Preview

Lao Tzu and Machiavelli's View of "The People"

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
987 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lao Tzu and Machiavelli's View of "The People"
Azhar A. Sapargaliyeva
Professor Hammerbeck
Introduction to Critical Issues
18 September 2012

Compare Lao Tzu’s and Machiavelli’s view of “the people”. How does each author’s conceptualization of “the people” affect what kind of government they support?

Life experience, culture, language, time of living and many other factors affected Lao Tzu’s and Niccolò Machiavelli’s views on how an ideal leader ought to govern a country. These views, expressed in their texts, reflected on how these writers perceived the fellow men. Lao Tzu is a Chinese philosopher and founder of Daoism. He is the author of a philosophical document called “Tao-te Ching”. Niccoló Machiavelli, is a 15th century aristocrat and a writer, mostly famous for his political treatise, “The Prince”. This essay will attempt to analyze both authors’ views on human nature and the way these views affected the types of government supported.
As mentioned above different lives of Lao Tzu and Machiavelli influenced their images of human nature. Lao Tzu worked in the court of the ruling dynasty and lived a quite stable and peaceful life in around the 5th century B.C.E. Whereas Machiavelli lived during the time of political turmoil in Italy. He was suspected of conspiring against the royal family and was even tortured for that (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Thus, these different living conditions led both philosophers to think of “the people” differently: Lao Tzu had a positive opinion of individuals, which is contrary to that of Machiavelli’s suspicious and cynical image of “the people”. This is important to analyze because these views in some way determined the way they portrayed an ideal government.
Lao Tzu, in his “Tao-te Ching”, has an optimistic, almost idealistic perception of “the people”. His proposed attitude for the ruler to have toward citizens resembles that of parents toward a child. They treat the child with love and care. At the same time they let go of restrictions and rules, so



Cited: Britannica Online Encyclopedia. Democracy. 15 Sep. 2012. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/157129/democracy> Britannica Online Encyclopedia. Dictatorship. 14 Sep. 2012. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/ 162240/dictatorship> Britannica Online Encyclopedia. Monarchy. 15 Sep. 2012. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/ 388855/monarchy> Jacobus. Lee A. A World of Ideas. Boston: Bedford / St. Martins, 2010. 925-28. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Niccolò Machavelli. 8 Sep. 2009. 14 Sep. 2012. <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/machiavelli/>

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hongwu apply Machiavelli’s teaching by making people to fear him.From the class handout, it said ”Men will quickly offend a beloved person; but fear creates a dread of punishment which never fail.” this quote explained that people can easily betray a beloved leader but not a fearful leader.It also showed us that a king should make people to fear, scared about…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both Lao-tzu and Machiavelli seem to have a clear-cut view on how they believe the government should run. In some ways, both men have very similar ideas; more often, though, they couldn't be more opposed. A few similarities brought forth are that people in power must not strive to make everyone happy, nor must they be considered unmerciful and they should avoid being despised. The final view they both share is that they believe if the common people think they are happy, then whomever is in power will not fear for their power. However, it seems for each similarity they have, several oppositions occur in their place. From the way they believe how a leader should govern, especially in times of war, to the way that they feel about simple lies shows us how different Lao-tzu and Machiavelli's opinions really are.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When compared to Machiavelli, Lao-Tzu's views are quite different, he believes that there exist a model system that a ruler should use to govern; wherein, the government should ideally have minimum involvement in the lives of its…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The understanding of human nature and the effects it has on the individual and society has been a serious topic in the philosophical world. Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were well known for their crucial roles in forming the foundation of political philosophy. While reading through Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan, both introduced a common focus on political theory even though living approximately 100 years apart. While learning about these two philosophers and their proposed theories, I noticed an innate relationship in the discussion of society’s human nature. Machiavelli ([1532] 2006) in The Prince theorizes the qualities that a dominant leader should have to gain and maintain power.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Machiavelli, no matter how extreme, violent at times, rigorous, and blunt he may come across, by setting examples and guides structured around the utilization of ruthlessness and egocentric cunning as the process of gaining political power, showed what a clear mind he had on what it takes to be an awe-inspiring leader, master of the art of winning a battle, and conquering lands. In this paper, by comparing the two, human nature and political potency, through the use of different ideologies of both, Plato and Machiavelli, corroborated that they were very powerful, unparalleled influences in the philosophy of human nature and the processes of political power as theorist of their…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the chapter assigned, Machiavelli asserts that it is not only acceptable, but necessary for a ruler to go back on his word if his previous promises place him at a disadvantage. In this paper, I will argue that the purpose of this passage is to persuade readers of the notion that being a good leader many times involves actions that would not be considered “good” as such. Then, I will use examples from the text to explain how this falls into Machiavelli’s overall themes of efficiency and pragmatism, and how this makes for a logical method of ruling.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sir Thomas More’s Utopia presents a more justified stance on the role of the government and the authority of a ruler compared to Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince, because More’s policy emphasizes that the government is for the people, and people are a product of their ruler. A message conveyed in The Prince states that it is better to be feared than loved. Machiavelli’s negative perception on human nature leads to ineffective policies because he inaccurately views men as “ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, and covetous” who “have less scruple in offending one who is beloved than one who is feared, for love is preserved by the link of obligation which...is broken at every opportunity for their advantage” (Machiavelli). He uses a metaphor,…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the state is an organised community of individuals who cooperate and coordinate to live under a single political structure, good governance is necessary. Nicholas Machiavelli contrasts Plato's utopia attending a central problem of politics by practising power over individuals to achieve wellbeing to the state. This essay explores how philosophers approach the concept of power through the virtues shown in their respective works The Republic and The Prince.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hobbes and Machiavelli

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Based on the readings assigned this term, compare and contrast Machiavelli and Hobbes with regard to the purpose or end or goal of government and the form it should take. With regard to the purpose or end or goal of government, you should consider each thinker’s view of political motivation, paying particular attention to glory, peace, stability, and material advantage. With regard to the form of government, you should examine what each thinker makes of the relationship between the political leader(s), or the sovereign representative, on the one hand, and “the people,” or those who are represented, on the other. Be sure to consider ways in which the two thinkers give similar and different accounts of political phenomena. As with the first two papers, craft a well-structured discussion, with a clear thesis statement and with effective use of textual quotations and references. For the Machiavelli portion of your essay, you must cite passages from both The Prince and The Discourses on…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli Eassy

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Machiavelli differs from the many political theorists who offer conceptions of a “natural state,” a presocial condition arising solely from human instinct and character. But while Machiavelli never puts forth a vision of what society would be like without civil government, he nonetheless presents a coherent, although not particularly comprehensive, vision of human nature.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiavelli and Hobbes

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To be successful, one must have the appearance of virtuousness, but not necessarily be virtuous. At least, this appears to be true according to Niccolo Machiavelli's works. Machiavelli's idea of the virtuous republican citizen may be compared to Hobbes' idea of a person who properly understands the nature and basis of sovereign political power. Hobbes' ideas seem to suggest that most anyone can claim rightful authority as there is a belief in God, and one can under Hobbes, claim legitimate authority rather easily. There are few proofs. Machiavelli, on the other hand, takes a strong position and suggests specific criteria in terms of power. With Machiavelli, there is a sense of righteousness and fairness and while he does not sanction authoritarian rule to save man from himself, it is also true that Machiavelli puts a lot of faith in leaders also. In some respects, one can see that the two theorists agree yet Machiavelli's proposed Political society is more feasible thus superior to that of Hobbes.…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Both St. Augustine and Machiavelli believed that in order to understand the true nature of society you must see men for what they truly were. Augustine and Machiavelli are similar in their pessimistic views toward human nature, looking at human self-love and self-interest and believed it to be full of evil, cruelty, betrayal, violence and tied that relationship into the creation of war. For both philosophers a good society is actually something that for almost all men is an unreachable attribute that can only be written about and not actually fully experienced in my view. For Augustine I feel it is a truly heavenly earth where all men are divine and are as close to the city of Heaven as you can be on earth. For Machiavelli it is a state of complete acceptance of each man’s role and how that role fits into society like a puzzle piece. In order to examine each philosopher’s view further, we must break their thoughts into three separate categories which are: human nature, political authority, and religious beliefs. This essay will take an in-depth look at both St. Augustine and Machiavelli, compare and contrast their views, and provide evidence that on some level the two thinkers were very similar in their ideology.…

    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli was a political realist. He thought there were certain skills and characteristics needed to become a political ruler. In his work, The Prince, Machiavelli gives advice on how to be a successful prince, or ruler. "Successful" is partly based on how powerful a ruler was during his lifetime (reign), but largely based on how much the prince affected the lives, through laws or societal norms, of future generations. Machiavelli was mainly interested in attaining and keeping political power. He believed people were inherently selfish and would, by nature, not respect the law or work for the common good, without civic virtues. The only way to ‘control' these human urges was to instill national pride and mutual respect for all citizens of a state. The difference in Machiavellian thought, up to this point in history, from other philosophers was he believed political authority was no longer justified by religious or spiritual doctrines. Although Machiavelli believed this to be true, he still knew it was important for citizens to maintain a commitment for the common good, through national pride and respect. Another aspect of differing thought up to this point in time was Machiavelli knew promoting civic virtue in citizens needed to be coupled with the pursuit of individual liberty.…

    • 2552 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While in exile, Niccoló Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes wrote about their political views on how to inaugurate a sturdy government. During each of their lives, they both contributed political philosophies that had differences and similarities. In Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’s The Leviathan, their philosophies are portrayed on how to maintain a stable government. Hobbes is recognized as the founder of the most later Western political philosophy in response to the social contract theory he established in his 1651 book Leviathan. Machiavelli is also a founder of an important term that has a lot of meaning in history. He is the founder of “Machiavellianism”, the person considers their goals to be of prime importance and that any method may be used to achieve them.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jose Rizal

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Monarchy in general it is a government having a hereditary chief of state with life tenure and powers varying from nominal to absolute. Hence, According to Aristotle, monarchy is exercised over voluntary subjects, but limited to certain functions, the king was a general and a judge, and had control of religion. In other country, they have a monarchial system, a king is the most powerful, and in the Philippines today we have a democratic kind of government system which headed by President and other government officials.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays