Preview

The National Judiciary: Questions and Answers

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
250 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The National Judiciary: Questions and Answers
The National Judiciary
520­526

Complete the following questions in complete sentences. 1.What is the difference between original jurisdiction and appellate jurisdiction? What kind of jurisdiction does the
Supreme Court have?
Original jurisdiction is when a court hears a case first. While appellate jurisdiction is when a court hears a case on appeal from a lower court. The Supreme Court has both original and appellate juridiction. 2.What role should judicial philosophy play in selecting federal judges? Judicial philosophy will play a role when the president goes to select federal judges, he will select one that goes along with his thoughts and beliefs.

3.(a) Why did the Framers see a need for a national court system?
(b) Why did the Framers believed that an independent judiciary was so important?
The Framers saw a need for a national court system because they needed to solve problems between states. The Framers thought independent judiciary was important to keep law makers in check.

4.What problems under the Articles of Confederation led the
Framers of the Constitution to create a national judiciary?
The problems under the Articles of Confederation were that disputes between States were often ignored by courts in the other State.

5.Who nominates federal judges? Who confirms the nominations?
The President nominates federal judges. While the senate confirms them. 6.Why do Presidents tend to choose judges from their own political party?
Presidents tend to choose judges from their own political party because judges may serve for decades so they will continue to follow that president.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    "Judicial Selection in the States." Judicial Selection in the States. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Jan. 2013. <http://www.judicialselection.us>.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Identify three characteristics of Supreme Court nominees and discuss how each characteristic has been politically relevant during the appointment process.…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CJUS 330

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Judges: in state courts they are elected by the voters. Federal judges are nominated by the president. Judges are the ultimate authority figures in the courthouse. Only they can set bail, instruct jurors, and impose sentences.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation each state had its own sovereignty. And the central government was to provide thing such as national security, treaties, courts, and currency. However the government could not tax. If the states didn 't pay their bills to the government there was nothing the government could do about it. This is just one of many reasons why the Articles didn 't work. In 1786 Virginia tried to get the Articles modified by holding a meeting known as the Annapolis Conference. This meeting failed because only five states sent delegates. A few months later another meeting was held in Philadelphia.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Q: The phrase “ a lawyer’s brief justifying a revolution” has been used to describe the ___…

    • 4220 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The framers of the United States constitution ultimately decided to give more power to the federal government rather than the state governments. There are some problems with the Articles of Confederation,I will explain the federal government and the state government.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film Twelve Angry Men suggest that The United States Judicial system is very unfair to the person being tried.In this trial, the defendant is being tried for killing his father. Some of the men in the jury are chosen very poorly. One example of them being chosen poorly is their past clouds their judgment. Juror number three had a bad past with his son which lead him to believe that all children are ungrateful and useless. “You're right. It's the kids. The way they are you know? They don't listen. I've got a kid. When he was 8 years old, he ran away from a fight. I saw him. I was so ashamed I told him right out “I'm going to make a man out of you or I'm going to have to bust you up into little pieces trying.” When he was 15 he hit me in the face. He's big, you know. I haven't seen him in three years. Rotten kid! You work your heart out.... All right let's get on with it.” This is unfair to the defendant because he's now seen as ungrateful and rotten to juror number three even before the case. The US should look…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aoc Dbq

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Continental Congress wanted to give as much freedom possible to the states. After much internal debate in the states,…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Math

    • 4047 Words
    • 10 Pages

    "The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations,…

    • 4047 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the year of 1789 the most crucial piece in the American legislation emerge from the first section of congress. The Judiciary Act of 1789 implemented the judiciary clause of the constitution that gave power to the congress to set a new number of justices on the Supreme Court and established a new system in the federal courts, as well creating a position for attorney general. This Act implemented a high court of six justices that later increase to nine by 1869…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Texas, all levels of Judges are elected to the individual court positions through a partisan ballot. Each candidate for…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consitutional Review

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Traditional theories of the judicial review hold that neutral or principled grounds are the only legitimate bases for judicial decisions and reject political moves in judicial decisions-making. Do you believe this is true? Do you see principled vs. political motives in important U.S. Supreme court constitutional decisions in which overturn laws passed by legislatures(such as restrictions on gun ownership or marijuana use?…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Judiciary Branch

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The judiciary branch of the United States’ government is comprised of a system of courts, on both federal and state levels, which are used to bring justice to cases between citizens of the States. The power of judicial review gives the courts the authority “to review and, if necessary, declare actions of the legislative and executive branches invalid or unconstitutional” (Ginsberg). It’s interesting that the branch that works to uphold the laws of the U.S. Constitution is sometimes viewed as the “least dangerous branch” of our Government. Referring to writings such as Federalist 78 (by Alexander Hamilton) and Brutus 12 (by James Madison), clears up exactly what the judiciary was set up for, why it is important to have in our Government system, and how it might affect the other branches, the executive and legislative. It is clear while reading the works that the two writers have opposing views. Therefore, it is crucial to study both works and compare their ideas to our current Judiciary to understand how our country has undergone changes within the system.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Systems

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Courts of original jurisdiction hear the original evidence and thoughts along with witness testimony for the first time. Supreme courts has exclusive jurisdiction over the cases it hears, and parties may not settle a dispute between states without the original authority of the Supreme Court. After both sides are presented, a decision is made by either a judge or a jury. Both federal and state courts harbor trial courts, and conduct trials under two subdivisions of this jurisdiction. These subsets are ‘Limited Jurisdiction’ and ‘General…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judicial Law-Making

    • 2281 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The independence of the judiciary was ensured by the act of settlement 1700, which transferred the power to sack judges from the crown to the parliament. Consequently, judges should theoretically make their decisions based purely on the logical deductions of precedent, uninfluenced by political or career considerations. The eighteenth century legal commentator, William Blackstone, introduced the declaratory theory of law, stating that judges do not make law, but merely, by the rules of precedence, discover and declare the law that has always been: 'the judge being sworn to determine, not according to his private sentiments...not according to his own private judgement, but according to the known laws and customs of the land: not delegated to pronounce a new law, but to maintain an expound the old one'. Blackstone does not accept that precedent does not even offer a choice between two or more interpretations of the law: where a bad decision is made, he states, the new one that reverses or overrules it is not a new law, nor a statement that the old decision was bad law, but a declaration that the previous decision was “not law”, in other words that it was the wrong answer. His view presupposes that there is always one right answer, to be deduced from the objective study of precedence.…

    • 2281 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays