Preview

Texas Judicial System Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1669 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Texas Judicial System Case Study
Notably, it is crucial to understand that within the state of Texas, the Supreme Court, the court of criminal appeals and other district courts offer vacancies for judges whose practice of law is meant to resolve any conflict that arises in due course (Mott, 49). It is a constitutional requirement for the selection of nine judges of the Supreme Court, nine justices to preside over the court of criminal appeals and an additional 80 judges who fill the various courts of appeal across the state of Texas (Hansberger, 121). Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the Texas is counted among the two members of the union that takes part in the partisan election and re-election of judges in which case the voters have an option of casting a straight-ticket …show more content…
The JNC is charged with the responsibility of declaring vacant positions to the public, reviews the applications, shortlists the qualified candidates on the grounds of experience and fitness and then presents a precise list to the Texas governor who then makes the appointment. This process will necessitate for fairness and overall competence in service delivery. The reasons why this system is deemed fit are:
• This criterion of judge selection through the relevant commission boosts the independence of the judicial arm of the government through an elimination of the partisan politics, political sponsorship as well as the influence of money when compared to the method that is currently in use.
• Regarding the decision making, the appointed judge under this pretext is less likely to be influenced by the opinions of the public, and therefore the probability of delivering fair judgments is high than in the case where politics are used as a determining factor of the judges’ fitness and capability.
• The commission which comprises of the judicial elites is better placed to make an informed decision as compared to voters who will blatantly elect judges based on the extent to which they share a common ideology. …show more content…
This fact is solidly undisputable because when money and political influence are used in selecting leaders of any society, then it implies that there are those who will be left out of the decision-making process because of the class they belong or social status to which they are categorized. For full inclusion of people in leadership processes, justice and truth must always prevail (Mott, 49). Therefore, concerning the case of Texas judge selection criterion, it is arguably not the best practice due to a multiplicity of reasons that have been highlighted herein. Consequently, necessary modifications need to be carried out that are in line with the suggestions of this paper for the sole rationale of achieving inclusivity, an open display of service delivery as well as transparency (Maxwell,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Franklin D. Roosevelt's Plan to Expand Judicial Power in 1937
    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page

    Franklin D. Roosevelt's Plan to Expand Judicial Power in 1937

    At no time in this century was the devotion to that principle more vigorously evoked than in 1937, when Franklin Roosevelt introduced a plan to increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court. The conflict set off by the President's plan is more understandable when viewed in the historical context of expanding judicial power as well as in the contemporary context of pro- and anti-New Deal politics.…

    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Paper
    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Paper

    1. The state of Florida is amongst 16 other states that selects judges through the method “appointment-retention election”. A method in which a proposing group shows names to the governor, who then makes the appointment; appointees need to win a retention vote in the next election. It is not necessarily a good system because the selection is placed in the hands of the judges or attorneys who comprise the nominating committee and the governor, with only a impression of voter input. Reorganizers argue that the plan eliminate judges from politics and saves the electorate the problem of voting on judicial candidates when they know little about their professional qualifications.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    To what extent are UK judges both independent and neutral?
    • 2833 Words
    • 12 Pages

    To what extent are UK judges both independent and neutral?

    The independence of the judiciary from the executive and legislative is said to kept by things like their fixed salaries and sub judice rule. Their salaries ‘are paid from the Consolidated Fund’ and aren’t fixed or changeable by Parliament or the government which keeps the judiciary free from political pressure in terms of finance. The sub judice rule is where the MPs in the House of Commons are unable to comment on current or pending cases. This keeps the judiciary free from political interference and prevents prejudice against judicial decisions. This rule is followed by ministers and civil servants too. Judges are said to be kept neutral because they lack politically ‘partisan activity’ as they don’t comment on ‘matters of public policy’ and avoid siding with different party governments. Another way the judiciary has been made increasingly independent and neutral is the changed position of the Lord Chancellor following the ‘2005 Constitutional Reform Act as he was previously the ‘head of the judiciary, the presiding officers of the House of Lords and a member of the Cabinet’. This Act removed his judicial role and transferred it to the Lord Chief Justice while also separating the ‘law lords’ from the House of Lords via the ‘establishment of a new Supreme Court’ in 2009. This again, separates the judiciary from the legislature and executive which enhances independence and neutrality.…

    • 2833 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Oregon Judicial Selection
    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Oregon Judicial Selection

    As a member of this committee it has been an honor to explore some of the concerns revolving around the judicial selection process in this Great State of Oregon. Oregon’s above average voter participations is an example of just how important democracy is to the individuals of the state. The committee has been asked to examine the nonpartisan judicial election process and to determine whether or not the non-partisan judicial selection has become increasingly partisan and more polarized. Both of which have serious consequences if unchecked periodically. As was said By James Madison in his writing of The Federalist No. 51, “It is of great importance in a republic not only to guard…

    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Brethren Sparknotes
    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Brethren Sparknotes

    The Brethren is a book about the evolution of the Burger Court during the years of 1969 to 1976. The Brethren takes readers inside the court for a fascinating view of how things really work: how justices build majorities for their points of view and, occasionally, how they lose them; how the chief justice can use his power to assign cases to impress their philosophy on the final decision; and the unique role played by the law clerks. This book is a balanced account of the inner workings of the Supreme Court from 1969 to 1976, the first seven years of Warren Burger's tenure as Chief Justice. The storytelling is also clearly slanted against the Burger court but the overall quality of the work makes the bias forgivable. It describes the decision…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary: Mock Juries
    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary: Mock Juries

    The majority influence may have an impact on the decision making of juries, and this is where a larger number of people…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Number 51 Essay
    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist Number 51 Essay

    The most intriguing element of the Constitution of the United States is the Independent Judiciary, in which judicial power for the country lies in the federal courts and operates separately from the legislative and executive branches. This institution allows for the civil settlement of conflicts and enables the fair application of the law to cases. Judicial independence ensures that federal judges aren’t punished for their decisions related to court cases and aren’t inhibited by political figures in their interpretation of the law. This tenet of the Constitution is the foundation for the generalized success and transparency of our standing judicial system and is why it has been the model for numerous systems across the globe. James Madison’s Federalist Number 51 is a fundamental interpretation of the concept of judicial independence delineated in the Constitution.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary Of My Own Words Ginsburg
    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Summary Of My Own Words Ginsburg

    Unless moral judgment is involved, the cost of enforcing the criminal code might well be employed in other areas.” (22) Her later jurisprudence would reflect this attitude. Of Justice Ginsburg, it is said: “Always, she pays careful attention to the history and purpose, fairness and effectiveness, of the rules that shape and direct our justice system. Throughout her speeches and writings, she includes “sideglances” at the justice systems of sister democracies for the light they shine on our own and offers homage to the waypavers and the pathmarkers who have improved our world through law.” (193) These “sideglances” are seen in sections such as one discussing Brown vs. Board of Education and another from a speech discussing the value of diversity.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Oklahoma's Judicial Process Analysis
    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Oklahoma's Judicial Process Analysis

    The state I have chosen to compare to Oklahoma’s judicial process, is my home state of Texas. Texas and Oklahoma have a long standing rivalry that gets fought on the gridiron between the two states leading football programs, the unbridled passion that these two states share is akin to a big and little brother affection. The judicial process of these two states might very well be night and day of each other, but it works for the individual states because of the logistics and each states constitution, which is sacred to each state in its own right. I will conduct this comparison by starting with the highest court and working my way down to the smallest, with a comparison of what is the same and different.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices
    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices

    One of the major jobs for the federal judges is to protect the United States from the “tyranny of the majority”. Furthermore, even if the majority rules, the minority still has rights. Many components of the Bill of Rights, which the judges are called to enforce, are designed to protect the rights of the unpopular minorities. Being a Supreme Court judge is a difficult job, and even with life tenure, they are not completely immune from political pressure. They remain members of society; therefore it is difficult to allow things to happen even if they know it is morally wrong, but constitutionally…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Different Levels Of Texas Courts
    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Different Levels Of Texas Courts

    In Texas, all levels of Judges are elected to the individual court positions through a partisan ballot. Each candidate for…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Methods Of Judicial Selection Across The United States
    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Methods Of Judicial Selection Across The United States

    There are five basic methods of judicial selection, but it is important to note that no two states use exactly the same selection method. In many states, more than one method of selection is used for judges at different levels of the court system and even among judges serving at the same level. And when the same method is used, there are still variations in how the process works…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Activism In Canada
    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Judicial Activism In Canada

    By making decisions regarding the interest of the society the courts assume responsibilities that belong exclusively to the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court justices may rule based on what is in their best interest while saying that they are deciding for the good of the society. Moreover, when the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected, they may not be the representatives of the public’s view. As a result, judges begin making policy decisions about social or political changes society should make and become “unelected legislators.” By freely interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, the communities’ confidence in the Supreme Court will be undermined. When judicial activism in the Supreme Court wields too much power, it can eventually destruct the essence of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gulliver's Travels: Film Review
    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gulliver's Travels: Film Review

    “Judges... are picked out from the most dextrous lawyers, who are grown old or lazy, and having been biased all their lives against truth or equity, are under such a fatal necessity of favoring fraud, perjury and oppression, that I have known several of them to refuse a large bribe from the side where justice lay, rather than injure the faculty by doing any thing unbecoming their nature in office.”…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional History of Pakistan
    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Constitutional History of Pakistan

    Case was not just an attempt to rectify the wrongs of the General, but was also an attempt to combine political principle and practical politics, to determine anew the appropriate role of courts in the polity…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics