The Relationship Between Culture And ELT
Journal of Education and Practice
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol.5, No.4, 2013
www.iiste.org
The Relationship between Culture and ELT: The Representation of Aesthetic Sense Culture in “Oxford Progressive English”
Mumtaz Ahmed*1, Sayed Kazim Shah2
1.
2.
Government Postgraduate College of Science, Samanabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Department of English Linguistics, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
* E-mail of the corresponding author: webmumtaz@gmail.com
Abstract
The present research is basically a qualitative study using also quantitative methods which involve the role of culture in English language teaching (ELT) mainly focusing on Pakistani context. The research makes hypothesis that the Pakistani learners of English (especially from religious and rural cultural background) are demotivated to learn English because the textbooks developed for them by foreign textbook writers are culturally irrelevant. The study involved evaluation of “Oxford Progressive English” (OPE) textbook series for cultural relevance. For evaluation the data was collected from “Oxford Progressive English” series designed especially for Pakistani learners of English. An evaluation model was developed for the content analysis of the OPE textbooks for cultural relevance from Adaskou, Britten and Fashi (1990) and the data has been analyzed to explore in the textbook series the cultural gaps between the target culture and the learner’s culture in the aspect of aesthetic sense culture. Various instances regarding cultural contrast in these textbooks have been highlighted and their irrelevance to Pakistani culture has been explored. The findings of the research show that the OPE textbooks by the foreign authors mainly focus on the target culture with little knowledge and information of the indigenous or learner culture. Moreover, the learner culture is presented as negative stereotypes. The OPE textbooks are culturally biased and based on hidden curriculum to
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol.5, No.4, 2013
www.iiste.org
The Relationship between Culture and ELT: The Representation of Aesthetic Sense Culture in “Oxford Progressive English”
Mumtaz Ahmed*1, Sayed Kazim Shah2
1.
2.
Government Postgraduate College of Science, Samanabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Department of English Linguistics, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
* E-mail of the corresponding author: webmumtaz@gmail.com
Abstract
The present research is basically a qualitative study using also quantitative methods which involve the role of culture in English language teaching (ELT) mainly focusing on Pakistani context. The research makes hypothesis that the Pakistani learners of English (especially from religious and rural cultural background) are demotivated to learn English because the textbooks developed for them by foreign textbook writers are culturally irrelevant. The study involved evaluation of “Oxford Progressive English” (OPE) textbook series for cultural relevance. For evaluation the data was collected from “Oxford Progressive English” series designed especially for Pakistani learners of English. An evaluation model was developed for the content analysis of the OPE textbooks for cultural relevance from Adaskou, Britten and Fashi (1990) and the data has been analyzed to explore in the textbook series the cultural gaps between the target culture and the learner’s culture in the aspect of aesthetic sense culture. Various instances regarding cultural contrast in these textbooks have been highlighted and their irrelevance to Pakistani culture has been explored. The findings of the research show that the OPE textbooks by the foreign authors mainly focus on the target culture with little knowledge and information of the indigenous or learner culture. Moreover, the learner culture is presented as negative stereotypes. The OPE textbooks are culturally biased and based on hidden curriculum to
References: Adaskou, K., Britten, D., and Fashi, B.(1990). Design decisions on the cultural content of a secondary English course for Morocco Alkire, S. & Alkire, A. (2007).Teaching literature in the Muslim world: A bicultural approach. TESL-EJ 10.4. Retrieved on September 12, 2010, from http://tesl-ej.org/ej40/a3.pdf Alptekin, C Argungu, D.M. (1996). English, Muslims and Islamisation: Between needs and deeds in English and Islam: Creative Encouters 96, Proceedings of the International conference, Malaysia, 331-347. Ariffin, S. (2006). Culture in EFL teaching: Issues and solutions. TESL Working Paper Series ,4 (1), 75-78. Arshad, M. (2009). Ulama’s response to English language in the Indo-Pakistan Subcontinent. Mayar, Educational and Research Journal, Department of Urdu, International Islamic university, Islamabad Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Heinemann. Eliot, T. S. (1948). Notes towards the definition of culture. London: Faber and Faber. Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal 51/1, 36-42. Genc, B. & Bada, E. (2005) Culture in language learning and teaching, The Reading Matrix, vol.5. No.1, 72-83. Haque, A. (1993). The position and status of English in Pakistan. In Baumgradner, R. (ed.) The English language in Pakistan Hyde, M. (1994). The teaching of English in Morocco: the place of culture: ELT Journal 48/4, 295-305. Jacques, C. (2006). Oxford Progressive English 5, Oxford University Press, Karachi. Mahboob, A. (2002) No English, no future: Language policy in Pakistan in Obeng, S.G., and Hartford, B. (eds.). McKay, S. L. (2002). Teaching English as an International Language: Rethinking Goals and Approaches. Nelson, G. (1995). Considering Culture: Guidelines for ESL/EFL Textbook Writers. In Byrd, P. Materials Writers’ Guide Phillipson R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Prodromou, .(1992 ). What culture? Which culture: cross-cultural factors in language learning, ELT Journal, Volume 46, 39-50 Rahman, T. (1991). A History survey of language-teaching among South Asia Muslims. Retrieved on March 23, 2011, from www.tariqrahman.net/lanmain.htm. Rahman, T. (1996). Language and Politics in Pakistan. 1998 paper edition. Karachi: Oxford University Press. Redford, R. (2005a). Oxford Progressive English 6, Oxford University Press, Karachi. Redford, R. (2005b). Oxford Progressive English 7, Oxford University Press, Karachi. Redford, R. (2005c). Oxford Progressive English 8, Oxford University Press, Karachi. Sercu, L. (2002). Autonomous Learning and the Acquisition of Intercultural Communicative Competence: Some Implications for Course Development Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal 42/4, 237-246. Stapleton, P. (2000). Uultur 's Role in TEFL: An Attitude Survey in Japan. Langauge, Culture and Curriculum , 293-301. Tomalin, B. & Stempleski, S. (1993). Cultural Awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Turkan, S. & Celik, S. (2007). Integrating culture into EFL textbooks and classroom: Suggested lesson plans. Novitas-ROYAL, Vol: 1(1), 18-33. Retrieved on January 30, 2012, from http://novitasroyal.org/turkan.pdf .