Preview

Utopia Vs Machiavelli's The Prince

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
365 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Utopia Vs Machiavelli's The Prince
Sir Thomas More’s Utopia presents a more justified stance on the role of the government and the authority of a ruler compared to Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince, because More’s policy emphasizes that the government is for the people, and people are a product of their ruler. A message conveyed in The Prince states that it is better to be feared than loved. Machiavelli’s negative perception on human nature leads to ineffective policies because he inaccurately views men as “ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, and covetous” who “have less scruple in offending one who is beloved than one who is feared, for love is preserved by the link of obligation which...is broken at every opportunity for their advantage” (Machiavelli). He uses a metaphor,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte is a well known political leader of the modern world. His conquests into other European countries and his military knowledge make him the historical legend that he has come to be. He made himself emperor of France and ended the French Revolution. Bonaparte’s successes in France cause him to be revered as a great leader who exemplifies Niccolò Machiavelli’s beliefs regarding the leadership of a country. Machiavelli offers advice to political leaders in his novel, The Prince, which is proven relevant through Napoleon’s ability to be war-minded, feared, and a good leader.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli's The Prince, hints of future democratic theories can be pulled out of Machiavelli's plan for the success of a prince of a state. Within Machiavelli's concentration of plotting out successful achievement of a stabilized state within a principality, he often reveals the importance of the satisfaction the people within the governing walls of that principality. One of the themes to Machiavelli's plan included the dismissal of the affection of virtue of the nobility as well as the significance of an honest people. Even though Machiavelli may have had other motivation for the writing of "The Prince",…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The understanding of human nature and the effects it has on the individual and society has been a serious topic in the philosophical world. Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were well known for their crucial roles in forming the foundation of political philosophy. While reading through Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan, both introduced a common focus on political theory even though living approximately 100 years apart. While learning about these two philosophers and their proposed theories, I noticed an innate relationship in the discussion of society’s human nature. Machiavelli ([1532] 2006) in The Prince theorizes the qualities that a dominant leader should have to gain and maintain power.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prince may gain power, but not glory. He gains esteem and glory through his courage. He must have wisdom to choose the least risky venture and act on it courageously and wisdom in picking his advisors. It is extremely important to gain the support of the people because you will need it in times of trouble. It also takes that same courage and wisdom to keep up the morale of his people during those troubled times. That is why a prince needs to relate to his people. He does not have to be loved by the people, but he must not be hated and should always be respected. However, Machiavelli makes a powerful case that it is better for a leader to be feared than loved. He feels that men respond more strongly to fear than love. Fear is constant, but love of the people can easily change. The prince cannot make people love him, but he has control over his people’s fear of him. Therefore, the course of action that the prince can best control is what he should pursue. In answering the question of whether it is better to be loved than feared, Machiavelli writes, “The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli thought human nature was two-dimensional. He saw humans as predictable, foreseeing their responses to the princes’ actions. Because humans are so unsophisticated in Machiavelli’s eye, they can only love or hate their prince, making them unable to see an intermediate to the good and bad in their ruler. Humans’…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 11 Absolutism

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to The Prince, by Machiavelli, who was from the Italian City-States during the rule of the Medici, portrayed that absolutism worked best when the ruler ruled through fear and not love. This was effective because “…fear is accompanied by the dread of punishment, which never relaxes.” This quote shows that people are scared of being punishment for wrong doing, and will be think twice before disobeying or disrespecting the Prince in any way. (Doc.1) Two Treatises on Government, by John Locke, who was in favor of democracy, stated in his work that the best types of government had a limitation of paper and that the citizens agreed with their thoughts.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book The Prince, Machiavelli presents a theory asserting that man needs a powerful leader in order to be successful. Machiavelli felt that a Prince must act in a way that guaranteed stability and order. However, his emphasis on political convenience was not in the service of the individual power of a Prince, but in allowing that Prince to do what was necessary for the sake of the people. He argues that as a leader, one has the duty to be dishonest or otherwise deceive its people in times of need. This is further clarified when he addresses the question of whether it is better to be feared or loved.…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Phil: “What would you do if you were stuck in one place and every day was exactly the same, and nothing you did mattered? Ralph: “That about sums it up for me.” I believe “that about sums it up for everyone,” and if it doesn’t then he or she is just simply kidding themselves. As bleak and austere as that may sound, it is undoubtedly true. The situation of Phil Connors is not just an interpretation of a repetitive bland life. It is an illustration of a major philosophical idea, if not the biggest one at that. The idea that we weren’t put on earth for a concrete purpose, and there is no ultimate objective…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's the Prince

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "The state is the highest achievement of man, a progressive and elaborate creation of his free will. The individual, the leader, the people, cooperate in maintaining it." This idea of state was put forth by Niccolo Machiavelli in The Prince, which was in essence a ruler's handbook to governing and maintaining his land. Machiavelli conjured his theories for government by basing his ideas in his belief that men, especially men in power, tend to follow the same directions, and therefore by looking at past leaders and their follies we can better determine how to run a state. "Men are always the same and are animated by the same passions that lead them fatally to the same decisions, acts, an results…. That one can foresee the course of political development by mediating upon the cycles and phases of historical events, and that essential to a statesman is not only the experience of modern events and constant study of the past. But also the ability to exploit this knowledge in actual political actions."…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to carefully study and analyze Sir Thomas More’s book Utopia. Before, I being with my analysis I want to give you a quick back brief on who Thomas More was, and why he might have wrote the book to begin with. Sir Thomas More was a man of many titles and jobs, but for the sake of this paper I will only discuss the titles and offices in which he held prior to the publication of this book. More was a lawyer who studied law at Oxford from 1492 to 1494. In 1499, More meets Erasmus for the first time. Erasmus was a humanist, Catholic priest, and a teacher. I believe that it was Erasmus who had the most influences on More, especially for his humanistic views in Utopia. In 1509, King…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli vs. Erasmus

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I believe that both of these views, to a certain extent and in certain situations, are still relevant today. With some people, the parts of the population that seek only to gain in their lives, and not contribute to the betterment of society, I would say that the Machiavellian approach would be of better use. Because he is right, a lot of men are ungrateful, fickle, deceptive, avoiders of dangers and eager to gain. With these kinds of people, they will try to take what they can without regard for who they crush, so the only way to keep them in check is their fear of the punishments they might receive. We obviously don’t have to worry about them killing someone for political reasons like in the times when “The Prince” was written, but I would say that seizure of property is still a punishment used today. That is the first thing people go for when seeking punishment or reparations; money, possessions or property. I think love of country, not necessarily the person running it is the best way to get devotion from people. So I disagree that those people who follow out of love are less reliable. Especially right now, as a member of the armed forces, I can speak for myself a many of my comrades that we don’t agree with most, if anything, our current leader says or does. But we follow his orders anyway, because we love this country, and that is greater than any personal reason for not following our President. If anyone even tried to use the fear approach, they would never even get elected. That is why they have propaganda and the occasional commercial telling all the good deeds they do, not saying who they punished for not agreeing with them. So maybe in a country where democracy doesn’t decide the leader, Machiavelli’s approach might be used, but in ours, I would say only for small portions of the population would it be useful.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas More describes an ideal society and government where people maintain high moral standard and live with ultimate freedom and happiness. In the Utopia, the Utopian government strive to fulfill and optimize the benefits and happiness of Utopian citizens. Reasonably, people would describe a safe and happy government as domestically stable and diplomatically powerful so that it obtains admiration and fear from both its citizens and surrounding countries, thus enabling its citizens to live with freedom and pursue the ultimate happiness. However, although the images of Utopian government are attractive and appealing, Machiavelli would reprimand the existence of this ideal government to be absurd and unrealistic because of its unreasonable equality…

    • 2069 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utopian Society

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The world of Utopia contrasts our own in several aspects; these differences in social relations, politics and culture reveal Thomas More’s ideas about the inherent nature of humans.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While in exile, Niccoló Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes wrote about their political views on how to inaugurate a sturdy government. During each of their lives, they both contributed political philosophies that had differences and similarities. In Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’s The Leviathan, their philosophies are portrayed on how to maintain a stable government. Hobbes is recognized as the founder of the most later Western political philosophy in response to the social contract theory he established in his 1651 book Leviathan. Machiavelli is also a founder of an important term that has a lot of meaning in history. He is the founder of “Machiavellianism”, the person considers their goals to be of prime importance and that any method may be used to achieve them.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine perfection! A world with no faults, no errors, and no delinquents. A world that lives in peace and harmony, and that never ceases to prove it’s worth every single day. This flawless realm was almost impossible to find or describe in Europe in the early sixteenth century due to all of the corruption that was occurring in the church and in the government. However, from the abyss of this dark world came a man who was ready to challenge these powerful, malicious supremacies; a man named Thomas More. In his book Utopia, More, “the Chancellor of England at the time (Notes),” described the perfect society by observing the world’s wonderful and wicked aspects. Though heavily influenced by his Christian and humanist background,…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays