Student Professor Bakehouse COM152 Topic: Sex offenders’ use of social media General Purpose: To persuade the audience that it is a problem there are no regulations against sex offenders using social media Specific Purpose: To convince the audience to participate in ways to protect our community from unregulated sex offenders using social media sites Thesis: In order to protect the community of Omaha‚ we must find ways protect ourselves from sex offenders on social media sites. I. Introduction A
Premium Sex offender Facebook Criminology
The issue of sex (besides being a national obsession) is reasonably interesting from a psycoanalytic and existential perspective. A lot of what drives us is sexual energy (in line with what Freud told us). This so-called energy isn’t explicit‚ but if you stop to think about questions like "Why am I here?" the "I" refers to you as a being and your sexuality is intimately tied with that. That "I" differs quite radically based on whether you are male or female. From a purely reductionist perspective
Free Sex Male Gender
for convicted sex offenders are not constitutional. Megan’s Law deals with child molesters and sex offenders by requiring a public registration when they are released from incarceration. The concern with registering sex offenders has progressed to a nationalized level‚ with the government requiring every state to have some form of law that deals with Megan ’s Law (Menendez‚ 251). However‚ is this law constitutional? In this position paper the laws of being notified of sex offenders and their registration
Premium Law Sex offender Crime
Law is unconstitutional as it violates the Eighth Amendment. The Eighth Amendment states that neither Federal nor State can impose any Cruel or unusual punishment to a person. For example‚ 0nce a person completes his or her sentence‚ the offender should not have to be punished again. But under Megan’s Law‚ once a person is released‚ he or she must register on a list which is like being sentenced twice for the same crime. According to a book written by Margie Druss Fodor‚ that
Premium Sex offender
Sex Differences : Males are better in math and sciences whereas females are better in language. This common but amusing topic is : Males are better in math and sciences whereas females are better in language . It can be observed that in our society ‚ most math and science related jobs ‚ such as actuaries ‚ engineers ‚ scientists ‚ are dominated by males . However most language related jobs ‚ such as language teachers ‚ social workers ‚ writers ‚ are dominated by females . Regarding this interesting
Premium Gender Male Sex
written by Beccaria. Deterrence theory assumes that offenders are rational and choose to commit crimes when the perceived benefits of criminal behavior outweigh the potential costs (Budd et al.‚ 2014). Deterrence theory quickly goes to the idea that every criminal thinks in logical steps. If there is too high of risk for severe punishment‚ the criminal will not offend. A few propositions made based on the deterrence theory is to give sex offenders longer prison sentences and serve more time (Budd
Premium Crime Prison Recidivism
Theory 302"‚ p. 1) (O ’Brien‚ (2012)‚ "A Day in the Life of a Mental Hospital Patient"‚ p. 1) http://idpm.me/2012/01/05/a-day-in-the-life-of-a-mental-hospital-patient-by-jennifer-obrien/ (Tewksbury‚ R.‚ & Connor‚ D. P. (2012). Incarcerated sex offenders ’ perceptions of family relationships: Previous experiences and future expectations. Western Criminology Review‚ 13(2)‚ 25-35) http://search.proquest.com/docview/1037380124?accountid=32521
Premium Sociology Erving Goffman Hospital
family again. Jesse Timmendequas took Megan’s life on July 24‚ 1994. Her funeral was held on Wednesday‚ August 3‚ 1994. Jesse Timmendequas was a twice convicted sex offender. He moved in across the street from Megan’s home without the family’s knowledge of his history as a pedophile. Joseph Cifelli was another convicted sex offender who had spent nine years at the Adult Diagnostic and Treatment Center. He had been convicted after admitting to repeated sexual abuse of a relative that had begun
Premium Sex offender
2007). However‚ they had omitted the disadvantages of the law regarding the inability to reduce the sex offenses as well as the lack of support in finding other ways for the rehabilitation of sex offenders (Schram & Milloy‚ 1995 as cited in Levenson‚ D`Amora‚ & Hern‚ 2007). This law had created a fake sense of security to the public‚ as they would want to know whether there are any sex offenders located in their area in order to protect their children. However‚ research found that it
Premium Law Sex offender Crime
An argument can be made that sex offenders have been marginalized by society by their actions (no judgment is intended here). Therefore‚ should they also be accorded the same benefits that are provided by our Government to our citizenry? A sex offender might make the case that if he or she is employed and paying taxes that they should also be able to benefit from federal or state programs
Premium Sex offender Social work