Preview

To What Extent Was Germany a Parliamentary Democracy?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1155 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Was Germany a Parliamentary Democracy?
To what extent was Germany a parliamentary democracy in the years 1900-1914?
A parliamentary democracy is the power in Germany being shared amongst everybody. The positions are democratically elected by the population of the country. The way Germany was run is based upon the Constitution the power lies between the Reichstag, the chancellor and the Kaiser.
Germany was a parliamentary democracy based on the constitution that Germany was run by. The Bundesrat being part of the constitution consisted of 58 members who were elected by the state assemblies, the Bundesrat had the power in theory to the law making process and by this having this possibly the right to alter the constitution. The Bundesrat had the power to veto legislation against a bill, therefore being able to stop such laws that would not be in favour of Germany. As well as this, the Bundesrat and the Reichstag had joint legislative power. The Reichstag was elected members represented by constituencies and were all male over the age of twenty five. One of the most significant points in favour of Germany being a democracy is that Bismark introduced universal male suffrage elections in 1871. This is clearly an example of a parliamentary democracy because it allowed people of all classes to vote; meaning that every layer of society had the opportunity to be represented. However importantly over the Bundesrat the Reichstag was significantly in power of the financial affairs and the banking system of Germany and perhaps most importantly the control the Reichstag had over the defence budget which was vital federal government expenditure. It had grown from being 100 million marks in 1890 to rapidly increasing to 2,405 million marks by 1913. Although the Kaiser did have the right to dissolve the Reichstag they still could hold elections after this. Furthermore the constitution was based on parliamentary democracy to an extent because members were elected into their positions. They held the power of money that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A major flaw in the Weimar constitution was the proportional representation electoral system, which was an attempt to become more democratic. Democracy comes at the price of a strong government as it is usually difficult to form a stable government in a democracy. This can be manifested by the fact that in the mere period of 14 years, there were 21 different governments and 13 chancellors. This shows that the Weimar government lacked stability and strength which would make it almost impossible for the government to be effective and tackle the problems. How could the government solve the difficult troubles that Germany was facing, when they could not even manage to cooperate and unite? Since, proportional representation is one of the fairest electoral systems, it was impossible to form a strong single party government who had a good hold in the Reichstag and only weak coalitions which could not agree upon a decision was formed. Weak coalitions meant ineffective and incompetent governments. On the other hand, it could be said that the Weimar governments were not as unstable as it is claimed to be. The Weimar constitution has produced effective and stable governments such as the grand coalition which was seen as a strong government and it stood for the longest amount of time. Also, despite the numerous changes in government, the base parties of…

    • 999 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the years following World War I, Germany had suddenly became a democratic state. The Weimar Republic created a divided situation in Germany, one that led to its downfall. The weak leadership of those at the head of government, the apathy of the German population towards democracy and the outright rejection of democracy by the communists were all factors that led to the instability and downfall of the Weimar Republic.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As World War I came to a conclusion, the German people faced an inherent complication: what was to be the future of Germany? Democracy was a paltry response to such a climactic part of history. The Weimar Republic not only deteriorated the already feeble nation, but became a mixing pot for the future of the Third Reich. Once the previous leaders of the Weimar Republic conceded defeat, Adolf Hitler rose in his ranks until he accepted his position as Führer on August 1st, 1921 for the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. They pushed through many different trials and victories, and finally became chancellor on January 30th, 1933.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany before WW1 had a climate that possible could have led them to follow democracy. After all the biggest party in Reichstag was a democratic party and there was a constitution. Along with this the voting system was fairly progressed giving votes to most men and turnouts for these elections had increased showing political participation to be increasing along with general interest in politics. It is for these reasons that one may argue that Germany was moving towards a democracy before WW1. However despite there being democratic elements within the German government, these features actually posed a threat democracy through counteracting the changes that would have led to it. For example although a constitution existed in Germany, this constitution made it possible for the Kaiser to rule Germany in an almost authoritarian manner and therefore stop any change in it’s path. Furthermore whether or not the SDP was the most supported party in Germany is also debatable due to the Hottentot election. Rigidity of the Kaiser’s powers, the inability for those in authority to suppress those power and urge for change and the fact that the SDP may not have been as supported as was once thought are all reason that has led to the conclusion that Germany was in a state of political stalemate before the war and the layout of the government was n such a way that a democratic Germany seemed an almost impossible achievement.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the period 1900-1914, Germany’s political landscape witnessed extraordinary changes in which typical features associated with a parliamentary democracy- such as significant and influential pressure group activity and universal suffrage- were present. It can however be argued that this period also represented a time in which the German Reichstag did not truly represent the population due to old and corrupt voting system for Prussia which saw votes unfairly given and the role of all the chancellors- in particular Von Bulow- during this time, which saw unelected officials yielding greater influence than that of the Reichstag. Germany was a parliamentary democracy due to the many contrasting features of the political system. Germany may have had many features where a “parliamentary democracy” can be boasted, but there are also just as many contrasting points which expose the system as being corrupt and broken.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution consisted of 25 federal states, within this there were 4 kingdoms, 12 Duchies, 6 Grand Duchies and 3 free cities. At first the Kaiser had pretty much entire control over all of these states however at this point the Kaiser had great control over each of these states, however each one did have a government which could decide healthcare system, education and justice policies. The states were at this point happy with this situation so on the whole they were content to remain part of Germany.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite elements of democracy, with the Kaiser at the Head of the Constitution and holding such significant powers, Wilhelminian Germany was clearly structured to maintain authority and keep the power concentrated at the top. The issue is whether or not in practice the state was totally authoritarian and how far Germany was stuck in authoritarianism, or in other words; how much potential for advancement towards democracy there was. It also needs to be established what is meant by an 'authoritarian state' as the Kaiser's power can be seen in the reflection of other powers; the Kaiser was the head of the army & appointed the Chancellor, therefore the authoritarianism & power of these two can be seen to reflect the authoritarianism & power of the Kaiser.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Second Reich constitution, it is clear that during the years of the Second Reich there was no democracy. The German Electorates could only elect the Reichstag, which had little power. The Reichstag was only able to accept or reject the laws that were proposed by the government and veto treaties agreed by the Kaiser. However, the Kaiser was able to summon and dissolve the Reichstag at any given time. Therefore most of the time the Reichstag would agree with Kaiser, which shows Kaiser Absolutism. This was similar for the Imperial Government. The Chancellor and the Cabinet did the day-to-day running of the Germany. However, at any given time the German Emperor was able to dismiss the Chancellor. Therefore at the end if something was not going according to Kaisers' vision for Germany he has the power to change so.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people would think Germany was democratic as they allowed men over the age of 25 could vote every 3 years. This is a form of democracy and it does show us that they were getting somewhere and that they did understand half the definition of “Democracy”. I believe from the statistics given that Germany was sexist and might have believed that women and younger adults weren`t intelligent and that women were supposed to be at home doing chores and looking after children, as they have for decades. This practically shows us that there was no equality.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To what extent do the weaknesses of Weimar democracy explain Hitler’s rise to power in 1933?…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kaiser Wilhelm II came to power in 1888 after Wilhelm I died and a brief reign from Frederick III, his behaviour could be unpredictable and although he was the grandson of Queen Victoria he was anti-British, however he admired them at the same time. He believed in the divine right of kings, the theory claimed that, kings were only answerable to God, and it was sinful for their subjects to resist them. Wilhelm II was determined to exercise much more direct control over government than his grandfather, this was apparent in 1890 when Wilhelm disagreed with Bismarck’s anti-socialist policies, colonial expansion and relations with Russia, consequently Bismarck retired ‘because of his health’. Wilhelm II was determined to reinstate the importance of the imperial throne, as opposed to the country being run by parliament, he wanted to demonstrate how important an all-powerful monarch was. This can be seen by Germany having 4 chancellors under Wilhelm II and each for less than ten years; Wilhelm II wished to have weak chancellors that he could easily control.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “old” German empire reached to an end when its significant personalities agreed on “a revolution from above” 1, as the Foreign Minister of Germany Paul von Hintze was convinced to try to prevent a revolution in Russian manner. It is essential to take a closer look at the constitution of 1919 while analyzing why the Weimar Republic failed and why Adolf Hitler became the chancellor. The position of the “Reichspräsident” that was created had way too much power. This leader position could break down the Reichstag with Article 25 that says, “the president of the Reich may dissolve the Reichstag, but only once for the same cause”(wiki). Furthermore he had the authority to suspend some basic rights in order to create his “personal” vision of the public order and security.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite having a Reichstag and various political parties within, showing different views, the country was still essentially run by the Kaiser. The Kaiser had the power to summon the Reichstag and dismiss it when he pleased, this clearely caused unrest as in spite of there being a government, and Wilhelm II had overruling authority. Again, as well as controlling the fate of the Reichstag, the Kaiser was also the one whom appointed the chancellors and all government ministers and it was these ministers who would propose legislation for the two houses of parliament. So from this we can see, despite not directly controlling the state through political decisions made by him, he could decide who he wanted as chancellor and when he wished to dismiss them. An example of this was Von Caprivi, the chancellor appointed in 1890 taking over from Von Bismarck, he let the Kaiser know that if appointed he would be compliant, possibly why he was chosen as then Whilhelm would have effortless ruling. However, showing again that it is an authoritarian state, and somewhat dictatorial, the Kaiser removed Caprivi as he felt he was too progressive. Caprivi wanted a cooperative Reichstag and to be…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people voted for the Reichstag, and the Reichstag had the power to pass an annual budget, and it had control over the defence budget. Although the Kaiser could dissolve the Reichstag, it couldn’t be dismissed indefinitely and had the right to hold elections straight after dissolution.…

    • 531 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    French Government Changes

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Like Napoleon in France, William Bismarck of Germany influenced major changes to German law. Under Bismarck, Germany adopted the German Civil Code. However, in 1918, a democratic constitution was recognized after World War 1 and the creation of the Weimar Republic. The Weimar Republic lasted briefly due to the rise of Adolf Hitler in 1933. The growth of the Nazi Party in Germany resulted in the removal of federalism and the formation of a centralized power. However, after defeat in World War 2, Germany…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays