Preview

The Importance Of God In Pascal's Wager

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
775 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Importance Of God In Pascal's Wager
The quote that I will discuss in this paper is located on page 163 in the second paragraph; "Either God is or he is not." But to which view shall we be inclined? Reason cannot decide this question. Infinite chaos separates us.At the far end of this infinite distance a coin is being spun which will come down heads or tails. How will you wager? Reason cannot make you choose either, reason cannot prove either wrong…Let us weigh up the gain and loss involved in calling heads that God exists. Let us assess the two cases; if you win, you win everything and if you lose you lose nothing. Do not hesitate then; wager he does exist. This passage is something that I feel is definitely important in the aspect of God, It questions whether he exists or doesn't …show more content…
Although it makes complete sense in the risks involved in the wager and that it is over all more beneficial to be faithful and believe in there being a god, than it is to assume there is no god and be wrong, but rather the wager gives no other reason as to why one should believe in god other than the fact that if there is a god you gain more by believing and by disbelieving you loose much more than if there is no god and you believe or disbelieve. If there is no god there is not much lost or won in either case. Pascal's Wager offers no more than this as to why one should believe in god. It seems very similar to the mother who tells her children that they must behave otherwise Santa will not deliver toys and games on Christmas Eve, but regardless of the child's actions they, at least in most cases still get a visit from Santa on Christmas, who leaves many toys and presents. In a way Pascal is making the same exact threat, follow and believe in God and you will go to heaven, but if you don't then you will pay dearly, granted there is a God. If there is not a God then nothing is truly lost from this
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Pascal's Wager: Monotheistic God
    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pascal's Wager: Monotheistic God

    Clearly, questions about whether anyone seriously believes –or could seriously believe – in the existence of an unorthodoxly conceived perverse monotheistic god are simply irrelevant to the assessment of the merit of this argument. If you accept the third premise – that is, if you are prepared to allow that there is some positive chance, however small, that an unorthodoxly conceived perverse monotheistic god exists – then it is very hard to see how one could claim that argument fails whereas Pascal’s wager argument succeeds. Question 2: Many people claim to hold religious beliefs on the basis of direct personal private, religious experience(s). If they are reasonable, how should such believers react to the fact that adherents of other religious faiths have equally vivid experiences seeming to support their own diverse…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pascal's Wager: Epistemic Argument For God
    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Pascal's Wager: Epistemic Argument For God

    Pascal’s Wager does not provide has some challenges in its reasoning and is not a convincing argument for one to believe in God, but it can be applicable to a catered category of people. Pascal’s Wagers main issue is that it is not an epistemic argument. Before just dismissing Pascal’s Wager as not an epistemic argument, one must understand what an epistemic argument is. An epistemic argument is an argument that must be rational, reasonable and justified in order to be believed. For instance, if one believes in God because one experienced a miracle and then claims the miracle experienced, like an apple falling from a tree into one’s hand is a sign from God, one’s argument pointing to the miracle as evidence is not applying an epistemic argument.…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Pascal’s Wager vs. the Ontological Argument
    • 2458 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Pascal’s Wager vs. the Ontological Argument

    Pascal’s Wager was a groundbreaking theory posed by the French philosopher, mathematician, and physicist Blaise Pascal. Pascal, who is said to be the father of modern probability, felt that that religion should be approached as a gamble. It was one of the first efforts to incorporate the concept of infinity. The wager stated that, even though the existence of God cannot be determined through reason, one should wager as though God exists, because living accordingly, has essentially nothing to lose and experiences can only be beneficial. Pascal’s Wager consists of three arguments. The first is the argument from super dominance. Pascal wrote: “God is, or He is not. But to which side shall we incline? Reason can decide nothing here. Which will you choose then? Let us see. Since you must choose, let us see which interests you least. Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing. Wager, then, without hesitation that He is.” In this quote, Pascal is implying that there is a possibility God exists, if one assumes God exists and he indeed does, then one has gained everything, perhaps heaven. However, if God does not exist then one has lost nothing. The Bible would merely be a mistake and He would not exist, along with Heaven or the like. Regardless, it is best to take the gamble because there is nothing to lose, according to Pascal. Pascal’s next argument was the argument from expectation. He supported this argument when he wrote: “Let us see. Since there is an equal risk of gain and of loss, if you only had to gain two lives, instead of one, you might still wager. But if there were three lives to gain, you would have to play (since you are under the necessity of playing), and you would be imprudent, when you are forced to play, not to chance your life to gain three at a game where there is an equal risk of loss and gain. But there is an eternity of life and…

    • 2458 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis
    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis

    They break down their argument into three different components, “Some contingent beings exist. If any contingent beings exist, then a necessary being must exist. Therefore there exists a necessary being” (Pg. 70). They explain that an infinite series is evidence to prove the contingent being exists. This presents an idea that there is no final explanation to this cause. To argue the statement by some atheist that claim that the world has always existed, they say that they do not make any claims about how old the universe which explains a universe that may have always…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pascal's Wager Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Pascal's Wager Rhetorical Analysis

    Pascal’s Wager is his attempt to justify the belief in God purely on appeal to possible personal gains. His argument is that it makes sense to believe in the God that is believed in by Christianity, therefore it makes sense for us to do so. Pascal believes that belief in God is the rational action to take, even if there is no evidence of God existing. In his work he finds various reasons to believe in God that are beneficial even if he/she does not exist. He also believes it is irrational to not believe in God. If you are an atheist you ultimately are missing out on the possibility of eternal happiness, because if there is no God you will not lose anything, but you will lose everything if there is a God.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Collins And Rowe's Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Collins And Rowe's Argument For The Existence Of God

    The question of whether there is a God has been debated by many philosophers, religious experts, and even your average citizens. Many of those people have attempted to argue why God is or is not real. This paper is going to present two different arguments by the philosophers: Robin Collins and William Rowe. The first argument by Collins is an argument for the existence of God, who designed our incredibly complex universe. The explanation of Collin’s argument will be followed by Rowe’s argument against the existence of God, which is in relation to intense suffering that exists in this world. With those two arguments at hand, the question is, are the conclusions compatible?…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis
    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis

    73 Evans, Manis). However the argument itself if just a mere introduction into what “God” is or rather who “God” might be. Evans and Manis hint to this in their final paragraph. McCloskey’s version of the argument is misguided in the notion that each individual argument is to be pulled apart singularly or that they cannot relate to form an over arching theme that “Gods” existence is dependent upon many facets. One may look to the “The Absurdity of Life Without God” article when defending this frame of view. That without “God” and the necessity of existence humanity is just a happy accident that is riddled with a meaningless purpose. Though personally the purpose of life and the existence of “God” are not relatable other than the fact they are ideas and existential questions asked only to attempt to “prove” the cause of unexplainable events or…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pascal Wager's Argument
    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pascal Wager's Argument

    The existence of God has always been a commonly asked question in the world today. Since there is no scientifically proven answer, arguments have been accumulated over time. One being the Pascal Wager’s argument. This theory states that either God exists or God does not exist, you can either wager for God or wager against God. This belief advocates the belief in God rather than providing evidence. Does Pascal's Wager commit the fallacy of appealing to consequences?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Was God Important to Descartes?
    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Why Was God Important to Descartes?

    “The existence of God would be obvious if we weren’t distracted by life in the sensory world. And the knowledge of God saves us from doubt about other things we are certain of.”…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Teleological Argument
    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Teleological Argument

    “With such signs of forethought in the design of living creature, can you doubt they are the work of choice or design?” (Socrates) The Design argument looks at the order and purpose, or telos, in the world and states that it implies that there must be a designer who made the world ‘just right’ for human existence. Religious believers go on to state that this designer is God. The argument states that if one uses one’s senses to look at order, such as gravity and the motion of the planets, which exists in the world, it is likely that one will accept that there is a designer God who created the world and gave it this order. Thus, the argument is both a posteriori, based on experience, and inductive, containing a conclusion that we are likely to accept if we believe the premises to be true. Although the argument was one of Aquinas’ five ‘ways’ in his book, Summa Theologica, the most famous version of the Argument from Design was put forward by William Paley in his book Natural Theology (1802), and therefore, this essay will focus mainly on Paley’s version of the argument.…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Cosmological Argument In Proving The Existence Of God
    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument In Proving The Existence Of God

    Have you ever thought to yourself, is there a god? Is there actually an almighty being to protect us? Someone who will be there to forgive us for our immoralities? Well in this report, I will be examining evidence there is that suggests the existence of god to determine whether or not there I a possibility of the existence of God.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rene Descartes Discourse on the Method Part 4
    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rene Descartes Discourse on the Method Part 4

    The arguments he stated has successfully convinced me that there is in fact a God, the arguments put forth establishes specific truths….. Namely that whatever we think of and see as truth is in fact so because God exists and everything in us is because of him.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Response Paper
    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Response Paper

    In 1968, a article was published by a man named H.J. McCloskey called “On Being an Atheist”, in which an attempt to present arguments against the existence of God is made. In his work, McCloskey attempts to provide readers with the argument that atheism is more “reasonable and comfortable (McCloskey,1968)” compared to the alternative theistic view. In his article, McCloskey attempts to make arguments against the three typical theistic proofs of God which includes the cosmological and teleological arguments, along with the argument from design. McCloskey uses the existence of evil and the irrationalness off faith against the theistic view of God. At the beginning of the article it seems that an intriguing argument will be made regarding the theistic view point of God, yet as McCloskey continues the argument becomes more biased in attacking spiritual beliefs which questions his validity.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    response to Being an Atheist
    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages

    response to Being an Atheist

    In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    God And The Existence Of God O Malley Analysis
    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    God And The Existence Of God O Malley Analysis

    In chapter eight and nine, O'Malley puts in place that the answer to God, the oldest question is possible. O'Malley states that Christians can know the answer because Jesus Christ invites us to let Him redeem us from our resentment that God is God and we are not God. O'Malley quotes numerous verses from the New Testament and gives us the reasons for Jesus' technique that knowing God is…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics