Preview

Hobbes and Machiavelli

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
276 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hobbes and Machiavelli
Write an essay of no more than 2750 words on the following topic. Be sure to cite passages generously from the texts of Machiavelli and Hobbes (in quotation marks, of course). Since we’re all using the same translations of Machiavelli, you should cite by page number; since we have discussed Hobbes with reference to chapter and section number, you should cite this way: L 18.2.

You should not do any secondary reading for this paper. Your work should be based on your own thinking, your own reading of the assigned texts, and your own comprehension of the class lectures.

The paper is due March 22nd.

Write on the following topic:

Based on the readings assigned this term, compare and contrast Machiavelli and Hobbes with regard to the purpose or end or goal of government and the form it should take. With regard to the purpose or end or goal of government, you should consider each thinker’s view of political motivation, paying particular attention to glory, peace, stability, and material advantage. With regard to the form of government, you should examine what each thinker makes of the relationship between the political leader(s), or the sovereign representative, on the one hand, and “the people,” or those who are represented, on the other. Be sure to consider ways in which the two thinkers give similar and different accounts of political phenomena. As with the first two papers, craft a well-structured discussion, with a clear thesis statement and with effective use of textual quotations and references. For the Machiavelli portion of your essay, you must cite passages from both The Prince and The Discourses on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    HIS 105 Assignment 2

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For the next part of this assignment you will create an outline of the main points you want to address in this paper. This will sewe as the basis for your Assignment 2.2 Final Draft. (Note: Please use the Purdue Owl Website to assist you with this assignment; this website can be accessed at: https://owLen Fg_~h.purdue.edu/enfl&c~ementJ2/2/55!…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bus Law203

    • 2307 Words
    • 10 Pages

    You are to work on this assignment alone without assistance from others; however, you may use your text, class lectures and your notes in completing the assignment.…

    • 2307 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The objective of this assignment is to further introduce us to the some of the themes of the course and to start collecting basic information. Please be sure to take your time with the answers and support your conclusions. To receive full credit, please cite your sources where appropriate (this will help you later on).…

    • 277 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When comparing Hobbes,’ Sandel’s and Machiavelli’s viewpoints regarding which of Aristotle’s three main categories of knowledge is the most significant for establishing good political systems or making good political decisions, one must consider what each theorists considers to be a good political system and create a link between the two. The most important category of knowledge for establishing and making good political systems for Aristotle is practical knowledge, the purpose of politics is to produce good, virtuous citizens, the law promotes just actions, purpose of legislators is to establish good laws. The most important category of knowledge for Hobbes is scientific knowledge, the absolute sovereign represents the commonwealth of its citizens, the absolute sovereign must uphold their self preservation, and all laws…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nederman, Cary. "Niccolò Machiavelli." Stanford University. Stanford University, 13 Sept. 2005. Web. 25 Mar. 2014. .…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher of the 1600’s that tried to create a basis for politics. Having experienced the English civil war, Hobbes realized that the conflict was the result of human nature. Hobbes exclaimed that the world was full of greedy people and those who are selfless and care only for themselves. Without the government to maintain order, Hobbes said that there would be “a condition of war of everyone against everyone”. Hobbes noted that in order to stop this, the people would have to sacrifice their freedom for the government. In exchange, they gained law and order. He also notes that this sacrifice would allow the government to suppress any form of rebellion. Hobbes called this agreement the social contract.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    english writing paper

    • 2001 Words
    • 8 Pages

    I declare that I have no prior knowledge of the questions in this assessment and that I will not divulge to any person information about the questions.…

    • 2001 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes Vs Machiavelli

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page

    Lastly, both Hobbes and Machiavelli agree in their opinion of man what is one that is very negative. In the novel The Prince, Machiavelli states that men are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive, and deceiving, avoiders of danger, eager to gain” (Machiavelli < 1542 > 2006). Similarly, in the novel Leviathan, Hobbes states how the life of a man is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (Hobbes < 1651 > 2009). This shows how both Machiavelli and Hobbes see men and their lives as very negative aspects, but differ in what there perspectives are of it. Machiavelli explains how men are unreliable and not worth trusting when Hobbes is explaining how life naturally is terrible and without sovereignty, life and man are nothing.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This an essay based on this week’s assignment answering two question and quoting three main points from page 94.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many intellectual influences also shaped Hobbes’ ideas and philosophies. He collected ideas from classic works, and Calvinist psychology. He derived political philosophy that man want to possess things and human society is not naturally a collection of individuals who live together bound by the rules. He drew aspects from the scientific revolution such as Euclid’s method of deduction, the law of inertia, and many of Galileo’s discoveries. He was focused on arriving at self evident truths. Similarly to Machiavelli, Hobbes’ works are filled with ideas influenced by the violence that he witnessed in his lifetime.…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosopher Thomas Hobbes argued that government was best if it was autocratic, an all-powerful sovereign. To understand Hobbes’s reasoning, it is crucial to first understand his view on man’s conditions in an anarchic environment. In Hobbes’ perspective, man’s life in the state of nature was “solid, poor, brutish, and short” because man is selfish and violent. Without institutions to provide security, man was always in a constant state of war. These anarchic conditions compel men to look after their own self-interest causing many problems to arise. Hobbes advocated for a monarchic government on the domestic state level because a society needed a central authority with sufficient power to provide rules for government and security. On the international level, Hobbes believed that the system was best when governed by one country.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli V.S. Hobbes

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When reading Machiavelli’s ‘The Prince’ to anyone who is not a king his ideas would sound horrible, but what most people don’t know is that his ideas are everywhere in modern day society and most people agree with those ideas without even knowing that they do. Whether it’s history, presidential debates, or pop culture, Machiavelli’s words have lead to inspire many where as Hobbes hasn’t received as much acknowledgement and acceptance for his views. If you’d ask a group of people if they believe in the saying “It doesn’t matter where you’ve been, only where you going” or “It’s all about what you’re doing, it doesn’t matter what you’ve done” most people would agree with it, without knowing that is exactly what Machiavelli is trying to express in his book ‘The Prince.’…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    [ 2 ]. Lawrence F. Hundersmarck, "Niccolo Machiavelli. Great Thinkers of the Western World. HarperCollins Publishers, 1999,”…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Both St. Augustine and Machiavelli believed that in order to understand the true nature of society you must see men for what they truly were. Augustine and Machiavelli are similar in their pessimistic views toward human nature, looking at human self-love and self-interest and believed it to be full of evil, cruelty, betrayal, violence and tied that relationship into the creation of war. For both philosophers a good society is actually something that for almost all men is an unreachable attribute that can only be written about and not actually fully experienced in my view. For Augustine I feel it is a truly heavenly earth where all men are divine and are as close to the city of Heaven as you can be on earth. For Machiavelli it is a state of complete acceptance of each man’s role and how that role fits into society like a puzzle piece. In order to examine each philosopher’s view further, we must break their thoughts into three separate categories which are: human nature, political authority, and religious beliefs. This essay will take an in-depth look at both St. Augustine and Machiavelli, compare and contrast their views, and provide evidence that on some level the two thinkers were very similar in their ideology.…

    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Understanding of goodness of Philosopher Kings and Machiavelli’s Prince citizens and their characters and also essay question asks about two distinctive types of rulers so comparison of the two sides in terms of types of rule. Two different views exist between Plato and Machiavelli, both having different ideas on virtues, structure of government, and role of populace.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays