Preview

Should The Us Take Hiroshima Persuasive Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
608 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should The Us Take Hiroshima Persuasive Essay
On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, killing thousands of innocent people! The United States did it to force Japan to surrender and end World War II. To this present day it still and will remain a controversy whether or not the US was in the right or wrong of bombing Hiroshima. I argue that the US shouldn’t have attacked Hiroshima the way they did. The politicians in power when this traumatic event occurred could have agreed to a different course of action instead of dropping an atomic bomb to Hiroshima. Therefore, instead of thinking about the long-term effects and coming up with a reasonable solution to end the war, the politicians in power chose the easy route. Bomb! Particularly, …show more content…
Within the radiation contamination radius it made the place uninhabitable for a very long time taking it many years to stop being radioactive. Everyone around the world will have their own opinion about the bombing on Hiroshima especially between the American’s and Japanese. I believe someone’s opinion makes an importance based off the generation he or she is from because American’s might’ve agreed to the bombing when it occurred because it was their generation when Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Japanese so it was a form of deadlier retaliation because their people such as loved ones were victims. Therefore, they didn’t want their deaths to be in vein. Moreover, parents wouldn’t have to send their children off to war because the US made it end with the deadly weapon to cause a surrender. Just as much as our present generation would bomb ISIS they don’t because we would know the aftermath a lot of innocent people will die, get injured and lose their homes. To conclude the US shouldn’t have dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima because a lot of innocent people died, the US didn’t think about the long-term effects for the city such as uninhabitable homes, genetically effects and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In this essay I will discuss the reasons for and against whether America was right to drop the two atomic bombs. These two bombs were unloaded on Hiroshima, 6th August 1945, and attempted to hit Nagasaki, 9th August 1945. America gave the two bombs code names, the one that was dropped on Hiroshima was called ‘Little Boy’. This bomb was made of uranium. The final death toll added up to 135,000. The nuclear bomb that fell on Nagasaki was called ‘Fat Man’. This bomb was made of plutonium. The final death toll was about 70,000. This was because the bomb had missed its allocated target and instead fell into a valley.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    BREAKING NEWS- President Truman had been warned about invading Japan, and the terrific casualties they were capable off. However since they were afraid of attacking our soil, he ordered for a weapon large enough and powerful enough in hopes of bringing this all to an end. On August 6th, 1945 a five ton-bomb was dropped in the city of Hiroshima, Japan. The bombing killed 80,000 people; the city wasn’t left in great shape as well. Although the devastating outcome, we believe that this is the last of the feuding between them and us. (P.2, http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/atomic-bomb-dropped-on-hiroshima). The atomic bombs are scary, and threating to all nations. Sadly we believe this has both ended problems we have been facing, but also…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped the first ever Atomic weapon on Hiroshima, Japan. 140,000 people lost their lives, most of which were civilians. President Truman was in charge of this major decision, and he made the correct choice. The alternative solutions were much too costly for the United States, both in expenses and American casualties. Another reason Truman’s decision is justified was due to the declination of the fair ultimatum recieved by Japan. Also it was important to the well being of the world to keep the Soviets out of Japan. Dropping the Atomic Bomb was the most reliable and definite way to end the war.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In august of 1945, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a questionable decision by Harry Truman, the president of The United States of America. Throughout the years, it has been a heated debate in terms of whether the decision was morally correct and justified. Historians have analyzed and presented many arguments. In this short essay, I will attempt to expand on how historians feel about the decision by Truman to use atomic bombs. The revisionists bring into perspective and question the motivations of Harry Truman claiming he had more on his agenda than just the war. In my opinion, the decision to use atomic bombs was somewhat justified because if looked at statistically, the death toll with an invasion would have been higher and Truman…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War in Japan Wwii

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. In your opinion, should the atomic bomb have been used on Japan? Why or why not?…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When talking about WW2 and Japan, something that comes to mind often is the atomic bomb. Some people say it was a good thing, as it ended one of the worst war in history. however, some say that it was wrong to drop a bomb of a country that was on the verge of surrender. Proof of this statement, this essay will tell you.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the seven long decades since the decision was made to bomb Hiroshima, much has been written both defending and attacking it. With all the information given, this paper should present an argument that the atomic bombings of Japan were wrong. The “wrongness” of the bombing of Hiroshima can be approached from a few different ways. One reason why I am against it is because I feel there were other things that could have been done that were less intrusive than an atomic bomb. Secondly, I argue that it was pragmatically wrong because the Japanese were about to surrender, anyway. Finally, the suffering on the human level was shockingly dreadful. I can’t imagine the pain that was endured during that time. Even…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many people say that the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was unjustified because the U.S. targeted…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1945 Harry S. Truman decided to use the atomic bomb not only once, but twice to finish World War Two. The first bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima August, 6th killed upwards to around 80,000 people and the second bomb dropped on Nagasaki August, 14th killed 40,000 people. The controversy of the atomic bomb is because of the amount of innocent people that were killed in Japan. Nobody will ever know the outcome of the war if we never dropped the bomb, but we do know that the war was ended because of it. Over 100,000 people lost their lives because of these bombs, but how many lives would have been lost if we never dropped them? That is the other question that can never be answered, but based…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aside from the innocent death of the bombs, the U.S were right in their decision to bomb Japan. The casualties from both sides, Japan and America, would be greater if America would have invaded instead of bombing Japan. The History Channel states that General Douglas MacArthur and many other top military officials advised Truman that the casualties would be up to a million American soldiers lives (Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki). Also, using the atomic bomb showed the world how devastating of a weapon it is. Dickinson Quotes, “Science has reached to the fringe of the universe and stolen the secret of life inviolate since the beginning of…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The infamous bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima is a highly controversial subject and many continue to debate about the event, over half a century after it occurred. In August of 1945, near the end of World War II, the US military dropped two atomic bombs over Japan, not only causing a mass of death and devastation, but it also induced the question- were dropping the bombs necessary and justified? Due to exaggerated statistics, and what students learn in textbooks, Americans are socialized into believing that dropping the bombs were necessary to ending the war. However, in reality, several reasons ranging from the fact that civilians outnumbered troops in the cities in which the bombs were dropped, to how Japan was willing to surrender to the US under conditions prove that to be untrue. The nuclear bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was both unjustified and unnecessary.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds’?” These were the word that Mr. Robert Oppenheimer used after the Manhattan Project was successful. Mr. Oppenheimer was one the scientist who help create the nuclear bomb that was later, dropped on Hiroshima. The bomb name was “Little Boy” which help end World War II. So, I believe that it was necessary to drop the bomb on Hiroshima because the war was still going strong and Japan wasn’t showing no sign of surrender. The war was costing a lot of American lives, the end was nowhere near, and Japan citizen were loyal to their Emperor and the war. So, I would be explaining why I think bombing Hiroshima with was the right thing to do to end World War II.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some people believe the bombing of Hiroshima was unnecessary. They claim that Japan was on the edge of surrendering, therefore the United States had no right to bomb the Japanese. Many feel that the bombing was unjust due to the amount of civilians that were either killed or injured. One year after the atomic bomb hit Hiroshima, the death toll stood at 70,000 from those that died instantly and as a result of the radiation (Takaki 47). Also, 30,524 people were considered severely injured and 48,606 people were considered slightly injured…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the aftermath over 60 cities were bombed by Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The bombs caused so much damage to the country that their society was will always be scarred by it. It was important for the U.S. to defend themselves but many of the people who died had no part in the war. The method the U.S. chose to use was morally wrong. In Hiroshima, one hundred forty thousand people died and in Nagasaki eighty thousand people died. Most of the people died after the bomb because of the radiation. The radiation would kill peoples white blood cells and if you have dead blood cells they can not fight off infection and then you will die. The radiation would also leave marks on your skin that would most likely never come off. The Japanese had a lot of damage done by the the atomic bombs and they did not deserve it. William Leahy thought the exact same thing “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons”…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays