Preview

How Democratic Was Germany at the Turn of the 20th Century?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
399 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Democratic Was Germany at the Turn of the 20th Century?
How democratic was Germany at the turn of the 20th century?

I believe that Germany was not democratic at all as they made they`re citizens believe that they were. Germany had tied to be democratic to show on the surface that they gave the people freedom to vote for who they wanted to. In this essay I will explain my point of view on this essay and what other people might believe and think in response to my opinions.

Many people would think Germany was democratic as they allowed men over the age of 25 could vote every 3 years. This is a form of democracy and it does show us that they were getting somewhere and that they did understand half the definition of “Democracy”. I believe from the statistics given that Germany was sexist and might have believed that women and younger adults weren`t intelligent and that women were supposed to be at home doing chores and looking after children, as they have for decades. This practically shows us that there was no equality.

Another point would be that only the Kaiser (Emperor) could dismiss the government. He could not just dismiss it he could dissolved the parliament (Reichstag) if the plans did not go to his way, this resulted in no democracy what so ever. But yet many other would respond to this and say that Germany did have political parties which actual people could vote for. For an example in the late 19th century the conservative party had won but yet in the 1912the SPD (Social Democratic Party) won with 110 points. This does show a great form of democracy but not enough to prove that they were as one third of the votes went to the Junkers. There weren`t many Junkers compared to Peasants and it shows the unfairness of their process to brain wash people at the time.
There are more cons then pros and it truly makes people think what democracy really is, and if the country that they live in is a real democracy or a play put on for them to feel safe and feel the sense of freedom given mentally and not physically.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To what extent was the effective government of Germany in the years 1919–33 handicapped by the nature of the Weimar Constitution?
    • 999 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To what extent was the effective government of Germany in the years 1919–33 handicapped by the nature of the Weimar Constitution?

    A major flaw in the Weimar constitution was the proportional representation electoral system, which was an attempt to become more democratic. Democracy comes at the price of a strong government as it is usually difficult to form a stable government in a democracy. This can be manifested by the fact that in the mere period of 14 years, there were 21 different governments and 13 chancellors. This shows that the Weimar government lacked stability and strength which would make it almost impossible for the government to be effective and tackle the problems. How could the government solve the difficult troubles that Germany was facing, when they could not even manage to cooperate and unite? Since, proportional representation is one of the fairest electoral systems, it was impossible to form a strong single party government who had a good hold in the Reichstag and only weak coalitions which could not agree upon a decision was formed. Weak coalitions meant ineffective and incompetent governments. On the other hand, it could be said that the Weimar governments were not as unstable as it is claimed to be. The Weimar constitution has produced effective and stable governments such as the grand coalition which was seen as a strong government and it stood for the longest amount of time. Also, despite the numerous changes in government, the base parties of…

    • 999 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To What Extent Was Germany a Parliamentary Democracy?
    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To What Extent Was Germany a Parliamentary Democracy?

    Germany was a parliamentary democracy based on the constitution that Germany was run by. The Bundesrat being part of the constitution consisted of 58 members who were elected by the state assemblies, the Bundesrat had the power in theory to the law making process and by this having this possibly the right to alter the constitution. The Bundesrat had the power to veto legislation against a bill, therefore being able to stop such laws that would not be in favour of Germany. As well as this, the Bundesrat and the Reichstag had joint legislative power. The Reichstag was elected members represented by constituencies and were all male over the age of twenty five. One of the most significant points in favour of Germany being a democracy is that Bismark introduced universal male suffrage elections in 1871. This is clearly an example of a parliamentary democracy because it allowed people of all classes to vote; meaning that every layer of society had the opportunity to be represented. However importantly over the Bundesrat the Reichstag was significantly in power of the financial affairs and the banking system of Germany and perhaps most importantly the control the Reichstag had over the defence budget which was vital federal government expenditure. It had grown from being 100 million marks in 1890 to rapidly increasing to 2,405 million marks by 1913. Although the Kaiser did have the right to dissolve the Reichstag they still could hold elections after this. Furthermore the constitution was based on parliamentary democracy to an extent because members were elected into their positions. They held the power of money that…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Weimar Republic Dbq 1 Analysis
    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Weimar Republic Dbq 1 Analysis

    He is arguing the positive effects of this new democratic state, but he is sating a very extreme opinion that is dividing the views of Germany. In Document 2, Marie Juchaez, a Social Democratic Party representative, talks about the sudden imposition of gender equality in Germany. This is a huge change in Germany that this particular woman thinks is a very positive change made by the new democracy and she mentions how “my sex now has the chance to fully develop all of its potential”. Marie Juchaez is arguing positively for the democracy because she is part of the government. Because she is part of the Social democratic party she will obviously advocate for her parties belief and success. In Document 1, Ernst Troeltsch, a leader of the German Democratic Party, talks about how though the democracy is good it does have issues. Though he does not give any specific problems of solutions he states that if changes in the state are not made Germany will fall to a dictatorship. The problems with government leadership can be seen in these documents. Ernst Troeltsch talks about the issues that the democratic state faces. As a citizen of this new democracy, one would not want to hear that their…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Euro Chapter 28 Outline
    • 2235 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Ap Euro Chapter 28 Outline

    xlviii) In France, the democratically elected government rested in the hands of the middleclassoriented moderates, while communists and socialists battled for the support of the workers.…

    • 2235 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Assess the importance of nationalism as cause of the failure of democracy in Germany in the period 1918-1934.
    • 1837 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Assess the importance of nationalism as cause of the failure of democracy in Germany in the period 1918-1934.

    Nationalism was an important and integral factor in the downfall of the Weimar Republic and in turn, the ensuing failure of democracy in Germany in the period 1918-1934. The sense of loyalty and devotion to ones nation, which the German citizens had felt in their militaristic past, was ultimately devastated by WWI and its consequences. Although nationalism was a major cause of the failure of democracy in Germany, there were many other factors adding to the stress upon the countrys government at this time. This included the Treaty of Versailles, the Reparations Bill, the occupation of the Ruhr and hyperinflation. Several attempts to install nationalistic beliefs back in the government occurred, the most important of these being the Kapp Putsch by the right-wing nationalists and the Beer Hall Putsch by the right-wing Nazi party. The disillusionment felt by the people and their need to restore pride in their nation influenced many factors that led to the failure of democracy, and to the rise of the Nazi political party and its leader Adolf Hitler.…

    • 1837 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    ‘in the Years Before Ww1 Germany Was Progressing Towards an Effective Democracy’ How Far Do You Agree?
    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    ‘in the Years Before Ww1 Germany Was Progressing Towards an Effective Democracy’ How Far Do You Agree?

    Germany before WW1 had a climate that possible could have led them to follow democracy. After all the biggest party in Reichstag was a democratic party and there was a constitution. Along with this the voting system was fairly progressed giving votes to most men and turnouts for these elections had increased showing political participation to be increasing along with general interest in politics. It is for these reasons that one may argue that Germany was moving towards a democracy before WW1. However despite there being democratic elements within the German government, these features actually posed a threat democracy through counteracting the changes that would have led to it. For example although a constitution existed in Germany, this constitution made it possible for the Kaiser to rule Germany in an almost authoritarian manner and therefore stop any change in it’s path. Furthermore whether or not the SDP was the most supported party in Germany is also debatable due to the Hottentot election. Rigidity of the Kaiser’s powers, the inability for those in authority to suppress those power and urge for change and the fact that the SDP may not have been as supported as was once thought are all reason that has led to the conclusion that Germany was in a state of political stalemate before the war and the layout of the government was n such a way that a democratic Germany seemed an almost impossible achievement.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Weimer Republic
    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Weimer Republic

    However the failures of The Weimar Government are many. For example, the economy looked like it was stable and becoming stronger but it still fully depended on the American loans. When the wall street crash happened, Germany was then depended upon by the rest of Europe to pay their reparations. To for fill the demand of the rest of Europe, Germany began to print more money but this only devalued the currency. This was dragging Germany’s economy in to crisis, again. Article 48 is another failure of The Weimar Government. Article 48 stated that in an emergency, the president could make decisions without consulting the Reichstag. This was an easy way for Germany to fall into a democracy. Also, the people of Germany still supported very extreme political parties. This ment that Germany was fighting its self, in a way that it’s people couldn’t agree. The members of the Germany Government were either supported the ‘left wing’ political parties or the ‘right wing’ political party, there would be little coordination with in the government.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Democratic Britian Was by the 1928?
    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages

    How Democratic Britian Was by the 1928?

    For any country to be called democratic, certain conditions have to exist. Firstly, all adults should have the right to vote but the right to vote did not in itself make Britain democratic. Between 1850 and 1928, other features of a democracy were created. These features included a fair system of voting, a choice of who to vote for and access to information to make an informed choice. It should also be possible for people from all backgrounds to become Members of Parliament themselves and parliament should be accountable to the voters. Although the transition from a political system dominated by aristocracy to one of universal suffrage was a long and protracted one by 1928, most of the features of a democracy had been met. Consequently Britain had become more democratic than it was in 1850.…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ap World History Dbq
    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ap World History Dbq

    German revolutionaries published the Spartacist Manifesto in which they put down the democratic Germany. They wrote about the “beast of capital,” democracy, which caused the war; they held the government responsible. Furthermore, they believed that the government could not fix what it caused. They felt that the government was unable to restore order, feed their people, insure laws, and give jobs to the country it has destroyed. They wanted a new government to replace the failing one; they recognized that democracy had failed them and they turned to fascism. (Document 1)…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Germany's Imperialistic Government
    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Germany's Imperialistic Government

    The "very roots of human life" were being neglected by Germany's imperialistic government which portrayed acts of aggression and tyranny toward their people and neighboring countries which posed a threat for world peace and democracy. Germany's imperialistic government overlooked the well-being of their people and put them in hardships without their approval.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    To what extent was the Second Reich an entrenched autocracy between 1900-1914?
    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages

    To what extent was the Second Reich an entrenched autocracy between 1900-1914?

    The German Imperial Constitution of 1871 was widely regarded by contemporaries to be one of the most democratic in the world. People commented at the time how it was more democratic than the UK system of first-past-the-post and the people of Germany were proud that their country was now the European capital of democracy. The Reichstag had universal male suffrage over the age of 25 and was elected by secret ballot. The people felt that they had the true power in Germany as any legislation that was proposed by the Chancellor had to be passed by them and as well as this they could stop any form of direct taxation put forward by the Imperial Government (who could only raise indirect taxes without consent) through blocking such. However, the Reichstag was not nearly as democratic as it initially seems: it couldn’t produce its own legislation and the only person who could, the Chancellor, couldn’t be removed by them. Similarly the Kaiser and Ministers were untouchable. Whilst the people of Germany voted for who represented them the very fact that the members of the Reichstag were unpaid guaranteed an unfair representation of conservative members, ironic considering it is meant to be the most democratic constitution using proportional representation. The Bundesrat was the collection of 58 representatives who spoke for the federal states of Germany. This was thought to be democratic as it…

    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How far was Britain a democracy by 1918?
    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How far was Britain a democracy by 1918?

    At the beginning of the time period, 1850, Britain was not democratic. There was not a lot of choice concerning the political parties, there were only two parties: The Liberals and the Conservatives. Woman did not have any right to vote and were considered second class citizens. In England and Wales only one million and five men could vote and some men could vote twice. The distribution of seats did not take into account the migration of Britain. The House of Lords (HOL) were aristocracy that were their because of their ancestry. MP’s were unpaid and had to own property so the poorer classes could not be MP’s and therefore opinions not heard. A democracy is one which has universal suffrage, equal distribution of seats, wide range of choice of parties that cover a wide range of issues, everyone has the right to be an MP and the HOL should be trusted members of the public. By the end of the time period, 1918, the majority of these had been overcome, lots of people had the right to vote, redistribution of seats made it more equal, there were now more than two parties, the property qualification in becoming an MP was abolished and they were paid salaries and the HOL lost the right to veto laws and hold them for two years, they could only hold them for one year.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How democratic was Britain by 1914?
    • 891 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How democratic was Britain by 1914?

    By "a democracy" we mean that there should be several certain features present. These features consist of universal adult suffrage, equal constituencies, every adult being able to stand as a candidate, a secret ballot, regular elections, a choice of political parties and freedom of speech/press. There is a debate over when exactly Britain actually became a representative liberal democracy. This essay will show that by 1914 Britain was not yet fully a democracy, but well on its way.…

    • 891 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Right Wing Of Germany In The 1920s
    • 258 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Right Wing Of Germany In The 1920s

    Therefore, the “Freikorps” crushed them easily by taking over their headquarters in 10 January 1919.…

    • 258 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Holocaust: The Genocide Of The Jewish Race
    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Holocaust: The Genocide Of The Jewish Race

    Germany was longing for a united nation with a stable economy. The Nazi party, lead by Adolf Hitler, came to power. "And then there is another fundamental error: they have never got it clear in their own minds that there is a difference or how great a difference there is between the conception 'national' and the word 'dynastic' or 'monarchistic.' They do not understand that today it is more than ever necessary in our thoughts as Nationalists to avoid anything which might perhaps cause the individual to think that the National Idea was identical with petty everyday political views. They ought day by day to din into the ears of the masses: 'We want to bury all the petty differences and to bring out into…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics