Preview

Was the Us Justified in Dropping Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki Essay Example

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1027 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was the Us Justified in Dropping Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki Essay Example
Conventional wisdom has it that America was justifiable after all by dropping a lethal bomb on a city full of civilians and soldiers, because their aim was to end the war. However, America was not reasonable by underestimating the human values, not warning them with the presence of an atomic bomb and leaving ever-lasting effects on a city. The atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed 100,000 people. The atomic bomb is described as “the most dangerous threat the world has ever seen” (allvoices, 2011). It literally opened a new era in warfare. Dropping such a bomb can not have any good intentions in it, even though it actually made the war end.

America suggests that using the atomic bomb was the best solution they had in order to prevent the death of more Japanese and American soldiers. They say that if they hadn’t used it then there would be a land invasion and a lot more people would die because Japanese soldiers are people who will do anything to win for the sake of their emperor and honor. However, if only their intention was really to decrease the number of the people who were going to be murdered, bring peace to the world and end the war than they wouldn’t drop the bomb on two big cities where a lot of people live. They would make a demonstration and drop it somewhere where there is not a sign of life. This way, the Japanese would be scared of another bomb and surrender and this kind of a massacre wouldn’t happen. Yet America knew that in case of a land invasion their chances of winning was not that high because of the dedication of the Japanese soldiers.

The number of people who were viciously murdered in a blink of an eye by the atomic bomb cannot be condoned. If the reason why America had used the bomb was to end the war then they would think about the innocent civilians they would be killing too. The fact that they were trained doesn’t affect their innocence; they are still considered as innocent civilians because they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “We are in possession of the most destructive explosive ever devised by man” stated Leaflet B dropped on August 6th, 1945. Since the United States knew how destructive the bomb was, they should have not used it in the first place. Not only was japan in danger but Leo Szilard and 69 co-signers at the Manhattan Project stated “ the cities of the United States as well as the cities of other nations will be in continuous danger of sudden annihilation.” Most people working on the project for two and a half years did not even know what they were working on or hiding from the American public. Though, Japan killed and injured many Americans, the U.S. killed more people and left Japan with high levels of radiation for many years after the bomb was dropped. In conclusion, the United States was not in any way justified for the decision of dropping the atomic…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay I will discuss the reasons for and against whether America was right to drop the two atomic bombs. These two bombs were unloaded on Hiroshima, 6th August 1945, and attempted to hit Nagasaki, 9th August 1945. America gave the two bombs code names, the one that was dropped on Hiroshima was called ‘Little Boy’. This bomb was made of uranium. The final death toll added up to 135,000. The nuclear bomb that fell on Nagasaki was called ‘Fat Man’. This bomb was made of plutonium. The final death toll was about 70,000. This was because the bomb had missed its allocated target and instead fell into a valley.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the bombs saved more lives than it claimed. To illustrate, many American and Japanese lives would have been lost in the battles to capture Japan. Similar to the battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, the Japanese would never surrender until all of their forces were lost, and this would result in a copious amount of death and despair. The Allied generals estimated over a 1,000,000 lives would have been lost in the upcoming battles if Truman did not decide to end the war with the atomic bombs. Additionally, the Japanese threatened to execute 100,000 Allied prisoners of war if they decided to invade the Japanese mainlands. Thus, by dropping the atomic bombs, many lives, including both Japanese and American, have been saved by bringing the war to an abrupt stop. Furthermore, the Japanese were given a fair warning before the Allies dropped the Atomic bombs. On July 26, a few days before the dropping of the bombs, President Truman issued a final ultimatum for the Japanese forces to surrender or be bombed. Yet, Emperor Hirohito declared that he would not surrender. On account of Emperor Hirohito not surrendering, Truman decided to drop the Atomic Bombs to end the war quickly. Hence, the Japanese were given a choice to surrender or to be bombed, but they chose to be bombed. Although many argue that the Atomic Bombs were not justified because they…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The act of dropping these bombs can be considered a great act against humanity, and rightfully so. Any act of war that will slaughter hundreds of thousands of people should be considered a crime against humanity. However, if we had not dropped the bomb on Japan, how many Americans would have been killed attempting to invade the Japanese mainland? Some estimates are as high as half a million, some lower but almost all of the estimates are well over one hundred thousand American lives that would have been lost. This number did not include the number of Japanese that would…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In WW2, the bomb wasn't the smartest thing America did. As they hurt many innocent Japanese people in the process. If President Harry Truman and the military thought out there plan to end the war. They could've ended it much more peacefully. If America were really wanted to drop the bomb, they should've dropped it on Germany, as they were the next threat during the…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The large death toll and the civilians who were targeted are crimes against humanity. The Nippon Times in Tokyo pointed out, “What meaning is there in any international law… in any concept of right or wrong, if the very foundations of morality are to be overthrown as the use of this instrument of total destruction threatens to do” (Document 4). By using the atomic bomb, the U.S threw away the morales it seemed to hold for itself. America is often known for helping other nations when needed, but annihilating hundred of thousands of people completely of a helping hand. Although this was during a time of war and Japan was the enemy, this is beyond acceptable actions of war because of both long and short term implications and death.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The propaganda taught in grade schools was that the United States dropped the atomic bomb to save American lives and end the war. President Truman and some advisors stated after the war, that somewhere between five hundred thousand to one million American lives would be loss with an invasion of the Japanese homeland (37). So, in an attempt to bring the War in the Pacific to an end they used the atomic bomb. They also justified the use of the atomic bomb by claiming using the bomb would save an untold number of Japanese lives. The information which came from President Truman and his administrative sounded sensible and salved the conscious of America, but was it the truth? In his book, historian J. Samuel Walker provides a step by step analysis of events leading to Truman’s use of the atomic bomb to bring World War II to closure and extensive coverage of the relationship of the United States and the U.S.S.R.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone around the world will have their own opinion about the bombing on Hiroshima especially between the American’s and Japanese. I believe someone’s opinion makes an importance based off the generation he or she is from because American’s might’ve agreed to the bombing when it occurred because it was their generation when Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Japanese so it was a form of deadlier retaliation because their people such as loved ones were victims. Therefore, they didn’t want their deaths to be in vein. Moreover, parents wouldn’t have to send their children off to war because the US made it end with the deadly weapon to cause a surrender. Just as much as our present generation would bomb ISIS they don’t because we would know the aftermath a lot of innocent people will die, get injured and lose their homes.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So, when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, in 1941, the United States reactions was justified for violent reaction, because of the attack by the Japanese. However, the people from Japan, may claim valid reason to attack, because of "Right Intention," but the United States action of dropping two separate nuclear weapons on two different cities, was an unjust war and extremely evil (Mattison). So, USA was justified in defending their island, but became unjust after the first nuclear attack, because it became responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands of women, children, and men. Destroying Hospitals, Churches, and Historical sites, which is illegal under international law or the Geneva Code of Conventions, but this happened before the United…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just nearly three years into the war America had lost already 400,000 young American soldiers. The US was starting to prepare to invade Japan’s main land. The US started to draft more young Americans. The US estimated it would need at least five-million-man power to invade Japan’s. At that time, Japan population was around seventy-one million citizens and seven million Japanese soldiers. The US already had drafted more than a million soldiers to support the war in Europe and the Pacific. It would probably take about another five years to overtake Japan. American didn’t want to keep on losing more young men to the war. So, the US went into the dilemma of either keep on with the war and lose more human lives to the war or drop the nuclear bomb on Hiroshima with the hopes it would end the war. And finally, they came to a decision on dropping the bomb. They planned at first to drop the bomb on Tokyo Japans capital city and most populated city at that time. The bomb would’ve killed more than a million civilians. So, they decided to drop the bomb on Hiroshima which it’s was a smaller city and with a smaller population than…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Towards the end of World War II, Japan had already been weakened by the battle of coral sea, but on August 6, 1945 an American B-29 bomber dropped a first hand developed atomic bomb on the civilian and military inhabited city of Hiroshima. 70,000 people were killed instantly. Thousands were left heavily injured and sick. The United States had many different reasons to be justified to have dropped the bomb. Nevertheless, the bomb was ‘a weapon of mass description, a weapon of terror’.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some people believe the bombing of Hiroshima was unnecessary. They claim that Japan was on the edge of surrendering, therefore the United States had no right to bomb the Japanese. Many feel that the bombing was unjust due to the amount of civilians that were either killed or injured. One year after the atomic bomb hit Hiroshima, the death toll stood at 70,000 from those that died instantly and as a result of the radiation (Takaki 47). Also, 30,524 people were considered severely injured and 48,606 people were considered slightly injured…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays