Why Didn T The United States Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Unjustified?
Japan's empire had shattered, and Nazi Germany had just surrendered. President Truman had decided to drop atomic bombs on both Hiroshima and Nagasaki. There' been a debate ever since on whether or not his decision was reasonable. Japan was ready to surrender and on the verge of collapsing. One could argue that the bombing was barbaric and unnecessary. President Along those lines, Truman's decision to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unjustified.
Japan had considered surrendering before the two atomic bombs were dropped. According to "United States history: Reconstruction to the Present,’’ the following 3 days after Little Boy was dropped in Hiroshima, Japanese leaders debated on whether or not they should have kept fighting. " The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender (Leahy).’’ On top of that, Ralph A. Bard, Undersecretary of the Navy, claimed that the Japanese government was looking for a reason to surrender. The Soviet Union declared …show more content…
The U.S military's alternative plan would have ended up with more than 5 million Japanese casualties (Stimson). "We had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarian dark ages (Leahy).'' The Admiral goes on to explain that a war can't be won by killing women and children. This shows that the U.S forgot that they were fighting the Japanese government and not the civilians. "We seemed suddenly to have possession of a merciful abridgment of the slaughter in the East and of a far happier prospect in Europe (Churchill).'' Winston Churchill was explaining how America had stooped to massive slaughter when it comes to dealing with the Eastern countries. As a "Humanitarian Nation," the United States should have given Japan two to three days before dropping the atomic bombs (Bard). The dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was basically premeditated mass murder. The atomic bombings were unjustified and dropped in a heinous
Japan had considered surrendering before the two atomic bombs were dropped. According to "United States history: Reconstruction to the Present,’’ the following 3 days after Little Boy was dropped in Hiroshima, Japanese leaders debated on whether or not they should have kept fighting. " The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender (Leahy).’’ On top of that, Ralph A. Bard, Undersecretary of the Navy, claimed that the Japanese government was looking for a reason to surrender. The Soviet Union declared …show more content…
The U.S military's alternative plan would have ended up with more than 5 million Japanese casualties (Stimson). "We had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarian dark ages (Leahy).'' The Admiral goes on to explain that a war can't be won by killing women and children. This shows that the U.S forgot that they were fighting the Japanese government and not the civilians. "We seemed suddenly to have possession of a merciful abridgment of the slaughter in the East and of a far happier prospect in Europe (Churchill).'' Winston Churchill was explaining how America had stooped to massive slaughter when it comes to dealing with the Eastern countries. As a "Humanitarian Nation," the United States should have given Japan two to three days before dropping the atomic bombs (Bard). The dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was basically premeditated mass murder. The atomic bombings were unjustified and dropped in a heinous