Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Why the Atomic Bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki shouldn't have been dropped

Good Essays
974 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why the Atomic Bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki shouldn't have been dropped
Was America justified in dropping the horrific atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Should the bombs have been used? The answer to that is undoubtedly clear: no. The bombs did more harm than good. The US had conducted “the world’s most devastating military mission”1, effects of which are still evident today.
World War II was primarily caused by Germany, Italy and Japan, influenced by fascist revolutions. While Germany and Italy dealt with matters in Europe, Japan had plunged itself in a Pacific War with Australia, New Zealand, Singapore and China, only to name a few. After the events of Pearl Harbor (a surprise military attack by the Japanese on the US naval base at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii) US had involved itself in the war as an Allie (countries opposing Germany and its ideologies). This meant that the US needed to defeat Japan in order for the Allies to succeed which they did so on the 15th of August 1945, when Japan announced its surrender after the atomic bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki are two towns in southern Japan. Nagasaki, at the time, had the largest seaport in southern Japan and it had a reputation for its industrial activity. Hiroshima, however, had military significance with defense camps and army headquarters situated there. To American officials these two towns were perfect for weakening a country’s military system and morale. The ‘Little Boy’ atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima on the 6th of august 1945. The second bomb, ‘Fat Man’, was released on Nagasaki on the 9th of August 1945. The attack on the city of Nagasaki was a surprise because US officials had actually wanted ‘Fat Man’ to drop on the city of Kokura. Nagasaki was the second option for the aircrew who were forced to drop the bomb on another city2.
So what is an atomic bomb and why are its effects so devastating?
An atomic bomb is a nuclear weapon which uses chain fission reactions. A nuclear fission is a chain reaction of neutrons bombarding an atom of uranium3. This releases immense amounts of energy as more and more neutrons are released. Because so much energy is released, it is vital that the chain reaction is managed carefully. In the event of the dropping of the bombs, no one knew as to what effects it will have as it was the first and only ever atomic bomb used in warfare. There are four categories of destruction that an atomic bomb can cause: the initial blast, thermal radiation, ionizing radiation and residual radiation4. The death toll of the Nagasaki bomb was 60,000-80,000+ people along with 90,000-166,000+ people dying due to the Hiroshima disaster. On the day of the explosions sixty percent of the deceased died from flash or flame burns, as a result of thermal radiation (burns causing the death of skin cells and tissue cells and charring5). Thirty percent died from falling debris, as a result of the initial blast, and 10% dies from other causes6. Out of the sixty percent that died due to burns, 15-20% died from radiation sickness7 due to the immediate and short-term effects of the atomic bomb. In the long term, the radiation ‘left-behind’ affected the river-systems and also found its way into seas and oceans causing radiation sickness leaving tissue cells damaged. Food supplies were affected too however the most serious of changes were the consequences the bombs had on human development. The delayed effects surfaced months and years after the inexcusable bombing. Those exposed to the radiation experienced problems such as life shortening, decreased fertility, genetic mutations and cataract formation8 (a disease in the eye which clouds the lens resulting in decreased vision); women who conceived after the bombing produced children with more abnormalities than average. These statistics prove why the bombings should have never taken place. They ruined and scarred many lives and further generations were affected significantly.
The bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were acts of pure evil by the American military force. Some may argue that the bombs forced Japan to surrender thus ending the war. However, bearing in mind the situation Japan was in the time of the bombings, the Emperor would still have surrendered because Russia had invaded the country from the west, catching all the troops by surprise. Japan, knowing that Germany and Italy had fallen, wouldn’t have been keen on taking all the Allies single-handedly hence surrendering. The need for two deadly atomic bombs was never needed.
America was responsible of the death of hundreds and thousands of humans which had no part at all in the war. Majority of those who died were innocent civilians including women, children and the elders. These children hadn’t even learnt the basics of life when their lives had been taken away so mercilessly. The need of an atomic bomb on everyday civilians was not necessary. The Japanese citizens did not deserve this distressing punishment. The acts of a few merciless Japanese officials and soldiers in attacking Pearl Harbor did not need to affect the lives of so many nationals. America could have easily targeted those responsible for the war but instead it chose to kill more than 250,000+ humans.
So again should the atomic bomb have been used? Obviously the answer is no. How can someone order such a destructive weapon to fall on innocent civilians?! These people were ordinary Japanese citizens who had no idea that two bombs were being dropped on them. Furthermore, what makes this act even more appalling is that the aftermath of this devilish act still remains. After all these years, the fallout from the radiation is still a major factor in the areas. The 6th and 9th of August, 1945 were two days which shook Japan forever and after sixty-seven years, people are still reminded of the effects of two unnecessary mass destructive atomic bombs.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I don't think that the US should have bombed Japan. It was entirely unnecessary and the US had plenty of opportunities to do other things. America could have used a technical demonstration to show how powerful the bombs were on a nearby, but uninhabited, island. This would have been a effective intimidation act while not adding to WWII's already enormous death count. Admittedly this alone would not have ensured Japan's surrender, but Japan was planning on surrendering in the fall off 1945. The only thing that was keeping them from surrendering sooner was their unwillingness to accept completely unconditional surrender. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have ended World War II, but was it worth the lives…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In August of 1945, the United States launched two atomic bombs on Japan; the first, in Hiroshima on August 6, and the second in Nagasaki a few days later. Despite the obvious diplomatic advantage to implementing one of the most intimidating weapons of that time, the United States’ tactics and goals behind dropping the atomic bombs were purely military oriented; the political benefit was merely an added bonus. The atomic bomb was necessary due to the Japanese’s refusal to surrender and the hundreds of thousands of lives at stake.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On the morning of August 6, 1945, the first atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Hiroshima. On August 9, 1945, the second atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Nagasaki. Thousands died instantaneously while many more died from radiation exposure from the bombs. The use of the atomic weapons was unnecessary due to the fact the Japan’s military was greatly weakened and ready to surrender, thousands of innocent lives were sacrificed simply for political power, and there could have been alternatives to cease the war.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting from 1939, World War 2 was the bloodiest war in the history of the globe. Throughout the war, there were many key battles that determined the final outcome of the war. The long term causes of the war included militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism. The war started with the invasion of Poland, where Germany and the Soviet Union split the country in two. The Allies decided to not appease the Axis powers any longer and declared war. Many countries entered the war due to their alliances with other countries. One country, however, decided not to join the war due to its isolationist beliefs. This country, the United States, decided to join the war after the Japanese pulled a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. During this battle,…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    War Without Mercy Summary

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Initially the United States had been reluctant to enter World War II when it begun, but the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941 the catalyst that spurred the nation to enter the war. The main target the US declared war on was not the Nazis of Germany, but rather Imperial Japan. The forces of Imperial Japan would ultimately become the principle enemy in the Pacific War. The Pacific Theater would span until 1945, the United States was motivated to ensure retribution for the lives lost in Pearl Harbor and at the same time to assist its allies against the axis forces. In the final year of World War 2, it appeared that the United States however was willing to end the conflict with the Japanese as quickly as possible. The United States brought…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States was one of the forces in the ending of war between Japan. The U.S. was faced with a difficult decision in dropping the Atom Bomb. President Harry S. Truman was contemplating the decision until giving the green light to drop the bomb. On August 6th 1945, a B-29 piloted by two american pilots dropped an atomic bomb with the nickname of “Little Boy” on the city of Hiroshima. The bomb had devastated the city with an estimation of 90,000 to…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, 1945 a bomber airplane realeased the first atomic bomb. The bomb "Little boy" exploded in Hiroshima ,Japan. The blast was very deadly and resulted in the death of 66,000 plus people.The whole blast was at least 1 mile in diameter. Three days later after "Little Boy" was dropped a second bomb " Fat Man" was dropped on the town of Nagasaki. This bomb weaight about 10,000 pound and destoryed almost half of the city. Scientists estimated that both atomic bombs only used one tenth of its…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The commencement of World War II in 1939 was largely the result of a decades-long Japanese pursuit for dominance in China and the Pacific. The United States officially entered the war on 8 December 1941, the day after the Imperial Japanese Navy conducted a surprise attack against the naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii crippling the U.S Pacific Fleet. Ironically, an attack intended to prevent the United States and their superior Navy, from interfering with Japan’s military objectives in the…

    • 2411 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1947, the United States was put in a difficult position. While the Japanese emperor did not want to lose his position, or lose honor, they could either fight until the last man stands or find another way. With the creation of an atomic bomb becoming more and more feasible, with the help of Mr. Einstein, it seemed like a great idea. But, there were many things they didn’t think about when they jumped to the idea of dropping the bomb; some were Japan’s surrender and the future of the civilians. The bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was not necessary.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, killing thousands of innocent people! The United States did it to force Japan to surrender and end World War II. To this present day it still and will remain a controversy whether or not the US was in the right or wrong of bombing Hiroshima. I argue that the US shouldn’t have attacked Hiroshima the way they did.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The infamous bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima is a highly controversial subject and many continue to debate about the event, over half a century after it occurred. In August of 1945, near the end of World War II, the US military dropped two atomic bombs over Japan, not only causing a mass of death and devastation, but it also induced the question- were dropping the bombs necessary and justified? Due to exaggerated statistics, and what students learn in textbooks, Americans are socialized into believing that dropping the bombs were necessary to ending the war. However, in reality, several reasons ranging from the fact that civilians outnumbered troops in the cities in which the bombs were dropped, to how Japan was willing to surrender to the US under conditions prove that to be untrue. The nuclear bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was both unjustified and unnecessary.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the year of 1939 to 1945 a detrimental War broke out creating World War II among many ethnic nations worldwide. Many lives were lost during World War II up to 600,000 innocent Military and Civilian casualties who fought bravely in the War. On August 6, the United States commanded Japan to surrender over to America and if failed to do so, the United States threatened to attack Hiroshima’s city with lethal atomic bombs. August 9, the United States dropped another lethal bomb over the Nagasaki city and killing thousands of innocent people and creating many damages in the city from the bombings. A few days later Japan publicized their surrendering to the world, and helping to create a peaceful end to World War II. Throughout 1945 the War has had an a negative effect on many people in the nearby area of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as well as many damages done to the city and has created a genocide between many ethnic…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This led to the arms race between Soviets and United States in 1949. Also that same year the USSR tried out their own atomic bomb and was successful. Following this the United States needed to build a bigger and better bomb so they developed the hydrogen bomb. A hydrogen bomb is a hydrogen particle being inserted into a ball of plutonium at the right point in time causing it to explode outward, and vaporize anything in its path. Not all nuclear weapons have the same design stated Eric Schlosser. Some use a fission reaction to set them off while others use a fission and fusion reaction. Even though the first type of nuclear weapon used was a bomb and had to be dropped, there are now more delivery systems than ever because of new technology that constantly is becoming available these systems include: ICBM, SLBM, MIRV, cruise missile, artillery shells, land mines, depth charges , torpedoes, and even can be deployed of a…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    History holds many controversial events. Some may even be considered injustices to the citizens of the world. I believe that the Atomic bombs that were dropped on Japan in World War II were one of the most heinous crimes. The bombs were inhumane, thus causing much suffering. Even if there was no other way to end the war I feel that there should have been more publication and publicity about the atomic bombs. The American people were mislead when the bombs were dropped. In addition, I believe the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was dishonorable. All in all, I believe the atomic bombs were unnecessary to end World War II.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays