Preview

William Pickton Anthropology

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1495 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
William Pickton Anthropology
After reading the article in assignment one, complete the following questions. 1. Analyse the behaviour of William Pickton using the three different social science perspectives. Choose one theory from psychology, sociology, and anthropology. Using each perspective, write a one page analysis of the behaviour of William Pickton. Write a perspective for each social theory (three pages in total). 2. Write a hypothesis to research a serial murderer using the following social science theories: Psychoanalysis, Functionalism, and Feminism. For example, a Marxist could look at the economic inequalities as a means of promoting a feeling of helplessness. This helpless feeling could promote feelings of anger against anyone who possesses any means of production, and has control of his/her life. Lashing out against a community that is capable of supporting itself is a means of gaining power. Miller's job is in the service industry and does not involve the direct production of goods. Not controlling the means of production forces him to sell his skill. 3. INDEPTH: PICKTON
The missing women of Vancouver
CBC News Online | Updated Aug. 10, 2006 4. After investigators spent 18 months excavating his Port Coquitlam farm, Robert William Pickton faced 15 murder charges in Vancouver's missing women case in 2002.

In May 2005, Crown attorneys added 12 more first-degree murder charges against Pickton, bringing the grim total to 27.

One of those charges was eventually dropped in March 2006, after a judge ruled Pickton could not be tried for killing an unidentified victim.

In July 2003, B.C. provincial court judge David Stone ruled there was enough evidence to take Pickton to trial. This came after an extensive six-month-long preliminary hearing.

But in June 2004, lawyers working on the case said Pickton's trial won't start until spring 2005 at the earliest. In December 2004, Pickton's defence team asked for another delay to give them time to examine DNA

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    I will briefly outline the circumstances of the case and how the perpetrator – Coulston, was eventually captured and the evidence that flowed to convict him for the triple murders in Summit Road, Burwood.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Old Cold Case Summary

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    James Lee Hall Jr. was the named the first suspected in the the case. Hall was seen running from Mrs. Robinson`s home, the lookout person, Robert Way, came forward saying he was the lookout person and Octavian Brewton committed the murder and sexual assault. As a result, Hall was let go. Hall later moved to Colorado and died in 2000 from natural causes.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While this was going on, Darryl Hunt’s original lawyer Mark Rabil was working with some scientist to figure out if the DNA inside of Deborah Sykes and on the crime scene, was Darryl Hunt’s or some other gentleman’s. The DNA result came back and the DNA that was found at the crime scene, did not match Darryl Hunt’s DNA at all (Innocent Project). Although the proof was there, Darryl Hunt’s appeal for trial was rejected by the court, because the people believed that even with that evidence it still didn’t prove Darryl Hunt…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Herbert Landry Case Study

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Cory Talbot: It was brought by the Rocky Mountain Innocence Center, and they take cases where there is proof that they (the convicted) are innocent. Usually, they take cases that have evidence, like DNA, to prove their innocence. But when I looked at this case, I saw that the evidence was circumstantial and chose to take the case to free an innocent man. I went to a CLE where they spoke about the innocent and standing up for the innocent. He (Herbert Landry) wanted to have his voice heard for he was saying he was innocent, and I wanted to help him in proving it.…

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS

    • 811 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Within a year of the trial, defense lawyers, a private detective, and The Winnipeg Sun began raising issues about the case:…

    • 811 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Circumstantial evidence and inconclusive physical evidence stopped detectives from holding and taking Ridgeway to trial for fear of him being…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mathew Shepard Case Brief

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On April 5, 1999, 22 year old, Aaron McKinney was found guilty of felony murder, second-degree murder, kidnapping and robbery. 21 year old, Russell Henderson pled guilty to kidnapping and felony murder and was sentenced to two consecutive life terms. Two women described as the suspects girlfriends, Chasity Vera Pasley (20) and Krista Lean Price (18) were charged as accessories after the fact of first-degree murder (The Data Lounge, Issues 2000, [on-line]).…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Joyce Gilchrist Case Study

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The pretermination hearing began on August 21, 2001 and lasted eight days. The hearing sustained allegations that Gilchrist made inappropriate expenditures, was dishonest when communicating with her supervisors, mishandled evidence and case files, and failed to establish proper procedures. Allegations of Gilchrist’s testimony compromising the Oklahoma City Police Department integrity and that her casework analysis was flawed and improperly documented were also sustained. On September 25, 2001 Gilchrist was terminated. Gilchrist was never formally charged with any crimes (04-6402 -- Gilchrist v. City of Oklahoma City).…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The wrongful conviction occurred on May 28, 1971 when Seale, a 17 year old was walking home from a school dance. He came across his friend Donald Marshall in Wentworth Park located in Sydney, Nova Scotia. Marshall and Seale were talking when a man named Roy Ebsary, a drunk who had a reputation for being violent and unpredictable and was previously convicted for a knife related weapon charge, and his friend Jimmy MacNeil. MacNeil stopped them to ask for a cigarette, when drunk Ebsary stabbed Seale in the stomach and sliced Marshall’s arm. MacNeil and Ebsary fled the crime scene and Marshall went to get help. An ambulance came and got Seale to a hospital unfortunately he died in the hospital the next day.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bennet began his second day of trial against Dr. Wecht in Pittsburgh 2008. Be ynnet still feels so uncomfortable having to testify against Wecht, but he still had no choice in the matter. Bennet just wanted to go back to his wife and home in California. The defendant lawyer than began his questioning on Bennet. He asked Bennet about how he was paid, if he was afraid during the FBI investigation, and about his immigration. Finally he asked Bennet about CTE and his discovery. He asked Bennet about the publicity that came along with it and Bennet says that he does not like it and sometimes wishes he never discovered the disease because of all the trouble that has come along with it. The trial ends 10 days later in a hung jury in April of 2008.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case had a total of three trials which lasted for about ten years. For the first trial Guy Paul was defended by a famous Toronto lawyer named Clayton Ruby (Guy). He was well known for facing tough criminal cases and his main defense in this trial was that the police did not build up a proper case before arresting his client, Guy Paul was then found not guilty but that trial was appealed and a second trial took place six years later. In the second case he was found guilty where he was against Neil McGuigan and was defended by Jack Kofshy (Guy). Unlike the first trial, Guy Paul was found guilty and was send to a lifetime in prison. Then 18 months into his prison sentence he was bailed out for $40,000 and had a third and final trial (Faryon). In this trial came new DNA evidence which proved that the seamen found on the underwear of Christine Jessop did not match Guy Paul’s DNA. With that in mind he was released of all charges and was let go. It took him 10 years and 3 visits to the court to be proven to not be guilty. It was known by him and his family that he was not guilty and that by the end of it all, the actual killer may not be found. This is a story which showcases a life of a man and his struggles against the Canadian justice system. Then finally after ten years he can live life knowing that he will no longer be judged of being a murderer. That is why his life can inspire people to…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sacco And Venzetti Essay

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Before the trial they tried Venzetti for a previous crime of a failed robbery. This…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1996 Neil Acourt, Mr Knight and Mr Dobson stood trial for murder but were acquitted after the judge decided the evidence of witness Duwayne Brooks - Stephen's friend and with him at the time - was unreliable.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those that have not been exposed to a jury trial might be rather shocked how to process works, not only in criminal matters but also in civil matters as in the case…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Scott Peterson Case

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages

    There was a good amount of evidence used in the Scott Peterson trial by the prosecution but all of it was circumstantial with not one piece of hard evidence. Five key items of evidence that the prosecution used to sway the jury in convicting Scott Peterson were the defenses major blunder from Dr. Charles March, the missing cement, the affair with Amber Frey, the two tarps used on the fishing trip, and finally the ultimate break down of Petersons fishing alibi. The first key item of evidence and the straw that broke the camels back was the complete break down of the defenses key witness Dr. Charles March. Dr. March was brought to the trail as the defenses…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays