Preview

The Stanley Milgram Experiment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Stanley Milgram Experiment
The Stanley Milgram experiment takes normal everyday people and gives them orders to do horrible things. The test is to see if someone would do an awful act just on the basis of someone telling them to.
This experiment speaks to the 'nature of responsibility' and to see if the subject will stop the experiment due to its dangerous nature. The subject is tricked into thinking they are the teacher, and the other person in the room, an actor, is the learner. The teacher will ask the learner a series of questions where if he answers incorrectly, he will receive an electric shock which increases in volume with every incorrect answer. The voltage of the shock can reach a magnitude of 450 volts, a lethal amount. What the subject does not know is that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The experimenter, teacher, and the learner were all in the same room, the learner would be strapped to a chair. The experimenter explains to the learner that “[h]e will be read lists of simple word pairs, and that he will be tested on his ability to remember the second word of a pair when he hears the first one again,” the experimenter also advises the learner that “[w]henever he makes an error, he (learner) will receive electric shocks of increasing intensity” (632); the intensity of the shocks ranged from slight shock to a severe shock. After the teacher read out loud the simple pairs or words, the experimenter would read out the first word of the pair, and the learner would attempt to answer with the second word of the pair. The teacher participated in the experiment not knowing that learner was an actor and that the learner was not receiving any electric shocks. Stanley Milgram explains that“[t]he point of the experiment is to see how far a person will proceed in a concrete and measureable situation in which he is ordered to inflict increasing pain on a protesting victim” (632). Milgram found that participants were more than willing to go pass what was comfortable to them to please authority; “Milgram found that few participants could…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgrams experiments are some of the most recognized behavior experiments in psychology today. Milgrams most known experiment was ‘shocking’ to people and has also been controversial ethically. As Ian Parker stated it would “make his name and destroy his reputation.” Parkers Obedience essay talks much of Milgrams life before the experiment and how the psychology community thought about his ethics.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Daniel Parks Freshman Studies Term II Critical Analysis and Milgram’s Response Obedience to Authority and the obedience experiments that produced Stanley Milgram’s famous book have produced almost equal amounts of surprise, curiosity and criticism. The criticism of social psychologist John Darley and playwright Dannie Abse are each representative of the general criticism Milgram has received; Darley focuses on whether the study has any relevance to real world events (such as the Holocaust), and Abse focuses on justification of the experiment, i.e. was the study worth doing in spite of the deception employed and its potential harm to the subjects. To Milgram, this criticism demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the goals and implications of the obedience study, to which he has responded by restating the goal of the experiment and explaining its beneficial effects upon the subjects.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After learning about the Stanley Milgram experiment, I found myself questioning why and how the majority of the subjects that participated in the experiment were willing to inflict apparent pain and injury on an innocent person, and found myself curious as to how I would react should I but put in the same situation. I believe that the most significant reason for this disturbing absence of critical thinking and moral responsibility is because the subjects involved in the experiment were blinded by authority and trapped in Stage 1 of Knowing: The Garden of Eden stage. The subjects were being tested on their responsiveness to authority and, in most cases, the subjects accepted their task given by the authority and performed atrocious acts by following orders, even though the authority in this experiment was simply an actor posing as a scientist by wearing a white lab coat. Although this experiment was staged, the point of this test was to see whether the teachers (subjects) would put a stop to the experiment or continue to the point where they would administer seemingly lethal electric shocks to the learner simply because it is what the scientist has told them to do. This experiment demonstrates how authority can negatively influence one’s critical thinking skills. In many cases during this experiment, the subjects were assigned their role and accepted the information given by authority without question or criticism, thus falling into the Stage 1 category of knowing. These subjects allowed themselves to believe that, “anyone who disagrees with the authorities must be wrong, including themselves.” They have forgotten the value of equally, in the sense that everyone is of an equal value and, although the man in the white coat may appear to have authority, he is just as equal as them in terms of human rights.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Milgram’s article, he explains an experiment he designed to test whether the subjects of the experiment would refuse the orders of authority and follow…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many subjects gave hesitation to giving the shocks, but with the administrator there, they obeyed, and gave the highest shock, which was 450 volts. It is sad that so many people followed directions to shock another person even thought they were complaining about the pain. Although, the administrator was reassuring them that they were fine, and things were ok.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    milgrams obedience study

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The experiment was inspired by the Holocaust - were the Germans in league with the Nazis, or where they simply following orders as they exterminated the Nazi's victims? Milgram wanted to study whether people would obey an authority figure, or would their own morals make them stop the experiment?…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Milgram's Study

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The results showed 65% of Miligram's participants delivered the full (and fatal) 450 volt shock. Even though the learner gave out an agonised scream…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The teacher is to give a pair of words to the learner, then the teacher is to repeat the first word and the learner is to repeat the second word that matches from the list of choice the teacher gives. For every question the learner answers incorrectly, he is to receive a “mild” electric shock, starting from 15 volts and increased by 15 per wrong answer up a maximum shock of 450 volts. The teachers did not know that there were no shocks and the procedure was perfectly safe. For every time a participant would refuse to continue on with the experiment, the scientist would give four different orders every time. The first order is “please continue,” the second is “the experiment requires you to continue,” the third is “it is absolutely essential that you continue,” and the last is “you have no other choice but to continue” (McLeod,…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram's experiment in 1960 by social psychologist Dr. Stanely Milgram's (1963, 1965) was a controversial experiment. He researched the effect of authority on obedience. I don't think the scientific community overreacted to this experiment because it is unethical to reduce subjects to "twitching shuttering wrecks". Though the human mind is amazing strong we still do not know its breaking point. For interviewers to carry out the kind of experiment they did, they have to be willing to face the consequences of the experiment which could be a permanent damaged mental state. I do believe we need to do experiments like this as the outcome was very eye opening but it has to be better regulated and the background and methods of experimentation clearly…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stanley Milgram was an extremely famous psychologist who was best known for his groundbreaking experiment on the subject of obedience during the 1960s. Milgram began his career as a psychologist just around the time that the horrifying truth of the concentration camps came out. The fact that almost an entire nation obeyed one man, who commanded them to do inhumane and grotesque acts to other human beings intrigued Stanley Milgram. He became even more interested when he began watching the trial of Adolf Eichmann, who simply did not seem to be the appalling monster that many people expected and portrayed him to be. In fact, Milgram described Eichmann as being less of a “sadistic monster…[and] that he came closer to being an uninspired bureaucrat…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout our nation's history, we have taken part in many unethical means of gaining information or knowledge. Some of the more famous cases include, The Milgram Obedience and Authority experiment, The Stanford Prison experiment, and of course the Abu Ghraib scandal involving our own U.S. soldiers. While two of these instances were not intended to cause physical harm, they were all branded unethical due to the extent of not only the physical abuses that took place, but the painful psychological impact it left on those involved.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The experiment had a unit of people willing to help the study (“On the Ethics of Intervention…”1). Researchers involved of Philip G. Zimbardo, Craig Haney, William Curtis Banks, and David Jaffe (“On…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The experiment was about people will respond to authority. In the experiment the teacher who is to obey the order of the authority who was the experimenter also the learner who was the recipient of incentive from the teacher. The teacher was given lists of words to teach the student, (learner) and the teacher have to read the original word given him also, read the four answers. What the learner would do was to press a button to show his answer. And, if the answer was wrong, the teacher would shock the learner, and increase the electric shock to 15 volt increments for every wrong answer. Also, if the learner gets the right answer, the teacher will read the next pair of word. What happened in the experiment that resulted into a higher level of authority was that the teacher did exactly what he was told to do by the…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays