Preview

Supreme Court Justice Pros And Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
502 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court Justice Pros And Cons
The essential purpose behind lifetime designation of our Supreme Court is to guarantee the honesty of the power allowed to Court Justices and protect them against unjust interference from either the legislative or executive branch. And also to protect our Supreme Judges from political pressure. But, I believe this can still be done by setting an specific time for the judge to leave the position and therefore, I believe it is unnecessary for judges to hold their position for lifetime.
Having our Supreme Court Justice serving on the bench for life can have pros and cons. Although, most of our fellows americans seem to have more drawbacks about our Supreme Court of Justice life tenure position. With this in mind, let me first mention the pros
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of No Term Limits On Supreme Court Justices
    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of No Term Limits On Supreme Court Justices

    Although their are pro's and con's for each argument, I believe that it is better for the country to have no term limits on supreme court justices. It seems to me that the problems term limits cause, such as strategic retirement, are preferable to the alternative possibility, that the justices begin making decisions based on what would best help their personal careers in the…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Muller Vs. Oregon: Impact On Supreme Court History
    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Muller Vs. Oregon: Impact On Supreme Court History

    Since its creation in the late 18th century, the Supreme Court has made numerous decisions that impacted the course of history. The Supreme Court has a very important job, to interpret the constitution principles and make decisions based on these important standards. Had it not been for the rulings made by this court, many laws and precedents may not have been adapted. One case that had an exceptionally important impact on history was the case of Muller vs. Oregon. This case is one of the most influential decisions in Supreme Court history and its impacts are still seen even today.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Franklin D. Roosevelt's Plan to Expand Judicial Power in 1937
    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page

    Franklin D. Roosevelt's Plan to Expand Judicial Power in 1937

    At no time in this century was the devotion to that principle more vigorously evoked than in 1937, when Franklin Roosevelt introduced a plan to increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court. The conflict set off by the President's plan is more understandable when viewed in the historical context of expanding judicial power as well as in the contemporary context of pro- and anti-New Deal politics.…

    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Judges In The Supreme Court
    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Judges In The Supreme Court

    The pros of lifetime of judges in the Supreme Court are that they do not have to worry about the political pressure or to contribute with money for any political campaign. “The basic purpose of lifetime appointment is to assure the integrity of the power granted to Court Justices and protect them against unwarranted interference from either the legislative or executive branch”. (laws, n.d.). In addition, there are judges in the Supreme Court that worries about make a fair system…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper
    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper

    | Correct, "Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Are Texas Appointed Judges
    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Are Texas Appointed Judges

    “Objective: Examine the potential impact on judicial independence that results from the election of judges versus the appointment of judges.”…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judges, are they politicians in disguise? (40)
    • 1269 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Judges, are they politicians in disguise? (40)

    The role of the Supreme Court is to interpret the constitution and to apply these interpretations to legislation that has been made by Congress as to avoid them from making unconstitutional law. In doing so this is called judicial review in which the Supreme Court takes an active role in intervening in politics. If a law is suggested as being unconstitutional the Supreme Court will either accept or decline and if they accept, this will result in the judiciary then looking at the case and determining whether or not the accusation is true or if the question is entitled to make a claim. In some instances this can be taken too far by the court and they can intervene and end up making a substantial decision on some very controversial issues which would be deemed as unfair by one of the parties, other times their intervention is adequate and justified. I will argue that they are not politically neutral due to the appointment process; however I think they are less like politicians in disguise and more just actively doing their job and interpreting the constitution as how it is supposed to be.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices
    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices

    First, a term limit may hurt the judicial independence. One of the best arguments against term limits is that life tenure frees justices from political pressure. Justices are not elected officials, and it would be gratifying for them to not feel the pressure of ordinary politics. Also, we do not want the justices to worry about their life after their Supreme Court career is over. The justices may become worried about how they vote on specific cases if they are trying to gain the respect of public opinion. Second, the Supreme Courts validity might be jeopardized by shortening the term limits. Having life tenure allows the justices to interpret the law exactly the way they see fit. People support the Supreme Court even in disagreements because they believe they are involved in something greater than ordinary politics (Ringhand np). Third, term limits could not eliminate all aspects of political gamesmanship. The Senate would still have the power to refuse to act on a nomination or vote down a nominee they find…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Review Pros And Cons
    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Judicial Review Pros And Cons

    Same-sex marriage is now legal across all US states due to a recent ruling from the Supreme Court of America (reference). Judicial review is the authority of a court to repeal unconstitutional government laws and actions (textbook reference). Theoretically, judicial review is there to “protect[] the constitutional rights of individuals” from arbitrary powers of the government. In practice, the court’s ability to do that varies between countries based on their constitutions. Some courts are able to strike down legislations while others can only criticize them. However, there have been debates about how judicial review is undemocratic in nature. This paper aims to argue for the importance of judicial review by further analyzing its characteristics…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros and Cons of Judicial Review
    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros and Cons of Judicial Review

    is one of the sole purposes of the Supreme Court of the United States. Many…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Supreme Court Term Limits
    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Supreme Court Term Limits

    The Supreme Court needs younger judges to function better. The supreme courts judges will not function very well because they are missing one judge out of nine judges. For example “Antonin Scalia suffered from coronary artery disease, obesity and diabetes” and this shows that the Supreme Court will not function properly with old judges. Therefore, term limits are a great idea because younger judges are less likely to have any medical problems that will interfere with their job. 10-20 years is long enough for a judge to build up genuine exercise and genuine powers and the majority of Americans are in favor.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Life Tenure
    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Life Tenure

    Because the life tenure for a Supreme Court Justice will protect them from making biased or “polarised” decisions, the life tenure should remain as it has been for over two hundred years. Just in the past year, Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito, who are all more conservative, have all voted on certain cases with more liberal justices. Andrew Martin and Kevin Quinn, who have researched the decisions of justices, have discovered that several justices change their opinions over time, something that wouldn’t happen so…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Candidate Essay
    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Supreme Court Candidate Essay

    We need Justices in the courts to put their jobs and the needs of the people before themselves and any of their personal biases. How could a Justice rule accurately to what the people need and what is fair if they do not listen to what is being needed or even outright reject something only on the grounds that their personal beliefs deem it wrong? If a Justice was allowed to do this, black rights would never have been established, the rights for gays to get married would never have passed and women may have never been able to vote or be paid accordingly. Because of issues such as these, we need someone who puts their duties before all…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court of the United States and U.s. Supreme Court
    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Supreme Court of the United States and U.s. Supreme Court

    The judge listens to both sides of the case to make a recommendation to the jury of what outcome to decide.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Selection
    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Judicial Selection

    In recent years judicial selection has become an issue of great debate with many different views and ways to make it better. In Texas, judicial selection is carried out by partisan elections where voters get to choose the judges and justices. This form of judicial selection has many advantages as well as some disadvantages.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics