Preview

Herbert Landry Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2048 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Herbert Landry Case Study
On February 6, 2006, Herbert Landry went to the police for they assumed that he had started the fire in the Shadow Wood Apartment Complex in Provo, Utah. The police had witnesses in the apartment complex who stated that they had seen Herbert Landry leaving the building shortly before the fire started. Forty-six-year-old Herbert Landry was then believed to be the culprit behind the fire even though the investigation was still in progress, and there was no substantial evidence linking Herbert Landry to the fire.
Before Mr. Landry was suspected of arson, he lived in New Orleans with his family. For reasons unknown, Mr. Landry sent his family to live with one of his relatives in Texas. Not long after, Hurricane Katrina hit Mr. Landry’s house. He …show more content…
Cory Talbot: The science that was presented to the jury about arson was not factual. It was circumstantial, and if experts had been brought in, it would have all been disproven.
What compelled you to take the case?
Benjamin Machlis: I worked with the Rocky Mountain Innocence Center for a while, and they brought me the case. I thought it was a good case and thought that Herbert Landry deserved to be exonerated.
Cory Talbot: It was brought by the Rocky Mountain Innocence Center, and they take cases where there is proof that they (the convicted) are innocent. Usually, they take cases that have evidence, like DNA, to prove their innocence. But when I looked at this case, I saw that the evidence was circumstantial and chose to take the case to free an innocent man. I went to a CLE where they spoke about the innocent and standing up for the innocent. He (Herbert Landry) wanted to have his voice heard for he was saying he was innocent, and I wanted to help him in proving it.
What do you believe were the primary reasons for his
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Essay On Chicago Fire
    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Essay On Chicago Fire

    The fire was around a small barn belonging to the O'Leary family that surrounded an alley behind a street called Dekoven Street. The first building to be consumed by the fire was the shed next to the barn, but many city officials never determined the exact cause of the fire. Over the years there were speculations. The most popular speculation was Mrs. O’Leary’s cow; therefore, others suspect that a group of men were gambling inside the barn and knocked over a lantern. There were still others that suggested that the fire connected to other fires in the area that day.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Darryl Hunt Research Paper
    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Darryl Hunt Research Paper

    While this was going on, Darryl Hunt’s original lawyer Mark Rabil was working with some scientist to figure out if the DNA inside of Deborah Sykes and on the crime scene, was Darryl Hunt’s or some other gentleman’s. The DNA result came back and the DNA that was found at the crime scene, did not match Darryl Hunt’s DNA at all (Innocent Project). Although the proof was there, Darryl Hunt’s appeal for trial was rejected by the court, because the people believed that even with that evidence it still didn’t prove Darryl Hunt…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Peter Zenger Case
    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Peter Zenger Case

    Andrew Hamilton of Philadelphia stepped up to defend Zenger. Hamilton admitted that Zenger printed the charges and demanded the prosecution to prove them false. The judge told the jury to convict Zenger if they believed he printed the stories. Thy returned with the verdict of not guilty. Zenger and Hamilton were hailed as hero’s.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tshuanahusset's Murder Case
    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Tshuanahusset's Murder Case

    This aboriginal man claimed to have been there the night of the murder and testifies that Tshuanahusset was the one that murdered William Robinson. Yet, he did not firsthand see Tshuanahusset kill William Robinson, nor did he immediately report him for the murder either. It was fifteen months before Sue Tas went to the authorities with information on the murder, and this rose no suspicion for neither the authorities nor the judicial system. The fact that Sue Tas waited this long to inform the authorities rises suspicion that perhaps he was lying because there was belief that Sue Tas was Tshuanahusset killed. Although this suspicion was out in the open, the authorities and judicial system still solely relied on Sue Tas as the only witness and did not look further into these circumstances. This could have simply been that Sue Tas saw the opportunity to pin an open case murder on Tshuanahusset which would explain why he reported him much later from when the murder actually occurred. Also, Sue Tas was threatened by his own tribe and chief after he went to the authorities and reported Tshuanahusset. This information was set aside by all authorities because they simply did not want to complicate the investigation and close it as soon as possible. This information could have meant that Sue Tas did something that was unforgivable by his tribe and this would not be revealing information, but perhaps this could be that he lied about the information to falsely convict Tshuanahusset. Furthermore, the complication of Sue Tas as the only witness should have encouraged authorities and the judicial system to look further into the murder case of William Robinson and not solely rely on one witness, yet through they perfunctory behaviour they closed the case quickly and…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparison Of Daubert, And Kumho
    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page

    Comparison Of Daubert, And Kumho

    Both Daubert, and Kumho, make it clear that the day of the expert, who merely opines, and does so on basis of vague notions of experience, is over. Experts are now held to a level of accountability that requires factual predicates, in historical fact, or in competent evidence, which allows a factfinder to independently verify the accuracy of the expert’s results. Absent such reliable verification, the expert’s opinion is not admissible. Choudek’s failure to test his hypotheses in a reliable manner or to validate his hypotheses by reference to generally accepted scientific principles as applied to the facts of this case renders his testimony on the cause and origin of the fire unreliable and therefore inadmissible under Daubert and Federal Rules of Evidence 702 and 104.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Scat By Carl Hiaasen
    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page

    Scat By Carl Hiaasen

    Sometimes, wrong judgement is dangerous, and in Scat, Duane Jr. is framed for arson. Because of his rough image, Nick suspects Duane, even though he’s innocent. Nick decides to look deeper into the case when Duane Jr. sincerely says, “I didn’t do that fire.”(pg. 216). Hiaasen shows that making conclusions too early is irresponsible,…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Rape Of Nanking By Iris Chang: An Analysis
    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Rape Of Nanking By Iris Chang: An Analysis

    To be able to properly analyze these claims, however, the definitions of an expert and a pure fact must be established. An expert will be defined as someone who is trained or selected to fulfil a particular role. While this definition may be flexible, it encompasses all experts that will be discussed, namely historians, lawyers, and jurors. In the context of this essay, evidence is defined as an undisputable fact which allows for conclusions to be drawn which are disputable.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jeff Wood Essay
    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jeff Wood Essay

    “Three former jurors have said they feel the government’s presentation to them of a discredited psychiatrist who predicted with certainty,” Tyler said in a statement Friday. “And without evaluating Mr. Wood, that Mr. Wood would be criminally violent in the future was unfair.”…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bullhead Arizona Death Case
    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bullhead Arizona Death Case

    In Bullhead City, Arizona, the city Sue Johnson and her husband thought would be a great place to raise their two children, one of their children, Scott dies in a mysterious shack fire. Sue and her husband moved from California to Arizona in the year 1973. Less than fifty yards from their new home, there stood an old shed, once used by copper miners as a powder magazine. Soon enough it became a playhouse for Scott and his friends, while Sue kept a close eye on the kids. On April 3rd,, 1974, at 3:45 P.M., the bullhead City Volunteer Fire Department responded to a call, the shed (The old powder magazine) was on fire. A former Bullhead City Fire Chief Larry Adams says he can remember the details very vividly: “What I could see through the smoke is what appeared to be upholstery on the floor. When I got the pike pole, I stooped down to look under the smoke to hook this material and hook it out to extinguish it.”…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Guy Paul Morin: The Canadian Justice System
    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Guy Paul Morin: The Canadian Justice System

    The case had a total of three trials which lasted for about ten years. For the first trial Guy Paul was defended by a famous Toronto lawyer named Clayton Ruby (Guy). He was well known for facing tough criminal cases and his main defense in this trial was that the police did not build up a proper case before arresting his client, Guy Paul was then found not guilty but that trial was appealed and a second trial took place six years later. In the second case he was found guilty where he was against Neil McGuigan and was defended by Jack Kofshy (Guy). Unlike the first trial, Guy Paul was found guilty and was send to a lifetime in prison. Then 18 months into his prison sentence he was bailed out for $40,000 and had a third and final trial (Faryon). In this trial came new DNA evidence which proved that the seamen found on the underwear of Christine Jessop did not match Guy Paul’s DNA. With that in mind he was released of all charges and was let go. It took him 10 years and 3 visits to the court to be proven to not be guilty. It was known by him and his family that he was not guilty and that by the end of it all, the actual killer may not be found. This is a story which showcases a life of a man and his struggles against the Canadian justice system. Then finally after ten years he can live life knowing that he will no longer be judged of being a murderer. That is why his life can inspire people to…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Csi Effect Summary
    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Csi Effect Summary

    The Honorable Donald E. Sheldon is a felony trial judge in Ann Arbor, Michigan and a member of the faculty at Eastern Michigan University. In Sheldon’s article, The ‘CSI Effect’: Does it really exist? that was published in the National Institute of Justice, he discusses the craze around the “crime-fiction television dramas” and the possible effects it has on jurors in their decisions in court cases. (Sheldon, par. 3)With the country in complete fascination with crime-fiction Sheldon found television rating from 2006 that showed that “five of the top ten television programs that week were about scientific evidence in criminal cases. Together they amassed more than 100 million viewers.” (Sheldon, Par. 6) With more than 100 million viewers watching crime-fiction in a given week Sheldon wonders “how many of them report for juror duty the next day?”(Sheldon, Par. 7) If the number is significant does it affect how they will judge the outcome in the courtroom?…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Wrongly Accused In To Kill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee
    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wrongly Accused In To Kill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee

    Wrongly Accused Who was wrongly accused when the trials of Tom Robison took place back in the 1930s? I will present some facts and quotes from informational sources that will prove how people are really the ones to blame. To discuss who or what was wrongly accused? Is to get to the bottom and find the evidence base on facts.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Scottsboro Boys Essay
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Scottsboro Boys Essay

    Despite his clashes with Callahan and his disgust with the corrupt Alabamian justice system, Leibowitz refused to retire from the case when given the opportunity. He argued that the boys were “his responsibility” (page 357). Leibowitz made it very clear when Chalmers wished to replace him with southern lawyers that he would not step down unless he made sure that the boys’ interests were safeguarded. This was noble of Leibowitz considering the physical, emotional, and mental toll that this trial took on…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The CSI Effect
    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The CSI Effect

    High profile cases, flawless police work, and only the most up to date technology. These are traits every reality crime show such as CSI or Criminal Minds portray. While it is no surprise that this type of television show is among the most popular, the viewers are beginning to develop a skewed perspective of forensics in the real world. This new mindset is changing more than just the way people perceive science. The misunderstanding of science and technology has begun to lead to issues in the courtroom, in real criminal trials. Jurors influenced by the appearance of perfect investigative science are demanding extensive testing that is unnecessary and extremely costly. Reality crime shows heighten juror expectations and force law enforcement…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Donald Marshall Jr
    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Donald Marshall Jr

    d Donald Marshall Junior, a young Mi’kmaq man, was arrested and wrongfully convicted of murdering Sandy Seale, a local black man in 1971. He spent 11 years in prison before being acquitted of his charges. It was because of the faulty and negligent police work that a seventeen year old was to be imprisoned for the next 11 years of his life. Due to their incompetence, not only was a young man sent to jail, but the perpetrator roamed free. It was in 1982 that the case was reopened by Marshall’s new lawyer, Stephen Aronson.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics