Preview

Plato Vs Machiavelli Leadership Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
566 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato Vs Machiavelli Leadership Essay
Consummately antithesis of what Plato says would assist in being a good leader and what a leader should fixate on, Machiavelli verbalizes that there should be nothing on the prince's (leader) mind other than mastering the art of war. A leader should fixate on the mechanics of war. Study it at all times. Know your opponent. War, to Machiavelli, is described as an art which needed the full attention of the designer. The only way to be head of the state and to win is to know this art. Have it thoroughly mastered not just mentally but also physically. Furthermore, prepare your mind, body, and soul. Learn how to be outdoors and the type of toll it would take on one’s body so you will not fall week during the real thing. Build one’s mind up to be vigorous and to be able to stand any additional mental strain and stress that may come during the genuine event of a war so that one could not be broken. Study how your opposing party handles their battles and their aspects of war. Learn and …show more content…
However, Machiavelli, no matter how extreme, violent at times, rigorous, and blunt he may come across, by setting examples and guides structured around the utilization of ruthlessness and egocentric cunning as the process of gaining political power, showed what a clear mind he had on what it takes to be an awe-inspiring leader, master of the art of winning a battle, and conquering lands. In this paper, by comparing the two, human nature and political potency, through the use of different ideologies of both, Plato and Machiavelli, corroborated that they were very powerful, unparalleled influences in the philosophy of human nature and the processes of political power as theorist of their
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Human Nature In Machiavelli And Hobbes
    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Human Nature In Machiavelli And Hobbes

    The understanding of human nature and the effects it has on the individual and society has been a serious topic in the philosophical world. Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were well known for their crucial roles in forming the foundation of political philosophy. While reading through Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan, both introduced a common focus on political theory even though living approximately 100 years apart. While learning about these two philosophers and their proposed theories, I noticed an innate relationship in the discussion of society’s human nature. Machiavelli ([1532] 2006) in The Prince theorizes the qualities that a dominant leader should have to gain and maintain power.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lao Tzu and Machiavelli's View of "The People"
    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lao Tzu and Machiavelli's View of "The People"

    Life experience, culture, language, time of living and many other factors affected Lao Tzu’s and Niccolò Machiavelli’s views on how an ideal leader ought to govern a country. These views, expressed in their texts, reflected on how these writers perceived the fellow men. Lao Tzu is a Chinese philosopher and founder of Daoism. He is the author of a philosophical document called “Tao-te Ching”. Niccoló Machiavelli, is a 15th century aristocrat and a writer, mostly famous for his political treatise, “The Prince”. This essay will attempt to analyze both authors’ views on human nature and the way these views affected the types of government supported.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli The Prince Research Paper
    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Machiavelli The Prince Research Paper

    During Niccolỏ Machiavelli’s lifetime, Italy’s city-states were in turmoil, and he was extremely interested in the politics behind the chaos.1 Machiavelli advised principalities on the proper way to conduct themselves by using his study of human nature. His understanding of human greed, disloyalty, and predictability created a vision of politics that utilizes power for a prince to maintain stability. Machiavelli created power-politics, his vision of how to stabilize a principality, in The Prince.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince: Christian Humanism
    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Machiavelli's The Prince: Christian Humanism

    In Machiavelli’s The Prince, he tackles of issues in society and the government as a whole. Machiavelli believed a good ruler is one that could give justice and provide some type of order to his citizens. He believed that a good ruler should focus more on the present rather than what could be. Machiavelli used several examples to demonstrate his way of thinking in a humanistic way and running a government. He used the fox and the lion for an example. A good ruler should be able to use cunningness and brute force per situation in which it is called for. Machiavelli believes that there are two ways of fighting something, that is by law or by force and he believed those are…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Attitude Toward Mankind
    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Machiavelli's Attitude Toward Mankind

    Machiavelli, a 15th ce writer and philosopher, had a negative and distrustful attitude towards mankind as he writes in his book “The Prince” about how to be the most effective ruler. His writing style throughout the book reflects that he was pessimistic towards man’s fortune.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Leadership In Julius Caesar Essay
    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Leadership In Julius Caesar Essay

    The idea of Leadership puts ecverything written about in shadow. Leadership is the most significant idea a leader can ever think about. Being popular doesn’t necersarrly mean that you are a leader. Being aple to represent propaganda to manipulate the community doesn’t represent a leader aswell. Very few ideas have something in common with leadership, that is 23hy it is so abstract, so different from everything else, and that’s why it is the most difficult thing for a pearson to achieve. As mentioned above being a leader sets every idea of manipulation in shadow. It is the door to a new era, and that is what Julius cesar achieved. He achived full control through leadership. That is the pricve of being a leader. The price is absolute control, but inorder to get to this idea of absolute control you will need to develop a society…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Classical Leadership Theory Analysis
    • 4179 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Classical Leadership Theory Analysis

    According to Plato, leadership is not just a power or decision-making authority; it is the system and process developed to establish the culture and how things are done in an organization or government. The nature of leadership should be driven by what is right and what is just. Plato believed that a monarch who served the best interest of the citizens was preferred to direct democracies that act to serve their own personal interest. According to Plato, leaders should serve the good of the people and not the good of the rulers or themselves. Plato felt that good leaders could only be men wise in years with education and experience. A person leads based on their knowledge,…

    • 4179 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Compare and Contrast Machiavelli and Max Weber
    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Machiavelli and Max Weber

