Preview

Pros and Cons of Judicial Review

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1033 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros and Cons of Judicial Review
Pros and Cons of Judicial Review

Adam Kimball Pol. 1110 Instr. Madigan 12/10/96

Judicial Review is the power given to Supreme court justices in which a judge has the power to reason whether a law is unconstitutional or not. Chief
Justice John Marshall initiated the Supreme Court's right to translate the
Constitution in 1803 following the case of Marbury Vs. Madison, in which he declared the Supreme Court as the sole interpreters of Constitutional law. This is one of the sole purposes of the Supreme Court of the United States. Many
Historical thinkers would find some difficulty in imagining a government set up to limit the power of itself,but others would argue that this form of government best works for the people, and not against them. The treatment of the
Constitution by the Supreme Court as a "living" document that is able to be translated differently over time for the good of the people has as many skeptics as it does supporters. But, if we do not allow the Supreme Court to translate the Constitution who then, should the people chose to do such an important job. If we were to look back at the ideas and thoughts of some of the greatest political thinkers of our time, we would find that individuals such as
Plato, Niccolo Machiavelli, and John Locke, would share extremely different views as to whether or not Judicial review, and the Supreme Court as a whole, would be successful in their ideal government situations. One of the earliest political philosophers Plato, would find our present day governmental setup of the Supreme Court to be the ideal group to deal with the United States' situation. Plato felt that government should be run by enlightened philosopher kings, that would rule for the good of the people, and not themselves. We today see the Supreme Court as a collection of the most
"enlightened" thinkers of our day. They are chosen to make moral decisions about laws made by others in our society, and decide whether or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    guarantee the honesty of the power allowed to Court Justices and protect them against unjust interference from either the legislative or executive branch. And also to protect our Supreme Judges from political pressure. But, I believe this can still be done by setting an specific time for the judge to leave the position and therefore, I believe it is unnecessary for judges to hold their position for lifetime.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    United States Supreme Court; the highest appellate court in the Federal judicial system. This court is tasked with taking on its own cases and normally takes from lower courts that struggle with defining Federal law. The nine justices are appointed for life by the president and reflect the highest responsibility. The United States Supreme Court is ultimately responsible for interpreting the United States Constitution and applying it to enforcement, prosecution…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We can consider United States as new born nation and, United States are proud to have one of the oldest and strongest written constitutions in the world. The idea of new constitution awaken many colonial countries and political system that are running by monarchy system. Whether other countries are following the right step or not, it is undisputable that the U.S. stable Constitution’s ideologies have led people to reconsider how to organize and rebuilt their government political structures.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    That the Supreme Court exercises a policy making role has been an established fact ever since Maybury vs. Madison defined the Court’s role in judicial review of existing law. By choosing which cases to review and by establishing precedents by way interpretation of a law’s meaning and applicability the Court influences the course of action adopted not only by government but by individuals and businesses who consider the implications of the Court’s actions. In adjudicating disagreements of alternative interpretations of a law the Supreme Court establishes policies which have implications extending beyond the specific case in question and into social policy at large. In choosing which cases to review the Court calls attention to certain issues…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary foundations for the power which it exercises over the American judicial system is the basics of judicial review. This power consists of the ability of the Supreme Court to decide upon “review” that a piece of some form of Government action is not permitted under the Constitution and can be deemed “unconstitutional”. The Supreme Court established this idea early in its existence and was empowered as a vital institution in the American Government primarily by exercising it. Judicial review is controversial because an unelected group is charged with interpreting the Constitution and the validity of laws affecting the population. Judicial review should be void of all political favoring, however, the power granted to a body that is not accountable to the public can be seen as an imbalance in the checks and balances intended by the three branch system of democracy in the United States.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    S. Supreme Court is the highest court, I believe it does respect the decisions made by the lower courts. Also, since state and local laws can conflict with the Constitution, I think it is imperative that the Supreme Court review the laws and cases to protect all of us from political injustices. Our diverse society is not always going to agree on what is right or wrong, so the Supreme Court is there to protect our rights and settle disputes such as those on the state level that conflict with our basic rights. It comes down to the fact that the Supreme Court cannot decide on the basis of conflicting social views, but instead on terms in connection with the supreme laws of the…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Apparently a great many people have forgotten that the framers of our Constitution went to such great effort to create an independent judicial branch that would not be subject to retaliation by either the executive branch or the legislative branch because of some decision made by those judges."said by Sandra Day O'Connor, former associate justice of the supreme court. The judicial branch translates the importance of laws, applies laws to induvial cases, and chooses if laws disregard the constitution. This legal branch is involved the supreme court and other government courts. Even though people argue that the judicial branch has too much power, the Supreme Court should still have the ability to declare laws passed by congress unconstitutional…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our founding father, Patrick Henry, said, “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government — lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.” Our founding fathers created a strong government for the people of the United States in order to protect their rights. They established a framework that our contemporary government is supposed to adhere to. Today, the American government has drifted away from the ideas embedded in our Constitution. The contemporary American government fails to work the way our founding fathers intended because of the representative government we have today.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the days of Chief Justice John Marshall, The Supreme Court has been the arbiter of constitutionality among the three branches of government. Through this judicial review, The Supreme Court has become the bastion of The Constitution. In the current case of Zivotofsky v. Kerry, the very checks and balances that hold the triarchy of American government stable are bearing inspection. Fomented in a small passage of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 2002 with, “for purposes of the registration of birth, certification of nationality, or issuance of a passport of a United States citizen born in the city of Jerusalem, the Secretary shall, upon the request of the citizen or the citizen’s legal guardian, record the place of birth as Israel”…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We, as citizens, look to our supremacy in judicial law to the Supreme Court, who establishes laws that protect…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution is often loosely interpreted to meet the issues of the present. In the words of former Justice Charles Evans Hughes, "We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is”. (Hughes) Judicial activism and judicial restraint are the philosophy and the reason behind the majority of judicial decisions. Most people are often confused over the true meaning and their proper applications. The theory of judgment that takes into account the spirit of laws and the changing times is referred to as judicial activism, and judicial restraint looks at strict interpretation of the law and the importance of legal precedent. To figure out whether a judge or court is considered to be an activist or restrained, you must look back at the history of judgments made by either the judge or the court.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Review

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When the rights of the American citizen are on the line than the judiciary should utilize the powers invested in them to protect and enforce what is constitutional. However, in times of controversy, where personal preference or aspects of religious or personal nature are at hand, the judiciary should exercise their power with finesse, thereby acting out judicial restraint. An example of such is in the case of Engel v. Vitale where Mr. Justice Black delivered the opinion of the court directing the School District’s principal to read a prayer at the commencement of each school day. In cases that do not regard whether an action is constitutional or not, the judiciary should suppress their power of judicial review.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison Essay

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In contrast, in Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee, the Supreme Court used the Judiciary Act of 1789 to say that Congress had properly authorized the Supreme Court to review state court decisions of federal law. The majority also noted that there is nothing in the Constitution that limits the Supreme Court’s appellate…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we know in the Article III of the U.S constitution says that all judges in the Supreme Court and Inferior Courts can have their jobs for the rest of their life. The reasons that the judges can lose their job is by retirement or if they have been accused of any crime.…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Texas v. Johnson of 1989 is one of the cases in which the law of a state was challenged as being unconstitutional by preventing a symbolic speech expression, which is under the protection of the First Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest court in America, its decisions set standards that all other courts then follow, and no lower court can ever overtake a Supreme Court decision. Article Ⅴ, of the Constitution bring balance to our governmental system. “From the beginning, Americans have embraced and idolized the notion of fundamental higher-order, immutable law that is somehow superior to politics. It is a view that entails rights enshrined in a constitution and interpreted by judges, who extend their authority over ever larger domains” (Grant).…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays