Preview

Stalin - History

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
885 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stalin - History
How far was Stalin’s victory in the power struggle between 1924 and 1929 the result of the popularity of his policies?
Even though Stalin’s victory in the power struggle was partly due to his popular policies, it was not just this that allowed Stalin also because of the mistakes made by other rivals and factors that played into his hands. For example Trotsky was a former menshevik which helped Stalin accuse him of not been a true Bolshevik.

There are many reasons that suggest Stalin’s victory in the power struggle was because his popular policies. For example Stalin’s popular policy of Socialism in one country put the needs of the USSR first, this was particularly popular because the conditions for the majority of the Russian people was unthinkable as extreme poverty was common for the average Russian in the the early 20th Century. It was a lot more popular than Trotsky's idea of World revolution, which would have seen many of the resources owned by the USSR sent abroad to try spread the Communist revolution abroad in other countries. Stalin developed his idea in Socialism in one Country because he did not like Trotsky. Stalin recognised that Trotsky’s policy was over optimistic and unpopular. The First World War and the civil war had destroyed the Russian economy and Stalin’s policy showed faith in the soviet people, almost portraying that Stalin believed in the Russian people. Stalin portrayed the Worldwide revolution as a policy that put the needs of other countries before those of the Russian people. Trostsky’s Jewish background marked him as a disloyal outsider among many party members anyway, and his international policy only seemed to confirm that he was not loyal to the people of Russia.

It was not just his popular policies that saw Stalin replace Lenin as the leader of the USSR. It was also partly due to the mistakes and weaknesses made by the other leading Bolsheviks such as Trotsky. Trotsky was seen as too powerful because he was the leader

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trotsky however was the complete opposite to Stalin. He was popular, an orator and a talented theorist who stirred loyalty in his troops. His radical ideas made him well-liked with the young and idealistic members of the communist party. Lenin in his testament identified Trotsky as a “the most able in the present communist committee” he also remarked on Trotsky’s “too far reaching self-confidence”…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin’s rise to power was due to many different factors. Firstly, on Lenin’s funeral day Stalin had given the wrong date to Trotsky which meant that Trotsky never turned up. Stalin took great advantage of the ‘Lenin Levy’ and how they worshipped Lenin. Stalin had written a short book which had summarised all of Lenin’s ideas and plans. From the side of the new Bolsheviks, this showed Stalin as the ‘true heir’ or natural successor of Lenin which made it increasingly difficult for his opponents to criticise him and his decisions. The absence of Trotsky at Lenin’s funeral created a large amount of political damage for him.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1925, Trotsky was forced to resign as Commissar for War. This was a potentially powerful position because it meant, if need be, the army would be on Trotsky’s side. Of course, Stalin realised this and how much of a threat it would be to him, and so it was he who persuaded the party to outvote Trotsky. Stalin did this by using his control of the party appointments to his advantage, as well as the 1921 ban on faction and the fears and jealousies within the party.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin was not a revolutionary man with people such as Trotsky having a far greater revolutionary record than him. He was a man of little initiative and preferred to take on the role of a follower rather than that of a leader. This would have been a problem for the party required someone with initiative and great leadership to steer Communist Russia in the right direction- something which Stalin lacked. He was also not an intellectual thinker. This was a bad thing, for being an intellectual thinker was one of the qualities the party looked highly upon. To be an intellectual thinker meant that you would be able to lead Russia into great heights and prosper, so for Stalin to fall short upon such qualities did little to improve his favour.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A further reason, why Stalin and not Trotsky was able to succeed Lenin was because Stalin’s policies were more popular. Stalin’s polices included making Russia Strong before spreading communism around the world. Whereas Trotsky believed in permanent revolution. This made…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Lenin’s death occurred most would have thought it obvious that Trotsky would succeed him. He was behind the planning of the November Revolution, he led the Red Army to victory in the Civil War, and he was Lenin’s good friend. Trotsky was the only party member who could rival Lenin as a speaker and writer. There were many reasons why…

    • 2242 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin’s race to become the all mighty ruler fully started after Lenin died of a stroke on the 21st of January 1924. With Lenin gone, Stalin started to eliminate the other members of the Communist Party: Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Rykov, Tomsky and Bukharin. He very cleverly switched between the left wing and the right wing, by making alliances with one wing the suddenly breaking with them, only to join the other wing, going against everything that they had just achieved. Stalin knocked out all other party members along the way even those who were considered to be his friend. His violent childhood, misguided early life and the death of his first wife caused him to lose all sense of emotion turning him into a vicious competitor in the Communist Party. Trotsky was one of Stalin’s major competitors for the title of all ruling leader, however even he could not stop this man of steel, a name that Stalin quite fittingly gave to himself as he joined the party.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone believed Trotsky would take leadership after Lenin died, even if they didn’t want him to. No one thought it would be Stalin. Therefore, Stalin felt he had to defeat Trotsky in order to become leader. However, the fear of Trotsky becoming leader isn’t the only factor in explaining Stalin’s victory in the power struggle.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin’s rise to power led to his greatest achievements. Stalin rose to power after helping Vladmir Lenin escape from Tsar’s army. Lenin then appointed him as general secretary of the Communist party. (“Joseph Stalin Biography” 1). Stalin took control through his popularity and the widespread support for him. Stalin revolutionized Russia and turned it into a global superpower. He imposed a five year plan to transform the Soviet Union. (“Joseph Stalin” 1). He forced rapid industrialization and the collectivization of agricultural land. Stalin caused a famine that lead to millions of deaths. Stalin kept his position of power by instilling fear. He punished people who didn’t agree with him by killing or exiling them to labor camps. (“Joseph Stalin: National Hero” 1) Stalin encouraged people to inform on one another which led to distrust between citizens. Ultimately, his paranoid thinking led to his downfall. He had thrown away his allies with the West and Nazi Germany had defeated him. Joseph Stalin modernized Russia in ways that no leader ever had before. Although Hitler and Stalin were strong dictators, Winston Churchill helped move his country…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin started his prominent rise in the leadership of the Soviet Union in 1924 after Lenin died of Neurosyphilis and a Stroke. During Lenin's final years as leader of the Bolshevik party, Stalin was one of the main men to take care of him, which is one of the reasons why Lenin made him the General Secretary in 1922, a job which later on in his career greatly helped Stalin further his cause to become the dictator of the Soviets.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    essay will look at Stalin’s rise to power and the success of his Domestic policies.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stalin

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Trotsky seemed to hold the most power due to his close friendship with Lenin before his strokes but an opposition had begun to emerge…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason as to why Stalin succeeded Lenin was his political powerbase and he showed this dominance in two ways. Firstly, he capitalised on the ‘Cult of Lenin’ by painting himself as a natural successor to Lenin. The ‘Cult of Lenin’ as he decided to adopt his ideologies and his life This was a smart move by Stalin as he could show that he was closely aligned to an almost perfect figure such as Lenin then by doing this he would able to win the popularity of ordinary Russians who were, to an extent, indoctrinated via this method. Therefore Stalin was able to consolidate his power by being seen as Lenin’s natural successor. In this sense, it wasn’t the political shortcomings of his opponents that allowed Stalin victory as it was the way in which he moulded and manipulated his powerbase to increase popularity.…

    • 635 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree to this only to a small extent, as there were a large number of other factors that affected the successor of Lenin. Josef Stalin was born into a peasant background in Georgia. Stalin was ‘safe’ in the eyes of the public and the Bolsheviks due to his perception of him. He was considered a pedestrian to them due to his background. Stalin wanted the idea of socialism in one country. After Lenin’s death Stalin opposed the idea of socialism spread across the world and the idea of permanent revolution, although this was against the ideas of Lenin this was appealing with the public and the right wing members of the party due to the first world war, the civil war and the 1915 revolution. This is because they felt that no more violence was needed. Stalin was General secretary of the Central Committee, he was also commissar of nationalities and also organised the rabkin. Stalin had a large power base but this was not the main reason to why he came into power.He was also liked by Lenin in the beginning of his political career due too the fact when he first met him Stalin impressed Lenin by standing up to him on matters of Marxist doctrine. By the time of Lenin’s death their relationship was different as we can see in Lenin’s testament that wasn’t released until after his death. Lenin wrote Stalin ‘Comrade Stalin, having become Secretary-General, has unlimited authority concentrated in his hands, and I am not sure whether he will always be capable of using that authority with sufficient caution’. Stalin managed to convince the politburo to ignore this and covered the testament up. Lenin praised Leon Trotsky in his testament.…

    • 637 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays