Preview

Stephen Lawrence Criminal Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
708 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stephen Lawrence Criminal Case
Despite a criminal case, a private prosecution and an inquest, no-one has ever been convicted of the murder of Stephen Lawrence. The racially motivated murder of this young black student and the subsequent bungling of the police investigation outraged the public and press alike. The Daily Mail campaigned vigorously for Stephen Lawrence. They even formally accused five men of murder and invited them to sue them if this was wrong. No complaint was ever made.

Stephen Lawrence was killed in a race attack 11 years ago

Black teenager Stephen Lawrence was murdered in 1993. His killers have never been convicted.
Despite an extensive reinvestigation, the Crown Prosecution Service has announced that no more charges will be brought over
…show more content…
What happened in the original investigation?
The original Metropolitan Police investigation - found by a later inquiry to be racist and incompetent - did not lead to any prosecutions.
But the family doggedly pursued the case and eventually five young men were identified as suspects.
Who were the five suspects?
In 1993, Neil Acourt and his brother Jamie, David Norris, Gary Dobson and Luke Knight were arrested.
Proceedings against Jamie Acourt and David Norris never went to trial.
In 1996 Neil Acourt, Mr Knight and Mr Dobson stood trial for murder but were acquitted after the judge decided the evidence of witness Duwayne Brooks - Stephen's friend and with him at the time - was unreliable.
In the case of Gary Dobson, a later Kent Police report said four adults had confirmed his presence elsewhere on the night of the murder.
All five have consistently denied the allegations made against them.
A reinvestigation was launched in February 1999 - but this has also now led to no charges being brought.
The CPS said there was not enough new evidence to go to court.

What effect did the inquiry into his death
…show more content…
Scotland Yard has made numerous changes in an attempt to stamp out racism, and all public bodies are now obliged to promote equality and tackle discrimination.
The government has also tackled the double jeopardy rule which states that, in English law, anyone cleared of a crime in court cannot be retried for the same crime at a later date.
Now they can be, if significant new evidence emerges.
What hasn't changed?
A lot of campaigners say the system is still failing minority communities.
The aftermath of Stephen's murder marked a low-point in relations between ethnic minorities and the police, something which senior officers say they are still trying to rectify.
Black people are still far more likely to be stopped and searched by police than white people.
Black men are also disproportionately over-represented in the prison population compared to white men.
Last year the commander of the Metropolitan Police's anti-racist unit said the force remained institutionally racist, despite a "sea-change" in its attitudes and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hunt was given a chance to plead guilty and then just serve 5 years. He refused for he knew he did not commit the crime and would not let Deborah Sykes death land on his shoulders. He was put through a second trial which was held in Catawba County in front of an all white jury. This time two jail informants claimed that Hunt plead guilty to them, Hunt was sentenced again in prison for life (Innocent Project).…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the year 1892 in Massachusetts, a young woman was convicted of brutally murdering her parents. Although everyone in the town said she was guilty, at the end of the trial she was dropped of all charges and given the verdict of not guilty. Despite all the evidence against her, she was set free. In the state of Massachusetts, justice wasn 't served in the murders of Andrew and Abby Borden.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The crime was committed by the East side serial rapist at the time, even though the police identified the semen found at the scene was none of theirs they still pinned the five for the crime. Likewise even though one of the cops who worked for both the serial rapist and jogger case had both semen samples he never cross checked the semen of the similar motives. The only time the five were acquitted for their crime was when Matias Reyes the man behind the decade old crime met Wise in jail and felt ashamed of sending innocent men to prison. All of the five in 2002 were admonished from their…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Through the Truscott case there are many witnesses, some defending Truscotts’ case, some against him. Jocelyne Gaudet was an important child witness to testify against Steven, but police notes exposed to view fissures in her story. The missing witness the crown kept cryptic was a vital witness who said “she saw Steve and Lynne riding down the county road on the way to the highway”. There were a few more witnesses adding to the case.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ray Lewis

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Oakley and Sweeting were acquitted of the charges in June 2000. No other suspects have ever been arrested since for the crime.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Later the three teenaged boys were arrested by police for murdering these three eight year old boys. The teenagers were sentenced to life in prison, all except Damien Echols, he had a death sentence. He was the only one out of the three to be ordered a death sentence because it was believed that he was the one…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Steve Arey and Terry Jordan were young, inexperienced lawyers who should have never even been considered for a capital case. Judge Persin, the presiding Judge in the case, however, decided on these two gentlemen because other more experienced lawyers refused to take the case because of the huge financial sacrifice it would require. Albeit public speculation that Judge Persin's previous profession as a prosecutor had led him to heavily favor the prosecution, his decision stood. The two prosecutors who Arey and Jordan would be opposed by were Mickey McGlothlin and Tom Scott. Both prosecutors had far more experience than the defense lawyers, but that didn't stop Judge Persin from appointing Arey and Jordan to the case. It was an obvious mismatch, intentional or not, and was just the beginning of many problems that would arise for the defendant's case.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The 1981 Brixton riots and the Scarman Report were supposed to be watershed moments in the history of the Police force in the United Kingdom, especially the Metropolitan Police. However, subsequent events, in particular the murder of Stephen Lawrence and the police failures in that investigation mean that the Metropolitan Police still has a long way to go to remove the shadow of institutional racism.…

    • 1766 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stephen Lawrence aged 18 lost his life due to a fatal stabbing at a bus stop on 22ndApril 1993 in a racist and unprovoked attack. This was a case which the police were deeply criticised for in respect of their role of responsibility and the reason why the case is so well known is because until now, 10 years on no one has been convicted of his murder (Macpherson Report, Ten Years On, 1999). The real question is: have policing strategies changed since the case of Stephen Lawrence and has the MacPherson report resulted in extinction of institutional racism? Ethnic minorities have always been disadvantaged in some category, if not education, then employment and these disadvantages can change a person’s lifestyle. For example black people are more likely to be stopped and searched whereas Asians are less likely to be stopped. The smallest issues like these have become today’s major problems as ethnic minorities feel they are treated unfairly. Is there a link between the criminal justice system and black people and if there is then how has it been produced? This essay aims to examine whether changes in policing arising out of Macpherson report has resulted in the extermination of institutional…

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since 1992, almost three hundred people in the United States have been exonerated by the Innocence Project. What this means is that almost three hundred people have been acquitted for a crime that they were falsely convicted of committing and were then released back into society. Many of these false convictions were the result of a lack of technology back in the time of the trials which lead to unvalidated or improper use of forensic science. Some additional reasons that people are wrongfully convicted are misidentifications from eyewitnesses and false confessions. In this paper, I plan to write about Kenneth Ireland. His story shows how wrongful convictions and exonerations are issues in the United States.…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stephen was a Black British man from Eltham in south east London, who was murdered in a racist attack while waiting for a bus on the evening of 22 April 1993. It was suggested during the course of that investigation that the murder was racially motivated and that Stephen was murdered purely because he was black. Initially, no one was arrested after the attack which then led to questioning about the handling of the case by the Police and the Crown Prosecution Service who were then themselves accused of institutional racism (according to the 1999 McPherson report). The investigation into Stephen's death was found to have been marred by professional incompetence and categorical errors. The general public were outraged when they learned that the Police had dismissed Stephen’s…

    • 1457 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New York Police Department has had discrimination in the workplace for many years. Many of the most qualified detectives, are not given to opportunity to get promoted because of race. Many of the detective’s white colleagues who joined later in time were given a promotion before the minority police members could. The main reason for this is discrimination. Another way the detectives were discriminated against is that all the detective were put into the same division. All of the qualified detectives were put into the same division even though many of the detectives were more qualified than the other detectives (Mueller, Southall, Dwyer & Beachy 2017).…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The O. J. Simpson Trial

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In October of 1995, O.J Simpson was found not guilty for the murder of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman. This trial was the most publicized criminal trial in American history. Evidence shows that he was in fact responsible for the murders when many witnesses…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am writing this report to explain how recent laws promote anti discriminatory practise in an health and social care environment.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The extent of police behavior using racial profiling causes complete mistrust between communities and the force. Entire cultures have formed around the abhorrence and disgust towards police brutality and a complete lack of tolerance due to people’s different…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays