Hello, Ladies and Gentlemen. My name is ___________ and I am a Federalist. As a Federalist I believe that with a stronger national government we will be able to get more things done. The government is in a state of near anarchy. The Articles as they are do not have the strength that is needed to establish a new and powerful country. I want the country to be united, I fear that if the Constitution is not ratified that America will break up into thirteen different nations.
It is true that the national government would have greater power than it did under the Articles of Confederation. But its powers are limited to tasks that face the entire nation, like trade, currency, and defending our new country from outside threats. Experience has shown that a stronger national government is needed to deal with these problems. The Constitution provides adequate protections for the state governments to prevent their being destroyed by the national government.
It is very important that the Constitution be ratified. The Constitution is a compilation of many of the proposed ideas suggested in various important documents such as the Magna Carta, English Bill of Rights, and even the Declaration of Independence. I am amazed at the compromises that are being suggested to win the Anti-Federalists' approval of the Constitution. I am also angered at the promise of a bill of rights! The national government would be so good at protecting the rights of the people that it would soon gain their loyalty and support. It could not become a tyranny because of the limitations placed on it by the system of checks and balances and separation of powers, because of that I feel a Bill of Rights is not necessary.
As a citizen of Mega world I have had the misfortune of being marked as "Scrambled". As a Scrambled individual I must rely on other citizens to assist me, I don't possess any skills that would help me become a productive part of my community. With this new Constitution I will be able to receive more support from the people I depend on because they in turn will receive more support from the government.
The Anti- Federalist biggest objection to the Constitution being ratified is the lack of a bill of rights. A bill of rights is unnecessary because the powers of the government are limited. A bill of rights would give the impression that the people could only expect protection of those rights that were actually listed. By passing the constitution we are not only working to help ourselves as individuals, but we are also working to help our nation, and make it the best country that it can be.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The articles of Confederation created a loose confederation. The national government had very limited powers. The National government could declare war but not raise an army, sign treaties, make alliances, and control relationships with Indians. The state's cold raise an army, and tax. There was no executive branch formed from the Articles of Confederation.…
- 54 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Before the federal system government, there was an article of confederation (1776-1787), which was designed to keep more power in the states government, and less power in the national government. The article of confederation had much weakness, which calls for a change in the government system. The federal government system which is also known as “Federalism” is a division of power between a central government and state/regional government, and the division of powers are as follow; delegated powers (enumerated), which is expressly given to the national government; reserved powers, which reside in the state; and the concurrent powers granted to both national and state government. The balance and boundaries between the federal government and state…
- 728 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Articles of Confederation of 1781 produced the first endeavor of government structure. This attempt of forming a national and state government failed. Some of the issues that transpired from the constitution include: Each state only had one vote in Congress, regardless of state size; Congress did not have the powers to tax or regulate foreign or interstate commerce; There was not a recognized national court system or executive branch to enforce acts passed by Congress; While amendments to the Constitution required a unanimous vote, the passing of a law required a 9/13 vote. The lack of involvement of the national government allowed states to become self-governing and sovereign. States printed their own money that only had value within that territory which created a hindrance in trade and in turn produced an unstable economy. The national government having no enforcing authority and the United States of America was in a state of chaos. This generated an out lash from individuals.…
- 780 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Analyze how the U.S. Constitution overcame the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation The article of confederation was intended to create weak federal government; it prompted many issues that inevitably needed to be addressed by the government. That lead to a meeting where the new pan of government called the constitution was writ. Once created, that constitution with time resolve some of the issues that under the article of confederation. One thing the constitutional did was to give the leader of the government the power to manage fund issue.…
- 316 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The state governments retained most of the power under the Articles, with little power give to the central government. Congress, for example, had to rely upon the states for its funds and for the executed of its decrees. The central government received little respect and was not able to accomplish much because it had little authority over the states of individuals in America.…
- 3043 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
“From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." During those years the United States government was still developing and the Articles of Confederation was not an effective form of government. The states had a strong objection against the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was not a government well suited for this new country. The United States needed power over the states to make it a better place to live and have separate states with different laws.…
- 405 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Although the Articles of Confederation gave the state more power but this was not enough because the congress did not get enough power. The country was in need for a stronger Federal government;in which, it was not present in the Articles of confederation. The lack of power for the national government and the congress led to the creation of the United States Constitution. The constitution created the executive branch, and federal courts. This makes the constitution better than the Articles of confederation because the Federal court system was created to ensure that law was followed throughout the country. The creation of executive branch is another advantage of the constitution.…
- 109 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
To amend the US Constitution, a bill has to go through a two-stage process: proposal and ratification. The proposal stage has to have two thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Every successful amendment has started this way and even the failed ones. A proposal can also be made by a Constitutional convention, which is a one-off body which is put together for a specific purpose, and this is called by Congress on petition by two thirds of the states. This method has never been used. The problem with this proposal method is that the Constitution doesn’t state how it should be done and there is no mechanism.…
- 735 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Compare and contrast the Articles of confederation and the Constitution, especially in regard to the specific powers granted to the national government.The formation and ideals of the Articles of Confederation and its successor, the Unites States Constitution, varied from each other in terms of a stronger or weaker federal government in dealing with issues. The Constitution gave more power to the federal government, while the Articles of Confederation involved a very weak government with primary rights interests of the individual states as the focus. Both gave Congress legislative power and set up departments that would eventually be incorporated into the president’s cabinet. The formation of the Articles of Confederation was of the extreme importance in the foundation and development of the Constitution and the stronger central government that still lasts to this day. Also known as “The Articles of Confusion”, the Articles of Confederation (finally passed by all thirteen states by 1781) created a “loose confederation” or “firm league of friendship” between the states. There were no judicial branch and executive branch in the new federal /national government, as the previous monarchy of George III still left bad feelings in minds of newly independent Americans, who were instilled with the ideals of being suspicious of government actions and remained filled with democratic zeal. According to the Articles of Confederation, each state had one vote in Congress. This meant the small state of Rhode Island, with its population of 60,000, had the same voice and power as the most populated of the states, Virginia. For a bill to be passed in the Congress, 9 of the 13 states had to approve. For any amendments to be made to the Articles of Confederation, a unanimous decision had to be agreed upon among the states. Amending the Articles was almost impossible, as it was rare for all the states to agree upon a certain issue. If the Articles had been able of being patched up…
- 1246 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The drafters of the Articles of Confederation wanted to make their country strong and independent. The Articles of Confederation created a national government of specific yet sharply circumscribed powers.The government wanted self-controlled states in which each state had one vote. Delegates were selected annually by the individual state legislatures and they could serve no more than three out of the six years in office. A president was elected annually by Congress and could serve no more than one year out of three. Votes were decided by majority of the states, except major questions which required the agreement of nine or more states. This government was “granted national authority in the conduct of foreign affairs, matters of war and peace,…
- 194 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Yes, the constitution should be ratified because the constitution can be amended, separation of powers, and the three branches of government. The constitution could be amended John Jay thought it was a good idea for them to amend the constitution because he thought that the constitution needed a little work.One thing he said in document G is that “Give the proposed Constitution a fair trial and mend it as time, occasion and experience.”The constitution cans be ratified due to it can be amended and it can be better than it was before.…
- 301 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The United States of America. A beautiful country that we fought so hard to create. An eight year struggle that we suffered through, but our fighting spirit never dwindled. But what if it were all to fall and break away? What if our efforts are meaningless? All of our suffering, all of it will go in vain. Our government is weak under the Articles of Confederation. If kept like this, America will fall into chaos! We need a stronger government! The Constitution offers us a strong government, with a strong leader. The leader can be kept in check by the people and the government, so there will no longer be a fear of tyranny! The Constitution also has a three branch government, in which each of the branches will limit the power of the others. The anti-federalists…
- 450 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In order for the United States to become a successful nation after the revolutionary war the Congress had to devise a system of government that would be just and effective. First, the articles of confederation were drawn up, but they failed massively. The major reason for failure was the excessive amount of power the states had over the federal government, creating a weak central government, and obviously, the states couldn’t function as a stable group. Unlike our current government, the articles relied on solely the congress with the executive and judicial offices nonexistent. With no executive office to enforce the laws, and no judicial wing to interpret them, most of the laws congress passed were ignored, or modified by the individual states,…
- 711 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This is an important moment for delegates to decide whether or not to ratify The Constitution. This is an important moment in our countries history because the delegates are deciding how the government is going to work.Why we have created this document is because the Articles of Confederation aren't working, and people think that the constitution are not going to work either.The proposed will give us Constitution nothing but failure. The Constitution shouldn't be ratified because this form of government has never been tried, even by Great Britain, and it could destroy the country a lot worse then the Articles of Confederation, it not only will do that but, even with the risk, we will have all branches of government to be filled with the wealthy elite class of people. And for these reasons, I think we shouldn't ratify the Constitution.…
- 625 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Why did the framers of the united states constitution ultimately decided to give more power to the federal government rather than the state governments. There are many problems with the articles of confederation, including the weaknesses and the lack of support it gave us.The topics i will be discussing are, focus on the federal government , the focus on the state government and finally what does the constitution say about the federal and the states.…
- 502 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays