as a Judicial branch can keep the other branches in alignment.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics