Preview

The Cosmological Argument Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1190 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Cosmological Argument Analysis
Philosophy Final
1. The three views of the relationship between faith and reason are inevitable conflict, independent, and overlapping. If you were to draw a diagram representing inevitable conflict it would just be one circle with both words written in it. Inevitable conflict says that faith and reason deal with the same reality in the same way, but make different claims. In this view one is right and one is wrong. To draw a picture of the independent view, it would be two separate circles, faith in one and reason in another. In this view faith and reason are about two different things. To put it in simplest terms, Bill Nye would not argue with a child about whether Santa is real or not because they do not have anything to do with each other. …show more content…
The cosmological argument proves the existence of God. It discusses contingent beings which exist, but could not have existed and necessary beings which exist and could not not exist. The cosmological says that there is a contingent being that exists. The existence of a contingent being must have a cause and the contingent being cannot be the cause of itself. The complete cause of a contingent being includes only other contingent beings or it includes a necessary being. Contingent beings alone cannot be the complete cause of a contingent being. The complete cause of a contingent being must include a necessary being. Therefore, a necessary being must exist. The cosmological argument shows that there must be a higher power, and that higher power is God. Everything that exists on earth is a contingent being. There is no person or animal that is not contingent. But what created everything to begin with if a contingent being cannot be the only cause of another contingent being? Everything on earth has a cause, but there must be a necessary being being that caused the Earth. There has to be something other than contingent beings. There has to be a necessary being that started everything. That necessary being is …show more content…
Aquinas’s view on the relationship between faith and reason is that they are overlapping. He says that man should use all things he can to learn about God. Aquinas states that there is general revelation and special revelation. General revelation is anything in the world, we use logic to see these. General revelation is reason. Special revelation can be seen through scripture and religion. Special revelation is faith. Aquinas believes that we should use any means we can to learn about God, so it is essential to use both general and special revelation. Through general revelation, he believes that we can use reason to give context to our faith. We can use reason to demonstrate some truths about faith, for example, the fact that God exists. Because you cannot understand everything from reason alone, there is some part of faith that can only be shown by special revelation. Aquinas believes that some things in faith that can be explained by reason and some ideas in reason that can be explained by faith and that is where the two overlap. On the other hand, there are other ideas that only faith can explain or only reason can explain. This is why he has an overlapping view on faith and reason because some ideas over lap and some do
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Vs Ontological Argument
    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cosmological Vs Ontological Argument

    There have been an innumerable amount of arguments for the existence of God for hundreds of years. Some have become much more popular due to their merit, and their ability to stay relevant through changing times. Two arguments in particular that have been discussed for a very long time are the ontological and cosmological arguments. Each was proposed in the period of the high middle ages by members of the Roman Catholic Church. They each have been used extensively by many since their introduction. However, one of the arguments is superior ant that is the ontological argument. The Ontological argument is the stronger of the two due to the fact that it is based on pure logic and reasoning.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Key Features of the Cosmological Argument
    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Key Features of the Cosmological Argument

    The cosmological argument seeks to prove the existence of God on the basis that the universe has not always been in existence and so for it to be created, an external cause was necessary; this outside agent is viewed as God. It creates à posteriori knowledge which provides inductive explanations and makes conclusions on ideas based on actual experiences. It is a non-propositional argument so it cannot be proven but can be argued by offering experience as support.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ontological Argument Analysis
    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page

    Ontological Argument Analysis

    The existence of God is one of the greatly talked about philosophical topics throughout history. There have been many arguments proposed in order to answer the question. One argument is the ontological argument. The first person to propose the ontological argument is St. Anselm in the eleventh century. St. Anselm tries to prove the existence God from the idea of a being that which no greater being can be imagined. St. Anselm contemplated that, if such a being did not exist, then a more superior being can be thought of to…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argument For God's Existence Of God
    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page

    Cosmological Argument For God's Existence Of God

    When discussing God’s existence, people appeal to both creation and logic. In this article, we aim to consider the arguments from creation. The first we will look at is the cosmological argument. Essentially, this argument suggests that because the universe has a beginning, there must be something that caused it. But, how do we know that the universe has a beginning? Consider this: if everything in the universe decays and eventually dies, it is impossible for the universe to be eternal, for it would have already died by now. However, if a divine Creator fashioned the universe at some point in time, it would explain our current and ongoing existence.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Defense Of The Ontological Argument Essay
    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Defense Of The Ontological Argument Essay

    The cosmological argument in short asserts that the universe had an “original cause”. The basic idea being that everything that moves is moved by something, that also had to have been moved by something else and so on. So the “original mover”, the one who began the universe would have to be God. Just like the first domino in a cascade, the first domino is to be metaphorically applied to God. The proof for this theory would therefore come from the observations on the nature of causality in the exterior…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluation of the Cosmological Argument
    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Evaluation of the Cosmological Argument

    Even though Aquinas puts forth a convincing argument about the existence of the universe; some critics have opposed to this claim as they do not believe it is sufficient evidence. One argument against Aquinas is the fact that he seems to contradict himself in the second way by saying that nothing can be the cause of it self. Thus saying that God cannot be the cause of himself, but to Aquinas, God is the exception? If you accept that there could possibly be an exception, then why must God be it? Why can’t the universe be the exception?…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Does the First Cause Argument Prove That God Exists?
    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Does the First Cause Argument Prove That God Exists?

    Another argument, the Kalam Cosmological argument, states that everything that comes into being must have a cause. The universe came into being; therefore it must have a cause. That cause is God.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    explain Aquinas' Cosmological argument
    • 939 Words
    • 3 Pages

    explain Aquinas' Cosmological argument

    Thomas Aquinas developed five ways to prove Gods existence. The first three are key to the Cosmological argument. These are from motion, causation, and contingency. He presented his work on these in the Summa Theologica, where he accepts that it may be impossible to prove the God of Classical theism caused the universe to exist, but believes that what God does proves Gods existence.…

    • 939 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Cosmological Argument Essay: Does God Exist?
    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument Essay: Does God Exist?

    The first argument we will indulge in is the cosmological argument. A cosmological argument is an argument that states that everything in the universe is dependent on something greater. For this to be true, at the end of a long line there would have to be an omnipotent, omniscient, and benevolent being. These contingencies on a…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cosmological Argument For The Existence Of God

    These types of arguments are known as “cosmological” arguments. The cosmological argument is that of the existence of the universe is strong indication for the existence of a God who created it. In this essay, I will…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Existence of God Argumentative Paper
    • 2105 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Existence of God Argumentative Paper

    the existence of the world or universe is strong evidence for the existence of a God who created…

    • 2105 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argumentative Analysis
    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cosmological Argumentative Analysis

    There has been a debate on God’s existence has remained a very heated argument that has been carried down through generations. Several arguments have been brought forward by those who are against the claim that God exists as well as by those who are for the argument. These arguments can be of cosmological or teleological nature. Cosmological arguments are based on philosophical laws as they try to argue for or against the origin of man and how they help describe the origin of God’s existence. Teleological arguments on the other hand are also based on philosophy but instead they argue by explaining phenomena by their ends or purpose. McCloskey in his article “On Being an Atheist” highlights the importance of having proof beyond any reasonable…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas' 2nd Argument
    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aquinas' 2nd Argument

    Thomas Aquinas deems the existence of God can be proved in his second way. Aquinas bases his second way on the foundation of efficient causes. The term efficient cause refers to the means or agent that brings something about. For instance, in the case of a painting, it is the painter and the movement of the brush that caused the painting to exist. Efficient causes occur constantly and can visibly be observed in nature, however an object efficiently causing itself has never been observed and is reasonably believed to be impossible. Aquinas states that in order for something to efficiently cause itself, it must have existed prior to itself, which by sure logic is nonsensical. Since nothing can possibly cause the existence of itself, Aquinas believes that there is one omniscient first creator that is the cause of all the happenings to follow. However, Aquinas’ argument does not cease there. He goes on to add that it is not possible to continue to infinity in a series of efficient causes. Aquinas explains this statement by saying that within a series of efficient causes there is the creator, or first member which causes the intermediate and eventually the final member. The intermediate members can be countless, but once a cause is removed the outcome on its following subject is no longer evident. In theory, if there…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument Theory
    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cosmological Argument Theory

    In this research paper I will be discussing and comparing two theories of whether or not God exists. First I will discuss Atheism, and then I will discuss the Cosmological Argument theory. I am going to compare the two theories and show you why I do not believe in the atheism theory and believe in the cosmological argument theory. I am a firm believer that there is a God and we are here on earth for a reason.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant's Cosmological Argument Analysis
    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant's Cosmological Argument Analysis

    Kant analyses three proofs for God’s existence, the ontological, cosmological, and physio-theological. I will be focusing on the cosmological proof. Kant believes the cosmological argument is impossible due to the argument’s reliance on the ontological argument. Kant argues against the ontological proof by stating that ‘god is perfect’ does not hold since god’s perfection is contingent upon god’s existence; the argument is tautological. The cosmological argument assumes that based on our experience of this world, there must be something that caused everything, and that something must be a necessary being. However, there is no reason to believe the necessary being is God without the ontological argument. Kant already established that the ontological…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More