Preview

Texas Supreme Court System Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1068 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Texas Supreme Court System Analysis
With consideration as to the size of Texas, I think it is necessary for Texas to have the complicated Supreme Court system that it has today. The Supreme Court System is used to take on both civil cases and criminal cases, and this is why it must be separated into two distinct branches.
The first branch of the State Court of Texas is the Texas Supreme Court. This court according to the website for Supreme Court Laws (2017), the Texas Supreme Court “hears and administers decisions concerning civil cases.” According to Nolo.com (2017), a civil case is a “noncriminal lawsuit, usually involving private property rights. For example, lawsuits involving breach of contract, probate, divorce, negligence, and copyright violations are just a few of the
…show more content…
In order to be successful in persecuting civil and criminal wrongs, the courts need funding if they want to accomplish anything. University of Austin (2017), the only area that has sufficient funding is the jail system. The Texas government issued a mandate to relieve overcrowding by building new jails and adding on to the old ones. However, with all the accused criminals coming from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals flooding into jails, it is almost impossible to prevent overcrowding. Impacts like these have led to numerous problems, including higher tensions among inmates, which has led to increased violence. Situations like these are why I think the Texas government should preserve the same structure in the court system while increasing their funding. Finding ways to do this can and will be difficult because of how many cases come through Texas each year. I would like to see this change because it has become apparent that the system needs more funding to stay on top of all the cases. This change also needs to occur in order to build more jails since overcrowding has become such a serious issue. The only other state that could compare to the correctional facilities in Texas would be California. However, even with California as an example, I think it would be wise to keep the structure of the Texas Supreme Court the way it is. I believe having a separate, multi layered judicial branch of government is an extremely effective way of doing things. One side handling the civil cases while the other side handles the criminal cases opens many doors for lawyers to specialize in either criminal or civil law, which makes the court run more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The constitution, weather the state or national, is a blueprint or outline in regards to the distribution of power. There are two main purposes to a constitution, the first reason is to establish a government and second reason is to delegate certain powers. Every state have a state constitution that is designed for that state, however the US Constitution override all state constitution. Although Texas is the oldest constitution in the US, the constitution have many revised many time. Since the establishment of Texas Constitution in 1876, the document have been revised or amended approximately 666. There have been so many revisions to the constitution over the years, the question stand what are the strengths and weakness of the current…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to identifying a reasonable solution for the California courts, it makes sense to look at the experience of another state faced with similar budget issues. The Washington state court system faced (and continues to face) funding crises, ranking last in the country for trial court funding, defense of indigent offenders, and the prosecution (Board for Judicial Administration Court Funding Task Force, 2004). Budget cuts led to limited staffing and reduced program funding. Legislators understood that this meant creation of inventive judicial programs to manage…

    • 1010 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    As the demonstrators marched through the streets, chanting their message, a fellow protestor handed Johnson an American flag that had been taken from a flag pole at one of their protest locations. Upon reaching the Dallas City Hall, Johnson doused the flag with kerosene and set it on fire. In addition, Johnson and his fellow demonstrators circled the burning flag and shouted “America, the red, white, and blue, we spit on you.” No one was hurt or threatened with injury by the act, but many who witnessed it were deeply offended. Therefore, Johnson was arrested, charged and convicted under Texas “desecration of a venerated…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Notably, it is crucial to understand that within the state of Texas, the Supreme Court, the court of criminal appeals and other district courts offer vacancies for judges whose practice of law is meant to resolve any conflict that arises in due course (Mott, 49). It is a constitutional requirement for the selection of nine judges of the Supreme Court, nine justices to preside over the court of criminal appeals and an additional 80 judges who fill the various courts of appeal across the state of Texas (Hansberger, 121). Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the Texas is counted among the two members of the union that takes part in the partisan election and re-election of judges in which case the voters have an option of casting a straight-ticket…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, I will explain why Texas should retain the partisan election of judges. Texas is one of the few states that choose their judges using a Partisan voting method. Partisan elections can be unreliable and deceitful. A high legal position such as a judge should never be chosen in such a manner. Judges are not chosen based on merit or skills.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gustavo Garcia said, “I am glad I was able to tell the Supreme Court justices that they were a little confused in thinking that we are all wetbacks”. I remember the first time I heard the term, wetback. I was young, twelve years old in the sixth grade. I had gone to this elementary since kindergarten, and had the same classmates too. We were all friends, but as we got older we began to break into cliques. It did not seem like a big deal, we still talked to each other every now in then. One day while on recess I heard there was a fight. Soon I found out my brother and his friends were involved. The fight began over something innocent, but quickly became ugly when the other group of boys called my brother and his friends, dirty wetbacks. All…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Acceptance is a vital part of human interaction throughout history. This concept of acceptance is interpreted in a quote from Barbara Jordan, was a politician, lawyer, educator, and a leader of the Civil Rights Movement. She believed that “We, as human beings, must be willing to accept people who are different from ourselves.” This belief is one that she lived by in all the aspects of her daily life. In analysis, it can be found that there are several similar themes present in the Collection One texts “Texas v. Johnson Majority Opinion”, “The Wife’s Story”, and “The Lottery”, all of which go hand- and- hand with Jordan’s quote about acceptance.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question of whether the judicial branch of the government proposed in the Constitution is given too much power is not very simple to answer. The antifederalist believed strongly that the the federal judiciary would become too powerful and that the judges would abuse their positions. The federalist argued that the system would work fine and that the balances would prevent the judiciary branch from gaining too much power over the other two. The antifederalists thought that the proposed federal judiciary would go against individual liberty and would eventually absorb the duties and roles of state judiciary.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. has a dual court structure. To be exact, we have a federal judiciary system and the systems that are operated by each of the states. This dual court structure is a unique feature of the American judicial system. Although most cases are tried in state courts, the federal court is playing a larger and larger role in finding resolutions to disputes. Partly, this is because congress in recent years has enacted a range of new laws that grant citizens access to federal courts.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federal Court System contains three levels of courts: first, U.S district courts and various courts of limited jurisdiction (trial courts of general jurisdiction). Second, U.S courts of appeals (intermediate courts of appeals). Finally, the highest level of the three level federal court system is the United State Supreme Court. Today, the United State Supreme Court is located in Washington D.C.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All state level governments have a third equal branch of government known as the judiciary. The States all have different ways of selecting or appointing judges to the bench. Each state has different levels of courts with in its own justice systems and the Judges are selected and elected for different terms in each state. There are three characteristics of the Judicial system in Texas that make it stand out from other states, one is that Texas has two appellate courts of last resort, its trial courts do not have uniform jurisdiction of subject matter and the judges are chosen in partisan elections (Womack, 2018).…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution in the state of Texas is a document that outlines the function and structure of the government of the United States of Texas. The Texas constitution provides separation of powers which incorporates the bill of rights directly into the constitution. The Texas constitution took effect on February 15 1876. The Texas constitution is the eight to include Mexican constitution in Texas history. Since 1876 the United States legislature has proposed 666 amendments, 662 have gone before Texas voters; only 483 have been approved. (W.W. Norton and Company)The current Texas constitution is among the longest of the states constitutions that have been set into place. The Texas constitution has been described by many has weird and misconstrued as well. To live in Texas is to have your own unique set Constitution that has been adopted to have quality of life amongst Texans. (Texas Politics)…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Models

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Supreme Court justices have a serious job of determining if something is unconstitutional or not. As with any big decision, there is a precise manor in which the justices decide weather an act is unconstitutional. There are three models that’s the courts follow. The first is the legal model. The legal model states that the court can base their rulings off of the previous rulings of the lower courts. The positive of this model is that the Supreme Court justices have a good background on what went on in the previous court and they can use that in order to interpret the constitution. The negative of this model is that the justices don’t have a clean interpretation of what happened. They are basing all of their knowledge on the last judges ruling,…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Reform In Texas

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Before 1975 Texas was considered to be a complete quagmire of judicial mumbo-jumbo. The state’s system of justice allowed for laws to be applied arbitrarily. Enforcement of personal property rights and contracts varied depending on which local court had the case. Moreover, several counties that had bad reputations notwithstanding the court. Judicial outcomes often depended on which attorney was before which judge in which county. Equal enforcement of the state’s laws was simply not a certainty upon which a citizen could rely. In the early most attempts at tort reform in the State of Texas, a well-respected University of Texas Law School professor was asked to spearhead a commission and make recommendations on how to fix the those judicial inequalities.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several events in the criminal justice system in Texas have caused people to question its integrity.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays