Preview

Stalin and Lenin Comparison Essay Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
349 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stalin and Lenin Comparison Essay Example
Barnard Castle School History Department IGCSE Coursework assignment A

Russia 1905-41

1. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

Stalin and Lenin were similar to an extent in their character but had many contrasting qualities. Lenin had great leadership skill in running the Bolshevik party, he was organised and his never-ending determination and dedication was rivalled by none other, however to say that Stalin was not hardworking would be incorrect he was calculating and very determined their work ethic and determination were very similar. Lenin's whole life was devoted creating his vision of Russia, his goal was clear a communist Russia was the only thing on his mind. This was a major difference between the two it is frequently debated whether Stalin wanted a better Russia or just immense power and personal gain. Stalin's goals as a member the Bolshevik Party were not as clear as Lenin's. Both Stalin and Lenin shared a common hatred of the political opponents to the party they were both ruthless and very forceful about making sure they got what they want. Stalin was not as charismatic and enthusiastic in speech and personality as Lenin was he seemed to blend in not really stand out, he was file jockey just a grey blur but we shouldn't underestimate his role in the party he was plotting his inevitable rise to power.

Lenin and Stalin shared some important beliefs such as the hope to create a communist state. It was thought that Marxism was the only way in which Russia could become a great nation once again. However they differed on the way this new Russia should be run. Lenin planned for no successor after him he wanted collective leadership to take the reins after his demise where Stalin believed that one figure of authority should control Russia one leader with absolute power. Lenin seemed more committed to communist principle where

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hitler and Stalin are names that will be forever remember as evil master minds of killing millions of people in order to create a perfect race. In this paper, there will be a comparison of Hitler and Stalin’s careers. Also, investigating which one had a greater impact on the twentieth century.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If one was alive and young back at the time of the second great war, which country would one choose to live in? Italy or Russia? Germany or Britain? United States or Japan? It honestly depended on the leaders. During the years of World War 2, there were many leaders; such as Roosevelt, Churchill, Hitler, and the two that were alike in many ways, but were also different are Benito Mussolini and Joseph Stalin. These two were Dictators who ruled over two different countries Mussolini ruled Italy, and Stalin ruled Russia. What did they stand for, did they treated their citizens differently, and what goals did they have? All of these questions will be answered in the following paragraphs, where you can easily tell the differences…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As well as this, after Lenin's death, Stalin wanted to employ a policy of ‘Socialism in One Country’. This meant that he wanted socialism in only the USSR. This again differed from Marxist ideas as it went against internationalism. It was also in contrast with Trotsky, who wanted a ‘Permanent Revolution’ across the world. The main reason Stalin did this was to agree with Lenin’s ideas, as he was trying to appear to be the natural successor to Lenin.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the turbulent years in which Lenin had passed, his significance still continued to dominate Russian politics. One clear example of this was his funeral as party members were afraid to read his testimony as it would make themselves look unpopular. This showed that even in death, Lenin’s words still held weight making him extremely significant. Furthermore, many of Lenin’s early policies such as his feminist policies continued to persist through Stalin’s administration as the USSR was the first country to have female pilots and female snipers. Lastly, we can see similarities in both Lenin and Stalin’s policies. For example, Stalin had copied some of Lenin’s “War Communism” as Stalin’s “Collectivization” advocated requisitioning of grain.…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin was reluctant to use terror against the politburo, but Stalin was more than willing to do so. This is exemplified in the so-called show trials of the late 1930s, where Stalin all but settle any possible competition. Also, Lenin had not been predisposed to forcing Russian peasants to enter collectives. However, Stalin accomplish a ruthless policy of peasant collectivization, and when many peasants resisted, he oversaw a period of intentional starvation that about one million kulak households (some five million people) were deported and never heard from again. On the other hand, Lenin still appreciated Russia as leading an active vanguard in the process towards worldwide communist revolution, whereas Stalin adopted a more pragmatic,…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two revolutions were very different. The Russian revolution was not a blowout and they could have very easily lost. Lenin's whole effort was to have the proletariat dominate Europe; his means for doing this were to capitalize on the crisis of capitalism. Lenin was able to lead as a dictator in a government that was supposedly ruled by the workers. He was able to keep his control on the country without having to kill too many people. Lenin was a master at propaganda and he was able to convince the population that his leadership was necessary because of problems that needed solved, this is very similar to Robespierre who was only listened to because of the crisis France was in.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin - History

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It was not just his popular policies that saw Stalin replace Lenin as the leader of the USSR. It was also partly due to the mistakes and weaknesses made by the other leading Bolsheviks such as Trotsky. Trotsky was seen as too powerful because he was the leader…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Part 1 Stalin Myth Essay

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He regarded Stalin who's idea of rule was a copy of the original revolution. He compares Lenin to Stalin, “Here we see no wisdom but only a demonstration of the brutal force which had once so alarmed V.I. Lenin.”…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bolshevik menshevik split

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both parties’ were aiming for the same thing but in different ways. The Mensheviks thought that the get revolution the best thing to do was to wait for the bourgeois stage had to happen first. But Lenin thought this was ridiculous and he proclaimed that both the proletarian and bourgeois stages could me merged into one revolution. Another issue the parties disagreed on was the party and its size. Lenin said the smaller the better as it would be more elite and easier to control and mange so they would get the job done faster as the party were smaller so less chain of command, but the Mensheviks thought that the party need to be big so they looks strong but Lenin thought this was a risky choice because of the secret police the more people in a party the more likely information is to be spread.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin stuck to many of his promises, which he had made before and during the revolution. One of the Bolshevik ideals is that there will be work for everyone, and fairer working conditions. After the revolution, Lenin made several changes to industrial workers lives. In November he made it law that ‘A maximum 8 hour day and 48 hour working week for industrial workers’ and ‘employment insurance introduced for workers, for injuries, illness and unemployment’. These changes were very beneficial for the industrial workers, as now they have free employment insurance, which helped many sick workers keep their jobs, and millions more to secure jobs. In addition the maximum 8h workload per day meant that workers weren’t allowed to work ridiculous hours, and have more leisure time. Later in December, the factories were all put under the control of the workers committees instead of being run by factory bosses. This allowed workers to have more of a say over the changes being made in the factory as they now had the power to do so. Lenin certainly kept to his promises in the extent of improving workers lives.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Stalin’s successful bid for power within the Bolshevik party, he both aligned himself with Lenin in the public eye as well as asserting his power as General Secretary. Unlike Trotsky, Stalin was content with mundane administrative work and during Lenin’s reign, he handled the vast…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to access whether Lenin was a successful leader it is important to note four main principals. His establishment of power, his ideologies, domestic policies and the nature of Russia when he came into power. When looking into success we need to analyse how far Lenin accomplished his aim or purpose and how he turned Russia into a single party state in such a short period of time. It is also important to note the length of Lenin’s rule- he was not there for a long period of time so it is interesting to see how much he was able to achieve in that short bracket of time. If Lenin had had lived longer would he have turned Russia into a purely communist country with no social classes or was it doomed for dictatorial ruling in the future?…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalin Dbq Essay

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages

    |For Example: for and against, positive and negative, social, economic, political. (The categories are determined based on the |…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Government structure of Tsar Nicholas II was nothing short of a savage autocracy. Locals were appointed by the Tsar for positions of power, an example of this is the appointment of judges by the Tsar (Source a3). Locals would only be appointed if their ideological beliefs matched the Tsars. People in power contrasting the Tsar's ideals were removed from the playing field by use of the secret police. In contrast to the Tsar, Lenin wanted communism for all, the mission to abolish all of the classist system. Lenin wanted to give the power to the people, the full power of publicly owning everything from the industrial sector to commercial sector. However, both leaders use ethically questionable tactics to achieve their goals, such as, but not limited to using terror tactics, and oppression of certain…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays