Preview

Explain The Problems With The Framers Of The Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
546 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain The Problems With The Framers Of The Constitution
The framers of the United States constitution ultimately decided to give more power to the federal government rather than the state governments. There are some problems with the Articles of Confederation,I will explain the federal government and the state government.
The framers of the constitution gave more power to the to the federal government rather than the states, Federalists and Anti-Federalists argued and fought over who should have more power. But it all had to come down to one or the other having more power.

There are 13 articles in the constitution, the anti-federalists were all about the articles becuase it gave more power to the states, the federalists did not agree with that. There were many problems with the articles of confederation one of them being that 9 of the 13 states had to agree with a law in order to pass it. Another problem was since there was no president or executive branch there was no way to guarantee laws passed by congress were carried out. There were also no courts to judge or pune the law because there was no national court system.
…show more content…
The federalists wanted more power to the president.”Document 1 states”, “I would propose next that in addition to the present federal powers, the national government should be armed with positive and complete authority in all cases which require uniformity”. The writer of the document believes in federal powers because he wants more power to the government not the states. The anit-federalists do not want the government to have power because. “Document 2 states”,”After such a declaration, what security does the constitution of the several states afford the liberty of the press and other invaluable personal rights, not provided for by the new

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There were other ways in which the power of the states was stated and the confederation type of structure was emphasized under the Articles. The original Congress of the United States was founded on the principle that each state was the equal…

    • 1180 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MidTerm Essay The Constitution divided the powers between the Federal,State and Local governments in a very specific way. Which we now call Federalism,but before this we had the Articles of Confederation. The reason we did not keep the Articles of Confederation was because it was to weak and gave too much power to the states. But it did set up a foundation which helped bring us the division of powers between Federal,local and state governments.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Federal Government showed to be ineffective under the Articles of Confederation. The Government lacked power, with large state governments showing to be superior. The U.S Constitution proposed a new form of government. With the addition of three separate branches of government, being, legislative, executive, and judicial, the Constitution also created a stronger Federal Government, weakening state governments. As southern states with larger populations were against the ratification of the Constitution, northern states consisting of fewer, more wealthy people, supported it. Federalists and Antifederalists took sides, prompting debate over a solution to the issue. The writings of the U.S Constitution produced major concerns at the center of the Constitutional Convention as the future of America had to be written.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Any power the legislative authorities of the central government possessed under the Articles was undone by the absence of executive authority to enforce the meager amount of verdicts that against all odds were passed. Perhaps the weakness of the Articles is to be blamed on opposing individual state interests; however, it was still the Articles that were to blame for the division of the Union nevertheless. Though some historians believe that with minor alterations the Articles of Confederation could have survived for many more years,[15] its fundamental flaw – its lack of a 3 house Congress – was destined to be efficacious in the eventually switch to the Constitution. What the Constitution really achieved for the country was a foundation of authority. It states in black and white the powers of the Congress and the rights given to enforce those powers, whereas the Articles only gave Congress an arbitrary right to rule that could easily be ignored because of its noncommittal language and potential to be…

    • 2155 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Constitution DBQ

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    At the end of the American Revolution, the free states needed some sort of control that would generate to a unified country. Issues arose to how power should be divided between local and national governments, common laws or the protection of the unalienable individual rights. Their first attempt at solving this issue was the Articles of Confederation, which was a failure for the most part, but not completely as it formed a template for a new document. After the failure of the articles, the state delegates tried to revise the articles, but instead, constructed the Constitution. One of many distinction between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution is the creation of the legislature. Representation of one state, while disregarding the population of the state, angered many people. The Constitution is known today as the foundation of American government. But before its ratification, debates arose regarding several unresolved and problematic factors that the Articles of Confederation failed to come to a resolution. Under the Articles of Confederation, the states had far more power than did the federal government. As a result, when writing the Constitution, they sought to maintain balance between state and federal power in a way where it would benefit the nation, shifting the power to the federal government. Slavery was never mentioned in the articles, yet the North and the South began a dispute over its existence. Alongside the creation of legislature defining distinction between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, the division of power between state and federal government and the existence and purpose of slavery are issues debated prior to the ratification of the Constitution.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although the Articles of Confederation gave the state more power but this was not enough because the congress did not get enough power. The country was in need for a stronger Federal government;in which, it was not present in the Articles of confederation. The lack of power for the national government and the congress led to the creation of the United States Constitution. The constitution created the executive branch, and federal courts. This makes the constitution better than the Articles of confederation because the Federal court system was created to ensure that law was followed throughout the country. The creation of executive branch is another advantage of the constitution.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists strived to create a more efficient government. As George Washington illustrated “thirteen sovereign, independent, disunited States are in the habit of ….refusing compliance with our National Congress at their option. Would to God that wise measures be taken in time to avert the consequences we have much to reason to apprehend.” (Document 3) George Washington is stating that the states were poorly governed and were in need of unification. Since the states are losing interest in the ratification, the federalists had to create a stronger central government. Another example that supported…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Founders’ perceptions were that America was weak and de-centralized. They created a weak, confederal government designed to protect people’s liberties by being to small to be a threat, but it was too small to handle national problems. The differences between the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution are that one, the US Constitution has a Bill of Rights, the power of the president is addressed and the separation of the branches. This changed occurred to make the government stronger and address the nation’s problems. The Anti-Federalists were a large group who didn’t like the Constitution but didn’t know what they wanted yet and they contributed to the branches. The Federalist were defenders of the constitution and they contributed to the bill of…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Branches of Government

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the beginning before the Constitution was drafted, the founding founders were concerned about how to solve the issue of a weak central government. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists had different ideology and views in regard to the issues at hand, but had the common goal of ensuring the government would be protected against any assembly having the ability to become overpowered by another.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many antifederalists did not want the government to have so much control over America. Amending the articles would require the confirmation of every state legislature. Unlike the king of Britain, the antifederalists were against one person ruling America and so they refused to appoint one single president under the Articles of Confederation. This created a weakness in the government. Under the Articles, the individual states would be represented by one to seven delegates with each state holding only one vote in Congress. The Articles gave the individual states more power than the federal government. When Congress needed money, it would have to ask the individual states to contribute money to the federal government. This complicated the government and made it extremely inefficient. Additionally, all of the judicial power would be given to the states. Regulation of commerce would be regulated by treaties that would hold no check on conflicting state regulations. The Articles of Confederation essentially gave much more power and control to individual states than to the federal…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Federalism Dbq

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    under the Articles of Confederation, just edit it a little. They wanted the states to hold the supreme power rather than the national government. Most feared that the constitution would turn our government into a monarchy. Brutus I made the statement, “And are by this clause invested with the power of making all laws, proper and necessary, for carrying all these into execution; and they may so exercise this power as entirely to annihilate all the state governments, and reduce this country to one single government.“ The name Anti-federalist is actually misleading, they were actually more for federalism than the federalist, as they wanted the power more separated to the states. Their thoughts were that a government under the constitution would lead to corruption as the power hungry federal government would become corrupt and try to consolidate all of the power.“In the new Constitution, the President and Senate have all the executive, and two thirds of the legislative power. In some weighty instances, (as making all kinds of treaties, which are to be the laws of the land,) they have the whole legislative and executive powers. They, jointly, appoint all officers, civil and military; and they (the Senate) try all impeachments, either of their own members or of the officers appointed by themselves.“ -Richard Henry…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One were deemed as Federalist, who sought that broad power and authority should reside in the federal government. While the Anti-Federalist, sought that power should reise in state governments, where it could best protect people’s liberties. Both of which were in continuous conflict with one another, for their vision for America were totally different and wanted a someone from their own group to run government to see fit their best interest at heart. One reason that motivated Anti-Federalist to demand the passing of the Bill of Rights was that they were the minority group. And so they feared that the Federalist, who were ruled the majority would form a much too powerful central government that would infringe their liberties and rights. The Bill of Rights made it so, that the power of the federal government be limited. And that the minority of states in America, be equally represented just as much as the large populated Federalist states.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were afraid of tyranny, and therefore did not want to give so much power to so little people. State constitutions were the start of the national constitution. Sure, the state constitutions then were nothing compared to the ones we have today, but they were used as an underlying written law to live by, and soon were changed to allow amendments and adaptation to the growing society. Soon after, we adopted…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists had more people at the time, but they were diverse and uncoordinated. The Federalists wrote over 80 essays, called The Federalist Papers, stating their positions; they were also able to successfully make the Anti-Federalists understand that the constitution was flexible and would allow some aspects of The Bill of Rights in the document. Federalists claimed that their Constitution would bring more democracy to the nation. They also brought attention to the economic and commercial state, all of which was greatly damaged after the Revolutionary…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Founding Fathers

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The United States' Founding Fathers had a difficult task in creating a new type of government that would protect peoples rights and states all while giving the states enough powers for the federal government. The Constitution was approved by the states and passed into law after arguments and solutions at the Constitutional Convention.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays