Preview

Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1019 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
Matthew Williams
HIS 3 Paper #1 Throwing off the British monarchy on July 4, 1776, left the United States with no central government. It had to design and install a new government and quickly. As early as May 1776, Congress advised each of the colonies to draw up plans for state government; by 1780, all thirteen states had adopted written constitutions. In June 1776, the Continental Congress began to work on a plan for a central government. It took five years for it to be approved, first by members of Congress and then by the states. This first attempt at a constitution for the United States was called the Articles of Confederation.
The Articles of Confederation was an agreement among the newly formed founding states that helped recognize
…show more content…
The American Revolution cost us a lot of money and since Congress couldn’t impose taxes on the states they didn’t have the means to pay back the loans they accumulated during the war. Another weakness in the Articles of Confederation was Congress did not have the power to regulate foreign and interstate commerce. Due to this states became divided from one another. This lead to competition for trade between the states. Despite its limited power, the Articles of Confederation have recorded some major achievements. Maybe the most important success was the formation of policies that helped develop the western land. This was possible thanks to the Treaty of Paris, Northwest Ordinance, and the Land Ordinance of 1785. For the Treaty of Paris, Britain had to surrender control of the region known as the Northwest Territory. No other government has ever been able to take this large territory that stretched from the Appalachian Mountains west to the Ohio and Mississippi River. In order to regulate these new western lands the Northwest Ordinance was formed. This declared that the region would be divided into three to five territories. Lastly the Land Ordinance of 1785 was created to setup a system of surveying and dividing land into new territories. After surveying, the land would be divided into 36 square mile townships.
I believe that the Northwest Ordinance was the most significant
…show more content…
The second was the Three-Fifth Compromise which counted each slave as 3/5 of a person for the purpose of both taxation and representation, and the agreement to have a unitary executive rather than a committee. The most significant compromise made during the Constitutional Convention was the Great Compromise was that it set up a lower house and an upper house. It also helped set up a solid structure of government.
James Madison defines factions as a group of people united by a common interest. Madison thinks the cause of factions were unequal distribution of property. Madison felt that factions would lead to tyranny by the majority. He said there are two ways to eliminate the negative effects of a faction; first being to eliminate common interest which is impossible, the second being to increase the republic so majority factions cant be formed so easily.
Madison was also concerned that certain rights were needed to protect the minority from the self-interests of the majority. Madison contended that this Constitution would remedy this by enforcing the Electoral College instead of the popular vote. The Electoral College gave some weighted influence on the smaller

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At Philadelphia in 1778, John Dickinson drafted the first constitution for the United States as a nation. The Articles of Confederation was adopted by Congress in 1777 and submitted to the states for ratification. When Virginia and New York agreed to give up their claims to western lands, the Articles of Confederation were finally ratified in March 1781. The Articles established a central government that consisted of just one body, a congress. In this unicameral nation, the power given to states had greater power than the Federal power. Under the Articles of Confederation America was a weak nation without unity, which caused many problems to arise.…

    • 799 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. "From 1781 to 1787 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." Using the documents and your knowledge of the period, evaluate this statement.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Madison, factions were caused by a few things. The first was the unequal distribution of property/wealth. Something else that caused factions was the fact that small groups were only for local issues/passions. Too many factions in a political party were dangerous, as each group believed a variety of different things. With many factions holding various opinions, this meant that no political party would have definite control of the government. This meant that the larger the faction, the more it could use its larger values and beliefs on others; merely because there are more people in a larger faction. Madison was against a majority rule. This is why Madison came to the conclusion that…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. According to Madison, why should a government not try to remove the causes of factions? Madison believed that these factions would have a negative effect on individual freedoms and liberties.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After America declared their independence from Britain in 1776 they had no governance system. One year after the Declaration of Independence was signed, and America gained their freedom the Articles of Confederation was signed and served as the governance for the nation. There were weaknesses in the articles such as the inability of the natural government to implement foreign or domestic policy, to tax, or regulate trade, and due to these weaknesses in 1778 the Constitution was the replacement of the Articles. The articles simply did not allow enough power to the national government, and because the constitution maintained state power it also gave the central government power over commerce and foreign policies. During this time, Britain was…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison made his concern of tyranny known especially in the 10th Federalist Paper, with some mention in his other papers, and writings including the Constitution in which his contributions were heavily influenced by his concerns. Factions were a legitimate threat, and the greatest of the potential evils for the United States because the good of the public would be disregarded by the majority faction, and they would make hasty decisions that would harm the country. The greatest cause for factions as described by Madison in the tenth federalist paper is different degrees of possession of…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison asserts factions are detrimental to the government because they tend to cause chaotic discourse between those involved, thus not accomplishing anything. Citizens that are concerned about their government do not want factions, and they are willing to lawfully combat against them. Madison also asserts that governments should be admired, but he acknowledges that it would be incorrect to say governments are absolutely flawless. He also acknowledges how people find it unfair that the majority tends to be favored over the minority. The majority is not always right because it…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were developed in 1781 and were established as a first constitution of United States of America. Under these articles, the states remained self-governed and independent. Congress only stepped in as the last resort on appeal…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist 10 Summary

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page

    Federalist paper 10 addresses the concerns of James Madison about factions. He refers to factions as groups of citizens that share common interests and beliefs and provides ways to control these groups as he believes they are inevitable and will always be a part of society. He mentions two ways of removing factions, by “destroying the liberty essential to their existence” and “to give everyone the same opinions, passions, and interests,” both of which are impossible. According to Madison, the best thing to do in regards to factions would be controlling the effects. He persuades the reader that the ultimate way to control conflicting factions is through a strong representative government that would help them in checking and balancing out their…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout these few years, the lack of a central government seemed to be an overwhelming factor when it comes to the effectiveness of this document. A large fault in the Articles is the inability of Congress to create taxes and regulate trade. There is simply no way that a central government can survive without taxes. Also, since the government had no authority over the colonies, they could not force anyone to contribute to the overwhelming war debt caused by the American Revolution. And without their ability to control the colonies, there is no central government. Also, the difficulty to make amendments to the Articles made it almost impossible for anything new to be put into action. With so many different ideals coming from the different parts of the nation, the Articles lacked in that it called for a nine-state majority to make amendments. It seems nearly impractical to try and acquire nine completely different states to agree on one topic, seeing they came from different parts of the country, and thus, making Congress close to nothing. And finally, if the U.S. were to be attacked by Britain again at this time, there would be no way for them to defend themselves, seeing that Congress could only ask states for troops, but could not raise an army. This would have been catastrophic if another country had decided to attack the U.S. for any reason. To sum that up, the inability to create taxes and trade regulations, the difficulty to make amendments, and the inability to rise up an army contributed to the ineffectiveness of the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison states, "The latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man," (Madison, Paragraph 5) so the solution is to control their effects. He makes an argument on how this is not feasible in a moral democracy but practical in a republic. Effects of a faction vary depending on whether the faction is a majority or minority faction. Madison argues that the only strenuous effects to control will come from majority factions. He states that the concept of popular sovereignty should keep minority factions from acquiring an influence. “But the most common and durable source of factions has been the various and unequal distribution of property. Those who hold and those who are without property have ever formed distinct interests in society” (Madison, Paragraph 5). However he argues that undesirable passions can spread from a small size to a majority faction fairly quickly. “. The regulation of these various and interfering interests forms the principal task of modern legislation, and involves the spirit of party and faction in the necessary and ordinary operations of the government” (Madison, Paragraph…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The definition of a faction by Madison is a certain number of inhabitants, regardless of whether they are the minority or majority, whose union exists because of shared passions, or interests, these interest are in contrast to the rights of other citizens. Madison takes a stance that there exist two methods for limiting damages from the factions that are the removal of the causes of the faction or having control over the camps. He proceeds further and says that there are two ways of eliminating the factions. One being the elimination of liberty which is an unacceptable action and creation of a similar opinion and interest in the society that is practically impossible since the cause of the factions is as a result of freedom in the society Madison makes a conclusion that limitation of the damages from the factions is through control of their effects.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Madison, there are several causes of factions. He believed that it was in the very nature of man to group with others with a common impulse, emotion, or for self interest. Factions were formed for the unity of people with an enthusiasm for different ideas and opinions on government and religion. They also formed to support leaders who were contending for power; people who felt attachment to those leaders wanted them in control, and for some factions who felt hostility from others, wanted to oppress their opponents. Overall, the main reason for factions was the various and unequal distribution of property. Because of the difference between holders of property and those who did not own, there were clashing interests between generalized groups, hence the need for factions.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In James Madison’s, The 10th Federalist, Madison believes that in a nation a larger republic is safer and more efficient than that of a smaller republic. James Madison answers the question of how to eliminate the negative effects of faction. He defines a faction as, “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a minority or majority of the whole, who are untied and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.” Madison believes the most serious source of faction is the diversity of opinion in political life, which leads to dispute over fundamental issues such as what system of government or religion should be preferred. Madison states that, “A pure democracy can admit no…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This statement means that by taking away the rights of the people, the damage that stronger factions cause can be corrected or make everyone believe in the same ideals, which is completely impractical. Because of two nearly impossible solutions, Madison offers to create a less centralized government, a republic. In these papers, Madison wants delegates who are elected by the people to be elected by a larger group of electors. This is to prevent factions from getting their special delegates into the government without the vote of more common people. To achieve this, the…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays