Preview

Case Analysis Texas V. Johnson

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1304 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Analysis Texas V. Johnson
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
________________________________________
491 U.S. 397
Texas v. Johnson
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
________________________________________
No. 88-155 Argued: March 21, 1989 --- Decided: June 21, 1989

This case analysis of Texas v. Gregory Lee Johnson was a Supreme Court case that overthrew bans on damaging the American flag in 48 of the 50 states. Gregory Lee Johnson participated in a political demonstration during the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas, where he burned the American flag. Consequently, Johnson was charged with violating the Texas law that bans vandalizing valued objects. However, Johnson appealed his conviction, and his case eventually went to the Supreme Court.
Facts And Procedural History
In 1984, the Republican Party convened in Dallas, Texas for their national convention. President Ronald Regan, seeking a second term in office, was to be officially delegated as the GOP (Grand Old Party) candidate for President. Scores of individuals organized a political protest in Dallas, which voiced opposition to Reagan administration policies, and those of some Dallas-based corporations. Among these protesters was a man by the name of Gregory Lee Johnson, who participated in a political demonstration, called the “Republican War Chest Tour.” As the demonstrators marched through the streets, chanting their message, a fellow protestor handed Johnson an American flag that had been taken from a flag pole at one of their protest locations. Upon reaching the Dallas City Hall, Johnson doused the flag with kerosene and set it on fire. In addition, Johnson and his fellow demonstrators circled the burning flag and shouted “America, the red, white, and blue, we spit on you.” No one was hurt or threatened with injury by the act, but many who witnessed it were deeply offended. Therefore, Johnson was arrested, charged and convicted under Texas “desecration of a venerated



References: ACLU (2011.) Burn the Flag or Burn the Constitution? Retrieved September 1, 2011 from http://www.aclu.org/blog/tag/flag-burning. Cline, A. (2011) Can Flag Burning Send a Political Message Be Made a Crime? Retrieved September11,2011fromhttp://atheism.about.com/od/flagburningcourtcases/a/TexasJohnson.html. Find Law (2011.) Cases and Codes. Retrieved September 1, 2011 from http://caselaw.findlaw.com/wa-supreme-court/1102265.html. Joel, S. (2011.) Texas v. Johnson. Retrieved September 1, 2011 from book Criminal Law, tenth Edition, Page47.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Atf

    • 5288 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Scruggs, R. (1993). Report to the deputy attorney general on the events at Waco, Texas Retrieved from: http://www.justice.gov/05publications/waco/wacoeight.html…

    • 5288 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The controversy of the legality of flag desecration was taken to the Supreme Court. Gregory…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court first found in the Reid case that the rule of common law did not apply to the Reid case. This is because the state of Virginia had already passed a statute stating that the evidence would not be competent in criminal cases, only in civil cases. The ruling goes on to state that the law that should be followed in federal criminal cases should follow the statutes and laws already set down by the states in which the trial by jury is taking place.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    New York. Irving Feiner gave an inflammatory speech to a diverse crowd. He called for African Americans to revolt against their oppression. After the crowd become restless, Feiner was asked three times to stop. He was arrested and convicted for violating New York’s disorderly conduct law. Supreme Court upheld his conviction based on a clear and present danger of inciting a riot is not protected. Justice Black did not agree with the majority and believed the police should have protected the speaker, not arrest him.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 1984 National Convention of the Republican Party in Dallas, Texas, President Ronald Reagan and President George H. W Bush ran for reelection. The convention held August 20 to August 23, 1984. Outside the Republican National Convention, Gregory Lee Johnson lit fire to an American Flag. Gregory Lee Johnson was protesting with the,” Revolutionary Communist Youth Brigade”. Gregory Lee Johnson along with approximately one hundred more protested and vandalized property and buildings at the Republican National Convention because he and the other protesters did not agree with the policies of the Ronald Reagan Administration, also known as Reaganomics.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The respondent, Johnson, participated in a political demonstration outside the republican national convention in Dallas in 1984. Approximately100 protestors demonstrated against the Reagan Administration and certain Dallas-based corporations by marching and chanting through the streets, overturning plants, spray painting walls, and staging “die-ins” to protest nuclear war. Johnson did not participate in these activities. During the demonstration, Johnson was handed an American flag, which had been stolen from a flagpole by another protestor. When the demonstration ended, Johnson doused the American flag with kerosene and set it on fire. Protesters chanted political slogans while the flag burned. Witnesses reported that no one was physically injured or threatened during the flag burning. Several witnesses testified they…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Texas v. Johnson (1989) supreme court case is very important. It was a landmark supreme court case, and decided for all future court cases how the first amendment would be interpreted. They had to look at and determine the extent of the phrase, "freedom of speech". Johnson's action of burning an American flag was to be reviewed and they would have to decide whether his action counted as "freedom of speech," and if it was protected by the first amendment. It turned out to be that his action was protected by the first amendment. Protection of the American flag does not come before the freedom to express political ideas.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On Monday August 21st, A body of a 5-year-old boy was found dead in A drive way of a home in West Mobile. The next day a daycare worker had been arrested and charged with abuse of a corpse.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In America, we are founded upon the rules and guidelines provided by our Constitution, but those rules and guidelines are constantly open to your own interpretation. When certain conflicts arise, we turn to our Constitution for admonition. But where do the provisions of our Constitution end? In the articles “Texas v. Johnson: Majority Opinion” and “American Flag Stands for Tolerance”, the issue of whether or not the First Amendment allows for people to use the burning of the American flag as a form of protest—but one does it better than the other.…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas V. Johnson Analysis

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the following passages goldfish, American flag, and Texas v. Johnson there are many ways the authors show their views on acceptance.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans are among the most patriotic citizens of the free world. But with extreme national pride comes occasional radicalism. While this anti-American activity may take on many forms, flag burning infuriates other citizens unlike no other. These acts of pure hatred toward this country are controversial in terms of free speech and first amendment rights, which is why many Americans see fit to punish these offenders even though they are protected by the constitution. The burning of the American flag is not attributed to a certain group of citizens but to those who strongly disagree with our country’s leaders and motives.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shirley Jackson Argument

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the document “Texas V. Johnson” that statement is demonstrated. “Texas v. Johnson” is a formal document of the court’s opinion on the burning the flag. On lines 37-39 it says, “The way to preserve the flag's special role is not to punish those who feel differently about these matters. It is to persuade them that they are wrong.” Even though the court had stated in lines 26-31 “We are tempted to say, in fact, that the flag's deservedly cherishes place in our community will be strengthened, not weakened,” The court did not punish Johnson for his actions of burning the flag because even if the court does not agree with him, they also believe “...nobody can suppose that this one gesture of an unknown man will change our Nation's attitude towards its flag…” (Lines 17- 19). In “Texas v. Johnson” the court may not agree with Johnson, but they do not punish him. Although he was being disrespectful, he did not break any laws. Additionally, in this document Brennan stated, “We decline, therefore, to create for the flag an exception to the joust of the principles protected by the first amendment.” (Page 15, Lines 1-2) Again, you should persuade them that they are wrong to burn the flag over compulsion, because our flag is founded on…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many states have laws in place that punish those who mistreat the American Flag. This goes from burning to various other activities that some may find rude and uncalled for. In this newspaper for Illinois, Mercer describes the numerous amounts of cases all around the United States where people have been jailed for such acts. While this is a newspaper, this view was that it should not be against the law to burn flags.…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas vs Johnson

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The First amendment of the Constitution of America calls for the protection of the United states citizens from the United States congress. It states that congress shall not pass any laws favoring a specific religious belief or stop any particular group from worshiping them. The first amendment also protects the United States citizen by allowing them freedom of speech/press and peaceful assembly or petition of the governments policies.(billofrightsInstitute) In 1984 Ronald Reagan was trying to run for his second term as president, however thousands of people gathered in front of the Dallas city hall to protest Reagan’s policies and in that crowd a protester named Gregory Lee Johnson. Johnson pulled a stunt that ended him up in the Dallas city court house convicting him to desecrating the U.S. flag. The Dallas city court’s decision was tried and took to the supreme court for Johnsons first amendment right being violated. The supreme court actually came to the decision that Johnson was protected by the first amendment. “After this decision by the supreme court, there has been six times the house of representatives have tried to vote a constitutional amendment known as Flag desecration amendment which stated “ congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag”. This amendment has not received the 67 votes it needs to pass but hasn’t been less than 63 voted for all six occasions” (billofrightsInstitute)…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays