Preview

Compare and contrast the Articles of confederation and the Constitution, especially in regard to the specific powers granted to the national government.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1246 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and contrast the Articles of confederation and the Constitution, especially in regard to the specific powers granted to the national government.
Compare and contrast the Articles of confederation and the Constitution, especially in regard to the specific powers granted to the national government.The formation and ideals of the Articles of Confederation and its successor, the Unites States Constitution, varied from each other in terms of a stronger or weaker federal government in dealing with issues. The Constitution gave more power to the federal government, while the Articles of Confederation involved a very weak government with primary rights interests of the individual states as the focus. Both gave Congress legislative power and set up departments that would eventually be incorporated into the president’s cabinet. The formation of the Articles of Confederation was of the extreme importance in the foundation and development of the Constitution and the stronger central government that still lasts to this day. Also known as “The Articles of Confusion”, the Articles of Confederation (finally passed by all thirteen states by 1781) created a “loose confederation” or “firm league of friendship” between the states. There were no judicial branch and executive branch in the new federal /national government, as the previous monarchy of George III still left bad feelings in minds of newly independent Americans, who were instilled with the ideals of being suspicious of government actions and remained filled with democratic zeal. According to the Articles of Confederation, each state had one vote in Congress. This meant the small state of Rhode Island, with its population of 60,000, had the same voice and power as the most populated of the states, Virginia. For a bill to be passed in the Congress, 9 of the 13 states had to approve. For any amendments to be made to the Articles of Confederation, a unanimous decision had to be agreed upon among the states. Amending the Articles was almost impossible, as it was rare for all the states to agree upon a certain issue. If the Articles had been able of being patched up

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. "From 1781 to 1787 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." Using the documents and your knowledge of the period, evaluate this statement.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Regarding structure, the Articles of Confederation, or simply Articles, were relatively ‘bare-bones’ when compared to the complex constitutions and declarations of government other countries had. It laid out a simple and ultimately primitive government: the power of the government was to lie solely in Congress, a group of delegates from all states. It was to be Congress and only Congress to create laws and run most of the government. This concept did not work well in practice: Congress, the only branch of the government, was weak and unable to bring about policy change for the country. First, all amendments to the Articles required a unanimous vote of all thirteen states - something that was quite rare - and even the simplest of national laws required a two-thirds majority to be established. This became a major issue. As a new country, a lot of issues were going to come forth to Congress, and due to the bureaucratic rules that were in place, it was difficult for a treaty or policy to be approved. Furthermore, the Articles did…

    • 2437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major flaw in the Articles of Confederation was that the state governments were given much more power than the central government. For example, the Confederation Congress could not levy taxes without approval of the states. They could only present their ideas to the states, hoping to reach an agreement. When the central government requested a tariff on imported items, the state of Rhode Island refused to pay. This inefficient method of funding resulted in inflation and overall lack of money for the central government. To make an amendment in the Articles of Confederation, all thirteen states had to agree. Although this weak central government was thought of as ineffective in governing the states, it provided equal rights for every state. Each state had the same amount of power, allowing a small state with few people to have the ability to cancel the vote of another state. Many of the states had conflicting views, resulting in large struggles over the amendment of laws. The Articles of Confederation was very effective in supporting small, minority states like Rhode…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was the first American constitution completed by the Continental Congress in 1777. The Articles of Confederation created a “firm league of friendship” between all 13 states. Each state agreed to send delegates to the Confederation Congress where each state will cast one vote in Congress. Under the Articles Congress had no possession over trade or passing laws regarding taxes. However, Congress can declare war, appoint military officers, coin money, and foreign affairs. Unfortunately, there were some downsides to the Articles of Confederation that people from all 13 states did not agree with or argued about it such things as alliance, passing laws, courts, money, and trade. (Davidson, 189)…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation of 1781 produced the first endeavor of government structure. This attempt of forming a national and state government failed. Some of the issues that transpired from the constitution include: Each state only had one vote in Congress, regardless of state size; Congress did not have the powers to tax or regulate foreign or interstate commerce; There was not a recognized national court system or executive branch to enforce acts passed by Congress; While amendments to the Constitution required a unanimous vote, the passing of a law required a 9/13 vote. The lack of involvement of the national government allowed states to become self-governing and sovereign. States printed their own money that only had value within that territory which created a hindrance in trade and in turn produced an unstable economy. The national government having no enforcing authority and the United States of America was in a state of chaos. This generated an out lash from individuals.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Women have always had a dominant role in the prosperity and growth of any community. These roles have changed depending on the time period, geography and race of the people. America had three most important groups of women: the Native Indian, the African, and the European. These three groups came from exceptionally different backgrounds, and played dissimilar roles in their family and community.…

    • 603 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1781 and 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an ineffective government, Although there were flaws, strong steps were taken in the attempt to try and make the United States a better country. The Articles set up a government that gave individual states the power to make their own laws and enforce them. This was ineffective for the following reasons: 1) The Continental Congress controlled public affairs but there was nothing in the Articles that gave Congress the power to enforce laws or unify the states. 2) There was no solid system of money to ensure that taxes would be paid or protect commerce, both nationally and with foreign trade. 3) The country lacked unity and strength because there was no leadership.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Doc A) A letter from the Rhode Island Assembly was sent to Congress stating the fact that states cannot tax. Under the Articles of Confederation state taxes could not be impressed, which forced them into economic failure. It also allowed Congress to collect from any state without a limit to time and the amount taken; this would allow Congress to become independent. Under the Articles of the Confederation Congress was allowed the power to choose which states they were to obtain money. Congress decided to obtain this money from the states, the ones that were commercially inclined. This act severely affected the commerce of Rhode Island and other states. The Articles of Confederation only proved to be a terrible idea among most states and the country. In 1770, the United States had the smallest population and income. In 1775, right before the Articles of the Confederation with a small population brought in the most income over a period of twenty years. Since the Articles of Confederation the population would still be increasing and the revenue would became pretty stable. However, in time the limited income under the Articles of Confederation would not be able to suite the growing population. Soon after the government would not be able to pay off debt and would not be able to tend the states needs which effected the people. Soon under the Articles of Confederation the government would become broke. . (Doc B), Shows…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Any power the legislative authorities of the central government possessed under the Articles was undone by the absence of executive authority to enforce the meager amount of verdicts that against all odds were passed. Perhaps the weakness of the Articles is to be blamed on opposing individual state interests; however, it was still the Articles that were to blame for the division of the Union nevertheless. Though some historians believe that with minor alterations the Articles of Confederation could have survived for many more years,[15] its fundamental flaw – its lack of a 3 house Congress – was destined to be efficacious in the eventually switch to the Constitution. What the Constitution really achieved for the country was a foundation of authority. It states in black and white the powers of the Congress and the rights given to enforce those powers, whereas the Articles only gave Congress an arbitrary right to rule that could easily be ignored because of its noncommittal language and potential to be…

    • 2155 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution were both recognized and followed by the same group of people. Even though the same group of people followed these two documents, these documents are very different. One example is the writing style of each document. The Articles of Confederation were repetitive, less direct and less certified for quoting than the Constitution. The two documents have a different approach towards the type of government and its control over the matters.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legislation was one of the biggest differences in the two documents. In the original Article of Confederation, each state received one vote regardless of size. This angered many of the more populous states because they felt that it was unfair that smaller…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States under the Articles of Confederation was more a country of thirteen nations rather than thirteen states. Each state had unanimous consent for ratification or amendment of clauses. Congress allowed states to retain all land claims derived from their original charters. That resulted in states with large claims having the ability to overpower their neighbors. An example would be Maryland refusing to accept the Articles until 1781, because they feared that Virginia’s western holdings would be to overpowering under their own jurisdiction. The unicameral legislatures under the Articles were inefficient and unwieldy to govern efficiently. There was no adequate way to distribute power within the national government or to the relationship between the Confederation and the states. The Land Ordinance of 1785 might be considered the major success of the Articles of Confederation, but that law couldn’t even be properly enforced since states wielded so much power. States wielded so much power that they didn’t have to adhere to the division of land set by the government. Of course the whole reason of the Land ordinance of 1785 was because Congress couldn’t levy taxes from the states and had to result selling land for money.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1985 Dbq

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation set up a unicameral Congress in which each state had one vote. The executive authority would be in a committee of thirteen. The rights which the Articles gave to the federal government were very limited. It was very difficult to get anything done because in order to add an amendment or change something a unanimous decision was required. The powers which were given to the federal government by the Articles of Confederation include: the authority to make war and treaties, as well as the ability to determine the amount of troops and money each state can contribute. However, there was no way for them to enforce it. The federal government…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was the year of 1787 and the country was in conflict. The new constitution had just been written and states were deciding to ratify it (Davidson, 205). This constitution would hopefully protect better than the Articles of Confederation did. As with many other situations, there were two sides; the Federalists and the Antifederalists. Federalists agree with the Constitution while Antifederalists disagree (Davidson, 205). Each side had valid arguments, but the Federalists more so. Federalists argued to support the Constitution because it allots the federal government power over trade and tax, gives each branch checks and balances on one another, and can be changed.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Let our government be like that of the solar system. Let the general government be like the sun and the states the planets, repelled yet attracted, and the whole moving regularly and harmoniously in several orbits.” said John Dickinson, a Delaware Delegate in 1787 (constitutionfacts.com). The United States has a government that, for the most part, flows smoothly. However, our governing documents have not always been so harmonious. The Articles of Confederation, created and ratified in 1781 during the Revolutionary War, was the first basis for the United States of America’s central government. This was a shaky set of laws, yet it evolved into The Constitution of the United States of America. Though The Constitution was created from the Articles of Confederation, there were many differences. Three of these are differences in powers, in purposes, and in effects.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays