Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Explain Why the Policies Adopted by Stalin in the 1920s Differed from Marxist Theory

Good Essays
353 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Why the Policies Adopted by Stalin in the 1920s Differed from Marxist Theory
In many ways, Stalins policies in the 1920s differed massively from Marxist theories. For example, when Stalin had invaded Georgia, he had gone against the Marxist idea of internationalism in favour of invading Georgia and taking of the republic for the interests of Russian Nationalism. As well as this, after Lenin's death, Stalin wanted to employ a policy of ‘Socialism in One Country’. This meant that he wanted socialism in only the USSR. This again differed from Marxist ideas as it went against internationalism. It was also in contrast with Trotsky, who wanted a ‘Permanent Revolution’ across the world. The main reason Stalin did this was to agree with Lenin’s ideas, as he was trying to appear to be the natural successor to Lenin. In fact, Stalin was so intent on gaining power, that he created the cult of Lenin. This was the elevation of Lenin, his ideas and his life to an almost divine status. This was contrary to Marxist ideas of ‘leadership’. Marx believed in the dictatorship of the proletariat, which would give way to a communist Utopia where there would be no leadership and no state. Also, in 1924, Stalin wanted to keep the NEP going, even though it went against Marxism as the NEP meant that a mixed economy in which there were features of capitalism. The main reason Stalin did this was because it was a measure brought in by Lenin, and at the time, Stalin wished to make himself seem as loyal to Lenin as possible, to appear to be the natural heir. The introduction of collectivization and industrialization by Stalin were both supposed to end ideological compromise and come closer to Marxist theory. However, many historians have made it clear that these policies created a socialist Soviet Economy which was the opposite of Marx’s theory. State control of the economy was a key feature of Stalin’s totalitarian rule. To conclude, it is quite clear that Stalins theories differed greatly from that of Marx. It is also clear, however, to see that Stalins theories differed purely to try to be as much like Lenin as possible.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 1917 Bolshevik Revolution was the seizure of power by the radical Marxists led by Vladimir Lenin and was one of the pivotal moments of the 20th Century. The ramifications of the event, and the subsequent establishment of the world's first Communist regime were immediately obvious, but also had continuing repercussions for decades. This essay will argue that although Lenin and Stalin seemed to have conflicting views, in reality they shared very similar policies; Stalin just took these policies to an extreme.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the turbulent years in which Lenin had passed, his significance still continued to dominate Russian politics. One clear example of this was his funeral as party members were afraid to read his testimony as it would make themselves look unpopular. This showed that even in death, Lenin’s words still held weight making him extremely significant. Furthermore, many of Lenin’s early policies such as his feminist policies continued to persist through Stalin’s administration as the USSR was the first country to have female pilots and female snipers. Lastly, we can see similarities in both Lenin and Stalin’s policies. For example, Stalin had copied some of Lenin’s “War Communism” as Stalin’s “Collectivization” advocated requisitioning of grain.…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin had several methods of social control that gave him such a powerful rule in Russia that even today he still has supporters. Socialist Realism was an essential method to create this, although it was not the most important method of social control.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Part 1 Stalin Myth Essay

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He argues that under Lenin was a “collectable leadership” with which they discussed political strategy. Stalin was power-hungry who repressed those who would stand up for their opinion, he didn't listen to the people and attacked those who supported him. Using the idea of “Enemy of the people” to justify his actions.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin a Red Tsar?

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lenin’s impact on Europe and Russia consisted of him applying Marxist ideas, which later led to complete Communism, and a threat to Europe and the rest of world. In developing his plan of socialism in Russia, Lenin followed the examples of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, the original developers of the communist theory. The main aspect of any kind of government, and especially socialism, is its economic structure. Lenin explained that in his economic theory, called Imperialism, the first step was to gradually move into a joined monopoly - capitalist phase, which later would become communism.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin seemed to be on good terms with Lenin until Stalin had spoken to Lenin’s wife Nadezhda Krupskaya following Lenin’s appraisal of Trotsky which Krupskaya had cited, and Lenin certainly did not like the way Stalin had spoken to her. In short, he amended his last testament and was making it clear that Stalin had to go because he could not be trusted, was rude and was an arrogant. In the party, Stalin had always been perceived as a dull, mediocre and uninteresting person who was happy to get on with dull, mediocre and uninteresting jobs which mainly consisted of administration and he proved he was good at this which was why he was ultimately appointed as the General Secretary of the party among other positions prior to this one – a potentially dire move by Lenin following his death simply because it put Stalin in a position where could place his friends and allies in high positions in the pending power struggle. This then raises the question how exactly Stalin came to be the dominant leader, and I will address potential reasons which could be argued as to…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin was the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union's Central Committee. After Lenin's death, he became the second leader of the Soviet Union. He was always Supporting Lenin and the Bolshevik system, even before the Bolshevik revolution. The political Communist of the Soviet Union was Marxism–Leninism which depends on the theories of Marxism and Leninism. The term Marxism–Leninism was called by Stalin.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How Did Lenin Gain Power

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Following the death of Lenin, the Bolshevik Party become complicated by personality clashes and a power struggle between senior party members. The ambiguity of Lenin’s will paved the way for the apparent heir to seize power, sparking conflict between Trotsky and Stalin. The ensuing struggle for power triggered fierce disputes over the economy and the question of succession was reflected in battles between the dominant right and left wing. Despite Trotsky’s standpoint as unofficial deputy to Lenin, Stalin was able to seize the role through his notion of socialism in one country which portrayed facets of both patriotism an rejuvenation, and was a core factor in his increased popularity amongst the Soviets. Stalin’s ability to manipulate and…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Collectivization was one of Stalin’s paramount methods of modernizing the Soviet Union in his “revolution from above”. Stalin sought to bring about industrialization and to streamline agricultural production through collectivization. Collectivization was not just intended to help industrialize the Soviet Union and improve agricultural efficiency but also to enhance widespread Communist control. Collectivization’s lofty goals were met through the exploitation of the peasants and industrialization had a great social impact on the people of the Soviet Union.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ideology of both Stalin and Lenin show that both these dictators came from different backgrounds and their policies were different. First, Lenin was the first dictator and followed a policy of a light communism and leaned more toward socialism, so his dream of a pure communism state was never achieved. While on the…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Evans, Benedikt (March 2004), essay: Compare and contrast the economic policies of Lenin and Stalin and evaluate their success, Impington (March 2004)…

    • 1282 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalin’s economic policies had one essential aim—the modernisation of the Soviet economy via two essential methods: collectivisation and industrialisation. Beginning in 1928, much of Russia’s economy (in terms of agriculture and industry) was brought directly under state control. Under Stalin, this was to be total. The way these radical were changes implicated has meant that the process was referred to as the ‘second revolution,’ a way of equating the importance of industrial/modernisation as that of the 1917 revolution. When Stalin introduced these drastic changes, he claimed that they marked a significant and vital stage in Soviet Communism as had Lenin’s actions during the October Revolution of 1917. It is understandable to claim that these comparisons show that the process of modernisation in Russia was intended primarily to enhance his own position as leader of…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin and his principals are the subject of a huge historiographical debate. The controversy surrounding Lenin's pragmatism in the face of social, political and economic instability begs the question: did Lenin compromise his principals in the race for survival? It is astonishing that surrounded by the turmoil that was Russia in the early 20th century Lenin actually survived for so long. During the years of 1917-18 he encountered food shortages, war and a vast amount of strikes. In 1921 he had to deal with civil war and a collapsing economy. Thus Lenin's primary task was survival which he accomplished. However one must question his method and in his quest for survival did he abandon his principals? To realise weather or not Lenin did actually abandon his principals we must first decide what those principals were. One of Lenin's most important principals was the idea of vanguardism – the elite. This was seen essential for the construction of the intelligentsia who could run the country in the name of the proletariat. Conformity through democratic centralism was also a key aspect. Lenin ensured a one party state. This would ensure the "dictatorship of the proletariat". Lenin saw himself not simply as representing the Russian worker…

    • 9686 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Joseph Stalin

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Joseph Stalin’s original support of The New Economic Policy shifted quickly. After having helped Lenin overthrown Genghis Khan he felt he deserved some sort of power in Asia. Stalin figured after having been ruled under the caste system for so long, it would be appealing to everyone to become equal to one another and pitched the idea to Lenin. If Stalin could make this a reality and have it be a successful form of government, Vladimir Lenin promised him a position as a leader of the Communist party. Stalin agreed ensuring that this was possible. Eventually Lenin trusts Stalin & his judgement, then promises everyone they would receive equal treatment, rights, and power if they accepted Communism. Since he was trusted they listened.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays