Preview

Stanley Milgram's Experiment

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1583 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stanley Milgram's Experiment
Stanley Milgram was an extremely famous psychologist who was best known for his groundbreaking experiment on the subject of obedience during the 1960s. Milgram began his career as a psychologist just around the time that the horrifying truth of the concentration camps came out. The fact that almost an entire nation obeyed one man, who commanded them to do inhumane and grotesque acts to other human beings intrigued Stanley Milgram. He became even more interested when he began watching the trial of Adolf Eichmann, who simply did not seem to be the appalling monster that many people expected and portrayed him to be. In fact, Milgram described Eichmann as being less of a “sadistic monster…[and] that he came closer to being an uninspired bureaucrat …show more content…
Respondents were being informed that the experiment would analyze how being punished could have an effect on learning aptitude. Three individuals would be involved in the experiment, one person who would be the “experimenter”, one person who would be the “teacher” and one person who would be the “learner.” The experimenter was in charge of the entire experiment, giving orders to the teacher when they were hesitant to perform their duties, and would continuously remind the teacher that they must continue the trial, even when they began to feel uncomfortable with their part in the experiment. The role of experimenter would be filled by someone who was completely aware of the experiment, and would try their best to keep the experiment going for as long as they could. The teacher was meant to listen and obey the rules of the experimenter and deliver unpleasant stimuli to the learner when ordered to by the experimenter. The learner was supposed to memorize word pairings and then answer questions about these word pairings to the best of …show more content…
While the test subject is in complete control over when the experiment can be stopped based on their own level of morals, it would not be considered proper to put the test subject in an environment like this that could be perceived as “hostile” without their complete knowledge of their part in the experiment. It would be impossible to inform the test subjects about the extremely stressful experiment they would be taking place in without informing them on exactly what they would be doing, and in this experiment, the discretion of the test was important to get clear and true results. Another immoral part of Milgram’s experiment was the severe psychological stress imposed on the applicants. Numerous participants stated that they felt extremely uncomfortable about what they were expected to do, although a sizable amount of the members in the primary trials subsequently pronounced that they felt vastly pleased to have been chosen to take part in the experiment. Another immoral aspect of the experiment was the fact that the test subject was not expressly given the right to withdrawal from the experiment, and were continuously given orders to continue the experiment. Milgram claimed that in this experiment strict orders were essential to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Before Milgram could publish his first book about his obedience experiment it found its way onto many medias from the New York Times, Life, ABC television, and the British Press. As the experiment became more celebrated one question continued to come up ‘had Milgram mistreated his subjects?’ Some psychologists, including Alan Elms and Bruno Bettelheim, think so after some of Milgrams subjects talked about having heart attacks and others talked about joining group therapy after the experiment. Since those reports came about the experiment has been attacked by psychologists and many others. “In Milgrams defiance,” says Parker, “Milgram would always highlight the results of post-experimental studies which never showed any traumatic…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Daniel Parks Freshman Studies Term II Critical Analysis and Milgram’s Response Obedience to Authority and the obedience experiments that produced Stanley Milgram’s famous book have produced almost equal amounts of surprise, curiosity and criticism. The criticism of social psychologist John Darley and playwright Dannie Abse are each representative of the general criticism Milgram has received; Darley focuses on whether the study has any relevance to real world events (such as the Holocaust), and Abse focuses on justification of the experiment, i.e. was the study worth doing in spite of the deception employed and its potential harm to the subjects. To Milgram, this criticism demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the goals and implications of the obedience study, to which he has responded by restating the goal of the experiment and explaining its beneficial effects upon the subjects.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The scientist explained that words would be given in pairs, and the learner should respond with the second word when hearing the first word again. If the learner made a mistake, they received an electrical shock. Next, the teacher was promptly led to another room where they were given a sample shock of 45 volts, then shown a panel from which they would shock the learner and read a script. Starting at 15 volts the teacher was instructed to increase voltage for every incorrect answer until the machine reached a max of 450 volts. Unbeknownst to the teacher, he was the real subject of the experiment.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanley Milgram experiment takes normal everyday people and gives them orders to do horrible…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram, born a Jew, wonders how he was fortunate enough to be born and raised in the United States, however, he was still impacted by the Holocaust. He felt very passionate about the Holocaust and feels guilty that he hadn’t died in the concentration camps with his fellow Jews in Europe (Miller, 2015). Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, sought out the reasoning behind why Nazi soldiers blindly obeyed authority, especially after the Nuremberg War Criminal trials in World War II (McLeod, 2007). The Nuremberg War Criminal trials consisted of thirteen trials against the higher ranked “Nazi war criminals.” The Nazi criminals killed innocent Jews but proceeded to do so anyway during the Holocaust (Nuremberg Trials, 2015). Some of the Nazis knew killing Jews was immoral, but claim they were “just following orders.” The fact that Milgram was a Jew (Miller, 2015) accompanied by the testimonies in…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning, Stanley Milgram was worried about the Nazi problem. He doesn’t worry much about the Nazis anymore. He worries about you and me, and, perhaps, himself a little bit too. Stanley Milgram is a social psychologist, and when he began his career at Yale University in 1960 he had a plan to prove, scientifically, that Germans…

    • 6499 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this experiment, participants were put under immense stress because of what they had to do. They played the role of a "teacher," administrating a shock to a "student" each time they answered one of their questions incorrectly. The shock level was told to be raised the more the student failed, starting at 30 volts and increasing in 15-volt increments all the way to 450 volts. The "teacher" believed it was real, but in actuality the "students" were all acts pretending to be shocked. Most of the participants asked the experiment if they should continue or not after a while.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram Aims and Context

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Milgram’s study was done after the trial of Adolf Eichmann. This was after the holocaust where 6 million Jews were murdered. This trial displayed an example of destructive obedience where people were said to have complied with what they were told to do, even if it had a negative impact on others, which in this case was murdering innocent people, although being completely mentally aware of what they were being asked to do and yet still carried out the task.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although many of us would agree not to commit crimes, Milgram's experiment proves that humans are easily manipulated. At the beginning of the 1930’s, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Party exploited the widespread discontent in Germany to attract popular and political support. Though the Germans were…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The volunteer believed the experiment was testing whether or not using an electrical shock as punishment would cause the student to memorize the information quicker than no punishment, but this was not the true purpose of the experiment. The volunteer would be appointed as the teacher, while the student and experimenter were merely actors. The student was placed in a separate room, out of sight from the teacher (See picture to the left). The teacher would have a list of words which the student was told to memorize. If the student got the answer wrong, he would receive an “electrical shock” from the electric shock switch panel; the “voltage” increased with each incorrect answer (there were 30 voltage levels, increasing by fifteen volts each level). The panel included switches ranging from a slight shock of 45 volts to a deadly shock of 450 volts. What the teacher didn’t know, was the student never received any electrical shock whatsoever. They were merely faking it. The person truly being tested was the teacher, who was instructed to administer very harmful shocks to the student by the experimenter. This naturally went against the volunteer’s conscience because the possibility of harming, or even killing the student seemed immoral. Although it went against their morals, the volunteer- in most cases- continued because they were prodded to do so…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Subjects were observed to sweat, tremble, stutter, bite their lips, groan and dig their fingernails into their flesh (Milgram, 1963). Many subjects said they could not go on, but nevertheless they did. Approximately sixty five percent of participants were fully obedient (Moghaddam, 1998), continuing until they reached the most potent shock on the generator, at which point, the experimenter called a halt to the session. Not one participant stopped before shock level 20, which was 300 volts, and the point at which the learner stopped answering questions. Milgram asked groups of laypeople and experts to predict the outcome of the experiment before it as conducted. As it was predicted that participants would refuse to administer shocks of more than a minimal voltage to learners (Moghaddam, 1998) these results amazed many people. This experiment demonstrated that normal, healthy, intelligent people are capable of carrying out violent and destructive acts, if placed in the right (or wrong) situation. This was also demonstrated by a study carried out by Zimbardo…

    • 2214 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, an experiment such as Milgram's one would hardly receive approval from any research ethics board, taking into account that they ensure the respect, well-being, and integrity of human dignity, informed consent moreover the minimum damage to participants subjected to risks.…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two types of people, leaders and followers, in Milgram’s experiment 65% of participants continued to go to the 450 volts experiment so this means people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figure. Milgram came up with an Agency theory which states. That the person giving the orders is perceived as being qualified to direct other people’s behavior. That is, they are seen as legitimate. The person being ordered about is able to believe that the authority will accept responsibility for what happens. I believe this theory to be true, if I would have been in this experiment I would have been part of the 65% because I find myself to be a follower. I find most people being followers more than leaders, being a leader is having…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The experiment was in between three people. One of them was the teacher (people who volunteered to be a part of the experiment), the learner (actor), the experimenter (Mr. Milgram). Participants were introduced to each other and their roles. The learner was placed on an electric chair and the teacher was given the control of electric shock generator. Both of them were taken to different rooms. Volunteers were told they were researching the effect of punishment on learning. The…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram Experiment

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stanley Milgram believed that humans have a tendency to obey other people who are in position of authority over them even if, in obeying, they violate their personal codes of moral and ethical behavior. Milgram believed that in some situations, the human tendency to obey is so deeply ingrained and powerful that it cancels out a person’s ability to behave morally, ethically, or even sympathetically. In 1963 Milgram carried out an experiment. He hypothesized that individuals who would never intentionally cause someone physical harm would do so if ordered by a powerful authority figure.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays