Preview

The Cosmological Argument In Proving The Existence Of God

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
971 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Cosmological Argument In Proving The Existence Of God
Have you ever thought to yourself, is there a god? Is there actually an almighty being to protect us? Someone who will be there to forgive us for our immoralities? Well in this report, I will be examining evidence there is that suggests the existence of god to determine whether or not there I a possibility of the existence of God.
The first piece of evidence I will be using to determine if there is an existence of God is the cosmological argument. The cosmological argument was famously publicised by St Thomas Aquinas and tries to prove the existence of God with three points, which are motion, causality and contingency: Motion, everything that moves must be moved by something else as nothing can move itself. There cannot be infinite regression
…show more content…
Furthermore, the teleological argument does this by explaining how complex and intricate the universe is. The teleological argument was famously publicized by William Paley, who came up with the renowned watch analogy. The watch analogy explains how if you were walking down a heath and stumbled upon a pocket watch, you wouldn’t just think it just appeared you would think that such a complex object must have been designed. William Paley then compared the universe to the watch, he then saw that the earth is so complex that there must have been a significant being to design the earth, William Paley then concluded the being was God. This is further justified by the complexity of photosynthesis, a naturally occurring process which is so complicated that it can’t have not been designed therefore there must have been a being who had designed the process.
Evidence of the existence of god is apparent with the teleological argument as the idea of the universe being designed by god which seems logical. God is sought out to be omnipotent therefore wouldn’t it make sense if he had designed the universe thus exist? Yes, it would! The universe is so complex that it couldn’t have just designed itself so there must have been a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    2. 1. Does anyone, in your opinion, have adequate evidence that God exists? That God does not exist? Why?…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theo 104 Quiz

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Teleological Argument (argument from design) claims that one can infer from what that God exists?…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One argument for the existence of God is the basic design argument. It states that: the world has purpose and order, the complexity of the universe shows evidence of design, such design needs a designer, the only designer of something as great as the universe is God. This provides evidence for the existence of God as natural objects, such as the human eye, are so complex that the chance of them occurring randomly are so minute that it is much more likely that the eye had a designer. This is because each individual part of the eye must be the exact right size and in a specific condition to be able to function at all. A designer who is capable of designing something so detailed must be omnipotent – no question. The only possible being who is able to create something so divine must be God. Therefore the Basic argument shows evidence for the existence of God.…

    • 984 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Let us assume that it is true to say that there is a clear existence of purpose and design in nature, the question is whether or not the existence of purpose and design implies the existence of God. The design that is apparent in the world can certainly be shown not to be the work of God, or at least God as an omnipotent (he can do anything), omniscient (he knows everything), omnipresent (He is everywhere) being.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Teleological Argument is the argument from a design stand point. The argument implies that a higher source of intelligence had to come up with the design in which the universe came into existence. McCloskey come up with numerous reason against this argument that suggest the Teleological Argument is not adequate in proving God exist. A design must have a designer and us as humans couldn’t create the earth ourselves even if we put all our thinking caps together, the creator of this world had to be something and someone so powerful and intelligent that it was beyond human belief. Whether he wants to call the being God or not he has to realize this isn’t something that happened on its own.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most common and influential argument’s for the existence of God are design arguments. In the last fifty years design arguments have received the most attention philosophically. Design arguments are both empirical and inductive arguments. Design arguments identify properties of objects in nature and argue that the only way that they could have occurred or the best explanation for them is that there is some intelligent/higher being that created or conceived the object. William Paley was a Christian apologist in the eighteenth century who was known for his popular version of the teleological argument (“watchmaker analogy”). Paley stressed the idea that the world’s complexity and design is not based off luck or chance, but rather designed by…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not find any of the traditional proofs for God’s existence persuasive, and I will go over each argument one at a time to explain why I do not find them persuasive, starting with Anselm’s ontological argument, then Aquinas’ cosmological argument, and finally Paley’s teleological argument. First, Anselm’s ontological argument is not persuasive because the argument can be used to prove things that do not exist. The faulty logic is shown in Gaunilo’s Lost Island Objection because instead of putting God as the thing to prove, Guanilo puts an island, and the logic still holds up. However, the argument does not hold up and would need more evidence or logical backing for why God works and the island does not. If someone says one is true, but the…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cosmological argument seeks to prove the existence of God on the basis that the universe has not always been in existence and so for it to be created, an external cause was necessary; this outside agent is viewed as God. It creates à posteriori knowledge which provides inductive explanations and makes conclusions on ideas based on actual experiences. It is a non-propositional argument so it cannot be proven but can be argued by offering experience as support.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are 3 main arguments that each seek to prove the existence of God; the Ontological, Cosmological, and Teleological Arguments. Each is different in its approach, but all arrive at the same conclusion. Ontological Argument argues God’s existence from the assumption of the existence a “Greatest Thing that can ever be conceived.” From there, it argues that in order for something to be “The Greatest Thing ever” it must exist physically (that is outside of the mind). The Cosmological Argument argues that since everything in the universe is contingent (or is dependent on other things for its existence), there must be a first cause that set the universe in motion.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Cosmological argument and the Experiential argument, I believe, are the most compelling evidence that God exists. The idea that something that begins must have a beginner or creator. That creator would have to be something that never begins. Saying that something that begins is not created from something is difficult to hold true. It may hold true if all the universe was just physical. Which would indicate that God would have to be physical and thus must have begun. But since God is spiritual then that would not work. The experiential argument is also a compelling argument because it shows people's experiences and the results are better people. Showing the causes is good because the end result is…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Teleological Argument recognizes the various complex aspects of the Earth, nature, and life and attributes these complexities to a designer. The most common analogy depicting this argument is described through a watch. A watch represents intricate and meticulous designing that couldn’t have just been formed accidentally. This analogy can be interpreted relating to the universe. The greater the design, the greater the designer. Much like the watch, there are various “natural” processes and events that happen in the world that could not have just happened coincidentally as it appears to have been the result of meticulous designing, there had to be someone or something that engineered it all and that being can be rationally reasoned to be God through the Teleological Argument as it implies intelligent design. There is no way that Earth is already fine-tuned to support the complexity of living organisms and life because there are so many qualities that characterize them; it had to be planned, intentional and caused by someone or…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His existence should not be doubted, simply for the reason that God may be an event. All that should be taken from this is the existence of God based on the idea that whatever created the universe is God. However, God can also be proved to be a sentient being. The proof of God being a sentient creature is similar to Rene Descartes belief that the perfect being cannot be imagined within in our own minds, but can only exist if the perfect creature placed the idea within our mind. The problem with this argument is that the idea of perfect cannot be defined, who is to say what perfect is? The idea of perfection is infinite and cannot be truly analyzed, however we can know that the creation of the universe can be qualified as perfect due to our existence and the way nature interacts with itself. The perfect cannot coexist in the universe as we as a species is flawed and cannot attain perfection. The perfection of the universe must exist in one single being. The single embodiment can only be defined as a supreme being. The supreme being can be called anything, but as a society it has been widely accepted to refer to it as…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The existence of God is one of the greatly talked about philosophical topics throughout history. There have been many arguments proposed in order to answer the question. One argument is the ontological argument. The first person to propose the ontological argument is St. Anselm in the eleventh century. St. Anselm tries to prove the existence God from the idea of a being that which no greater being can be imagined. St. Anselm contemplated that, if such a being did not exist, then a more superior being can be thought of to…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The ontological, cosmological, and teleological arguments collectively strive to prove one point, the existence of God. Ontological arguments lean on reasoning to prove its point of an a priori being or existence. Cosmological arguments focus on the idea that because there is this vast universe with an infinite amount of galaxies, God or a higher being, must have had a hand in creating the world and universe we live in. Teleological arguments emphasize on the idea that the universe was created solely to carry out the purpose or end result that it was designed for by…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The cosmological argument proves the existence of God. It discusses contingent beings which exist, but could not have existed and necessary beings which exist and could not not exist. The cosmological says that there is a contingent being that exists. The existence of a contingent being must have a cause and the contingent being cannot be the cause of itself. The complete cause of a contingent being includes only other contingent beings or it includes a necessary being. Contingent beings alone cannot be the complete cause of a contingent being. The complete cause of a contingent being must include a necessary being. Therefore, a necessary being must exist. The cosmological argument shows that there must be a higher power, and that higher power is God. Everything that exists on earth is a contingent being. There is no person or animal that is not contingent. But what created everything to begin with if a contingent being cannot be the only cause of another contingent being? Everything on earth has a cause, but there must be a necessary being being that caused the Earth. There has to be something other than contingent beings. There has to be a necessary being that started everything. That necessary being is…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays