Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Judges In The Supreme Court

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
239 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Judges In The Supreme Court
As we know in the Article III of the U.S constitution says that all judges in the Supreme Court and Inferior Courts can have their jobs for the rest of their life. The reasons that the judges can lose their job is by retirement or if they have been accused of any crime.
The pros of lifetime of judges in the Supreme Court are that they do not have to worry about the political pressure or to contribute with money for any political campaign. “The basic purpose of lifetime appointment is to assure the integrity of the power granted to Court Justices and protect them against unwarranted interference from either the legislative or executive branch”. (laws, n.d.). In addition, there are judges in the Supreme Court that worries about make a fair system
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of No Term Limits On Supreme Court Justices
    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of No Term Limits On Supreme Court Justices

    Although their are pro's and con's for each argument, I believe that it is better for the country to have no term limits on supreme court justices. It seems to me that the problems term limits cause, such as strategic retirement, are preferable to the alternative possibility, that the justices begin making decisions based on what would best help their personal careers in the…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judical Selection Process in Pa and Arizona
    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Judical Selection Process in Pa and Arizona

    According to the judicial selection website, Pennsylvania does not use the Judicial Nominating Commissions as their method to selecting a justice to serve on the bench (www.judicialselctions.us). The justices run for election to gain a seat in the courts. They do this by campaigning and getting the necessary funds from donations and their political party. Elections in the state are held in odd numbered years. Once a justice is elected they can serve an unlimited amount of terms until the mandatory retirement age of seventy and are retained or re-elected by voters. Appellate Courts and Courts of Common Pleas judges serve ten year terms. All other court justices such as, Magisterial District and…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    US History Chapter 11 Vocab
    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    US History Chapter 11 Vocab

    John Marshall- One Federalist judge, Chief Justice John Marshall, was not removed when the new Republican-Democratic Congress reeled the Judiciary Act of 1801 and repealed16 new federal judges. He served under presidents including Jefferson and others for 34 years. He shaped the American legal tradition more than any other person.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper
    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper

    | Correct, "Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Appellate Court
    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Appellate Court

    State court judges are selected in a variety of ways, including They can be elected, appointed for a certain of years, for life, or even a mixure of these…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Justice Pros And Cons
    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Supreme Court Justice Pros And Cons

    Having our Supreme Court Justice serving on the bench for life can have pros and cons. Although, most of our fellows americans seem to have more drawbacks about our Supreme Court of Justice life tenure position. With this in mind, let me first mention the pros…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judges, are they politicians in disguise? (40)
    • 1269 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Judges, are they politicians in disguise? (40)

    The role of the Supreme Court is to interpret the constitution and to apply these interpretations to legislation that has been made by Congress as to avoid them from making unconstitutional law. In doing so this is called judicial review in which the Supreme Court takes an active role in intervening in politics. If a law is suggested as being unconstitutional the Supreme Court will either accept or decline and if they accept, this will result in the judiciary then looking at the case and determining whether or not the accusation is true or if the question is entitled to make a claim. In some instances this can be taken too far by the court and they can intervene and end up making a substantial decision on some very controversial issues which would be deemed as unfair by one of the parties, other times their intervention is adequate and justified. I will argue that they are not politically neutral due to the appointment process; however I think they are less like politicians in disguise and more just actively doing their job and interpreting the constitution as how it is supposed to be.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assess The Importance Of The Judicial Branch
    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page

    Assess The Importance Of The Judicial Branch

    The Executive branch is headed by the president. The president has powers of directing government, running the Armed Forces, dealing with international powers, and vetoing laws. He can recommend new laws and he carries out federal laws.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Assess The Importance Of The Judicial Branch
    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess The Importance Of The Judicial Branch

    The Constitution was written in 1787 to establish a national government, divide powers, and gives the roles to the three branches. James Madison, one of the authors of the Constitution, decided along with many other leaders that it is best to have a framework of how the government should work so there would be order and avoid problems in the future. The legislative branch is in change of passing and making laws. The judicial branch is in charge of making sure that the country is being constitutional.. The executive branch is in charge of enforcing the laws.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    United State Supreme Court Research Paper
    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    United State Supreme Court Research Paper

    The Federal Court System contains three levels of courts: first, U.S district courts and various courts of limited jurisdiction (trial courts of general jurisdiction). Second, U.S courts of appeals (intermediate courts of appeals). Finally, the highest level of the three level federal court system is the United State Supreme Court. Today, the United State Supreme Court is located in Washington D.C.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices
    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices

    First, a term limit may hurt the judicial independence. One of the best arguments against term limits is that life tenure frees justices from political pressure. Justices are not elected officials, and it would be gratifying for them to not feel the pressure of ordinary politics. Also, we do not want the justices to worry about their life after their Supreme Court career is over. The justices may become worried about how they vote on specific cases if they are trying to gain the respect of public opinion. Second, the Supreme Courts validity might be jeopardized by shortening the term limits. Having life tenure allows the justices to interpret the law exactly the way they see fit. People support the Supreme Court even in disagreements because they believe they are involved in something greater than ordinary politics (Ringhand np). Third, term limits could not eliminate all aspects of political gamesmanship. The Senate would still have the power to refuse to act on a nomination or vote down a nominee they find…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Judicial Branch In The 20th Century
    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Judicial Branch In The 20th Century

    "[The Judicial Branch] may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment” Hamilton explained when analyzing the Judiciary’s initial intent. Article 3 section 1 of the Constitution grants the Supreme court “The judicial Power of the United States.” this power can be given to inferior courts such as circuit and district courts as “Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” Later, in article 3 section 2, the Judicial branch is granted power that “extend[s] to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority.” The Judicial branch has explicit power to interpret the intent of past laws, treaties made, and…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros and Cons of Judicial Review
    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros and Cons of Judicial Review

    is one of the sole purposes of the Supreme Court of the United States. Many…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Supreme Court Term Limits
    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Supreme Court Term Limits

    The Supreme Court needs younger judges to function better. The supreme courts judges will not function very well because they are missing one judge out of nine judges. For example “Antonin Scalia suffered from coronary artery disease, obesity and diabetes” and this shows that the Supreme Court will not function properly with old judges. Therefore, term limits are a great idea because younger judges are less likely to have any medical problems that will interfere with their job. 10-20 years is long enough for a judge to build up genuine exercise and genuine powers and the majority of Americans are in favor.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Persuasive Essay
    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Supreme Court Persuasive Essay

    Many speculate that Trump will have the opportunity to appoint not one, but three justices as many get ready to retire. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer, are 83 and 78, respectively. Both are liberal and help balance the current composition of the Supreme Court. In addition, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who is 80, also help balance the Supreme Court (Barnes). If those three retire, which is likely, then Trump appoint more justices. However, if they stay, then the make up will remain slightly more balanced.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics