Preview

Articles Of Confederation Persuasive Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
450 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Articles Of Confederation Persuasive Essay
Do not deny, ratify! The United States of America. A beautiful country that we fought so hard to create. An eight year struggle that we suffered through, but our fighting spirit never dwindled. But what if it were all to fall and break away? What if our efforts are meaningless? All of our suffering, all of it will go in vain. Our government is weak under the Articles of Confederation. If kept like this, America will fall into chaos! We need a stronger government! The Constitution offers us a strong government, with a strong leader. The leader can be kept in check by the people and the government, so there will no longer be a fear of tyranny! The Constitution also has a three branch government, in which each of the branches will limit the power of the others. The anti-federalists …show more content…
constitution will be the cement layer of our nation. Only after the cement has been laid can you build upon it. Likewise, only after the U.S. has ratified the constitution, will we be able to build on top of it. So do not deny, ratify! If the Constitution is ratified, then there will be peace and happiness in our land.Think about it. If we did not have committees during the war, then could we have won? If we fought in disarray, with no order, no system, could we have won? The answer is no! Likewise, without any order in our government, we will never be able to battle our future problems! So do not deny, ratify! The Constitution offers America a stronger government, which will lead to peace in our country. Tyranny will never be possible again because of the system of checks and balances which is in the Constitution. Now, power is always kept in check. No one will be able to tromple over us the way that King George III did. Our country can prosper, and be the envy of the world! But we need the support of our citizens! The lack of your one vote can be the reason that the constitution will not be ratified. So do not deny the constitution, ratify it to make our country

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine oneself back at the constitutional convention in seventeen eighty-seven. All of the brightest minds and most respected people in one place, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the southeast of the state, near New York. Because it is May, and just beginning to be summer, it is hot, and because all the windows are closed in the interest of secrecy, it is stifling as well. Fifty-five well known thinkers of the age, all white males, have come. They range in age from James Madison, an up-and-comer and a prodigy who is twenty five to Benjamin Franklin, a wise, venerable, learned man who is eighty one. Delegates from eleven states are present, New Hampshire not turning up until July, and Rhode Island not at all, thinking to veto the proceedings by their absence. The problem that had caused these proceedings was that the Articles of Confederation, the current system of government was too weak. although the Northwest Ordinance resulted of it, and it fixed the fear of a strong central government and dominance by large states, there were unfair competition among states, unenforceable trade agreements, no power over states governments, no president, no judicial branch and the government could not pay debts because they could not force states to pay taxes. As the cons out-weighed the pros, it was clear that something had to be done. The framers decided to create a new government completely. The question was; How do we give the government the power it needs while preventing tyranny? This essay will address the many and varied was the constitution guards against tyranny. In this essay, the word tyranny refers to James Madison’s definition, which states, “The accumulation of all powers…in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, Hook Document). The constitution addresses tyranny in four main ways: the balance of powers between national and state…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. "From 1781 to 1787 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." Using the documents and your knowledge of the period, evaluate this statement.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is understood that the US Constitution was written to form a more centralized form of government, a federation, which could protect and regulate the rights of the US citizens. While the Articles of Confederation was avoiding this type of government affected by the British experience, the constitution encouraged it. The main difference between these two documents is the balance and centralization of powers. How did the constitution change the role of national government in the life of US citizens?…

    • 1180 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of confederation allowed States to be independent while the federal government was overall a meeting place for all the state representatives to meet and debate new law. The federal government had laws in place but their were very hard to enforce. The federal government under the Articles of Confederation had no president. They instead had the Committee of the States which had one representative from each state. Even though that the Committee of the States was the most central form of the federal government, they had very little power to the Constitutional Congress.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although the Articles of Confederation gave the state more power but this was not enough because the congress did not get enough power. The country was in need for a stronger Federal government;in which, it was not present in the Articles of confederation. The lack of power for the national government and the congress led to the creation of the United States Constitution. The constitution created the executive branch, and federal courts. This makes the constitution better than the Articles of confederation because the Federal court system was created to ensure that law was followed throughout the country. The creation of executive branch is another advantage of the constitution.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throwing off the British monarchy on July 4, 1776, left the United States with no central government. It had to design and install a new government and quickly. As early as May 1776, Congress advised each of the colonies to draw up plans for state government; by 1780, all thirteen states had adopted written constitutions. In June 1776, the Continental Congress began to work on a plan for a central government. It took five years for it to be approved, first by members of Congress and then by the states. This first attempt at a constitution for the United States was called the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After many long and hard years of constant fighting, turmoil, and endless bloodshed, the thirteen colonies finally separated itself from England. The country of America now had a new problem at hand, setting up an effective government that would be much better than the oppressive rule of the British. The first step, of course, is setting up a constitution. The Articles of Confederation, ratified in 1781, was the first constitution of America. The Articles of Confederation was strong in that it gave the central government the powers to conduct foreign affairs, regulate western lands, and set up departments. This constitution was weak in that the central government was unable to impose taxes, control international trade, or enforce laws, and it was difficult to pass any law. Even though the Articles of Confederation had its strengths and weaknesses, its weaknesses outweighed its strengths rendering the document useless in governing the new country.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the Articles of Confederation did have some achievements like bringing peace and unity, they were more ineffective than effective for providing a stable government for the United States. The Articles of Confederation were ineffective for these reasons. First, The Articles of Confederation did not allow Congress to impose a tax, so this prevented the new nation of the United States of America to have a strong economic system. Second, The Articles of Confederation prevented the Chief Executive (President) from having any power and thus also having no military. Lastly, The Articles of Confederation didn’t allow the United States to have very good foreign relations with any foreign nation since we were viewed as weak.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be said that in a democracy, unity among the many cannot exist without compromise. Following the conclusion of the American Revolutionary War in 1776, the Articles of Confederation (the “Articles”) were written to allay fears about, and promote liberty, for its citizens, by legitimizing the rights of individual states. However, the Articles provided such restrictive powers for the underfunded national government to counteract deficiencies, that the union was at risk of collapse. A series of meetings, known as the Constitutional Convention (the “Convention”), was held to fix America’s dysfunctional political system, resulting in re-writing the American Constitution. Throughout the process of ratifying this historic document, many disputes…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How was the Constitution used to establish our government? Articles 1, 2, and 3 setup 3 branches, the Judicial Branch is 1 of those branches. Its job is to interpret laws and the constitution, there are many powers the Judicial Branch has given to them by Act 3 of the Constitution. One of the most if not the most important power is Judicial Review, this gives the Judicial Branch the power to rule whether a law passed by Congress and signed by the President is unconstitutional.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Articles of Confederation, from 1781-1789, had a higher purpose of attempting to create a stabilized government, while limiting its power, the overall effectiveness of this plan is not up to the standards as needed by the newly formed nation of America, and thus the government broke down by around 1786.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The articles of confederation is just not good for our states. It has so many weaknesses that affect the people living in the states. Examples the government can not force the states to obey its laws so the states can do things the government says is not ok, the states can make its own paper currency in other words they can have there own money, also there is no army or navy so we can not protect ourselves as a country we just regular people have to stand up and fight for ourselves. The articles could be a really good system but the weaknesses overrun the strengths by about 3 to 1. A revise would be really good for our states because things are not looking to well for farmers and people like me.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Historical Context: Today, over 200 years after it was written ad ratified (approved), most Americans think of the US Constitution as something almost sacred. We assume that this great document has always been honored and looked up to. This is NOT true. When it was written in 1787 and submitted to the states for ratification, it set off months of fierce and often bitter debate. There were, of course, many who welcomed it as a stronger and more effective national government which could successfully tie the 13 states together into one nation. But others were afraid of this proposed powerful new national government. Why should they now set up a new distant central government which could threaten their liberties just as King George and Parliament had? The debate went on in towns and villages across the country for months. Some of the smaller states ratified the new Constitution quickly, but in most states the debate continued. In February of 1788, the Massachusetts convention voted 187 to 168 to ratify or approve the Constitution. In June, Virginia ratified 89 to 79. New York followed almost immediately. Now, with the approval of 11 states, the new government was established. In April of 1789 George Washington was sworn in as President, even though two states still had not approved the Constitution. It took North Carolina until November 1789 and Rhode Island until May 1790 to join the new government.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anti-Federalists believe that the government should not have too much power over us as a nation, due to having no desire of a repeat of British Rule, which claimed absolute rights over us as citizens, rather wanting to have additional control over their daily lives, rather than have someone control it for them. While the Federalists wanted a strong government, the Anti-Federalists did not trust British Rule not to happen again. We are opponents of the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, we as Anti-Federalists have diverse factions, such as supporters like the Articles of Confederation supporters, or the opponents to the Constitution.? Confusing thesis…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is an important moment for delegates to decide whether or not to ratify The Constitution. This is an important moment in our countries history because the delegates are deciding how the government is going to work.Why we have created this document is because the Articles of Confederation aren't working, and people think that the constitution are not going to work either.The proposed will give us Constitution nothing but failure. The Constitution shouldn't be ratified because this form of government has never been tried, even by Great Britain, and it could destroy the country a lot worse then the Articles of Confederation, it not only will do that but, even with the risk, we will have all branches of government to be filled with the wealthy elite class of people. And for these reasons, I think we shouldn't ratify the Constitution.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays