Preview

Judiciary Branch

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1492 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Judiciary Branch
The Least Dangerous Branch in U.S. Government

The judiciary branch of the United States’ government is comprised of a system of courts, on both federal and state levels, which are used to bring justice to cases between citizens of the States. The power of judicial review gives the courts the authority “to review and, if necessary, declare actions of the legislative and executive branches invalid or unconstitutional” (Ginsberg). It’s interesting that the branch that works to uphold the laws of the U.S. Constitution is sometimes viewed as the “least dangerous branch” of our Government. Referring to writings such as Federalist 78 (by Alexander Hamilton) and Brutus 12 (by James Madison), clears up exactly what the judiciary was set up for, why it is important to have in our Government system, and how it might affect the other branches, the executive and legislative. It is clear while reading the works that the two writers have opposing views. Therefore, it is crucial to study both works and compare their ideas to our current Judiciary to understand how our country has undergone changes within the system. Before comparing the works of writing and the writers’ opinions, it is necessary to know the basic facts about the organization and function of the judicial branch. A key point about this branch is that it is completely split up and organized in such a manner that if a case is appealed in a lower court, it may be brought to a higher court, and so on if necessary. Both court systems, State and Federal, have a series of courts within themselves as well. Above these courts is the Supreme Court, which is the highest court a case may be presented to in our government. This major court is comprised of one Chief Justice and eight Associate Judges, and functions on the basis of seniority. Lower State and Federal court systems must request for judicial review before the Supreme Court may even review the case at hand by deciding if the case is unconstitutional. Not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “Its is emphatically, the province and duty of the judicial department, to say what the law is.” (Ducat, Craig Constitutional Interpretation p. 10) These seventeen words written two hundred years ago made the highest court in the United States supreme, and making it so, Chief Justice John Marshall’s words in that sentence continue to make an impact on every Supreme Court case thereafter. Justice Marshall laid the basic foundations to protect the Federal system that was established by the Constitution. In Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v. Maryland, and Gibbons v. Ogden the Supreme Court maintained the United States as a federal state.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court through Chief Justice Marshall has shown that the constitution is more superior than the federal law. No place in the constitution affirms the words Justice Marshall proclaimed. In making his judgment, Marshall stated that “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” There is no mention of such words in the Constitution, but it has come to the attention of the courts that whenever there is a conflict of law, the constitution is always supreme (Murphy,…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most important concerns of the argument presented by James Madison in The Federalist No. 41 & 45 is the possible misappropriation of power that the government has over the country. Madison stresses the importance of maintaining civil liberties and preventing the government from having too much power. The new government will be granted great influence over many aspects of life for the American citizen so there must be a system of checks and balances.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Develop a detailed outline of your third main point. (For assistance with your writing skills, refer to the Ashford Writing Center)…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The omission of the judicial review power in the US constitution in the text has triggered a huge debate from the diverse fronts. It is imperative to comprehend that the United States constitution makers, despite not incorporating the judicial review power in text form in the US constitution; they actually implied the judicial review power in the constitution. This implies that this power is not direct but rather implied and ought to be practiced. The United States` Supremacy Clause contained in the constitution sensitively states that there exists a judicial review form. This clause states that the US constitution as well as the United States laws that will be passed in accordance thereof; together with all the treaties that shall be signed…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison Essay

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marbury v. Madison was the landmark case that laid the foundation for judicial review in the United States. Article III of the Constitution, in granting power to the judiciary, extended judicial power to various types of cases but made no comment as to whether a legislative or executive action could be struck down. Chief Justice Marshall, relying on reasoning and the Constitution, read the power of judicial review over acts of the government into constitutional law, thus setting the precedent for future cases. He said, “a law repugnant to the constitution is void and that when a law is in opposition to the constitution, the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply. It is the Supreme Court’s duty to say what the law is and thus has the power of judicial review over federal legislation/acts.”…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marbury v. Madison

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In analyzing the views of the Marbury vs. Madison case one can tell that after analyzing the documents that the case resulted in puzzlement of Article III Section 2 of the Constitution. In the year of 1803 the Marbury vs. Madison case raised the question of if the Supreme Court should have the authority to overturn unconstitutional federal laws. Yes, the Supreme Court should have the authority to overturn unconstitutional federal laws. According to Article III Section 2 of the constitution, The Supreme Court is deemed the right to scrutinize a law established by Congress if it is deemed unconstitutional as document F supports. When applying this statement to the case, the conflict originated from whether the Supreme Court was able to deem Marbury’s wish constitutional or unconstitutional. Marbury’s argument in this case was that he was obligated to his position as justice of peace because the President nominated him and the Senate confirmed his commission. This is true, Marbury was entitled to his appointment as justice of peace, but the Supreme Court was not the place where Marbury was able to get relief for his request. Since the Supreme Court has the right to reject a law that does not agree with the Constitution, the nation’s highest law, the act is invalid. This supports the claim made by Hamilton in Document B. As Hamilton implied, this strips the judicial branch of its power and gives more power to the other branches and the Supreme Court. On the whole this weakens the judicial branch and allows it to become the “least dangerous branch”. In conclusion Marbury was entitled to his position and the evidence supported his claim. But due to the fact that the Supreme Court was deemed the power, like stated in Document J, to state that the law being used as his verification was unconstitutional, Marbury and others appointed to government post where in lack of their Justice.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison argues how checks and balances can not only advocate a separation of powers but also create an effective government. Madison writes to help his readers understand how a well structured government can lead to a successful country. One of his main arguments is that no branch should have too much power, therefore, different branches of government should exist. "Legislative, judiciary magistracies should be drawn from the same fountain of authority, the people, through canals having no communication whatever with one another." To assure greater independence, government is separated into the Legislative Branch, the House of the Representatives and the Senate. He states "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition." meaning the ambitions of legislators must be checked by the executive and judicial branch which is then checked by the ambitions of legislators and presidents. This separation of powers advocated the idea of compromise. Madison also asserts that the members of each branch should not be too dependent on the members of the other two branches. If a man is presented with too much power, it may rule over him. Madison states "If men were angels, no government would be necessary. " The government must control the people but control itself as well. While the will of the people is no doubt the primary control on the government, other controls are necessary.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scalia vs Breyer

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Justice Scalia’s decision-making process could be summed up in two words: text and tradition. Scalia is wary of any departure from the original meaning of the Constitution’s text, strongly criticizing Supreme Court decisions that he believes demonstrate an activist judiciary rather than a neutral decision-making branch of a democracy. Scalia “argues that primacy must be accorded to the text, structure, and history of the document being interpreted and that the job of the judge is to apply either the clear textual language of the Constitution or statute if the text is ambiguous, yielding several conflicting interpretations, Scalia turns to the specific legal tradition flowing from that text to what it meant to the society that adopted it. In the case of Schwarzenegger v Entertainment Merchants Association, Justice Scalia will most likely find that California’s law to censor patently offensive video games for minors is unconstitutional, and reject California’s assertion that the court should use a new Ginsberg standard rather than the strict scrutiny standard when evaluating the Bill in dispute, because his textualist approach would be highly inhospitable to California’s arguments.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marbury v. Madison

    • 1386 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In a the year of 1803 a watershed case, Marbury v. Madison, John Marshal Chief Justice's opinion founded the Supreme Court's power to declare acts of United States Congress, and by significance acts of the president, unconstitutional if they surpassed the authorities allowed by the Establishment or Constitution. But most significant thing was that the Court became the judge of the Constitution, the final authority on what the document meant. Intrinsically, the Supreme Court became as a matter of fact also as in theory an equal partner in authorities, and it has acted that role always later on (Erskine P.88-109).…

    • 1386 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    views as to whether or not Judicial review, and the Supreme Court as a whole,…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By making decisions regarding the interest of the society the courts assume responsibilities that belong exclusively to the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court justices may rule based on what is in their best interest while saying that they are deciding for the good of the society. Moreover, when the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected, they may not be the representatives of the public’s view. As a result, judges begin making policy decisions about social or political changes society should make and become “unelected legislators.” By freely interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, the communities’ confidence in the Supreme Court will be undermined. When judicial activism in the Supreme Court wields too much power, it can eventually destruct the essence of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Judicial Branch

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hamilton argues in the federalist No. 78, which branches of government, specifically the judicial branch and how it’s the weakest branch of government. Hamilton believes that the Judicial branch only has the power to judge on laws, but does not alter the actual final decisions on what the laws people need to uphold. Hamilton recognizes that you need all three branches to make a successful government function and that the judicial branch is the least powerful of the three. The legislative branch makes the laws, executive branch enforces these laws and lastly the Judicial branch needs to understand the laws that are being put forth. Being the least dangerous branch of government it still has its checks and balances being able to hold one another to be accountable for each other, but also as a Judicial branch can keep the other branches in alignment.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary foundations for the power which it exercises over the American judicial system is the basics of judicial review. This power consists of the ability of the Supreme Court to decide upon “review” that a piece of some form of Government action is not permitted under the Constitution and can be deemed “unconstitutional”. The Supreme Court established this idea early in its existence and was empowered as a vital institution in the American Government primarily by exercising it. Judicial review is controversial because an unelected group is charged with interpreting the Constitution and the validity of laws affecting the population. Judicial review should be void of all political favoring, however, the power granted to a body that is not accountable to the public can be seen as an imbalance in the checks and balances intended by the three branch system of democracy in the United States.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil and Criminal Law

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “The judicial power of the federal courts has been limited by Congress. Essentially, it extends to matters involving (1) questions of federal law (federal question cases), (2) the United States as a party, (3) controversies among the states, and (4) certain suits between citizens of different states (diversity of citizenship).” (Reed et al., 2005, Chapter 3)…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays