McCloskey goes on to make another proclamation that in order to prove the Teleological Argument irrefutable examples of design and purpose must be presented. The major issue with his assessment is the standards he sets to defend the argument is one he can’t even live up to. Based on McCloskey accusations he implies that evolution dismisses the need for a perfect designer. It is definitely not reasonable for him to require indisputable examples, when his belief in atheism does not require one. If McCloskey was to require theism to present indisputable examples, then it is only right that he provide indisputable evidence for the arguments of atheism, which can’t be
McCloskey goes on to make another proclamation that in order to prove the Teleological Argument irrefutable examples of design and purpose must be presented. The major issue with his assessment is the standards he sets to defend the argument is one he can’t even live up to. Based on McCloskey accusations he implies that evolution dismisses the need for a perfect designer. It is definitely not reasonable for him to require indisputable examples, when his belief in atheism does not require one. If McCloskey was to require theism to present indisputable examples, then it is only right that he provide indisputable evidence for the arguments of atheism, which can’t be