    Niccolo Machiavelli, known as the founding father of modern Political Science, lived between 1469 and 1752 in Florence in what is known today as Italy. He is not only known for his work in politics and diplomacy, as he was also a well-versed historian. He employed the method of citing historic figures and events in his justification for the suggestions he made in his famous book: The Prince. In the book that was dedicated to Lorenzo Medici, Machiavelli raises many important aspects relating to the political environment, governance and ethics of an individual in possession of political power citing political actions that should and should not be taken, the state briefly and violence in governing which is studied by political philosophers today as there are many ancient concepts…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato, Machiavelli
    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato, Machiavelli

    Nicolo Machiavelli is known as being an realist who accepted that fact that humans are brutal, selfish, and fickle while Plato was an idealist who believed people could be ruled by a philosopher king who ruled over the warriors and tradesmen of his ideal republic with rationality. In his view the philosopher-king was in charge of making the state a "utopia" in that everyone had his/her place and all worked together for the common good of the state. Machiavelli said that this was a foolish idea. Machiavelli philosophy of government was centered on the ruler. He believed the king, or despot, had the right to do whatever was necessary for his own gain, or whatever the monarch considered the "good of the state" which he called Virtu’. Machiavelli believed the only purpose for a ruler was to make war, and protect its citizens from attacks by other states. He advocated the slaughter of surrendered generals in order to crush hopes of revolution - even rationalizing that it was worth the risk of revolution should it anger the people. Machiavelli believed a ruler should be immoral using deception and illusion for power and never allowing the people to know the “real” him…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato-Machiavelli Comparison
    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato-Machiavelli Comparison

    Though often presented as two ideological opposites, personally I find there to be a lot more similarities between Plato and Machiavelli than usually acknowledged. Obviously there are some sharp contrasts. If one examines the excerpts from Machiavelli’s “The Prince” and Plato’s “The Republic”, it’s easy to conclude that Plato believed it to be essential for a government leader to be just, good, and free from corruption. Whereas Machiavelli’s ideal ruler is less concerned about morality, and more about shrewdness, awareness, and pragmatism.. That being said, ultimately both men arrive to the same conclusion all be it through different means; that a ruler’s primary objective is to create and maintain a unified, orderly, and controlled state, with a content population.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Should Be a Leader?(According to Machiavelli)
    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Should Be a Leader?(According to Machiavelli)

    of intellectuals who have books and different thoughts about government and authority. One of them is Machiavelli who is reputed with his book ‘the Prince'. This book includes some advice to leaders. Machiavelli claims in ‘Prince' (chapter XVI, XVII, XVIII) that a prince should be miser than liberal, should prefer being feared rather than being loved, and should not be faithful. In my opinion, a leader shuld not be miser and should prefer being loved than feared and should be faithful; in contrast, a leader should be liberal,faithful, trustworthy and should prefer to be loved rather than to be feared. I think that if a leader is miser,faithless and if he spreads terror, this person can not be a leader of a country or community a long time. This leadership will continue until a rebellision, because the subjects do not like this kind of authority and want to freedom. Therefore, I do not agree with Machiavelli.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plato Vs Machiavelli Research Paper
    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato Vs Machiavelli Research Paper

    I think Plato and Machiavelli are known as two orominent philosphers.Who brought out the creativity in the political life.Both them have many simiilarites in between them.The first similarity in them is that Plato wants only the best should be the head of the etate in his view socartes are the best suitable for that job where as Machiavelli thinks that the prince should be the head of the state because he think mostly price are capaable of doing many things which other people can not.Both Plato and Machiavelli agree on that leader should know what he is doing he should have knowledge about what he is doing.Both beilve that ruler should have complete power for making decisions.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    St. Augustine vs. Machiavelli: a Comparison of the Good Society
    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages

    St. Augustine vs. Machiavelli: a Comparison of the Good Society

    Both St. Augustine and Machiavelli believed that in order to understand the true nature of society you must see men for what they truly were. Augustine and Machiavelli are similar in their pessimistic views toward human nature, looking at human self-love and self-interest and believed it to be full of evil, cruelty, betrayal, violence and tied that relationship into the creation of war. For both philosophers a good society is actually something that for almost all men is an unreachable attribute that can only be written about and not actually fully experienced in my view. For Augustine I feel it is a truly heavenly earth where all men are divine and are as close to the city of Heaven as you can be on earth. For Machiavelli it is a state of complete acceptance of each man’s role and how that role fits into society like a puzzle piece. In order to examine each philosopher’s view further, we must break their thoughts into three separate categories which are: human nature, political authority, and religious beliefs. This essay will take an in-depth look at both St. Augustine and Machiavelli, compare and contrast their views, and provide evidence that on some level the two thinkers were very similar in their ideology.…

    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Political Philosophy and Machiavelli
    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Political Philosophy and Machiavelli

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s essay, “The Qualities of the Prince” is a very interesting piece of literary work that has an atypical way of depicting the qualities of a successful leader. Machiavelli developed a way of thinking that changes the human perspective on what a quality leader is made of. He took what people were afraid to say aloud and voiced it in a way that almost unraveled the truth about what people in power were really like. Machiavelli comes to a junction is his essay when he writes; “being disarmed makes you despised”. When Machiavelli says this he means to say that in order for someone to appear powerful they must be armed and physically capable of warfare. In his essay he very clearly portrays that in order for someone to have control and ultimate power, they must have the means to start a war.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Discourses Summary
    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Machiavelli's Discourses Summary

    Aristotle and Machiavelli analyze every aspect of the human being to conceive their two theories, and they are aware that human beings are not perfect as Plato and More illustrated in their works who believe that humans have no feeling, or sense, or courage to make changes in their lives. People have a free will and moral principles, they are free to choose whatever is in the benefit of them and their…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics