Preview

To what Extent was Germany a parliamentary democracy in the years 1900

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1085 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To what Extent was Germany a parliamentary democracy in the years 1900
To what Extent was Germany a parliamentary democracy in the years 1900-14?

In the period 1900-1914, Germany’s political landscape witnessed extraordinary changes in which typical features associated with a parliamentary democracy- such as significant and influential pressure group activity and universal suffrage- were present. It can however be argued that this period also represented a time in which the German Reichstag did not truly represent the population due to old and corrupt voting system for Prussia which saw votes unfairly given and the role of all the chancellors- in particular Von Bulow- during this time, which saw unelected officials yielding greater influence than that of the Reichstag. Germany was a parliamentary democracy due to the many contrasting features of the political system. Germany may have had many features where a “parliamentary democracy” can be boasted, but there are also just as many contrasting points which expose the system as being corrupt and broken.
One of the most significant points in favour of Germany being a parliamentary democracy is the fact that it practiced universal suffrage. Following the unification of Germany in January 1871, Bismarck introduced universal male suffrage for elections to the Imperial Parliament called the Reichstag, which were conducted through the use of a secret ballot. This is an example of Germany acting as a parliamentary democracy because it allowed people of all classes to vote, meaning that everyone in society had the opportunity to be able to be represented. The use of the secret ballot also helps to enhance the argument that Germany was a parliamentary democracy due to the fact that it allowed the electorate to cast their vote without fear of being persecuted for their choice. This system of voting, coupled with the fact that all males over 25 had the right to vote, emphasis the perceived idea of freedom and choice which the German people were offered at this time, Germany stood out

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A major flaw in the Weimar constitution was the proportional representation electoral system, which was an attempt to become more democratic. Democracy comes at the price of a strong government as it is usually difficult to form a stable government in a democracy. This can be manifested by the fact that in the mere period of 14 years, there were 21 different governments and 13 chancellors. This shows that the Weimar government lacked stability and strength which would make it almost impossible for the government to be effective and tackle the problems. How could the government solve the difficult troubles that Germany was facing, when they could not even manage to cooperate and unite? Since, proportional representation is one of the fairest electoral systems, it was impossible to form a strong single party government who had a good hold in the Reichstag and only weak coalitions which could not agree upon a decision was formed. Weak coalitions meant ineffective and incompetent governments. On the other hand, it could be said that the Weimar governments were not as unstable as it is claimed to be. The Weimar constitution has produced effective and stable governments such as the grand coalition which was seen as a strong government and it stood for the longest amount of time. Also, despite the numerous changes in government, the base parties of…

    • 999 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany was a parliamentary democracy based on the constitution that Germany was run by. The Bundesrat being part of the constitution consisted of 58 members who were elected by the state assemblies, the Bundesrat had the power in theory to the law making process and by this having this possibly the right to alter the constitution. The Bundesrat had the power to veto legislation against a bill, therefore being able to stop such laws that would not be in favour of Germany. As well as this, the Bundesrat and the Reichstag had joint legislative power. The Reichstag was elected members represented by constituencies and were all male over the age of twenty five. One of the most significant points in favour of Germany being a democracy is that Bismark introduced universal male suffrage elections in 1871. This is clearly an example of a parliamentary democracy because it allowed people of all classes to vote; meaning that every layer of society had the opportunity to be represented. However importantly over the Bundesrat the Reichstag was significantly in power of the financial affairs and the banking system of Germany and perhaps most importantly the control the Reichstag had over the defence budget which was vital federal government expenditure. It had grown from being 100 million marks in 1890 to rapidly increasing to 2,405 million marks by 1913. Although the Kaiser did have the right to dissolve the Reichstag they still could hold elections after this. Furthermore the constitution was based on parliamentary democracy to an extent because members were elected into their positions. They held the power of money that…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nationalism was an important and integral factor in the downfall of the Weimar Republic and in turn, the ensuing failure of democracy in Germany in the period 1918-1934. The sense of loyalty and devotion to ones nation, which the German citizens had felt in their militaristic past, was ultimately devastated by WWI and its consequences. Although nationalism was a major cause of the failure of democracy in Germany, there were many other factors adding to the stress upon the countrys government at this time. This included the Treaty of Versailles, the Reparations Bill, the occupation of the Ruhr and hyperinflation. Several attempts to install nationalistic beliefs back in the government occurred, the most important of these being the Kapp Putsch by the right-wing nationalists and the Beer Hall Putsch by the right-wing Nazi party. The disillusionment felt by the people and their need to restore pride in their nation influenced many factors that led to the failure of democracy, and to the rise of the Nazi political party and its leader Adolf Hitler.…

    • 1837 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany before WW1 had a climate that possible could have led them to follow democracy. After all the biggest party in Reichstag was a democratic party and there was a constitution. Along with this the voting system was fairly progressed giving votes to most men and turnouts for these elections had increased showing political participation to be increasing along with general interest in politics. It is for these reasons that one may argue that Germany was moving towards a democracy before WW1. However despite there being democratic elements within the German government, these features actually posed a threat democracy through counteracting the changes that would have led to it. For example although a constitution existed in Germany, this constitution made it possible for the Kaiser to rule Germany in an almost authoritarian manner and therefore stop any change in it’s path. Furthermore whether or not the SDP was the most supported party in Germany is also debatable due to the Hottentot election. Rigidity of the Kaiser’s powers, the inability for those in authority to suppress those power and urge for change and the fact that the SDP may not have been as supported as was once thought are all reason that has led to the conclusion that Germany was in a state of political stalemate before the war and the layout of the government was n such a way that a democratic Germany seemed an almost impossible achievement.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Democracy was a foreign concept to the German people, whose authoritarian tradition had deep psychological and social roots. On 9 November 1918, when the Kaiser’s abdication was announced, and Friedrich Ebert the leader of the Social Democratic Party was entrusted with the German Empire, “The old and rotten – the monarchy – has broken down. Long live the new! Long live the German Republic!” was shouted towards the public. However, familiarity of authoritarian rule and therefore the traditional expectation for the government to take control, make strong decisive decisions and stand as a unified front, was not a feature replicated in the new republican government. One of the problems lay in the new republican constitution of 1919, which guaranteed the basic rights of the German people but also contained weaknesses that undermined its functionality as a democratic constitution. The voting system based on proportional representation was one such weakness. With a…

    • 2088 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite elements of democracy, with the Kaiser at the Head of the Constitution and holding such significant powers, Wilhelminian Germany was clearly structured to maintain authority and keep the power concentrated at the top. The issue is whether or not in practice the state was totally authoritarian and how far Germany was stuck in authoritarianism, or in other words; how much potential for advancement towards democracy there was. It also needs to be established what is meant by an 'authoritarian state' as the Kaiser's power can be seen in the reflection of other powers; the Kaiser was the head of the army & appointed the Chancellor, therefore the authoritarianism & power of these two can be seen to reflect the authoritarianism & power of the Kaiser.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The German Imperial Constitution of 1871 was widely regarded by contemporaries to be one of the most democratic in the world. People commented at the time how it was more democratic than the UK system of first-past-the-post and the people of Germany were proud that their country was now the European capital of democracy. The Reichstag had universal male suffrage over the age of 25 and was elected by secret ballot. The people felt that they had the true power in Germany as any legislation that was proposed by the Chancellor had to be passed by them and as well as this they could stop any form of direct taxation put forward by the Imperial Government (who could only raise indirect taxes without consent) through blocking such. However, the Reichstag was not nearly as democratic as it initially seems: it couldn’t produce its own legislation and the only person who could, the Chancellor, couldn’t be removed by them. Similarly the Kaiser and Ministers were untouchable. Whilst the people of Germany voted for who represented them the very fact that the members of the Reichstag were unpaid guaranteed an unfair representation of conservative members, ironic considering it is meant to be the most democratic constitution using proportional representation. The Bundesrat was the collection of 58 representatives who spoke for the federal states of Germany. This was thought to be democratic as it…

    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first case study, the Hottentot Election was in 1907. The war in German West Africa causes outrage among the people and the Reichstag (SDP and ZP). This is because Germany commits Genocide twice. Later on the Kaiser and Chancellor worked on a budget together to collect taxes to spend in Africa, in hopes of improving and extending the Empire. However, both the ZP and SDP disapproved and therefore vetoed the budget. At this point the Reichstag shows its power by standing against the Kaisers wish. This shows Nascent Democracy as it is also about exercising the power, and here part of…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people would think Germany was democratic as they allowed men over the age of 25 could vote every 3 years. This is a form of democracy and it does show us that they were getting somewhere and that they did understand half the definition of “Democracy”. I believe from the statistics given that Germany was sexist and might have believed that women and younger adults weren`t intelligent and that women were supposed to be at home doing chores and looking after children, as they have for decades. This practically shows us that there was no equality.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kaiser, who was also the King of Prussia, was extremely powerful in terms of politics. He had the final say in any dispute over the constitution, gave assent to all laws and commanded the Germany army directly. These factors alone demonstrate that, in 1871, the constitution gave the Kaiser vast amounts of power and the people of Germany did not have a say in the way the country was ran. On the other hand, the Reichstag were members of parliament elected by males over 25. It could be argued that this was a fair and liberal factor, since men from every social class had the right to vote. But, Bismarck interfered with the appointment of ministers, perhaps the votes were not entirely fair. Also, the Reichstag had the right of free speech. However, this seems ironic, since they could not amend a law or demand dismissal of the Chancellor or ministers. Also, Kaiser Wilhelm I could dissolve the Reichstag, which meant compared to him they were practically powerless.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problems that Germany faced pre-1914 should not be underestimated. The clash of the booming middle and urban working class in contrast to the poor agricultural working class. Such Industrialisation during this period had created economic demands for the acquisition of raw materials and markets beyond Europe, this lead to radical nationalist pressure groups forming, such as the Pan-German League, which reflected the radicalisation of the middle classes and peasantry who feared the rise of the socialists. The existence of political divisions as stated before lied at the responsibility of the constitution. The weakness of the Reichstag and parties unwilling to work together entrenched divisions. The constitution allowed Prussia to dominate the Bundesrat as only 14 votes were needed to block a motion, Prussia controlling 17 out of 58 seats meant that nothing could be…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question of whether Wilhelmine Germany was an entrenched authoritarian state has been the subject of much debate. Those who have argued that it was have pointed mainly to the constitutional balance of powers to substantiate this view, which indeed appeared to give the Kaiser nearly complete authority over German politics. Some historians such as Wehler have offered an alternate version of the argument that Germany was ‘authoritarian’ by suggesting that it was in fact elites, such as the army and judiciary, who controlled German politics. However, other structuralists have argued that mass political movements were consistently growing throughout the period, and did in fact have influence over politics, and as such if Germany was to some extent authoritarian, this authoritarianism was by no means entrenched. In this essay I will discuss these…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Weimar Republic was the name given to the parliamentary republic established in 1919 in Germany to replace the imperial form of government, with leader Friedrich Ebert. The Weimar’s main aims were to work towards a more democratic, fair Germany, replaced what was essentially a state under autocratic rule. The Germany with which Ebert was left to reform was one of depression, instability and overcome with division in the people. Ebert promised freedom of speech, improved working conditions and a democracy to be put in place. From the beginning the Weimar’s prospects did not look good; the change from the traditional autocratic Germany to one of democracy would require an instant change and acceptance from the German people. However the Weimar managed to gained support as having lived under the rule of Kaiser and its consequences, many people welcomed democracy as positive change.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Edinger, Lewis J., and Brigitte L. Nacos. "From the Bonn to the Berlin Republic: Can a Stable Democracy Continue?" Political Science Quarterly, 1998: 179-191.…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This article is about the current parliament of Germany. For the governing body of the Germany. Confederation from 1815 to 1866, see Bundesversammlung (German Confederation).…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays